Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab municipal corporation act 1976 Page 1 of about 5,033 results (0.086 seconds)

Apr 01 2005 (HC)

Raj Guru Sood Vs. the Municipal Corporation Through the Commissioner, ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2005)140PLR521

..... portion and rs. 50/- for the two shops. in the year 1979, the petitioner was informed that the property in question was to be assessed under the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 (in short '1976 act') and consequently, by virtue of an order dated 25.7.1980, passed by respondent no. 2, recovery proceedings were started against the petitioner whereby the property had ..... the matter to the assessing authority with the observations that the assessment be made in accordance with the provisions of the east punjab urban rent restriction act (for brevity 'the rent act'). it is further stated that the commissioner, municipal corporation, ludhiana again determined the annual rental value of the property of the petitioner, by order dated 3.3.1982. annexure p ..... respondent nos. 2 and 3 respectively are quashed and the matter is remanded to the municipal corporation, ludhiana for determining the rateable value of the property in question under clause (b) of section 93 of the 1976 act and if for any justifiable reason, the municipal corporation, ludhiana cannot determine such value under clause (b), it may then resort to the ..... provisions of clause (c) of the said section. the municipal corporation, ludhiana shall afford a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1996 (HC)

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, Jalandhar Division and a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1997)115PLR545

..... each of the writ petitions are hereby set aside and directions are given to the respondents to determine the house-tax as per the provisions section 93 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 and in the light of the observations made by this court in this judgment. before proceeding further in the matter, the respondent-authorities of course shall give ..... assessment and by not doing so, the assessing authority as well as the appellate authority committed a patent illegality by violating the provisions of section 93 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 and therefore, the impugned assessment orders and the appellate orders are liable to be quashed. the counsel further submitted that the assessing authorities had assessed the costs of ..... for petroleum though embedded inside the ground will fall within the definition of structure and thus would be building within the meaning of section 2(3) of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976.11. the second point for determination in this case would be whether the orders of assessment passed by the authorities are in accordance with the provisions of section ..... denoted as house no. b-17-38 which consists of some residential house. oil storage tanks. non-residential building and sheds. the municipal corporation, respondent no. 2 issued a notice under section 103 of the punjab municipal act, 1976 proposing to impose house-tax at the rateable value to rs. 9,82,800/-. objections were filed to the proposed amendment. inspite of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 08 1993 (HC)

The Municipal Corporation Vs. Shri Arjan Kumar and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1993)104PLR582

..... -1989, copy annexure p-8 to the writ petition, vide which the appeal filed by respondent arjan kumar under section 269 sub sections (2) &(3) of punjab municipal corporation act 1976 against the order of the commissioner, municipal corporation, amritsar dated 22-5- 1987, was accepted.3. the case of the petitioner, as set up in this writ petition, is that arjan kumar, respondent no ..... . the observations made by the supreme court in the above case are clear and as such when a citizen dispute the validity of notice issued by a corporation constituted under the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976, he would be well within his rights to lead evidence in this eventuality, the district judge should permit the concerned parties all possible assistance by applying the ..... bench admitting the writ petition. as such the preliminary objection taken by the respondent now cannot be gone into.13. i have gone through the relevant provisions to the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976. under section 269(3) district judge has been empowered to examine the legality of a notice issued under section 269(1) which requires a person to demolish an ..... -2) 90 p. l. r. 540 (s.c ) the supreme court examined the matter arising out of proceedings taken by the municipal corporation, amritsar, under section 69(1) and the scope of section 384 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976. even though the question in the above case was as to whether additional evidence can be led by resorting to order 41 rule 27 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1995 (HC)

Tejinder Singh Bawa and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1995)110PLR578

..... them.7. in order to examine the primary contention raised by the counsel for the parties, it is apt to notice the relevant provision of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as the act). this act was enacted with the object of providing 'better administration, better amenities and better planning for future...' in the cities of amritsar and ludhiana. chapter ..... and prayed that a writ of mandamus be issued directing the respondents to sanction the plan or to acquire the land on payment of compensation under section 275 of the punjab municipal corporation act., 1976. it appears the even before the plan had been formally sanctioned, the petitioners had started raising construction on the site on january 20, 1989. on january 31, ..... of the grant of an ad interim injunction, the building was actually demolished on june 20, 1989. thereafter, notices under sections 269(1) and 220(1) of the punjab municipal corporation act, were issued to the petitioners. they were informed that they had started the repair of the demolished shops without permission in violation of filed civil writ petition no. 12910 ..... alongwith another person purchased the land measuring 633 square yards close to the district court chowk in amritsar. they submitted a plan for raising construction on this land. the municipal corporation, amritsar, respondent no. 2, rejected the plan on the ground that the land in question was 'a part of green space'. even a representation submitted by petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 1991 (SC)

Shri Krishna Das Vs. Town Area Committee, Chirgaon

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1991SC2096

..... and similar provision of the municipal act 1911. the petitioner challenged the constitutional validity of the said statutes and the levy on ..... punjab : [1979]1scr845 , the state of punjab in april, 1977 required the various municipal bodies in the state to impose tax on the sale of india made foreign liquor @ re. 1/- per bottle w.e.f. 20-5-1977. the municipal authorities having failed, to take action pursuant to the directive the state of punjab directly issued a notification under section 90(5) of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 ..... fit. by the instant notification dated march 4, 1933 the provincial government extended the provisions of section 298(2)f(d) of the united provinces municipalities act, 1916, hereinafter referred to as the municipalities act, to the town area of chirgaon in the jhansi district in the modified form set forth in the notification itself. the word 'panchayat' was ..... above provision concluded that the tac became empowered to levy all those taxes which the state government could levy under sub-section (1) of section 128 of the municipalities act; and the tac could impose any tax which the state legislature could impose under the constitution. further, it was concluded that entry 52 of list ii empowered .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 06 2004 (HC)

Partap Steel Rolling Mills (1935) Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation of ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR2005P& H164; (2005)139PLR578

..... . 2.2. the facts as emerge from the writ petition are that the municipal corporation, amritsar is a corporate body constituted under the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 (for short 'the 1976 act'). the petitioner-company which till 12.4.1978 was situ- ated within the territorial jurisdiction of municipal committee, chheharta was being assessed on the annual value of the property upto the ..... year 1975-76 by the said committee, under section 3(1)(b) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 (for short '1911 act ..... stood dissolved with effect from 12.10.1978 and the area where the petitioner-company is situated, was included in the municipal corporation, amritsar. the municipal corporation, amritsar issued a notice under section 103 of the 1976 act to the petitioner-company proposing to enhance the value of the property to rs. 5,02,668 for the year 1978-97 ..... nos.l and 2 respectively are set aside and the case is remitted to the municipal corporation, amritsar for determining the rateable value of the property under clause (b) of section 93 of the 1976 act and if for any justifiable reason, the municipal corporation, amritsar cannot determine such value under clause (b), it may then resort to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 1997 (HC)

Pran Nath Bhatia and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1997P& H309; (1997)117PLR44

..... passing act no. 8 of 1996, wherein the maximum number of wards from 50 was increased to 70 in ludhiana, 60 in amritsar and ..... in this behalf, issued the delimitation of wards of municipal corporation order, 1995 (hereinafter referred toas 'the delimitation order of 1995'), to determine the delimitation of wards in the ..... up to 31-3-1997.5. punjab government in supersession of government of punjab, department of local government, notification no. g.s.r. 28/p.a.-42/76/s. 34/95, dated 5-6-1995, and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 8 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 (punjab act no. 42 of 1976), and all other powers enabling it ..... 37 and 24, respectively, in the corporation. ludhiana municipal area had been earlier divided into 50 wards; namely, ludhiana (east) consisting of 12 wards, ludhiana (west) consisting of 13 wards, ludhiana (north) consisting of 13 wards and ludhiana (south) consisting of 12 wards.4. punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act of 1976') was amended by the state legislature by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 28 1989 (HC)

Banarsi Dass Mahajan Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1990)97PLR1

..... punjab concast steels ltd. ludhiana v. the municipal corporation ludhiana, (1985-1) 87 p. l. r. 757. and on the other hand the ..... in these matters. and the contestants on the other side are house-tax payers. their dispute with the corporation and its officers is with regard to the method of the assessment of house-tax under the provisitions of section 93 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'the corporation act'). the house-tax payers rely on a division bench decision of this court in ..... ,000/- with effect from 1-4-1975 vide order annexure p-l passed by the administrator, municipality, amritsar under the punjab municipal act, 1911 (hereinafter referred to as 'the municipal act') as by that time the corporation act had not come into vogue the corporation act came into force with effect from 31st december, 1976. it appears that the annual rental value so determined at the rate of rs. 6.000 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 1989 (HC)

Shukan Kumar and Others Vs. Municipal Corporation, Ludhiana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1990P& H115

..... of the act. as a matter of a fact s. 192 of ..... .4. so far as construction activities of buildings within the municipal limits of ludhiana are concerned, the same are governed by the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976. section 275 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976, provides that the building activity can be by a town plan or building scheme. upto 1-4-1977 the punjab municipal act, 1911, was operative at ludhiana. under the punjab municipal act, 1911, the building activities were regulated by s. 192 ..... -laws in existence and there is absolutely no prohibition in raising more than one-storeyed buildings on the sites in questions u/ s. 275 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976.2. on the contrary, the stand of the municipal corporation is that the petitioners are bound by the terms and conditions on which the transfer of the shops was made to them, as one of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 1997 (HC)

Jainti Parshad JaIn Vs. Municipal Committee Ferozepore City and Anothe ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1997P& H287; (1997)117PLR487

..... subject to the following :-- **********' in neither of the aforesaid two provisions, namely, section 3(1) of the punjab municipal act, 1911, and section 93 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976, there is any non obstante clause, thereby excluding the applicability of the punjab rent act. since there is no non obstanle clause in section 93 and, in that light. rent control law is held ..... sum obtained by adding the present market value of the land and estimated cost of erecting the building less ten per cent depreciation : ********** 10. section 93 of the punjab municipal corporation act. 1976, reads as under :--'93. determination of rateable value of lands and buildings assessable to taxes--subject to the rules, if any, made by the state government in this ..... in accordance with the provisions of section 93 of the said act. under section 93, rateable value of the land and building, assessable to ..... decision of the supreme court in dewan daulat rai kapoor v. new delhi municipal committee, air 1980 sc 541, was relied upon.9. it has to be noticed that the town of ludhiana was governed by the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976, and the house tax was levied by the municipal corporation, ludhiana, after determining the annual rent in cwp no. 2257 of 1982 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //