Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab municipal amendment act 2012 Page 1 of about 1,160 results (0.042 seconds)

Jul 19 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Kulbhushan Raheja Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... from the date of such commencement. (6) a municipality constituted upon the dissolution of a municipality before the expiration of its duration shall continue only for the ..... ].****** exists immediately before the commencement of the punjab municipal (amendment) act 11 of 1994, shall be held within a period of six months ..... is less than six months, it shall not be necessary to hold any election under clause (b) for constituting the municipality for such period. (4) the firs.election to a municipality constituted under this act after the commencement of the punjab municipal (amendment) act 11 of 1994, shall be held within a period of six months of its being notified as such. (5) elections ..... to the municipalities where no elected body kumar vino.2013.07.22 12:44 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cwp no.19261 of 2012 [8 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ...

Court : Delhi

..... amendment) act, 2012, the amendment act of 2012 is deemed to be still born and of no legal consequence and effect.141. on these aspects, another judicial precedent sheds further light. a notification was issued by the lieutenant governor of delhi on 28th june, 2000 specifying that it was issued in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section 1 of section 19 of the punjab courts act ..... case, the court was examining a challenge to the unit area method of levying property taxes in delhi as were introduced by virtue of the delhi municipal corporation (amendment) act, 2003 as well as the delhi municipal corporation (property tax) bye-laws, 2004 and a prayer was made that both be declared as unconstitutional and void ab initio. the petitioner s ..... position of delhi, the supreme court in new delhi municipal council v. state of punjab (supra) has further clearly stated thus: ?155...the third category is delhi. it had no legislature with effect from 1-11-1956 until one has been created under and by virtue of the constitution sixty-ninth (amendment) act, 1991 which introduced article 239 aa. we have ..... which was in force in the union territory of delhi. the question was as to whether the property taxation under two municipal acts, one being the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 and the other being the punjab municipal act, 1911 both applicable in delhi, constituted union taxation or not. the issue of the legislative competence of the delhi legislature to legislate by virtue of article .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

..... amendment) act, 2012, the amendment act of 2012 is deemed to be still born and of no legal consequence and effect.141. on these aspects, another judicial precedent sheds further light. a notification was issued by the lieutenant governor of delhi on 28th june, 2000 specifying that it was issued in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section 1 of section 19 of the punjab courts act ..... case, the court was examining a challenge to the unit area method of levying property taxes in delhi as were introduced by virtue of the delhi municipal corporation (amendment) act, 2003 as well as the delhi municipal corporation (property tax) bye-laws, 2004 and a prayer was made that both be declared as unconstitutional and void ab initio. the petitioner s ..... position of delhi, the supreme court in new delhi municipal council v. state of punjab (supra) has further clearly stated thus: ?155...the third category is delhi. it had no legislature with effect from 1-11-1956 until one has been created under and by virtue of the constitution sixty-ninth (amendment) act, 1991 which introduced article 239 aa. we have ..... which was in force in the union territory of delhi. the question was as to whether the property taxation under two municipal acts, one being the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 and the other being the punjab municipal act, 1911 both applicable in delhi, constituted union taxation or not. the issue of the legislative competence of the delhi legislature to legislate by virtue of article .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2014 (HC)

Present:mr.Karan Nehra Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... order dated 28.03.2012 (annexure p-12).it is, at this stage, that the petitioner has approached this court challenging these two orders as well as the vires of the indian stamp (punjab amendment) act, 2005. counsel for the petitioner has asserted that the amendment act of the state of punjab to the extent it applies to the property falling within the municipal limits is not disputed ..... to the accuracy and integrity of this document high court, chandigarh cwp no.25108 of 2012 (o&m) 9 explanation.- (for the purpose of this section,- (1) the expression municipality . and the corporation . shall have the same meaning as assigned to them respectively, under the punjab municipal act, 1911 and the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976. (2) the expression social security fund . means a fund constituted under the ..... but the same is discriminatory, arbitrary and irrational thus, violative of article 14 of the constitution viz-a-viz the properties which fall within the periphery of 5 kms.of the municipalities and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2017 (HC)

Sarin Memorial Legal Aid Foundation vs.state of Punjab & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... page 107 of 169 called naya gaon. after considering the objections received, the final notification in terms of sections 4 and 5 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, as amended by amendment act 11 of 1994, was issued on 18.10.2006 declaring the local area mentioned in the schedule thereto comprising of villages karoran, nada and kansal ..... peripheral area should be taken up if the same affects the environment and the quality of the lake. ? by order dated 29.05.2012, the high court of punjab and haryana constituted a special tribunal to identify the government and shamlat land and the tribunal submitted its interim report. a portion of ..... were disposed of by the abovementioned order dated 22.04.2014 by virtue of which (i) the order of the high court of punjab & haryana dated 26.03.2012 in civil writ petition no.20425/2010 (aalok jagga v. union of india) was set aside and the writ petition was restored to ..... concerned world body.4. the said writ petition was disposed of by a division bench of the high court of punjab & haryana by order dated 26.03.2012 holding that the periphery control act, 1952 does not contemplate a complete embargo on the raising of construction in the periphery. it was also held that ..... by the participating parties, we do not feel the necessity that the sub-committee of the technical experts, as suggested in the minutes dated 07.05.2012, would need fresh map. accordingly, we shall proceed in accordance with the map of the survey of india, which was taken on record by this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2017 (HC)

Aalok Jagga vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... page 107 of 169 called naya gaon. after considering the objections received, the final notification in terms of sections 4 and 5 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, as amended by amendment act 11 of 1994, was issued on 18.10.2006 declaring the local area mentioned in the schedule thereto comprising of villages karoran, nada and kansal ..... peripheral area should be taken up if the same affects the environment and the quality of the lake. ? by order dated 29.05.2012, the high court of punjab and haryana constituted a special tribunal to identify the government and shamlat land and the tribunal submitted its interim report. a portion of ..... were disposed of by the abovementioned order dated 22.04.2014 by virtue of which (i) the order of the high court of punjab & haryana dated 26.03.2012 in civil writ petition no.20425/2010 (aalok jagga v. union of india) was set aside and the writ petition was restored to ..... concerned world body.4. the said writ petition was disposed of by a division bench of the high court of punjab & haryana by order dated 26.03.2012 holding that the periphery control act, 1952 does not contemplate a complete embargo on the raising of construction in the periphery. it was also held that ..... by the participating parties, we do not feel the necessity that the sub-committee of the technical experts, as suggested in the minutes dated 07.05.2012, would need fresh map. accordingly, we shall proceed in accordance with the map of the survey of india, which was taken on record by this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 2014 (HC)

Arrive Safe Society of Chandigarh Vs. National Highway Authority of In ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... 'ble supreme court of india has not been successful. we have analysed the new policy, a copy of which has been placed on record by the state of haryana. the amendments made to the policy have been carried out in bold letters.the relevant clause for our purpose is para 1.2.5, which reads as under:- 1.2.5 restriction ..... court dated 17.12.2013, which was dismissed on 10.3.2014, and the application is allowed. cm3371of 2014 the petitioner has filed this application seeking a direction that the amendment to the liquor policy by incorporating clause 1.2.5 (b) does not serve the purpose and a new liquor policy ought to be framed. we are not inclined to ..... interpretation of the liquor policy as a whole, one way or the other. as far as state of punjab is concerned, it appears that the necessary affidavit has been filed in cwp11391of 2012. we have examined the same. it is pointed out that the only amendment required qua the issue raised before us is, once again, of making it applicable even for state ..... /municipal corporations/councils/housing boards, etc.as the provisions of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restriction of kang gursharan singh 2014.03.19 15:36 i am the author of this document chandigarh civil writ petition no.25777 of 2012 (o&m) 5 unregulated development act, 1963 will not apply to the said areas. he, however, submits that clause (b) takes care .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

Mr. Anil Kshetarpal Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aditya Vs.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... two years i.e. 2013-14 and 2014-15 when the matter was pending in pil in cwp no.25777 of 2012. the clause 2-b of the amended policy was incorporated whereby the licencee has been allowed to close down only the vends on the highways and not singh ..... liquor vends on national or state highway alongwith liquor vends in rural area, the state shall not be entitled to enforce clause 2b of the amended policy against such licencees without their consent. as a consequence, such licencees shall not be obliged to continue with the vends in rural area ..... 7. the twin issues that arise for determination in these petitions are as under:- (i)whether the state was empowered to unilaterally impose terms of amended policy on the licencees?.; (ii)whether the remedy of writ petition is available to the present writ petitioners?.8. under issue no.(i), state ..... we have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.5. learned counsel for the petitioners made the following submissions:- (i)the amended policy annexure p.6 is illegal and arbitrary as it compels the licensee to continue with the unaffected vends whether it is profitable to him or ..... in the areas of municipal committees/municipal corporations/councils/housing boards or any other local authority/urban estates/the areas developed by the colonizers with the approval of the government) shall be located at a distance as stipulated in the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restriction of unregulated development act, 1963 (41 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2013 (HC)

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... the said purpose. 3.the ordinance seeks to give effect to the above decision." 6. on 16.11.2012, the amendment made through the ordinance was carried through under the amending act under the tamil nadu co-operative societies (third amendment) act, 2012 (act 37 of 2012). section 21(2)(i) was amended, whereby, the expression "or by the general body where there is no board" after the expression "by ..... the word "or" has to be read as disjunctive and the observance of either one or more need not be sequential. in the decision reported in (1980) 1 scc 15.(municipal corporation of delhi vs. tek chand bhatia), the apex court referred to stroud's judicial dictionary 3rd edition, vol.i at page 135, which reads as under: " in stroud's ..... authority on the governing body for the purposes of administering the society. he also placed reliance on the decisions reported in air 196.sc 150.(roop chand vs. state of punjab), [2000] 118 stc 14.(j.c.budharaja vs. state of orissa and others) at paragraph 10, 2006-3-l.w. 546 (l.ramasubbu and k.s.a.krishnamoorthy vs. madura ..... the decision reported in air 197.sc 96.(damyanthi v. union of india), which was distinguished by the decision reported in air 198.sc 97.(daman singh v. state of punjab), the supreme court pointed out that the rule would prevail over the bye laws of the society, which confined the membership to only persons belonging to the parsi community. on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2017 (HC)

Central Bureau of Investigation vs.ram Pat Garg

Court : Delhi

..... of the commissioner to be the disciplinary authority in relation to all municipal officers and other municipal employees is subject to the regulation that may be made in this behalf. this section 59(d) was introduced by way of amendment by act 67 of 1993 with effect from 1.10.1993. further the opening ..... section 89 which provide that the corporation shall appoint suitable persons to be the municipal engineers, the municipal health officers, the education officer, the municipal chief accountant, the municipal secretary and crl.rev.p.636/2012 page 4 of 13 the municipal chief auditor and may appoint one or more deputy commissioners and such other officer ..... take into account the judgments delivered in state of bihar and others v. rajmangal ram 2014 (4) scale338 prakash singh badal and anr. v. state of punjab and ors. (2007) 1 scc1 state of madhya pradesh v. virender kumar tripathi 2009 (7) scr etc. is not correct. the issues involved in ..... respondent coram:-"hon ble mr justice ashutosh kumar ashutosh kumar, j judgment1 the petitioner/cbi has questioned the order dated 03.08.2012 passed by the special judge, p.c. act (cbi-09), central district, tis hazari: delhi in rc no.29a/08 whereby the respondent/ram pat garg, the then ..... it has been submitted that in prakash singh badal v. state of punjab 2007 (1) scc1 it has been held that the effect of sub-section (3) and (4) of section 19 of the crl.rev.p.636/2012 page 3 of 13 act are of considerable significance. in sub-section (3), the stress is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //