Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-11-1994
Reported in : AIR1994SC1918; JT1994(2)SC215; 1994(2)SCALE37; (1994)3SCC1; 2SCR644
..... , once again examined the relevant provisions of the constitution and the commission of inquiry act, 1952, and observed in paragraph 33 as under :in our country, there is, at the top, a central or the union government responsible to parliament, and there are, below it, state governments, responsible to the state legislatures, each functioning within the sphere of its own powers which are divided into ..... twenty seven voted against it. before announcing the result, however, the speaker announced that he had received a complaint against five independent m.l.as. in the ruling coalition alleging disqualification under the anti-defection law and that he was forthwith suspending their right to vote. this resulted in an uproar in the assembly. the session had to be adjourned. on ..... in various parts of the country resulting in considerable loss of lives and property. by an order dated december 10,1992 issued under section 3(1) of the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967 (37 of 1967), the government of india banned several alleged communal organisations including rss, vhp and bajrang dal.madhya pradesh:207. on december 8,1992, the governor of madhya ..... by the house of the people. provided also that in the case of the proclamation issued under clause (1) on the 11th day of may, 1987 with respect to the state of punjab, the reference in the first proviso to this clause to 'three years' shall be construed as a reference to 'five years'. (5) notwithstanding anything contained in clause (4), .....Tag this Judgment!