Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the mines and minerals development and regulation amendment act 2015 Page 17 of about 166 results (0.038 seconds)

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

M/S Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

..... coming into force of this amendment or till the state government passes order thereon or the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is the earliest: provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). ..... (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of ..... is the case of the petitioners that: (i) the grant and renewal of mining leases by state governments, including the period thereof, is governed by section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and under sub-section (1) whereof, the maximum period for which a mining lease will be granted shall not exceed 30 years and the minimum period shall not ..... be less than 20 years; under sub-section (2) thereof, mining lease is renewable for a period not exceeding 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (Fimi) Vs. Union of India & Or ...

Court : Delhi

..... coming into force of this amendment or till the state government passes order thereon or the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is the earliest: provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). ..... (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of ..... is the case of the petitioners that: (i) the grant and renewal of mining leases by state governments, including the period thereof, is governed by section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and under sub-section (1) whereof, the maximum period for which a mining lease will be granted shall not exceed 30 years and the minimum period shall not ..... be less than 20 years; under sub-section (2) thereof, mining lease is renewable for a period not exceeding 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

M/S Orissa Manganese & Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... coming into force of this amendment or till the state government passes order thereon or the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is the earliest: provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). ..... (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of ..... is the case of the petitioners that: (i) the grant and renewal of mining leases by state governments, including the period thereof, is governed by section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and under sub-section (1) whereof, the maximum period for which a mining lease will be granted shall not exceed 30 years and the minimum period shall not ..... be less than 20 years; under sub-section (2) thereof, mining lease is renewable for a period not exceeding 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

M/S Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... coming into force of this amendment or till the state government passes order thereon or the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is the earliest: provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). ..... (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of ..... is the case of the petitioners that: (i) the grant and renewal of mining leases by state governments, including the period thereof, is governed by section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and under sub-section (1) whereof, the maximum period for which a mining lease will be granted shall not exceed 30 years and the minimum period shall not ..... be less than 20 years; under sub-section (2) thereof, mining lease is renewable for a period not exceeding 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (Fimi) Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Delhi

..... coming into force of this amendment or till the state government passes order thereon or the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is the earliest: provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). ..... (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of ..... is the case of the petitioners that: (i) the grant and renewal of mining leases by state governments, including the period thereof, is governed by section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and under sub-section (1) whereof, the maximum period for which a mining lease will be granted shall not exceed 30 years and the minimum period shall not ..... be less than 20 years; under sub-section (2) thereof, mining lease is renewable for a period not exceeding 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 2014 (HC)

Ms Tata Steel Limited Through Mrs Meena Lall Vs. the State of Jharkhan ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... , west singhbhum at chaibasa to forthwith issue an express order in furtherance of its considered opinion in terms of section 8(3) of the mines minerals (development & regulation) act 1957 in respect of the petitioner's noamundi iron ore mines and pursuant to its application for renewal dated 17.12.2009. (b) an appropriate writ, order or direction for setting aside the notice dated 04.09 ..... minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957.5. mr. rajesh shankar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-state of jharkhand has submitted that in view of decision of the hon'ble supreme court in goa foundation vs. union of india [w.p.(c) no.435 of 2012] and the amendment in rule 24a(6) of the mineral concession rules, 1960, the state government was under a ..... bound by the judgment rendered by the apex court in the case of goa foundation and the amendment made to rule 24(a)(6) of the mmdr act by the government of india in july,2014. by virtue of the judgment and the amendment made, any mining after expiry of the lease of the petitioner on 31st december,2011 became illegal in view of ..... the said case. it is also evident that in view of the directions passed by the apex court in the case of goa foundation(supra), amendments have been made to rule 24(6) of the mineral concession rule wherein it is made clear that this rule would not apply to the renewal under sub section 3 of section 8 of the m .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

M/S Orissa Manganese and Minerals Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... coming into force of this amendment or till the state government passes order thereon or the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is the earliest: provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). ..... (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of ..... is the case of the petitioners that: (i) the grant and renewal of mining leases by state governments, including the period thereof, is governed by section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and under sub-section (1) whereof, the maximum period for which a mining lease will be granted shall not exceed 30 years and the minimum period shall not ..... be less than 20 years; under sub-section (2) thereof, mining lease is renewable for a period not exceeding 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2014 (HC)

Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (Fimi) Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Delhi

..... coming into force of this amendment or till the state government passes order thereon or the date of expiry of the maximum period allowed for first renewal, whichever is the earliest: provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule shall not apply to renewal under sub-section (3) of section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (67 of 1957). ..... (vi) that the petitioner federation of indian mineral industries (fimi) in w.p.(c) no.7745/2014 was formed as an all india body to promote the interest of ..... is the case of the petitioners that: (i) the grant and renewal of mining leases by state governments, including the period thereof, is governed by section 8 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and under sub-section (1) whereof, the maximum period for which a mining lease will be granted shall not exceed 30 years and the minimum period shall not ..... be less than 20 years; under sub-section (2) thereof, mining lease is renewable for a period not exceeding 20 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 04 1958 (HC)

A. Kotaiah Naidu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1959AP485

..... of the government of india and not a law enacted by parliament; and (2) that the enactment governing the regulation of mines and the development of minerals, is the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1948, and the rules framed thereunder, viz., the mineral concession rules, 1949; and neither the act nor the rules envisage the reservation of areas for the public sector to be exploited for ..... of the state.'to this list may be added the power to carry on trade or business as prescribed by the article 298, which was amended in its present form by the constitution (seventh amendment) act, 1956.9. there is thus no force in the contention of the learned advocate for the petitioner that the resolution passed by the government ..... of india, which was given effect to by the state government, is bad for want of legislative sanction.10. the second contention advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner that the mineral ..... concession rules, 1949, do not authorise the state to undertake the exploitation of mineral resources, is also devoid of substance. section 5 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act empowers the central government to make rules for regulating the grant of mining leases or for prohibiting the grant of such leases in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 29 2005 (HC)

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) and or ...

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2005(3)JCR357(Jhr)]

..... and the sub-lessee, which admittedly became effective from 27th october, 1964. according to the learned advocate general, since the lease came to be recognized after enactment of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957, all its provisions came to apply with full force to the said lands, including the provisions of section 8, which provides that the maximum period for which a ..... . we are of the view that having regard to the stipulations contained in the agreement dated 29th march, 1973, the same would be subject to the provisions of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 and the rules made thereunder. accordingly, in view of the notification dated 22nd may, 1996, issued by the ministry of coal, government of india, whereunder the central ..... and the state of bihar became the lessor by operation of law.4. subsequently, the bihar land reforms (amendment) act was enacted in 1964 and section 10-a was incorporated in the parent act. section 10-a provided that the interest of every lessee of mines or minerals, which was subject to a sub-lease, would, with effect from such date as might be notified ..... lease directly under the state government and the provisions of sub-sections (2) and (4) of section 10 would mutatis mutandis apply to his lease.5. the effect of such amendment was that the interest of the lessee, bokaro and ramgarh limited, in the lease hold property, was extinguished and the sub-lessee, west bokaro limited, became a direct lessee under .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //