Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the punjab state legislature prevention of disqualification act 1952 Court: mumbai Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.018 seconds)

Mar 22 2001 (HC)

Mohansingh Tanwani and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-22-2001

Reported in : AIR2002Bom39; 2002(1)ALLMR818; 2001(3)BomCR285; 2001(3)MhLj339

..... motor service, tirunelveli, : air1957mad48 . (2) anjar municipality v. j.m. vyas, : air1999guj298 . (3) jyotiben r. pathak v. rafigsa chammansa fakir, : air2000guj129 . (4) r.s. saini v. state of punjab, : (1999)iillj1415sc . 11. by the constitution (74th amendment) act, 1992 part-ixa has been inserted in the constitution relating to municipalities in terms of article 243p to 243zg. article 243u ..... of office of the councillors shall be coterminus with the duration of the council. section 55b provides for disqualifications for continuing as councillor or becoming councillor on removal as president or vice-president and section 44 deals with the disqualification of councillor during his term of office. whereas section 55 deals with removal of president by councillors ..... 309 gives extraordinary powers to the collector, in case of emergency, for execution of certain works, section 310 empowers the director to prevent extravagance in the employment of establishment. section 311 empowers the state government to order an inquiry to be held by any officer appointed by it into any matters concerning the municipal administration or any matters ..... him in accordance with the constitution. article 162 states that subject to the provisions of the constitution the executive power of a state shall extend to the matters with respect to which the legislature of the state has power to make laws. article 163 provides for council of ministers and states that there shall be a council of ministers with .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2001 (HC)

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-28-2001

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR419

..... the petitioners on 26-5-1984 and 7-8-1984 under various provisions of the prevention of corruption act, 1947. however, the criminal law (amendment) act, 1952, which provided for constitution of special courts to try the offences under the act of 1947, and excluded the jurisdiction of other courts, was not extended to the state of sikkim, and no special court was constituted in the ..... , a question arose in the writ petition as to the jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain a civil suit involving the question as to the disqualification of the director of a company under the companies act. an argument was advanced by the petitioner that the rights of the second respondent are creatures of the company law and hence the remedy under ..... repeal of the aforesaid regulations, and havingregard to the savings clause in the 1997 regulations, pending proceedings are not saved and it can be inferred that the intention of the legislature is that the pending proceedings shall not continue, but fresh proceedings may be initiated under the provisions. the savings clause in the 1997 regulations does not keep alive any obligation ..... when such thing was done or action taken. several decisions have been cited at the bar on this question, and we shall now proceed to consider the same. 161. in state of punjab v. mohar singh pratap singh air 1955 sc 84, the respondent had filed a claim in accordance with ordinance no. 7 which was promulgated on 3-3-1948, claiming .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //