Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab infrastructure development regulation act 2002 Page 2 of about 574 results (0.052 seconds)

Apr 12 2017 (HC)

Sarin Memorial Legal Aid Foundation vs.state of Punjab & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... needed to be suitably deployed to ensure balanced growth. such resources, it was felt could also be raised and credited towards a dedicated fund which could be used for developing and upgrading basic infrastructure in the periphery area and specially for the settlements therein. " w.p.(c) nos.2924/2014 & 2999/2014 page 111 of 169 113. after addressing various issues such ..... of the periphery control act, 1952, which was promulgated with the intention of controlling and regulating the periphery of chandigarh, the capital of the state of punjab. ? it is also in violation of the policy formulated by the state of punjab pursuant to the directions issued by the high court of punjab and haryana in cwp no.14357/2002 under which no residential development project can be ..... acres. such townships shall provide independent access from the highways, make sufficient provision for water supply and sewage disposal, provide adequate housing for weaker sections and will have adequate social infrastructure in terms of educational, medical and recreational facilities; the municipal and nagar panchayat towns, as a "mega project" or otherwise, subject to compliance with the master plan, or any draft .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2017 (HC)

Aalok Jagga vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... needed to be suitably deployed to ensure balanced growth. such resources, it was felt could also be raised and credited towards a dedicated fund which could be used for developing and upgrading basic infrastructure in the periphery area and specially for the settlements therein. " w.p.(c) nos.2924/2014 & 2999/2014 page 111 of 169 113. after addressing various issues such ..... of the periphery control act, 1952, which was promulgated with the intention of controlling and regulating the periphery of chandigarh, the capital of the state of punjab. ? it is also in violation of the policy formulated by the state of punjab pursuant to the directions issued by the high court of punjab and haryana in cwp no.14357/2002 under which no residential development project can be ..... acres. such townships shall provide independent access from the highways, make sufficient provision for water supply and sewage disposal, provide adequate housing for weaker sections and will have adequate social infrastructure in terms of educational, medical and recreational facilities; the municipal and nagar panchayat towns, as a "mega project" or otherwise, subject to compliance with the master plan, or any draft .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (HC)

Sukhmani Kaur Brar and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... to members of faculty, chand parkash 2014.03.12 15:46 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp-6420-2011, etc. - 21 - investment made, infrastructure provided and future development varying from 6 to 15 per cent based on account-books and additional expenditure, rise in salary and stipend minus services rendered by the students and medical officers; (iv ..... shall also take into consideration, inter alia, the salary or remuneration paid to the members of the faculty and other staff, the investment made by them, the infrastructure provided and plan for future development, of the institution as also expansion of the educational institution. future planning or improvement of facilities may be provided for. an institution may want to invest in an ..... section(1) and sub- section(2) within a period of ninety days from the fixation of such provisional fee. . the first amendment in the 2006 act was effected vide the punjab private health sciences educational institutions (regulation of admission, fixation of fee and making for reservation) amendment ordinance, 2006 and section 7 was substituted in the following terms:- 7(1) the state government ..... laid down therein. a committee was, thus, required to be set up to give effect to the judgment in tma pai foundation and others vs. state of karnataka and others, (2002) 8 supreme court cases 481 by each state headed by a retired high court judge, to be nominated by the chief justice of that state. this was in the context .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2014 (HC)

ionik Metallics and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Gujarat

..... and registered asnbfc under the rbi act, 1934 in 2002. 43.infrastructure development finance company ltd.-- 44.pradeshiya industrial andinvestment corporation ofu.p. ltd. 45.rajasthan state industrial development and investment corporation ltd. riico ltd.state of rajasthan 46.state industrial development corporation of maharashtra ltd.state of maharashtra 47.west bengal industrial development corporation ltd.state of wb 48 ..... of norms/guidelines for npa when the others coming within the purview of clause (b) are also guided by the some other statutes, for instance, banking regulation act, companies act etc. 44. lastly, in the case of m/s holystar natural resources pvt. ltd. and anr vs. union of india and anr reported in air ..... of kerala 34.madhya pradesh financial corporationstate govt. of mp 35.maharashtrastatefinancial corporationstate govt. of maharastra 36.orissastatefinancial corporationstate govt. of orissa 37.punjabfinancial corporationstate govt. of punjab 38.rajasthan financialcorporationstate govt. of rajasthan 39.uttar pradesh financial corporationstate govt. of up. 40.west bengalfinancial corporationstate govt. of wb 41.tamilnadu industrial investment corporation ..... case made out by the petitioners in sca no. 14908 of 2012 may be summed up thus: [a]. the petitioners are the borrowers and/or guarantors of punjab national bank, which is the respondent no.2 in this writ-petition, whose account with the respondent-bank had allegedly become non performing assets [npa, for short .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1994 (SC)

Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti and ors. Vs. Orient Paper and Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT1994(7)SC414; 1994(4)SCALE914; (1995)1SCC655; [1994]Supp5SCR392

..... expenditure for carrying out order of the state government and any other work entrusted to market committee under any other act; (e) contribution to any scheme for increasing agriculturists in the market area; (f) to develop necessary infrastructure within a radius of one kilometer from the market yard/sub-market yard for facilitating the flow of notified agricultural ..... contribution to the government servants on deputation; [vi] better control of market committees; [vii] meeting any legal expenses incurred by the board; [viii] imparting education in regulated marketing of agricultural produce; [ix] training the officers and staff of the market committees in the state, provisions for technical assistance to the market committee in the preparation of ..... reference may be made to keval krishan puri's case [supra]. there this court has upheld the legality of the fees levied for the following purposes stated in the punjab agricultural produce markets act, 1961, viz., [i] better marketing of agricultural produce; [ii] marketing of agricultural produce on co-operative lines; [iii] collection and dissemination of market rates ..... huge surplus and were required to make donations to many educational institutions. the marketing committees also spent large sums on general improvement of the municipal area. the punjab act permitted diversion of funds for any purpose calculated to promote the general interest of the committees or the national or public interest. the court further observed that, .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 03 2012 (HC)

M/S. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd. and Others Vs. Haryana S ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... urban areas act, 1975 (for brevity the act of 1975), vide letter dated 29.1.1990 (annexure p2) and have sold the farm houses ..... land of village raisina, district gurgaon, after obtaining the sanction under the provisions of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas (restriction of unregulated development) act,1963 (hereinafter to be referred as the act of 1963) and the haryana development and regulation of ..... . the case set up by the petitioners-accused, in brief in so far as relevant, was that the plpa act is applicable to the state of haryana, including the land in litigation. the petitioners m/s ansal properties and infrastructure ltd. and others developed the area, measuring about 1200 acres in an around 1988-89, made un-cultivable land (banjar qadeem) into cultivable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2014 (HC)

Adityaeducational Society, Rep., by Its Vs. the Union OfIndia Rep., by ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... to the patients and their ailments during the cours.of their study. (manohar lal sharma4; mci v. state of karnataka1).the regulations, framed by the mci under section 33 of the act, stipulate the infrastructural and institutional facilities to be provided by a medical college with an attached hospital, and are mandatory in character. (k.s.bhoir2 ..... to refuse renewal of permission, can be exercised by the 2nd respondent only if the applicant medical college has failed to comply with the infrastructural and instructional requirements of the regulations. the regulations contemplate an opportunity being afforded to the college to rectify the deficiencies. it is only if they are informed thereof, can the colleges take ..... prime consideration, for issuance of the writ, is whether or not substantial justice will be promoted. (rajasthan state industrial development & investment corporation42; commissioner of police, bombay v. govardhandas bhanji70; praga tools corporation v. shri c.v imanual71; punjab financial corporation v. garg steel72; union of india v. arulmozhi iniarasu73; and khela banerjee v. city montessori school74 ..... air1965sc98029) air1969sc104830) (1989) 1 scc72431) air1979sc104932) (1981) 4 scc17333) (1988) 2 scc29334) air1962sc15935) 1987 supp scc35036) (1991) 1 scc8637) 2002(2) alt426(d.b) 38) (2008) 2 scc39039) 98 l ed 873 : 347 us4831954 40) (2012) 6 scc141) (2002) 8 scc48142) (2013) 5 scc42743) (2013) 2 scc77244) (2011) 7 scc63945) (1966) 5 scc12546) (2013) 8 scc51947) (1974) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 18 2000 (HC)

Rameshchandra Shamjibhai Raniga Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2000)4GLR1

..... for the land released after the repeal of urban land (ceiling & regulation) act, 1976 has not been indicated by local plan or such land is for a use other than housing activity, then,subject to assessment of state governments/local authorities and subject to availability of infrastructure facility and environmental clearance the case may be considered for change in the ..... repeal the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976.be it enacted by parliament in the fiftieth year of the republic of india as follows:-1.(1) this act may be called the urban land (ceiling and regulation) repeal act, 1999.(2) it applies in the first instances to the whole of the states of haryana and punjab and to all the union territories ..... holders to put their land to use and also to provide financial assistance for housing schemes of economically weaker section of the society and of low income groups and for developing infrastructural facilities such as water supply, drainage, sanitation, roads etc. in the urban areas;now, therefore, in pursuance of clause (2) of article 252 of the constitution of ..... 252. the legislatures of haryana and punjab have passed resolutions empowering parliament to repeal the act in those states. the act stands repealed in those states and in the union territories immediately after promulgation of the repeal ordinance and subsequently if state legislatures adopt this repeal act by resolution, then the urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976 will stand repealed in those .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 27 2006 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. S. Venkatasubramaniam

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2007)207CTR(Mad)88

..... ravindra kumar jain v. commissioner of income-tax and ors.d) : [1997]225itr792(sc) in the case of punjab state industrial development corporation ltd. v. commissioner of income-tax. 4. learned counsel for the assessee submitted that the admission fee and contribution to infrastructure development fund is only to become a member of the coimbatore stock exchange and the same cannot be treated as ..... its incorporation isto apply for and obtain from the government of india recognition of the exchange as a recognised stock exchange within the meaning of the securities contracts (regulation) act, 1956 and to facilitate assist, regulate and control the trade and business in all kinds of securities with a view to safeguard and further the interests of brokers, jobbers, dealers and the investing ..... tax under gift-tax act or not. in both the judgments, the issue is entirely different from the present case. hence, these judgments have also no relevance. 13. in view of the foregoing reasons, we are of the view that the tribunal is right in holding that amount paid towards admission fee as well as contribution to infrastructure development is revenue expenditure and ..... in view of the same, we answer the questions of law in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. hence the tax cases are dismissed. no costs. t.c.(a) no. 920 of 2005:14. this appeal is filed under section 260a of the income tax act, 1961 by the assessee .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2013 (HC)

C.W.P. No.14752 of 2011 Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... applied to the director, town and country planning, haryana (respondent no.2) for grant of permission/licence, under section 3 of the haryana development and regulation of urban areas act, 1975, for developing a commercial colony on their aforesaid land. vide notice dated 14.03.2011 (annexure p8) second respondent informed the petitioners virender singh adhikari 2013 ..... is granted to the petitioners the stipulation of 50% reservation shall be breached but a similar licence has already been granted to m/s.r.s.infrastructures pvt.ltd.(hereinafter referred to as, the company) in excess of the 50% limit and plea of the respondent that that the company had applied ..... fact and law, are proposed to be disposed of by this common judgment being passed in c.w.p.no.12786 of 2011, m/s.conscient infrastructure pvt.ltd.and others versus state of haryana and another. facts are also taken from this very petition. the petitioners.who own 02.31 acres ..... of india, is the conundrum that craves resolution in these civil writ petitions, i.e., c.w.p.no.12786 of 2011, m/s.conscient infrastructure pvt.ltd.and others versus state of haryana and another, c.w.p.no.14752 of 2011, m/s.casting properties pvt.ltd.and others versus ..... .p.no.12786 of 2011 and other connected cases -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh ***** date of decision:19.09.2013 1. c.w.p.no.12786 of 2011 m/s.conscient infrastructure pvt.ltd.and others ....petitioners versus state of haryana and another .....respondents with2 c.w. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //