Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab police act 2007 Page 1 of about 31,688 results (0.121 seconds)

Dec 11 2012 (HC)

Resurgence India Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... from cwp-1253-2009, etc. -5- today. the respondents shall also take decision as to whether any action is required to be taken under the provisions of punjab police rules, 1934, as well as punjab police act, 2007, against those officials in respect of whom criminal trials are pending. such a decision shall be taken within a period of three months and shall be communicated to ..... taken against the convicted employees as well.5. the service conditions of the police officials are governed by the punjab police rules, 1934 as well as punjab police act, 2007. these rules, inter alia, provide for suspension of the police officials under certain circumstances, like the cases where inquiry/investigation is pending or where the police officials are charged with criminal offence. therefore, it becomes the duty of the ..... out above, the respondents have terminated the services. we would like to point out that the petitioner in cwp-1253-2009 has given list of 1398 instances where the police officials have been convicted and/or are under-trial and it is conceded at the bar by the learned counsel for the petitioner that all those names have already been ..... unnecessary to continue these proceedings on the board of this court. the same can in our opinion be disposed of with a direction to the chief secretary, government of punjab, to periodically monitor the action against the employees who are convicted for the offences alleged against them and ensure that those who deserve to be weeded out on account of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2013 (HC)

Cocp No.3486 of 2012 Vs. Shri Rakesh Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... a preliminary enquiry. cocp no.3486 o 3. 2. that it is respectfully submitted that section 15 of the punjab police act, 2007 will be fully complied with in future. in view of the above affidavit filed on behalf of the state of punjab, this writ petition has become infructuous and is disposed of accordingly. however, directions are issued to the state of ..... .2006 (12) sc 225. upon notice, reply has been filed by the state of punjab through samir kumar, ias, cocp no.3486 o 2. secretary, department of home affairs & justice, punjab, wherein it is stated as under:- 1. that as per section 15 of the punjab police act, 2007, the officers posted to the following posts, shall have minimum assured tenure of one year ..... of police of a range, 3. senior superintendent of police, 4. superintendent of police, 5. assistant superintendent of police, 6. ..... against those posts, which shall be extendable to maximum period of three years:- 1. inspector general of police of a zone, 2. deputy inspector general .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2013 (HC)

Civil Writ Petition No.16989 of 2011 Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... attracted. cwp nos.14652 of 2011 & connected cases [4].we find that during the pendency of this writ petition, state of punjab in exercise of its powers under the punjab police act, 2007 has amended and substituted rule 12.6 of the punjab police rules, 1934 and the amended rule reads as follows:- 12.6 eligibility conditions for direct appointment to the post of sub-inspector ..... 2011. cwp nos.14652 of 2011 & connected cases [2].the petitioners in this writ petition are directly recruited assistant sub inspectors in punjab police. they seek quashing of the notification dated 27.7.2011 (annexure p-3) whereby the punjab police rules, 1934 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1934 rules') have been amended to the extent that the post of sub inspectors can ..... , learned counsel for the petitioners has requested for permitting the petitioners to participate in the selection process meant for direct recruits by giving relaxation in age in accordance with the punjab civil services (general and common conditions of service) rules, 1994 (for brevity, 'the 1994 rules').mr.kshetarpal has submitted that according to rule 5 of the 1994 rules cwp ..... mr.justice surya kant. hon'ble mr.justice naresh kumar sanghi. present : mr.anil kshetarpal, advocate and mr.rajan bansal, advocate, for the petitioners.ms.munisha gandhi, additional ag, punjab. mr.sapan dhir, advocate, for the intervenors.-.- 1. whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. to be referred to the reporters or not?. 3 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2013 (HC)

Cwp No. 9527 of 2012 (O/M) Vs. State of Punjab and Others(S)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... been termed as a transfer order, but it amounts to change of cadre of the petitioners.it is contended that after coming into force of the punjab police act, 2007, a policy decision was taken by the state of punjab to allocate subordinate officers in the district. a decision with regard to allocating the inspectors and assigning them the cadre was taken that the base ..... .relieving them from the district police. this order is dated 17.7.2011. cwp no.9527 of 2012 and connected case -2- counsel for the petitioners.at this ..... of 2012 was promoted to the rank of assistant sub inspector with effect from 21.2.1994 and sub inspector on 14.9.1994 (2.10.1994 revised) in the punjab armed police on the basis of his name being brought on promotion list dated 30.6.2005. had petitioner's name been considered in the district ..... inspector tarsem singh and others versus state of punjab and others as common questions of facts and law are involved in these writ petitions and the impugned orders are also the same, i.e.order dated 6.7.2011, vide which the respondents have been not transferred the petitioners to punjab armed police from the district police and thereafter, granted them the posting orders .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2013 (HC)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Vs. State of Haryana and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the writ petitions submits that in view of the aforesaid, the only submission he is making is that the two legislatures in their wisdom having enacted the punjab police act, 2007 and haryana police act, 2007 respectively these acts should be given full effect to especially as they are stated to be so enacted keeping in mind the observations of the hon'ble supreme court in the ..... aforesaid judgment. in this behalf, our attention has been drawn to section 54 in the punjab act and section 68 in the haryana act regarding constitution of the district police complaints authority ..... no.2738 of 2012 anil kumar aggarwal and others ....petitioners versus state of haryana and others ....respondents cwp no.5087 of 2012 h.c.arora, advocate ....petitioner versus state of punjab and another ....respondents cwp no.5110 of 2012 h.c.arora, advocate .....petitioner versus state of haryana and another ..respondents coram :hon'ble mr.justice sanjay kishan kaul,chief ..... in the respective states. learned additional advocate general for both the states submit that it was felt that in view of there being other authorities, there was no need of this authority at the moment. we fail to appreciate the aforesaid plea as it is not as if some new authorities have come into being post 2007 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2013 (HC)

Cwp No. 936 of 2013 Vs. the State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... order dated 31.12.2012 (annexure-p-1).passed by the additional director general of police (administration).punjab, according to which, the executive clerical cadre will be merged with the district police cadre, which is not permissible as per section 4 (b) of the punjab police act, 2007 (in short 'the act').on considering the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner who has, while referring ..... to section 4 (b) of the act, tried to impress upon the court that the executive clerical cadre ..... falls within the technical and support cadre and by this order dated 31.12.2012, they have been merged with the district police ..... cadre when there is no such legislative intent or power conferred on the director general of police, punjab. he states that only four separate cadres have been specified under the act and it further states that a person belonging to a particular cadre cannot be transferred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr.Ajay JaIn Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... respondents no.1 to 3 mr.munish raj, advocate, for respondent no.4 *** rekha mittal, j. the petitioner prays for quashing of calendra under section 66 of the punjab police act, 2007 (for short the act .) (annexure p-3) and the proceedings emanating therefrom including order dated 11.2.2013 (annexure p-4) passed by the judicial magistrate ist class, ludhiana. the facts relevant for ..... disposal of the present petition are that the petitioner submitted an application to the commissioner of police, ludhiana (annexure p-1) for taking action and registration of fir under sections ..... magistrate has taken cognizance in violation of provisions of section 468 of the code, the calendra and proceedings emanating therefrom are liable to be quashed. counsel for the state of punjab and counsel for private respondent has vehemently contested the claim of the petitioner. counsel for respondent no.4 has submitted that as considerable time was consumed in completion of process ..... paramjit kaur 2013.09.19 16:05 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh crl. misc. not m-6613 of 2013 -4- section 66 of the act after expiry of period of one year. however, section 470 of the code deals with exclusion of time in certain cases. respondent nos.1 to 3 in their reply have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 15 2015 (HC)

Akash Kashyap @ Puniyan Vs. Lt.Governor of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... cases in both the notices in which the petitioner was found to be involved. first notice s. fir date no.no.1 98 05.04.2007 w.p(crl) no.1148/2015 section of law police present station status611/14 punjab excise act farsh bazar 2 268 30.07.2007 308/34 ipc gandhi nagar acquittal 3 22 27.01.2010 12/9/55 gambling ..... act gandhi nagar conviction 4 122 18.05.2010 12/9/55 gambling act gandhi nagar pending trial 5 161 20.06.2010 12/9/55 gambling act gandhi nagar pending trial ..... two cases of 2012, which are also pending trial are under delhi excise act and gambling act. it appears that after 2007, the petitioner was made accused in 2010. thereafter, in ..... nagar pending trial 3 303 14.09.2012 12/09/55 gambling gandhi act nagar pending trial 13. the list of cases in which the petitioner is said to be involved reflects that in two cases of the year 2007, one being under the punjab excise act and the other registered under section 308/34 of the ipc, the petitioner was acquitted.14. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Gurbir Singh Pannu Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Anoth ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... bench of this court in the case of kulwinder singh and others v. state of punjab and another, 2007 (3) rcr (criminal) 1052, this petition is allowed and fir no.171, dated 2.12.2012, under section 336, ipc, and section 25 of the arms act, registered at police station, laddowal, district ludhiana, and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed. (naresh kumar ..... kumar sanghi, j.1. prayer in this petition is for quashing of fir no.171, dated 2.12.2012, under section 336, ipc, and section 25 of the arms act, registered at police station, laddowal, district ludhiana, and the consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise.2. vide order dated 27.2.2013, the affected parties were directed to appear ..... counsel for the state on instructions from swaran singh of police station, laddowal, district ludhiana, admits the factum of the compromise. he has also gone through the report submitted by the learned court below and the copies of the statements ..... petitioners are bleak. crm-m-39158-2012 (o&m 6. respondent no.2-complainant, ram singh, is present in the court, who has been identified by hc swaran singh of police station, laddowal, district ludhiana. ram singh admits the factum of the compromise and has no objection if the impugned fir and the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.7. learned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2008 (HC)

State of H.P. and anr. Vs. Jagat Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 2008(3)ShimLC459

..... court of india have held in harjit singh and anr. v. state of punjab and anr. : (2007)9scc582 , that while issuing second show-cause notice, the competent authority ought to specifically consider why misconduct was considered to be gravest act of misconduct under rule 16.2 of the punjab police rules. their lordships have held as under:it is one thing to say ..... re-employed elsewhere, a full descriptive roll, with particulars of the punishments, shall be sent for publication in the police gazette.7. it was incumbent upon the director general of police to take into consideration rule 16.2 of the punjab police rules before altering the punishment from forfeiture of one year's service and stoppage of one increment into dismissal from ..... appellate authority it will amount to miscarriage of justice.6. it is also specifically provided in rule 16.2 of the punjab police rules as applicable to the state of himachal pradesh that the penalty of dismissal should be imposed only for the gravest acts of misconduct or as the cumulative effect of continued misconduct proving incorrigibility and complete unfitness for ..... service. there is no finding recorded by the director general of police that the respondents were incorrigible and completely unfit for police service. the director general of police was also required to look into .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //