Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the right to information act 2005 Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 1,187 results (0.032 seconds)

Jul 01 2008 (HC)

Public Information Officer, Chief Minister's Office, Civil Secretariat ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(4)AWC3574

..... observations in accordance with the provisions of the rules of 1999, sub-clause (xvii) of section 4(1)(b) and also sub-clause (2) of section 4 of the right to information act, 2005, which says that it shall be a constant endeavour of every public authority to take steps in accordance with the requirements of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of ..... appropriate action may be initiated or taken against the erring officers and also against the arbitrary and illegal orders.14. the supreme court even before the advent of the right to information act, 2005 had stressed upon the importance of transparency in administration and governance of the country and for that matter time and again has entertained writ petitions requiring the state to ..... more than rs. 1 lac from the chief minister discretionary fund, can be given to the information seeker or it is an information, which stands exempted under section 8(j) of the right to information act.(2) whether the chief information commissioner while considering the complaints under section 18 of the right to information act, 2005 is competent only to award the prescribed punishment, in case of failure of ..... provided, though it is not found to be exempted under the provisions of the act.2. right to information act. 2005 (referred to as the 'r.t.i. act') enacted by the parliament, received assent of the president on 15.6.2005, and which came into force w.e.f. 12.10.2005, is relatively a new legislation and, therefore, is having its teething problem giving .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2008 (HC)

Vikram Simon Vs. State Information Commissioner, U.P. State Informatio ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR2009All51; 2009(1)AWC70

..... in the case being case crime no. 457 of 2007 under section 452/506 ipc and has been confined to prison.2. the petitioner made an application under the right to information act, 2005 seeking information in respect of the following two questions:a. whether dr. r.s. upadhyaya has lodged an f.i.r. with the station house officer, highway, mathura against the petitioner ..... petitioner till date.6. so far as the first contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is concerned, we may only record that under section 8(h) of the right to information act, 2005 such information need not be disclosed as may impede tie process initiated as an f.i.r. for ready reference section 8(h) is quoted below:8. exemption from disclosure of ..... petitioner qua the place of his arrest in the facts of the case is squarely covered by section 8(h) and, therefore, we are satisfied that there is no right of the petitioner to ask for such information under the right to information act, 2005. the contention raised in that regard by the petitioner is rejected.9. so far as the payment of penalty for delayed ..... information is concerned, we only provide that the petitioner may make an application before the appellate authority along with a certified copy of this order and we request the appellate authority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 06 2009 (HC)

Nishit Sharma Vs. Vice-chancellor, Aligarh Muslim University and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2009(2)AWC1715

..... no. 601/adms.dated 2.2.2009prabhat sharma1/14 tar ka nagla,gurudwara road,aligarh-u.p.subject : seeking information underthe right to information act, 2005.reference to decision no. cic/sg/a/2008/00155/1315 dated 28.2.2009 received from the information commissioner on the appeal no. cic/sg/a/2008/00155 dated 1.10.2008 filed by you regarding percentage in ..... in general category had secured 47.75 marks.4. he also moved an application dated 6.10.2008 to the authority under the right to information act for being provided with complete details about the. admissions made in class xi in all the categories including waiting list and list of candidates selected in different categories.5 ..... -chancellor unregulated and absolutely capricious and lacks reason.19. furthermore, a perusal of annexure-1 to the supplementary rejoinder-affidavit, which is an information supplied by the assistant controller/cpio, (admission) under the right to information act regarding percentage in examination of last admission under alumni/old boys category was given cut-off marks of 35 % whereas the percentage in examination ..... of the aligarh muslim university.3. an application was moved by the father of the petitioner on 24.9.2008 under the right to information act regarding percentage of marks obtained by him in entrance examination. he was informed that the petitioner had obtained 39% marks in the combined entrance examination and that the last candidate, who had been granted admission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2011 (HC)

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... developed or used for industrial purpose. most of the land is in possession of the villagers, who are carrying on agriculture relating activities. an application was submitted under the right to information act, 2005 on 20.06.2011, seeking information about the industrial development in the acquired land of the village in question, which was replied by letter dated 11.07.2011. as per the ..... by the petitioners vide letter dated 25.2.2010 to the chief executive officer for exempting the petitioners' land from acquisition. information was also obtained under the right to information act 2005 and by letter dated 6.10.2010 the petitioners have been informed to the effect that out of 1.178 hectares of land of plot no. 407, only 0.778 has been proposed ..... which was with the state government, no reasonable person can form an opinion that there was need to dispense with the enquiry under section 5a of the act. under the right to information act, the petitioner was informed that the area of village roza yakubpur is included in tech zone-4, sector-2, sector 16, sector 16b, ichotech-12, ichotech-13 and ichotech-15. ..... information given by the public information officer (industries), no land has been allotted for industrial purpose in village ghori bacchera. a copy of the letter dated 11.07.2011 has been .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 29 2008 (HC)

Devendra Nath Tiwari Son of Sri Hari Krishna Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2865

..... includes the phrase 'in which the process of recruitment is initiated by appointing authority' and declaring the rules 4, 5, 6 and 20 of allahabad high court rules, right to information act 2005 as ultravires the constitution of india. in another writ petition no. 66816 of 2006 the petitioner has sought relief of mandamus directing the respondent to provide the benefit of ..... this court. however, so far as the relief claimed by the petitioners for declaration of rules 4, 5, 6 and 20 of allahabad high court rules and provisions of right of information act as ultravires, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner did not press the aforesaid relief, therefore, we need not to go into the merits of the aforesaid relief. thus, ..... section 33 of act no. 1 of 1996 to the petitioner and further directing the respondent to consider the petitioner under physically handicapped quota by providing reservation for physically disabled ..... not yet been identified by the state government. it is further stated that under the provisions of section 33 of persons with disabilities (equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act, 1995 (act no. 1 of 1996), the quota which shall be fixed for physically handicapped persons shall not be less than 3% of vacancies. it is further stated that .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2008 (HC)

Parashuram Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2008(3)AWC2668

..... of the panchayat members, and the no dues certificate filed by him.8. the tribunal found that the information furnished by the zila panchayat, allahabad dated 6.2.2006 under (the) right to information act, 2005 established that shri parashuram shukla was a defaulter of 'tehbazari' dues of rs. 63,000. apart from this ..... shri parashuram shukla is entered as a defaulter of rs. 63,000 of 'tehbazari', on form no. 29. this information was given to the election-petitioner under (the) right to information act, 2005. the amount due is of the years 1996-97 and 1997-98. paper 7c was an objection filed on 5. ..... 10.2005 against the nomination of the petitioner shri parashuram before the election officer. paper no. 45c was the register ..... filed alongwith the affidavits of shri rakesh kumar varma, law munsarim, zila panchayat, allahabad also enclosed the certificate on form 29 which certified the information dated 6.2.2006, to the effect that shri parashuram shukla is a defaulter.7. on his part shri parashuram shukla filed his affidavit and ..... that the documents forming the acts or records of the acts of public officers are public documents. section 76 provides that every public officer having the custody of a public document which any person has a right to inspect shall give that person a copy of it together with the certificate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2009 (HC)

Vikas Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC104

..... ) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring rules 4, 5, 6 and 20 of the allahabad high court rules (right to information act, 2005) as ultra vires the constitution of india and the right to information act, 2005.(vii) issue any other suitable writ, order or direction, as this hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of ..... writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 4.5.2009 (annexure-8 to this writ petition) issued by the joint registrar (e)/central public information officer, high court, allahabad.(iii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent to provide only 50% of reservation out of the total advertised ..... been filed. we are also not aware whether as per the abovesaid order the minister for law and justice of the concerned state has been informed about the progress in the selections or not. let the requisite information be filed on affidavit within a period of four weeks from today.i.a. no. 35 has been filed by the allahabad high court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2011 (HC)

Sukh Lal Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... for 14 days. the petitioner's vehicle was also claimed to be attached from 2nd march, 2006. the petitioner made an application under the right to information act, 2005 enquiring details of outstanding amount in his loan amount. he was informed by letter dated 18th august, 2010 that total due till 31st august, 2010 is rs.4,44,004/-. the branch of respondent no.4 ..... sent a letter dated 20th october, 2010 to tahsildar/sub divisional officer, tahsil bara, allahabad informing that defaulters who are covered by proceedings under section 95 ..... additional district judge, banda and others reported in a.i.r. 1994 (allahabad) 298. (iv)even in proceedings of recovery under section 95-a of the 1965 act, the petitioner has to be informed of the dues and without giving any opportunity of hearing recovery certificate cannot be sent by the registrar under section 95-a. reliance has been placed on the ..... deed is void has no substance. 27. the next submission of counsel for the petitioners is that even in the proceedings under section 95-a of the 1965 act, the petitioners have to be informed of the dues. he has placed reliance on a division bench judgment of this court in the case of m/s. ram narain himmat ram and another .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 2006 (HC)

Praveen Verma, son of Sri Triloki Nath Srivastava Vs. the Hon'ble High ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2986

..... act, 2005, which reads:6. request for obtaining information -(1) a person, who desires to obtain any information under this act, shall make a request in writing or through electronic means ..... ii of the said act, 2005 has to be read along with section 6 of the said ..... that said decision was rendered before promulgation of 'right to information act, 2005'. aforesaid case was with respect to 'election matter'. apex court has no where laid down that in case a person possesses right to information, it has to be furnished without asking for it.12. law has now been codified with the enactment of 'right to information act, 2005.' however, 'right to information' under sections 3 and 4 of chapter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 21 2010 (HC)

Dr. Kalp Nath Chaubey Vs. Information Commissioner, Central Informatio ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2010(2)AWC2087(1)

..... , which has arisen in the present case, is as to whether the central information commissioner has rightly invoked the power under section 20 of the right to information act, 2005 for imposing penalty. section 20 of the right to information act, 2005 is quoted below:20. penalties.--(1) where the central information commission or the state informationer commissioner, as the case may be, at the ..... was working on the post of lab assistant in the same college and was also president of shikshanettar karmchari parishad, satish chandra degree college, ballia sought certain informations under the right to information act, 2005 vide his application dated 8th april, 2009 (annexure-1 to the writ petition). the said application was forwarded by letter dated 14th april, 2009 of ..... quashing the order dated 16th december, 2009 by which penalty of rs. 25,000 has been imposed upon the petitioner as deemed public information officer/principal under section 20 (1) of the right to information act, 2005.4. the petitioner's case in the writ petition is that petitioner was working as principal, satish chandra degree college, ballia from march ..... which the opinion/conclusions are formulated. we are of the view that the opinion as contemplated under section 20(1) of the right to information act, 2005 for imposing penalty has not been formulated by the central information commissioner.16. an authority, when exercises power to impose penalty, is bound to give reasons for conclusion. merely repeating the words .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //