Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the mines and minerals development and regulation amendment act 2015 Page 6 of about 162 results (0.031 seconds)

Feb 04 2017 (HC)

Modi Projects Limited Through One of Its Directors Pradip Modi Vs. The ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of royalty under the head ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building is as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and specific notification issued by the state government thereunder or not? this issue has squarely been answered by the learned division bench of this court in ..... lpa no. 705/2015, holding that the writ petitioners are liable to make payment of royalty under residuary clause at entry-19 of the same notification dated 27.12.2010 issued by the state of jharkhand under section 15 of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. 8 parties have therefore to abide by the ..... no. 4737/2014. learned single judge, by judgment dated 25.03.2015, was pleased to restrain the respondent state from realizing royalty for ordinary 7 earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building without amending second schedule of jharkhand minor mineral concession rules, 2004 and without prescribing the rate of royalty for the ..... same. it is submitted that the state of jharkhand being aggrieved, preferred lpa no. 705/2015 (state of jharkhand & others versus m/s mrkr-pallavi upkar jv & .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2017 (HC)

Saurabh Kumar and Bros Through One of Its Partner Saurabh Kumar Agarwa ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of royalty under the head ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building is as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and specific notification issued by the state government thereunder or not? this issue has squarely been answered by the learned division bench of this court in ..... lpa no. 705/2015, holding that the writ petitioners are liable to make payment of royalty under residuary clause at entry-19 of the same notification dated 27.12.2010 issued by the state of jharkhand under section 15 of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. 8 parties have therefore to abide by the ..... no. 4737/2014. learned single judge, by judgment dated 25.03.2015, was pleased to restrain the respondent state from realizing royalty for ordinary 7 earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building without amending second schedule of jharkhand minor mineral concession rules, 2004 and without prescribing the rate of royalty for the ..... same. it is submitted that the state of jharkhand being aggrieved, preferred lpa no. 705/2015 (state of jharkhand & others versus m/s mrkr-pallavi upkar jv & .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2015 (HC)

Steel Authority of India Limited Represented Through General Manager L ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... under second and subsequent renewals, mining was being done . a further prayer for amending the interim prayer portion of the writ petition has been made which reads as under: and an interim writ of mandamus be issued commanding upon the respondents to forthwith issue an formal order in terms of section 8(3) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and further be ..... the respondent state of jharkhand. in the counter affidavit, the respondent state of jharkhand has admitted that it has already issued an order under section 8(3) of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. considering the above factual aspect of the matter, i am of the opinion that i.a. no. 6193 of 2014 deserves to be allowed. 8. ordered accordingly. ..... maninder singh, the learned additional solicitor general of india appearing for the petitioner sail, submits that though the state government has already issued order under section 8(3) of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 vide letter dated 22.10.2014, a fact which has been admitted in paragraph no. 10 of the 3 counter affidavit dated 26.11.2014, still to avoid ..... suraj singh, advocate for the state : mr. jai prakash, aag mrs. debolina sen hirani, j.c. to aag order no. 07 dated: 09.01.2015 i.a. no. 6193 of 2014 this application has been filed seeking amendment in the prayer clause of the writ petition for incorporating the following prayers: 1.(iii) a further writ/order/direction particularly a writ of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2017 (HC)

Tracks and Towers Infratech Pvt Ltd Through K P Naidu Vs. East Central ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of royalty under the head ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building is as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and specific notification issued by the state government thereunder or not? this issue has squarely been answered by the learned division bench of this court in ..... lpa no. 705/2015, holding that the writ petitioners are liable to make payment of royalty under residuary clause at entry-19 of the same notification dated 27.12.2010 issued by the state of jharkhand under section 15 of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. 8 parties have therefore to abide by the ..... no. 4737/2014. learned single judge, by judgment dated 25.03.2015, was pleased to restrain the respondent state from realizing royalty for ordinary 7 earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building without amending second schedule of jharkhand minor mineral concession rules, 2004 and without prescribing the rate of royalty for the ..... same. it is submitted that the state of jharkhand being aggrieved, preferred lpa no. 705/2015 (state of jharkhand & others versus m/s mrkr-pallavi upkar jv & .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2017 (HC)

Ms Bkb Transport P Ltd Through Saurabh Kumar Agarwal Vs. East Central ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of royalty under the head ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building is as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and specific notification issued by the state government thereunder or not? this issue has squarely been answered by the learned division bench of this court in ..... lpa no. 705/2015, holding that the writ petitioners are liable to make payment of royalty under residuary clause at entry-19 of the same notification dated 27.12.2010 issued by the state of jharkhand under section 15 of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. 8 parties have therefore to abide by the ..... no. 4737/2014. learned single judge, by judgment dated 25.03.2015, was pleased to restrain the respondent state from realizing royalty for ordinary 7 earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building without amending second schedule of jharkhand minor mineral concession rules, 2004 and without prescribing the rate of royalty for the ..... same. it is submitted that the state of jharkhand being aggrieved, preferred lpa no. 705/2015 (state of jharkhand & others versus m/s mrkr-pallavi upkar jv & .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2017 (HC)

Nageshwar Prasad Vs. East Central Railways Represented Through Chief A ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of royalty under the head ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building is as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and specific notification issued by the state government thereunder or not? this issue has squarely been answered by the learned division bench of this court in ..... lpa no. 705/2015, holding that the writ petitioners are liable to make payment of royalty under residuary clause at entry-19 of the same notification dated 27.12.2010 issued by the state of jharkhand under section 15 of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. 8 parties have therefore to abide by the ..... no. 4737/2014. learned single judge, by judgment dated 25.03.2015, was pleased to restrain the respondent state from realizing royalty for ordinary 7 earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building without amending second schedule of jharkhand minor mineral concession rules, 2004 and without prescribing the rate of royalty for the ..... same. it is submitted that the state of jharkhand being aggrieved, preferred lpa no. 705/2015 (state of jharkhand & others versus m/s mrkr-pallavi upkar jv & .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2017 (HC)

Mrkr Pallavi Upakar Jv Through Its Authorized Signatory M Vasudeva Red ...

Court : Jharkhand

..... of royalty under the head ordinary earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building is as per the provisions of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 and specific notification issued by the state government thereunder or not? this issue has squarely been answered by the learned division bench of this court in ..... lpa no. 705/2015, holding that the writ petitioners are liable to make payment of royalty under residuary clause at entry-19 of the same notification dated 27.12.2010 issued by the state of jharkhand under section 15 of mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957. 8 parties have therefore to abide by the ..... no. 4737/2014. learned single judge, by judgment dated 25.03.2015, was pleased to restrain the respondent state from realizing royalty for ordinary 7 earth used for filling or leveling purposes in construction of embankment, roads, railways, building without amending second schedule of jharkhand minor mineral concession rules, 2004 and without prescribing the rate of royalty for the ..... same. it is submitted that the state of jharkhand being aggrieved, preferred lpa no. 705/2015 (state of jharkhand & others versus m/s mrkr-pallavi upkar jv & .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 2015 (SC)

Tata Steel Ltd Vs. Uoi and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... from the leased area at the rate for the time being specified in the second schedule in respect of that mineral. (2-a) the holder of a mining lease, whether granted before or after the commencement of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) amendment act, 1972, shall not be liable to pay any royalty in respect of any coal consumed by a workman engaged ..... production of iron and steel.9. initially tata steel and tisco were of the opinion that in accordance with the provisions of section 9 of the mines and minerals (regulation and development) act, 1957 [now renamed as the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 or the mmdr act].[4]. they were liable to pay royalty at the rates mentioned in the second schedule to the mmdr ..... of india ltd.[2]. (hereafter sail) has been accepted by the high court, namely, that royalty is chargeable [in accordance with section 9 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (the mmdr act)]. on the quantity of coal extracted at the pit-head, yet the refund of excess royalty paid by tisco for the period from 10th august, 1998 ( ..... of as above. however, the parties will bear their own costs. .............................cji (h.l. dattu) .................................j (madan b. lokur) .................................j (a.k. sikri) new delhi; march 17, 2015 ----------------------- [1]. manu/jh/0590/2002 [2]. (1998) 6 scc476[3]. 2014 (2) jljr702[4]. with effect from 18th december, 1999 9. royalties in respect of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2017 (HC)

Jindal Steel & Power Limited & Anr vs.union of India & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... : (i) that the rights of the petitioners to the said 298.913 hectares of land were also under the lease deed granted to the petitioners under section 10 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and which lease has now been cancelled by the supreme court. (ii) that under the orders of the supreme court and the ordinances ..... / acts supra in pursuance thereto the entire area which was leased to the petitioners vested in the central government. w.p.(c) nos.3398/2015 & 886/2016 page 18 of 34 (iii) that though under section ..... and the ordinance itself was replaced by a second ordinance which has since been further replaced by the coal mines (special provisions) act, 2015 notified on 30th march, 2015. (e) that auction proposed of gare palma-iv/1 was challenged in w.p.(c) no.7867/2015 which is pending before the division bench of this court and vide order wherein the auction process was ..... as amended upto 2009 of the ministry of environment and forests prescribes use of fly ash for other purposes as well. (viii) the petitioners, instead of using the fly ash otherwise, are wanting to dump the same in the mining area to which they have been left with no right, to save their own costs and expenses. w.p.(c) nos.3398/2015 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2017 (HC)

Jindal Steel & Power Limited & Anr vs.ministry of Labour and Employmen ...

Court : Delhi

..... : (i) that the rights of the petitioners to the said 298.913 hectares of land were also under the lease deed granted to the petitioners under section 10 of the mines and minerals (development and regulation) act, 1957 (mmdr act) and which lease has now been cancelled by the supreme court. (ii) that under the orders of the supreme court and the ordinances ..... / acts supra in pursuance thereto the entire area which was leased to the petitioners vested in the central government. w.p.(c) nos.3398/2015 & 886/2016 page 18 of 34 (iii) that though under section ..... and the ordinance itself was replaced by a second ordinance which has since been further replaced by the coal mines (special provisions) act, 2015 notified on 30th march, 2015. (e) that auction proposed of gare palma-iv/1 was challenged in w.p.(c) no.7867/2015 which is pending before the division bench of this court and vide order wherein the auction process was ..... as amended upto 2009 of the ministry of environment and forests prescribes use of fly ash for other purposes as well. (viii) the petitioners, instead of using the fly ash otherwise, are wanting to dump the same in the mining area to which they have been left with no right, to save their own costs and expenses. w.p.(c) nos.3398/2015 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //