Court : Chhattisgarh
Decided on : Jul-13-2007
Reported in : 2007(3)MPHT86(CG)
..... is under article 226. such was the view taken by the allahabad high court in aidal singh v. karan singh : air1957all414 ) and by the punjab high court in raj kishan jain v. tulsi dass and barham dutt v. peoples' co-operative transport society ltd., new delhi and we are in ..... r. dwivedi, dy. labour commissioner, chhattisgarh area, raipur referred the following industrial dispute to the labour court under section 10 of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (act 14 of 1947).d;k jh mns';ke ,oa vu; 3 lwph layxu dks lsok i`dhdj.k os/k ,oa mfpr gs ;fn ugha ..... the high court by the constitution of india. accordingly, writ appeal under section 2(1) of the chhattisgarh high court appeal to division bench act, 2006 is maintainable and the right of appeal cannot be taken away from the appellant and any such attempt would amount to adversely affecting the ..... adhiniyam'). the said provisions of letters patent appeals was repealed by the chhattisgarh high court (appeal to division bench) act, 2006 (no. 1 of 2007) and by the same notification. chhattisgarh high court rules, 2005 came into force wherein the provision of appeal is provided under rule 2, which is as follows:2. appeal ..... be allowed.7.4. cost of the petition may also be given.4. before coming into force of the chhattisgarh high court (appeal to division bench) acts, 2006, the intra court appeals were being filed under the provisions of madhya pradesh uchcha nyayalaya (letters patent appeals sampati) adhiniyam, 1981 (hereinafter referred to .....Tag this Judgment!