Court : Mumbai
..... by such authorities at the state or union territory level, as the case may be, under the relevant provisions of law governing such regulation namely, mumbai municipal corporation act, 1888, m.r.andt.p. act, mmrda act, maharashtra land revenue code, 1966 (for short mlrc ). such regulation would include inter alia the grant of permission for development, construction such as iod, cc, oc, ..... of colaba division (backbay reclamation scheme-vi) which falls outside the defence boundary. necessary action at your end may be taken as deemed fit for the welfare of service personnel/exservicemen/ their widows. 332. on 12.5.2000, the collector submitted his report to the principal secretary, revenue and forest department. since beginning it was being represented on behalf of ..... in the said inquiry proceedings. the appellant raised objection for inclusion of mr. maru ram in the enquiry committee but the same was overruled. the learned single judge of punjab and haryana high court allowed the petition filed by the appellant on the ground that the departmental proceedings was vitiated for the flagrant violation of principles of natural justice as ..... in law as it is in violation of principles of ad alteram partem. in support of this submission, he relied upon decision of mohinder singh gill vs. chief election commissioner((1978) 1 scc 405). the said decision is followed in the following decisions: a. deepak babaria vs. state of gujarat ((2014) 3 scc 502), and in particular paragraphs 62 to .....Tag this Judgment!