Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab cinemas regulation act 1952 Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 2,279 results (0.082 seconds)

Nov 15 1965 (HC)

Rasdeep Touring Talkies Vs. District Magistrate and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H219

..... raised one common question of law as to the constitutionality and validity of rule 3(iv) of the punjab cinemas (regulation) rules, 1952, hereinafter called the punjab rules, framed under section 9 of the punjab cinemus (regulation) act, 1952 (punjab act 11 of 1952), hereinafter referred to as the punjab act before dealing with the abovesaid importance question of law, i would give a brief resume of the relevant ..... grant the temporary licence in question to the petitioners, on the solitary ground that a permanentcinema exists in kurukshetra and hold that rule 3(iv) of the punjab cinemas (regulation) rules, 1952, is unconstitutional and void and that the petitioners are entitled to have their applications for grant of temporary licence underrule 3(i) of the said rules disposed ..... case where it is proposed to install a touring cinematograph in a building, the provisions of the rules in part iii of the punjab cinemas (regulation) rules, 1952, should be strictly complied with by the licensees.' by punjab government notification, dated august 8, 1955, the following was substituted as sub-rule (iv) of rule 3 :--'a licence to a ..... purpose of the 1952 act was to resolve the confusion by re-enacting the provisions of the 1918 act, as subsequently amended, separating the provisions relating to the sanctioning of films for exhibition (a union subject) from the provisions relating to licensing and regulation of cinemas, which is a state subject.9. the preamble of the punjab act shows that it was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 1965 (SC)

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Hari Krishan Sharma

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1966SC1081; [1966]2SCR982

..... which arises in this appeal relates to the construction of section 5(2) of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952 (no. 11 of 1952) (hereinafter called 'the act'). the respondent, hari krishan sharma, who claims to be owner of a certain site in the town of jhajjar, desired to construct a cinema hall at the said place for the purpose of exhibiting cinematographs. on december 16, 1956 ..... 3 of the act provides that no person shall give an exhibition, by means of a cinematographs, elsewhere that in a place licensed ..... of the act. that is how the question about the construction of s. 5(2) falls to be decided in the present appeal. 9. before dealing with this question, we may very briefly indicate the effect of the broad provisions of the act. the act was passed in 1952 in order to make provisions for regulating exhibitions by means of cinematographs in the punjab. section ..... under this act or otherwise than in compliance with any condition and restriction imposed by such licence. section 4 provides that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1966 (HC)

Rudra Talkies and ors. Vs. Prem Sagar and Co. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1967P& H348

..... of october 1968, respondent no. 1, messrs. prem sagar and company, applied to the district magistrate, karnal, the licensing authority under the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952, (punjab act no. 11 of 1952), hereinafter referred to as the act, for permission to construct a cinema house outside the city of thanesar on the road leading to birla mandir. on inspection of the site by the authorities it was found ..... 130 feet from the centre of railway track and 500 feet from the local arya high school. as rule 19 (1) (a) (ii) of the punjab cinemas (regulation) rules, 1952, framed under section 9 of the act, hereinafter referred to as the rules, provided that the site of a building licensed for cinematograph exhibition shall not be within a radius of one furlong (660 ..... any premises intended to be used for cinematograph exhibition from any of the provisions of the act or of any rule made thereunder, messrs-prem sagar and company moved the government for exemption from the provisions of the rule relating to the distance between the proposed cinema building and am educational institution viz., rule 19 (1) (a) (ii).in this representation ..... the jewellers' business, which he was previously carrying on, and had thus to engage himself in some other business to support his large family. he further pointed put that the cinema, known as 'rudra talkies', which already existed in the town, was even less than 500 feet from the gita high school. on due consideration of the matter, the government .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 1978 (HC)

Shri Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)164

..... , were without jurisdiction. learned counsel relied upon a decision of their lordships of the supreme court in the state of punjab and anr. v. han kishan sharma : [1966]2scr982 . in my view, the aforesaid case, which relates tote provisions of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952, is not applicable to the facts of the present case, because the provisions with which i am concerned in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1979 (SC)

Kewal Krishan Puri and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1980SC1008; (1980)1SCC416; [1979]3SCR1217

..... but the distinction between the said case and the present one is that under the former there was no provision in section 5(1) of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act of 1952 that the power of the licensing authority to grant licence was subject to any rule, the rule in its turn providing an overriding power in the ..... and ors. v. the state of orissa and ors. : [1961]2scr537 the challenge was to the cess levied by the orissa mining areas development fund act, 1952. the petitioners' stand in the first instance was that the cess levied was not a fee but a duty of excise on coal and hence beyond ..... or commission agent or otherwise but does not include a person licensed under section 13.as per clause (i):'market' means a market established and regulated under this act for the notified market area, and includes a market proper, a principal market yard and sub-market yard.the definition of 'market proper' ..... together and are being disposed of by a common judgment.2. in the erstwhile composite state of punjab the act was passed in the year 1961 to consolidate and amend the law relating to the better regulation of the purchase, sale, storage and processing of agricultural produce and the establishment of markets for agricultural ..... year and, therefore, each is required to pay 30 per centum of its income to the board by virtue of the amendment brought about by punjab act 4 of 1978. under section 25 all receipts of the board are to be credited into a fund to be called the marketing development fund. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 1980 (HC)

Deepak theatre, Dhuri Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1981P& H92

..... dhuri. it has been granted a licence by the district magistrate, sangrur, respondent no, 2 under section 5 of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952(hereinafter referred to as the act). it is alleged that it made three classes and fixed rates for each class. respondent no. 2 vide order dated feb ..... has to be read subject to other section of the act. it cannot be said that by virtue of the clause unlimited powers have been given to the rule making authority to frame any rule.9. rule 4 of the punjab cinemas (regulation) rules, 1952 on which reliance has been placed by the respondent is ..... the lessee used to charge 10 paise per cycle for parking in the cycle stand.the state government amended a rule framed under the madras cinema (regulation) act, and made a provision that the licensee would provide a suitable cycle stand for all cycles that might reasonable be expected and appoint a care ..... will be relevant to refer to the scheme and some of the section of the act. the preamble of the act is in these words:--'the act to make provision for regulating exhibitions by means of cinema to graph in the punjab.'4. section 3 provides that no person shall give an exhibition, by means of ..... a cinematograph, elsewhere than place licensed under the act or otherwise than in compliance with any .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1981 (HC)

State of Punjab and anr. Vs. Deepak theatre, Dhuri

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1981P& H230

..... cinematographs in the punjab.'now is would be plain from the above that the very heading of the statute gives and inkling of its purpose to ..... in deepak theatre, dhuri. it had been duly granted a licence by the district magistrate, sangrur, under section 5 of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952(hereinafter called the act) and the rules framed thereunder. the licensing authority by its order dated the 26th of february, 1975, had made four classification of seats, namely box ; i st class ; ii ..... the statue, namely, the regulation of the business of cinematograph exhibition in general within the state and its rigid licensing in particular. inevitably, in this context what first catches the eye is the heading of the statue itself and the preamble that follows which are in the following terms :-'the punjab cinemas (regulation) act 1952-' an act to make provision for regulating exhibition by means of ..... s.s. sandhawalia, c.j. 1. whether the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952 and the rules framed there under authorise the licensing authority to make classes of cinemas hall seats and to prescribe the rates therefor is the meaningful and indeed solitary question which falls for determination in this set of fourteen connected appeals under clause .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1982 (SC)

Sampuran Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1982SC1407; 1983(1)Crimes49(SC); [1982(45)FLR272]; (1982)IILLJ281SC; 1982(1)SCALE647; (1982)3SCC200; 1982(2)SLJ551(SC)

..... a permanent cinema hall. pending the application, instructions were issued by the state government that all such applications for licence shall be forwarded ..... decision was quite different from the question involved in the case in hand.15. in state of punjab and anr. v. hari krishan sharma : [1966]2scr982 the sub-divisional officer had been constituted the licensing authority, under section 4 of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952, for the concerned area. the respondent made an application to him for a licence to construct ..... necessary implication the removing authority may be higher in rank to the appointing authority.12. in commissioner of police, bombay v. gordhandas bhanji : [1952]1scr135 an application for permission to build a cinema on a site within the city of bombay was rejected by the commissioner of police. the respondent applied for re-consideration of his application and ..... the commissioner, acting on the advice of the cinema advisory committee, granted the application on the 16th july, 1947, though he indicated in an affidavit filed later that but for this advice he would .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 1982 (HC)

The Chandigarh Administration and ors. Vs. Surjit Kesar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1983P& H142

..... answer to the question posed at the outset is rendered in the affirmative to the effect that a temporary licence for a touring cinematograph granted under section 5 of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952 and the rules framed thereunder is essentially transient and migratory in nature.16. now on the aforesaid finding it inevitably follows that the length of the operation of a ..... s.s. sandhawalia, c.j.1. whether a temporary licence for a 'touring cinematograph' granted under section 5 of the punjab cinemas (regulation) act, 1952 and the rules framed thereunder, is essentially transient and migratory in nature--comes to be the spinal issue in these two connected appeals under clause x of the letters ..... the union territory. the respondent-writ petitioner surjit kesar secured a temporary licence (for six months in the first instance) for a touring cinematograph under rule 3 of the punjab cinema (regulation) rules, 1952(hereinafter called 'the rules') in january, 1977. the respondent-writ-petitioner's averments that the licence was given in pursuance of a policy decision and that an understanding was ..... is the fact that the relevant ss. 3, 4 and 5 of the act and indeed the whole statute did not in terms provide for any categorisation of different kinds of licences or the duration thereof. this was, however, provided by the promulgation of the punjab cinemas (regulation) rules, 1952(hereinafter called the rules) which made detailed provisions with regard thereto which have been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1982 (HC)

National Assn. of Motion Pictures Exhibitors, Delhi Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : ILR1983Delhi691

..... the notification dated 21-11-1980 issued by the central government in exercise of the powers conferred by section 2 of union territories laws act, 1950 extending to the union territory of delhi, the punjab cinema regulations act, 1952 being punjab act ii of 1952 as at present in force in the state of haryana. proposition no ix : (19) the argument under this head is that sections ..... sachar, j. (1) does delhi administration lack competency in law to fix rates for admission to cinematograph exhibition in cinema houses notwithstanding the extension of the punjab cinemas regulations act, 1952 (hereinafter to be called the punjab act 1952), as at present in force in state of haryana to delhi by means of notification dated 21-11-1980 iss,ued by the central government under section 2 ..... power he invoke by virtue of notification of 21-11-1980 issued in exercise of powers of section 2 of the union territories act, 1950 by which the central govt. has extended to delhi the punjab cinemas regulation act, 1952 as is in force in the state of haryana and the further notification of 11-12-1980 issued by the administrator by which he ..... the licensees. our conclusions are as follows : (1) that the notification dated 21-11-1980 issued by the central government under section 2 of the union territories (laws) act, 1950 extending to union territory of delhi the punjab cinema regulations act, 1952 as at present in force in state of haryana is valid and constitational; (ii) section 7a and section 7b of the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //