Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the textile undertakings nationalisation laws amendment and validation act 2014 Page 1 of about 15 results (0.026 seconds)

Nov 28 2018 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Nareshkumar Badrikumar Jagad .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... filed contempt petition for initiating appropriate action against the appellant ntc. during the pendency of the review petition, an ordinance was promulgated titled as the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014 which later on became the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) act, 2014 (for short validation act 2014 ), as a result of which the union of india has filed an application for urging additional grounds in the review petition. as the issues to ..... to the provisions of this act, as amended by the textile undertakings laws (amendment and validation) act, 2014, shall be deemed to be null and void and notwithstanding such transfer, continue to vest in the national textile corporation under this act. . (nationalisation) 8.(1) the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014 is hereby repealed. (2) notwithstanding the repeal of the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014, anything done or any action taken under the principal acts as amended by the said ordinance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2018 (SC)

National Textile Corp. Ltd. Vs. Nareshkumar Badrikumar Jagad .

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... filed contempt petition for initiating appropriate action against the appellant ntc. during the pendency of the review petition, an ordinance was promulgated titled as the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014 which later on became the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) act, 2014 (for short validation act 2014 ), as a result of which the union of india has filed an application for urging additional grounds in the review petition. as the issues to ..... to the provisions of this act, as amended by the textile undertakings laws (amendment and validation) act, 2014, shall be deemed to be null and void and notwithstanding such transfer, continue to vest in the national textile corporation under this act. . (nationalisation) 8.(1) the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014 is hereby repealed. (2) notwithstanding the repeal of the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014, anything done or any action taken under the principal acts as amended by the said ordinance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2018 (SC)

Nareshkumar Badrikumar Jagad and Ors. Vs. O P Singh and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... filed contempt petition for initiating appropriate action against the appellant ntc. during the pendency of the review petition, an ordinance was promulgated titled as the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014 which later on became the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) act, 2014 (for short validation act 2014 ), as a result of which the union of india has filed an application for urging additional grounds in the review petition. as the issues to ..... to the provisions of this act, as amended by the textile undertakings laws (amendment and validation) act, 2014, shall be deemed to be null and void and notwithstanding such transfer, continue to vest in the national textile corporation under this act. . (nationalisation) 8.(1) the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014 is hereby repealed. (2) notwithstanding the repeal of the textile undertakings (nationalisation) laws (amendment and validation) ordinance, 2014, anything done or any action taken under the principal acts as amended by the said ordinance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1982 (SC)

Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC239; 1982(2)SCALE1193; (1983)1SCC147; [1983]1SCR1000

..... section 4 of the constitution forty-second amendment act. an objection was raised before the court by the learned attorney general ..... had been enacted before the constitution forty-second amendment act, 1976. yet, counsel successfully persuaded the court to go into the question of the validity of ..... validity of section 4 of the constitutional forty-second amendment act, 1976 arose for consideration in the case, firstly, because the immunity from attack given to a law giving effect to the policy of the state towards securing the principles specified in clause (b) or clause (c) of article 39 was given by the constitution twenty-fifth amendment act 1971 itself and secondly because the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2009 (HC)

Jindal Vijayanagar Steels Ltd., Now Known as Jsw Steel Ltd. Rep. by It ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2009(4)KCCR2566(D.B)

..... section 4 of the constitution (forty-second amendment) act. an objection was raised before the court by the learned attorney-general ..... had been enacted before the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976. yet, counsel successfully persuaded the court to go into the question of the validity of ..... validity of section 4 of the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976 arose for consideration in the case, firstly, because the immunity from attack given to a law giving effect to the policy of the state towards securing the principles specified in clause (b) or clause (c) of article 39 was given by the constitution (twenty-fifth amendment) act, 1971 itself and secondly because the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 1980 (HC)

Benaras Electric Light and Power Co. Ltd. Vs. U.P. State Electricity B ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : [1983]53CompCas597(Cal)

..... asked for. 7. mr. d. p. gupta, appearing with mr. ramen mitra, for the respondent board, submitted that the word ' undertaking' includes the bookdebts on the date of vesting. he referred to section 7a as amended by the u.p. (amendment & validation) act, 1975, sub-section (5)(f), where it has been laid down in provisions for the determination of the amount payable to ..... saradindu gupta on the 23rd of may, 1080, wherein it has been recorded that the valuation of the undertaking of the company (in liquidation) would be made under the provisions of the indian electricity act, 1910, as amended by the indian electricity u.p. (amendment & validation) act, 1975, and the board and the company would do everything in their power to expedite the completion of ..... as it has been done in other cases like the mrtp act, the coal nationalisation act, the sick textile nationalisation act, etc. this is a sort of confiscation of the properties under the said electricity act and the u. p. amendment and it has to be very strictly construed and, in my view, the word ' undertaking ' can in no way include the book debts being the arrears of ..... 4. it now appears that the amount payable to the company (in liquidation) has not yet been fixed by the special officer under the u.p. electricity (amendment & validation) act, 1975, read with the amendment act, 1974. 5. now, the whole question in this application is whether the board is liable to pay the said arrears of electricity charges collected by it, after the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2001 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Elphinstone Spinning and Weaving Co. Ltd. and ors. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2001SC724; JT2001(1)SC536; 2001(1)SCALE157; (2001)4SCC139; [2001]1SCR221; 2001(1)LC496(SC)

..... the constitution ivth amendment act of 1955 which enables to make law for taking over of the management of any property by the state for a limited period either in the public interest or in order to secure proper management of the same. the law made by the parliament is the textiles undertakings (taking over of management) act, 1983. the said law permits take over ..... is the natural inference and the preamble read as a whole would indicate that the parliament thought it appropriate to take over the management of textile undertakings in the public interest pending nationalisation of such undertaking and in this view of the matter the high court was hyper-technical in recording a finding that even though the financial condition become wholly ..... petitions in bombay high court challenging the applicability of the ordinance so far as those mills are concerned. after replacement of the ordinance by the act the writ petitions were amended and thus the validity of the act was challenged qua the three writ petitioners. though the challenge was on three counts, namely, violation of article 14, violation of article 19(1 ..... that the high court was in error in basing its conclusion on the earlier affidavit of one mr. singh. according to learned solicitor general that while considering the constitutional validity of a statute, more particularly a statute on economic matter, certain well established principles evolved by the courts as rules of guidance in discharge of its constitutional function of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 09 1987 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd. and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1988(3)BomCR581a; (1987)89BOMLR485

..... of an order passed under the industries (development and regulation) act, 1951 taking over the management of the mills and the constitutional validity of the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1974. the two judges of the supreme court who heard the matter observed that constitutional amendments made after april 24, 1973, by which acts, or regulations were included in the ninth schedule, could be ..... article 31, the only provisions of part iii which would generally come into play on the question of validity of laws were articles 14 and 19.31. the act was introduced into the ninth schedule after april 24, 1973. the constitution amendment act by which it was so introduced must be tested to determine whether it is destructive of or damaging to ..... justification for making additions to the ninth schedule with a view to conferring a blanket protection on the laws included therein. the various constitutional amendments by which additions were made to the ninth schedule on or after april 24, 1973, would be valid, only if they did not damage to destroy the basic structure of the constitution. referring to ..... four corners of article 19(2). the supreme court noted that the press was not immune from the ordinary forms of taxation, nor from the application of general laws relating to industrial relations. the legislation imposed reasonable restrictions on the fundamental right in the interests of persons employed in newspaper establishments and therefore, fell outside the categories .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 14 1989 (HC)

Unni Mammu Haji Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (1989)IILLJ493Ker

..... the words 'the principles specified in clause (b) or clause (c) of article 39'. the validity of section 4 of the 42nd amendment act was considered by a constitution bench of the supreme court in minerva mills' case 1980(3) scc 625 where the constitutional validity of the sick textiles undertakings (nationalisation) act, 1974 was in question. chandrachud, c j. for himself and on behalf of gupta. untwalia ..... source of authority for the two statutes being different, article 14 can have no application.this decision was followed by the supreme court in a recent decision on the validity of different state laws relating to court fees reported in p.m. ashwathanarayana setty v. state of karnataka : air1989sc100 . following the mandawar's case, (supra) it is stated at page 120:but ..... such policy. in kesavananda bharati's case the majority of judges held that article 31c is valid except as regards its latter part precluding challenge in cases where law contains a declaration that it is for implementation of the directives in clause (b) or (c) of article 39. it is clear from the ..... effect to the policy of the state towards securing the directives in clause (b) or (c) of article 39 of the constitution. the article contained also a provision that no law containing a declaration that it is for giving effect to such policy shall be called in question in any court on the ground that it does not give effect to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 1984 (HC)

Doctors' Sahkari Grah Nirman Samiti Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Avas Avam Vikas ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1984All234

..... validity of section 4 of the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976 arose for consideration in the case, firstly, because the immunity from attack given to a law giving effect to the policy of the state towards securing the principles specified in clause (b) or clause (c) of article 39 was given by the constitution (twenty-fifth amendment) act, 1971 itself and secondly, because the sick textile undertakings (nationalisation) act ..... had been enacted before the constitution (forty-second amendment) act, 1976.'the supreme court also expressed its doubts ..... iv of the constitution did not properly arise for consideration, held that inasmuch as the law validity whereof had been questioned in that case had been enacted prior to the amendment made in article 31c of the constitution by constitution (forty-second amendment) act no question of testing its validity on the footing that it effectuated the directive principles other than those contained in article 39 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //