Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade marks Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 183,435 results (0.158 seconds)

Jan 05 2018 (HC)

Ragini Shrivastava Vs. Jharkhand Academic Council,ran

Court : Jharkhand

..... remedy as it depends on facts of each and every case. view of this court gets fortified by the decision rendered in the case of whirlpool corporation vs. registrar of trade marks, mumbai & ors as reported in air1999sc22 wherein the hon'ble court has enunciated that alternative remedy is not an absolute bar and a writ court can exercise judicial review under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 2017 (HC)

Krishna Prasad Shah Vs. Human Resources Department

Court : Jharkhand

..... increment with or without cumulative effect and, therefore, it would be a minor penalty only. the learned state counsel has relied on decision in whirlpool corporation vs. 5 registrar of trade marks, mumbai and others reported in (1998) 8 scc 1.6. in his dissenting opinion lord denning m.r., in breen vs. amalgamated engineering union reported in (1971) 1 all er ..... the petitioner. one of the charges is unauthorized absence on a saturday. explanation offered by the petitioner was that in the closing hours he had left the school for submitting marks sheet and attendance of the students in the office of jharkhand academic council at daltonganj. the petitioner has pleaded that mid day meal for the students in the school is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2017 (HC)

Sanjay Danchand Ghodawat Vs. Additional Commissioner of Customs (Port) ...

Court : Kolkata

..... by a statute which gives a special remedy for enforcing it, the remedy provided by that statute must be availed of. in the case of whirlpool corporation-vs.-registrar of trade marks, (1998) 8 scc1 the apex court observed that under art. 226 of the constitution of india, the high court having regard to the facts of a case, has a discretion ..... ,653/- stating that the petitioner was approaching the settlement commission. on 14 february, 2013 the addl. director, dri addressed a letter to the commissioner of customs (port).with a copy marked to the petitioner, enclosing the said two bank drafts and copy of the petitioner s letter dated 11 february, 2013. (10) on 8 march, 2013 the petitioner addressed a letter .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2017 (HC)

M/S Banwarilal Goel and Sons and Ors. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Kolkata

..... the proposition of law that the writ court can entertain the writ petition if the case is made out to the exception laid down in whirlpool corporation versus registrar of trade marks reported in (1998) 8 scc1 the apex court in the said report held that it would be a sound exercise of discretion to refuse the interference under article 226 of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2017 (HC)

Nandu K. Belani and Ors. Vs. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors ...

Court : Kolkata

..... the order of the original authority when the remedy by way of an appeal is provided in the statute unless the exceptions carved out in whirlpool corporation versus registrar of trade marks, mumbai & ors.reported in (1998) 8 scc1is made out. the apex court in the said report held that it would be a sound exercise of discretion to refuse the interference .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 2017 (HC)

Rajat Agarwal and Anr. Vs. Quadrific Media Pvt Ltd and Anr.

Court : Kolkata

..... in both the suits are similar and/or identical. the core issue is the assertion of right by the parties over and in relation to the trade mark, trade dress relating to spartanpoker , the logo spartanpoker and the domain name spartanpoker.com . although the plaintiff has filed an application under section 10 of ..... nos.1 and 2 are evading and/or threatening to evade the plaintiffs right or enjoyment over the property by threatening to use the trade name and trade mark of the plaintiff containing the word spartan in connection with the online business. it is alleged that the defendant nos.1 and 2 ..... of the suits would have followed. although mr.bachawat has submitted that the suit in the alipore court is not a suit for infringement of trade mark or copyright and accordingly the district judge would not be the appropriate court for institution of the said proceeding, but even assuming that the plaintiffs ..... suit has various dimensions. one of the common issues that the court would be required to decide is the right of quadrific to use the trade mark spartan to the exclusion of all others.if ultimately it is contended and held that the defendant no.7 is in reality a partnership and ..... on 4th december, 2016 the plaintiff had published a website making defamatory statement against the defendant no.7 and threatened to commence business under the mark spartanpoker . the plaintiff no.1 despite being a director of the defendant no.7 had filed objections before the trademark registry objecting to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 23 2017 (HC)

Bengal Waterproof Limited Vs. Bengal Rubber Company Limited and Others

Court : Kolkata

..... the registered user agreement dated 25th february 2008 dated or the alleged supplementary registered user agreement dated 25th march 2008 and to claim any ownership in respect of the trade mark duckback in any manner whatsoever. however, this order will shall not affect any pending proceedings between the parties or any order passed in such proceedings. affidavit-in- ..... effect to or taking steps in pursuance of the orders dated 21st october, 2014 and 22nd october, 2014 passed by the respondent no.1 in relation to the trade mark registration nos.1515089 and 1515090 respectively. mr.mitra accordingly has prayed for an order of injunction restraining the respondents to act in derogation of clause 10 of the ..... passed on 13th april 2011, justice defendant sanjib meaning surrendering the banerjee thereby bihar registered user further restrained rubber company agreement in the third limited relation from to the trade mark duckback and bengal waterproof limited was restrained from terminating such registered user defendant, bihar rubber company limited. agreement of the third both the interlocutory applications were disposed of ..... mr.s.k. kanodia, advocate ms.sananda mukhopadhyay, advocate ...for respondent nos.2, 5, 6, 7 and 8. the plaintiff has filed this action for infringement of the trade mark duckback . the plaintiff is a pioneer in manufacturing waterproof products like gumboots, raincoats, rubber cloths and the like. the plaintiff was established in the year 1920 by renowned bose .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 2017 (HC)

Skipper Limited Vs. Akash Bansal and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... that no man is entitled so to describe his goods as to represent that the goods are the goods of another, there is no exception . [see: kerly s law of trade marks and trade names, 15th edition]. this view was approved in parker-knoll v. knoll international (1962) r.p.c. 265, at 279 in most of the cases relied upon by the ..... of passing-off . action are the reputation of goods, possibility of deception and likelihood of damages to the plaintiff. in our opinion, the same principle, which applies to trade mark, is applicable to trade name.13. in an action for passing off it is usual, rather essential, to seek an injunction temporary or ad-interim. the principles for the grant of such injunction ..... the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, the time of production of goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of goods or service; 4. the trade mark where it is necessary to indicate the intended purpose of a product or service, in particular as accessories or spare parts. provided he uses them in accordance with honest practice ..... se or in conjunction with skipper . either as prefix or suffix on the strength that the petitioner has been manufacturing, selling and marketing metal pipes manufactures under the trade mark bansal . with the mark skipper . suffix thereto from 1981 without any interruption. the said claim is resisted by the defendants on the ground that the defendant nos.1 to 4 are all having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2017 (HC)

Telco Transport Companies Association Through Tis Executive officer N ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (l) no. 506 of 2016 ------- tata motors limited, previously known as tata engineering and locomotive company limited) a company registered under companies act, having its registered office at 24 homi mody street, fort mumbai and its works at jamshedpur,p.o. and p.s. telco, district singhbhum east, through its authorized signatory dgm legal services rajesh kumar das, son of late p.n. das, resident of c/15, vivekanand road, po- baridih, ps sidhgora, town jamshedpur, district- east singhbhum, jharkhand ... petitioner versus 1.the regional provident fund commissioner, jamshedpur, sub regional office, jamshedpur, p.o. mango p.s. mango district singhbhum east 2.telco transport companies association, jamshedpur,p.o. & p.s. telco district singhbhum east throgh its chief executive officer 3.m/s b.m. transport through its manager, mr. jagdish singh son of late charan singh, resident of shop no. e sector market, telco colony, p.s. telco, dist. east singhbhum 4.m/s a.p. transport company through its manager mr. chatubhuj shukla son of uma shankar shukla, resident of 102 radhika nagar near radha krishna mandir, telco colony, p.s. telco district east singhbhum 5.m/s bhaskar transport pvt. ltd. through its manager, mr. p.s. shukla son of late l.d. shukla resident of new rani kudar, house no. 75, p.o. kadma, p.s. & district east singhbhum 6.m/s canara motors through its manager, md. nehaluddin khan son of late murtuza khan, resident of eastbhum .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 04 2017 (HC)

Tata Motors Limited Through Its Authorized Signatory Dgm Legal Service ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (l) no. 506 of 2016 ------- tata motors limited, previously known as tata engineering and locomotive company limited) a company registered under companies act, having its registered office at 24 homi mody street, fort mumbai and its works at jamshedpur,p.o. and p.s. telco, district singhbhum east, through its authorized signatory dgm legal services rajesh kumar das, son of late p.n. das, resident of c/15, vivekanand road, po- baridih, ps sidhgora, town jamshedpur, district- east singhbhum, jharkhand ... petitioner versus 1.the regional provident fund commissioner, jamshedpur, sub regional office, jamshedpur, p.o. mango p.s. mango district singhbhum east 2.telco transport companies association, jamshedpur,p.o. & p.s. telco district singhbhum east throgh its chief executive officer 3.m/s b.m. transport through its manager, mr. jagdish singh son of late charan singh, resident of shop no. e sector market, telco colony, p.s. telco, dist. east singhbhum 4.m/s a.p. transport company through its manager mr. chatubhuj shukla son of uma shankar shukla, resident of 102 radhika nagar near radha krishna mandir, telco colony, p.s. telco district east singhbhum 5.m/s bhaskar transport pvt. ltd. through its manager, mr. p.s. shukla son of late l.d. shukla resident of new rani kudar, house no. 75, p.o. kadma, p.s. & district east singhbhum 6.m/s canara motors through its manager, md. nehaluddin khan son of late murtuza khan, resident of eastbhum .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //