Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions banks act 1978 Page 1 of about 143 results (0.063 seconds)

Mar 01 1994 (HC)

Swaran Vs. Prescribed Authority

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)107PLR471

..... petitioners have challenged order dated january 25, 1994 passed on a petition filed by the punjab national bank, bilaspur branch, tehsil jagadhri, district yamunanagar under section 8-a(1) of the haryana agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions (banks) act, 1973 (for short, the act) in this petition under articles 226/227 of the constitution of india.2. bakhtawar singh ..... , resident of village sandhaya, tehsil jagadhri, district yamunanagar, husband of petitioner no. 1 and father of petitioner no. 2, took a loan of rs. 24,000/- for a tube-well from the punjab national bank ..... , bilaspur branch on april 11, 1987. he executed mortgage deed mortgaging his agricultural ..... 43,908.53 is outstanding against the petitioners' predecessor-in-interest, which includes interest upto march 31, 1993. the punjab national bank initiated proceedings under section 8-a(1) of the act against the petitioners. the petitioners were given notice of the application and were afforded full opportunity to lead their defence .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1998 (HC)

Amar Singh and anr. Vs. the Punjab National Bank

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1998)120PLR253

..... of rs. 49,000/- from the punjab national bank, sirsa on march 17, 1980 and mortgaged their agricultural land measuring 87 kanals and 11 marias situated in village kariwali, tehsil sirsa. since there was default in payment of the loan, the respondent-bank moved an application under section 8(1) of the haryana agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions (banks) act, 1973* (for short, the act) for the recovery of rs. ..... 58,269/-. the suit was decreed. thereafter, the bank filed an application for execution of the decree. by an order dated 16.1.1997, the ..... debtors. the grievance seems to be justified. the impugned order is a non-speaking one and it does not disclose as to how much amount is due to the respondent-bank from the judgment-debtors. the executing court has also not taken note of the accounts paid by the judgment-debtors.4. without going into the merits of the claims ..... case of the parties that the petitioners have deposited a sum of rs. 1,27,312/- in all which amount, according to the respondent-bank, has been reflected in the statement of accounts. counsel for the respondent-bank states that a sum of rs. 53,672/- is still due from the judgment- debtor as on 11.11.1996.3. the grievance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 2014 (HC)

Present : Mr.Vivek Khatri Advocate Vs. Punjab National Bank Ludana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the loan, he mortgaged his 75 kanals of land to the punjab national bank. the petitioner defaulted in payment of equal monthly instalments. the loan became irregular and remained unpaid in part. in order to recover the loan amount, the bank filed an application under section 8-a (1) of haryana agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions (banks) act, 1973 for sale of the mortgaged property to satisfy the ..... loan along with interest which at the time of filing of the application was to the tune of ` 8,73,350/-. the prescribed authority under the act-cum-sub divisional officer (civil).safidon passed the following order on 7.8 ..... reliance is placed on the decision of the learned single judge of this court in rajinder singh v. union bank of india; 2010 (3) rcr (civil) 354 to contend that where notices are not issued as required by section 8 of the act, further proceedings are a nullity. it is his pleaded case that no notice was issued to the petitioner by ..... the prescribed authority. it was only the bank who had determined the loan and issued notice for recovery, upon which, there was failure to discharge .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2014 (HC)

Present Mr. Vivek Khatri Advocate Vs. Pnb Ludana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... case, is that when notices are not issued in the manner provided by section 8(1) of the haryana agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions (banks) act, 1973 and are not served, the proceedings are a nullity. reliance for this proposition is placed on rajinder singh v. union bank of mamta cr no.2768 of20142 2014.04.24 10:30 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of ..... be reported in digest?. rajiv narain raina, j (oral) the issue raised in this petition is identical to the issue in cr no.1755 of 2014, chand ram v. punjab national bank, ludana, which was decided on 07.03.2014. the factual position in the present case is also similar to the one in chand ram's case. there is also no ..... of hearing to the petitioner. the petitioner undertakes to deposit half of the decretal amount before the prescribed authority on the firs.date of hearing, to be paid to the bank and for the remaining, he would have a right to respond to the notice and take such steps as are warranted by law in his defence, if any, and in ..... mamta cr no.2768 of20141 2014.04.24 10:30 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document in the high court of punjab and haryana, chandigarh cr no.2768 of2014date of order: 22.04.2014 vikram ..............petitioner versus pnb ludana ..................respondent coram hon'ble mr.justice rajiv narain raina present mr.vivek khatri , .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 2013 (HC)

Gurbachan Singh Vs. Punjab National Bank and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... order dated 27.01.2003 annexure p-1 passed by respondent no.2-sub-divisional officer (civil).sdo (civil) on application filed by respondent no.1-punjab national bank under section 7of the haryana agricultural credit operation and miscellaneous provisions (bank) act, 1973. according to application filed by respondent no.1, petitioner and one gurcharan singh (who was respondent no.2 before sdo (civil) but is not ..... party to the instant revision petition) had taken loan from respondent no.1-bank which was to be repaid in installments but was not so paid. respondents had also ..... for the petitioner stated that the petitioner was ready and willing to pay the amount as may be found due in the statements of accounts to be furnished by the bank. in view of the aforesaid statement made by counsel for the petitioner, nothing survives for adjudication in the instant revision petition. accordingly, the instant revision petition is dismissed. ..... haryana at chandigarh cr no.3536 of 200.date of decision :20. h august 201 gurbachan singh . petitioner versus punjab national bank & another . respondents coram : hon ble mr.justice l.n.mittal **** present : mr.sanjiv gupta, advocate for the petitioner. none for respondent no.1. mr.deepak girotra, assistant advocate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Rajinder Goyal Advocate Vs. Collector/Sub Divisional Offi ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... petition is to an order dated 23.01.2012 (annexure p-3) passed by the sub divisional officer (civil).pehowa on an application filed by the bank under section 8(1) of the haryana agricultural credit operation and miscellaneous provision (bank) act, 1973. the sub divisional officer has passed the following order: file presented. counsel for the applicant is present. statement of the manager has been recorded in ..... which he said that we want to settle this case. if the respondent deposits the loan amount alongwith interest with the bank within one month i.e.by ..... 24.2.2012, the bank can grant 20 ..... cwp no.8231 o 1. in the high court of punjab & haryana, chandigarh cwp no.8231 of 2012 date of decision:13. 03.2013 randhir singh ..petitioner versus collector/sub divisional officer and another ..respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice hemant .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2014 (HC)

interest but the Respondents Have Failed to Discharge Vs. Sub Division ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... . there were defaults in repayment of the loan and as a consequence the petitioner bank filed a petition on 01.07.1996 under section 8 of the haryana agriculture credit operation and miscellaneous provisions (banks) act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the said act ) for recovery of ` 1,91,954/- which amount was inclusive of interest ..... upto 31.03.1996. this petition was allowed vide order dated 07.09.1998. operative part of the order reads as under ..... 1908 as the grant and non-grant of interest was not a clerical or arithmetical mistake. in view of the aforesaid order, the petitioner bank has filed the present writ petition under article 226 of the constitution of india. we have heard learned counsels for the parties. in our ..... respondents to repay the amount of ` 1,91,954/- jointly and severally failing which the amount is ordered to be recovered by the applicant bank by the sale of mortgaged property of respondent no.1. . in order to absolve himself of the liability and to prevent the foreclosure of ..... in the high court of punjab & haryana at chandigarh civil writ petition no.1135 of 2003(o&m) date of decision: 20.05.2014 central bank of india ..petitioner versus sub divisional officer (civil).ambala and others ..respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice sanjay kishan .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 2013 (HC)

Kamla Devi and Others Vs. Sub Divisional Magistrate (Collector) Civil- ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

cwp-18601-2012 (o&m) 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp-18601-2012 (o&m) date of decision:- 26.08.2013 kamla devi and others ...petitioners versus sub divisional magistrate (collector) civil-cum-prescribed authority under haryana agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions (banks) act, 1973, bilaspur, district yamuna nagar and others...respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice sanjay kishan kaul, chief justice .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1994 (HC)

Kishan Lal and anr. Vs. the Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1994)107PLR16

..... loan agreement and hypothecation deed moved the prescribed authority (sub divisional officer civil, narwana) under section 8-a of the haryana agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions (bank) act, 1973 (for short, the act). the prescribed authority passed a decree in favour of the bank after following the prescribed procedure. the execution of the decree was taken out. the petitioners filed objections to the execution. these were ..... revenue. his only defence is that the debit due to a scheduled bank falls within the purview of the haryana relief of agricultural indebtedness act, 1989 (for short, the relief act). consequently, the remedy of the bank, if any lay under the relief act and not under the act. section 3 of the relief act says that every debt, together with interest due thereon, owed on ..... lead any evidence except that their counsel tendered a photostat copies of the notice and statements of accounts, ex. c.1 and c.2. the respondent-bank examined sh. uma kant ghai, senior manager, punjab national bank, tohana, on january 10, 1994. his statement reads thus :-' i know the facts of the case from the records and can depose on the ..... accounts. he submitted that in notice, exhibit c-1, it was mentioned that a sum of rs. 72,000/- was due. shri uma kant ghai, senior manager, punjab national bank, tohana has explained that the amount mentioned in exhibit c-1 was not the total amount due from the petitioners. by depositing the amount mentioned therein, the account of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2014 (HC)

Virender Singh Vs. Punjab National Bank and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... failed to maintain the financial discipline, resulting in proceedings being initiated by the respondent-bank under section 8(1) of the haryana agricultural credit operations and miscellaneous provisions act, 1973. the petitioner sought to deny everything in the written statement filed: notices are forged, no loan has been taken, if the petitioner has taken a loan then only ..... only plea raised herein).we are of the view that the jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution of india is to be exercised in favour of the parties who act bona fide and not the parties who indulge in falsehood. we, thus, dismiss the writ petition with costs quantified at `5,000/-, to be deposited with the high court mediation ..... ) date of decision: 24.01.2014 virender singh ..petitioner versus punjab national bank and another .....respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice sanjay kishan kaul, chief justice hon ble mr.justice arun palli present: mr.sandeep kumar yadav, advocate for the petitioner .sanjay kishan kaul, chief justice: (oral) the petitioner availed of an agricultural loan of `4,30,000/- against mortgage of land, but .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //