Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the land acquisition punjab amendment act 1969 Page 3 of about 3,378 results (0.111 seconds)

Jan 04 2002 (HC)

B. Gowra Reddy Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2002AP313; 2002(3)ALT439

..... that in the case of the list of wakfs relating to any part of the state and published or purporting to have been published before the commencement of the wakf (amendment) act, 1969, such suit may be entertained by the civil court within the period of one year from such commencement. explanation.- for the purposes of this section and section 6a, the expression ..... property. since we are of the view that at the time when the wakfs commissioner was conducting the enquiry the property had not vested in the state government under the land acquisition proceedings, it was not incumbent upon the wakfs commissioner to issue any notice to the state government in those proceedings and the said proceedings could not be held to have ..... year from the date of the notification. thus, once the assistant collector and the collector had jurisdiction to decide, their decision became final and section 13 of the panchayat act punjab village common land (regulation) act, 1961 barred the civil suit filed by the wakf board. 21. the decisions cited by the learned counsel for wakf board need to be taken note of while ..... sustainable in law as it is in gross violation of the provisions contained in sections 4 to 6 of the act. in support of his submission, he relies upon the decisions in muslim wakfs board, rajasthan v. radha kishan 1 and punjab wakf board v. gram panchayat 2.8. on the other hand, the leaned government pleader and the learned counsel appearing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 27 1974 (HC)

Swatantra Land and Finance Private Ltd. Vs. the State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1975P& H52

..... act now makes it clear that the collector, while passing anv order on an application for reference, whether making ..... the provisions since made in subsections (2-a). (2-b) and (3) of section 18 of the act by the pun.iab legislature. sub-sections (2-a) and (2-b) were inserted in the act bv the land acquisition (punjab amendment) act no. 17 of 1962 while sub-section (3) was added by the land. acquisition (puniab amendment) act no. ii of 1954. sub-section (3) of section 18 of the ..... . air 1969 pat 131 and after considering the conflict of iudicial opinion held in paragraph 17 of the report :--'on a consideration of the entire matter, such as the relevant provisions of the act, and the decisions of the different high courts, it will be clear that the majority of the high courts are in favour of this view that a land acquisition judge ..... not for consideration before the learned single judge.41. the matter came up twice before the supreme court in state of punjab v. mst. qaisar jehan begum. air 1963 sc 1604 and the state of u. p. v. abdul karim. (1969) 2 scwr 579 in which the conflict of judicial opinion in the high courts was noticed but not resolved. the latter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 1994 (HC)

Mrs. Tara Paul Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1995)110PLR129

..... it was held therein that in view of the instruction by the government punjab, since the possession was not taken within one year after the issuance of notification under section 42 of the act, the acquisition proceedings having already come to an end, could not be revived subsequently by the land acquisition (amendment) act no. 68 of 1984.8. in parkash singh's case (supra) admittedly the ..... dated 4th of november, 1969. the said scheme was notified under section 36 of the punjab town improvement act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the act) vide notification dated 21st december, 1973. the aforesaid scheme was sanctioned by the state of punjab and notification under section 42 of the act was published in the punjab government gazette dated 30th of december, 1976. the land acquisition collector gave his award ..... has been assessed at the rate of rs. 6.60 paise per square yard, whereupon, the petitioner informed respondent no. 3 that he had purchased the plot on 4th november, 1969 at the rate of rs. 9.16 per square yard and that compen- sation has been assessed without issuing any notice, or, giving any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 1956 (HC)

Sm. Kako Bai Vs. the Land Acquisition Collector, Hissar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1956P& H231

..... judge, hissar. this order of the collector, however, is open to revision under section 18 sub-section (3) as this sub-section has been added to section 18, land acquisition act fay section 3, land acquisition (punjab amendment) act, 1953 (punjab act 2 of 1954). when this enactment was brought to the notice of the learned counsel for the petitioner he prayed that the petition under article 226 of the ..... do is to decide whether the formalities laid down in 9. 18 have been complied with or not and this decision has now been made subject to revision under the land acquisition (punjab amendment) act, 1953 (act 2 of 1954) in accordance with the provisions of section 115, civil p. c.3. now, the formalities laid down in this section have been fully satisfied in ..... . it appears that this entire land is evacuee land and sm. kako bai is an allottee ..... orderbishan narain, j.1. certain place of land situated in mauza basti bewan, tahsil fatehabad, district hissar, has been acquired by the punjab government for the purpose of constructing a mandi, township and a factory under the land acquisition act and notification under section 4 of the act was issued on 31-1-1955 and the notification under section 6 was issued on 17-2-1955 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 03 1996 (HC)

Tara Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1996)113PLR766

..... the government in exercise of the powers under section 17(1), (2) and (4) of the act dispensed with the en quiry under section 5-a of the act and issued a notification under section 4 for acquiring the land.6. the punjab legislature has amended the central act by land acquisition (punjab amendment) acts no. 2 of 1954 and 17 & 18 of 1956 whereby an explanation has been added to ..... sub-section (1) of section 17 of the act. sub-section (2) has been added in which clause ..... (b) of sub-section provides :'(b) whenever in the opinion of the collector it becomes necessary to acquire the immediate possession of any land ..... government invoking the urgency provisions of section 17(1) & (2) read with section 17(4) of the land acquisition act, 1894 (in short the act) and of dispensings with the enquiry under section 5-a of the act while issuing notification under section 4 of the act.2. it has been contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the notification under section 4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1998 (HC)

Manmohan Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab Through Principal Secretar ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1998)120PLR471

..... 2 of the written statement filed on behalf of respondents no. 3 and 4, it has been specifically averred that under section 17(2)(c) of the land acquisition (punjab amendment) act, ii of 1954, in the opinion of the government the requirement of land was/is for a public purpose. the entire material such as pre-feasabilty report, detailed project report, survey report of the ..... acquisition of the land was/is of urgent importance.9. when confronted with the urgency involved in the matter as spelt out from the ..... , it may not be easy to arrange more funds.in view of the above submissions it is evident that land for the construction of s.t.p. is required for a public purpose and the provisions of section 17(2)(c) of land acquisition (punjab amendment) act ii of 1954 have been invoked in the present case as in the opinion of the state government the ..... both these petitions.2. facts have however, been extracted from cwp no. 11544 of 1997.3. challenge herein is to notification under section 4 read with section 17 of the land acquisition act (hereinafter referred to as the act) published in the official gazette on 23.4.1997 as also the declaration under section 6 once again read with section 17 of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 1994 (HC)

Bans Gopal Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)106PLR598

..... 's case (supra) was not challenged by the respondents in the apex court. the same has attained finality.6. sub-section (3) as added in section 18 of the act by the land acquisition (punjab amendment act ii of 1954 postulates that if any order is passed by the collector on the application filed under sub-section (2) of section 18 it shall be subject to ..... bench expressed doubt about the correctness of this judgment principally on the ground that the provision of sub-section (3) of section 18 of the act as introduced by the land acquisition (punjab amendment) act ii of 1954 were brought to the notice of the learned judge deciding karnail singh case (supra). it is how the case is placed before us for decision. acceptance of ..... the compensation after filing of the application under section 18 of the act or prior thereto will amount to acceptance of the compensation under protest. filing of a ..... 17, 1989, the counsel for the petitioner, relying upon a single bench judgment of this court in karnail singh v. state of punjab, (1982) 84 p.l.r. 267 submitted that it was not within the jurisdiction of the land acquisition collector to decline to make a reference on the ground that the compensation was accepted without protest. the matter has to be .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1985 (HC)

State of U.P. and ors. Vs. Raj NaraIn Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1986All321

..... claimant-respondent was also entitled to solatium at the rate of 30% and interest at the rate of 9% in place of 6% in view of the land acquisition (amendment) act 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the amending act). 4. having heard counsel for the parties we find it difficult to agree with the submission made by the counsel for the appellants that the compensation as ..... , ballia, against the judgment dt 25-9-1973 in misc. reference 3 of 1971 under section 18 of the land acquisition act. 2. some land belonging to the claimant-respondent 1 was acquired under the land acquisition act (hereinafter referred to as the act). the relevant notification under section 4 was issued on 4-11-1965. the notification under section 6 was issued on 1-12-1965, and ..... . 4500/- was the best exemplar, inasmuch as it was executed a few months before the notification under section 4, of the land acquisition act and the land sold by it was barely one furlong from the land acquired and was of the same nature as the land acquired. relying on the statement of bhagwati datt tewari (p.w. 4) who stated that the value of the ..... : air 1977 sc 1560, padma uppal v. state of punjab, (1977) 1 scr 329 : air 1977 sc 580). in certain other cases this court indicated that for determining the market value of a large property on the basis of a sale transaction for smaller property a deduction should be given. in special land acquisition officer, bangalore v. t. adinarayan setty, (1959) suppl (1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 14 1985 (SC)

Bhag Singh and ors. Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh Through the Land ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1985SC1576; 1985MhLJ914(SC); 1985(2)SCALE246; (1985)3SCC737; [1985]Supp2SCR949; 1985(17)LC910(SC)

1. this appeal by special leave raises a short but interesting question of law relating to the interpretation of section 30 sub-section (2) of the land acquisition (amendment) act, 1984 (hereinafter referred to as the amending act). there are divergent views expressed by different benches of this court in regard to the interpretation of this provision and hence it is necessary to examine this question afresh ..... are few and may be briefly stated as follows. on 9th october 1974 a notification was issued by the state of punjab under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the act) stating that a large chunk of land admeasuring 10768 bighas 18 biswas was likely to be needed for the purpose of establishment of a cantonment within the revenue estate ..... was followed by another notification issued by the state of punjab under-section b of the act declaring that the entire area admeasuring 10768 bighas 18 biswas was needed for the establishment of a cantonment. the land acquisition collector thereafter issued a notice under-section 9 of the act and required persons interested in the land forming the subject matter of the declaration to submit their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 1996 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Sou. Kamlabai Vishwanath Bagad and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1997(3)BomCR597

..... also we have to consider as to whether the amendments made to land acquisition act, 1894 by the central act no. 68 of 1984 could be made applicable ipso facto ..... is no separate machinery provided for acquiring the land and the acquisitions under both these acts are made under the land acquisition act, 1894. in the aforesaid case before the supreme court, the question was whether for the purpose of acquiring the land, the amended provisions of land acquisition act, 1894 could be made applicable ipso facto to the acquisitions of lands under the punjab town improvement act, 1922 or not. in the present case ..... to the acquisitions of lands under the maharashtra regional & town planning act, 1966. according to .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //