Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: trade marks Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 194,120 results (0.185 seconds)

Feb 14 2020 (SC)

Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... to entertain or not to en tertain a writ petition. the court has imposed upon itself certain restrictions in the exercise of this power. (see whirlpool corpn. v. registrar of trade marks [(1998) 8 scc1 .) and this plenary right of the high court to issue a prerogative writ will not normally be exercised by the court to the exclusion of other available .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Tusaj Lifestyle Pvt Ltd vs.skb Food Products Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

..... restaurant or package food items or from using yum yum tree or any other trademark identical or deceptively similar, phonetically or visually, with or without prefix or suffix to the trade mark of the respondent and from passing of their business. fao. 325/2016 page 1 of 4 2. appellant is also aggrieved by order dated 09.06.2016 whereby the review .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2019 (HC)

M/S b.e.c. Industries vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

..... petitioners assure the court that the order passed today shall be communicated to the associations mentioned above. a notice shall be put up on the website of the trade marks registry for inviting suggestions from practitioners and other stakeholders so that the various technical problems and procedural issues faced can also be submitted online to the ld. controller ..... above shows that, currently, all the trademark applications filed in the five different offices at ahmedabad, bombay, calcutta, chennai and delhi are all initially transmitted to the trade marks registry in mumbai, from where the publication takes place and thereafter the application proceeds for registration, if there is no opposition. however, whenever there are objections raised by ..... as renewals, assignments, etc. are concerned, whether the same should be dealt with by a separate department and if so whether post registration formalities of specific registered trade marks ought to be handled by a single officer.7. the above be placed in the form of an affidavit so that this court may consider passing appropriate directions for ..... acceptance of fee, allocation of application number, examination and generation of examination report, acceptance of responses, hearings held, if any, orders passed on the said files, grant of trade mark registration certificates, change of address, change of name, processing of licences and assignments, renewal notices, etc. and whether they are dealt with by one officer or by different .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2019 (HC)

Asianet Star Communications Pvt Ltd. Vs.the Registrar of Trademarks & ...

Court : Delhi

..... petitioners assure the court that the order passed today shall be communicated to the associations mentioned above. a notice shall be put up on the website of the trade marks registry for inviting suggestions from practitioners and other stakeholders so that the various technical problems and procedural issues faced can also be submitted online to the ld. controller ..... above shows that, currently, all the trademark applications filed in the five different offices at ahmedabad, bombay, calcutta, chennai and delhi are all initially transmitted to the trade marks registry in mumbai, from where the publication takes place and thereafter the application proceeds for registration, if there is no opposition. however, whenever there are objections raised by ..... as renewals, assignments, etc. are concerned, whether the same should be dealt with by a separate department and if so whether post registration formalities of specific registered trade marks ought to be handled by a single officer.7. the above be placed in the form of an affidavit so that this court may consider passing appropriate directions for ..... acceptance of fee, allocation of application number, examination and generation of examination report, acceptance of responses, hearings held, if any, orders passed on the said files, grant of trade mark registration certificates, change of address, change of name, processing of licences and assignments, renewal notices, etc. and whether they are dealt with by one officer or by different .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 2019 (HC)

Kishore Kumar vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

..... petitioners assure the court that the order passed today shall be communicated to the associations mentioned above. a notice shall be put up on the website of the trade marks registry for inviting suggestions from practitioners and other stakeholders so that the various technical problems and procedural issues faced can also be submitted online to the ld. controller ..... above shows that, currently, all the trademark applications filed in the five different offices at ahmedabad, bombay, calcutta, chennai and delhi are all initially transmitted to the trade marks registry in mumbai, from where the publication takes place and thereafter the application proceeds for registration, if there is no opposition. however, whenever there are objections raised by ..... as renewals, assignments, etc. are concerned, whether the same should be dealt with by a separate department and if so whether post registration formalities of specific registered trade marks ought to be handled by a single officer.7. the above be placed in the form of an affidavit so that this court may consider passing appropriate directions for ..... acceptance of fee, allocation of application number, examination and generation of examination report, acceptance of responses, hearings held, if any, orders passed on the said files, grant of trade mark registration certificates, change of address, change of name, processing of licences and assignments, renewal notices, etc. and whether they are dealt with by one officer or by different .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2019 (HC)

Sunil Mittal & Anr. Vs.anup Gupta & Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... .2019 the plaintiffs have sued the two defendants namely (i) anup gupta; and, (ii) m/s. da darzee inter alia for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from infringing the trade mark the darzi of the plaintiff and from passing off their tailoring services and tailored goods as that of the plaintiffs by using the word da darzee.2. as per the ..... case of the plaintiffs, the mark of the defendants is dzines auf darzee (da darzee). no injunction restraining the defendants from using the said mark has been claimed.3. i have enquired from the counsel for the plaintiffs, whether the plaintiffs have no objection to the ..... defendants using the mark dzines auf darzee (da darzee), registration whereof has also been applied cs(comm) 645/2019 page 1 of 2 for by the defendants.4. the counsel for the plaintiffs states .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2019 (HC)

Siddhant Choudhary vs.toasha Agencies & Anr

Court : Delhi

..... the suit. for disposal of the present appeal, suffice it is to say:-"fao (os) (comm) 264/2019 page 1 of 3 (a) the appellant (original defendant) has got registered trade mark toasha . (b) the said registration was given by the competent authorities in favour of the defendant on 29.06.2011. (c) the respondent (original plaintiff) has already preferred an application ..... for rectification under section 47 to be read with section 57 of the trade marks act, 1999 further read with rule 92 of the trade mark rules, 2017 and the same is pending before the concerned authorities since june, 2016. (d) thus, it appears that there is a registered ..... trade mark namely toasha in favour of this appellant (original defendant) and rectification preferred by the respondent (original plaintiff) is pending before the registrar of trade marks, as stated hereinabove. these facts constitute a prima facie case in favour of this appellant (original defendant).3. looking .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2019 (HC)

Arun Chopra vs.kaka-ka Dhaba Pvt Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

..... supra analyzed by me in the earlier judgment dated 4th december, 2017 in this suit, held that the plea with regard to invalidity of registration of trade mark can be deemed to have been abandoned on non-filing of an application for rectification, after order under section 124 of the act. it follows ..... by the plaintiff without this court pronouncing on the prima facie tenability of the plea of the plaintiff as to invalidity of the registration of the trade mark of the defendants. xxxx xxxx xxxx 28. the counsel for the plaintiff draws attention to section 57(2) of the act which entitles any ..... no such proceedings are pending and the court is satisfied that the plea regarding the invalidity of the registration of the plaintiff s or defendant s trade mark is prima facie tenable, raise an issue regarding the same and adjourn the case for a period of three months from the date of the framing ..... defendant raises a defence under clause (e) of sub-section (2) of section 30 and the plaintiff pleads the invalidity of registration of the defendant s trade mark, the court trying the suit (hereinafter referred to as the court), shall, (i) if any proceedings for rectification of the register in relation to the ..... cs (comm) 728/2018 judgment1 this is an application by the plaintiff for stay of the proceedings in the present suit under section 124 of the trade marks act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the act ). facts 2. the plaintiff has filed the present suit on 06.03.2014 alleging infringement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2019 (HC)

Steelcase Inc. Vs.mr.k.j. Bhuta and Anr.

Court : Delhi

..... , which would thus have the consequence of prejudicing defendant no.1, as it may deprive them of the defence under section 34 of the trade marks act, 1999. mr.kirpekar drew my attention to the contents of the application to submit that the plaintiff has not disclosed any justification for ..... publicity and excellent quality of the goods sold thereunder, the mark 'steelcase' of the plaintiff has acquired tremendous reputation and goodwill amongst the purchasing public and the members of the trade such that the use of the same or similar trade mark by any other person is bound to cause confusion and deception ..... global registrations, long use, vast publicity and excellent quality of goods to support its case of tremendous reputation and goodwill among the public and the trade. the averments sought to be incorporated in paragraphs 11 & 12 elaborate the position taken in the plaint, and are therefore permissible. c. the ..... would add the following averments at the end of paragraph 10:-"this subsidiary, to the year 1965. prior the plaintiff has been using the mark 'steelcase' in india since about the incorporation of the plaintiff was exporting and selling its steelcase branded goods to india through its parent company. ..... as to the source of the product and/or imply a false association with the plaintiff and/or its goods under the said mark. xxxx xxxx xxxx .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2019 (HC)

M/S Bhagwan Das Khanna Jewellers Pvt Ltd vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... said order reads as under: accordingly, the prayers made in ia no.6779/2008 are allowed and the defendants are restrained from using, depicting, displaying in any manner whatsoever, the trade mark/trade name bhagwan das khanna bdk or similar variant thereof on any showroom display boards, packaging, advertising material, labels, stationery articles, business cards, or any other manner as used in course ..... w.p. (c) 7851/2011 page 3 of 6 is in the operative portion of the order, in terms whereof there is a restraint order against use of the trade mark and the trade name by the appellant of ?. bhagwan dass khanna?. and ?.bdk?. or similar variant thereof. his plea is that the expression?. similar variant?. should not imply that the appellant is ..... orders are called for in this petition.10. accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, leaving the parties to urge their contentions on merits in respect of the name and mark in the pending civil suit or in appropriate proceedings. ld. counsel for respondent w.p. (c) 7851/2011 page 5 of 6 no.3 submits that his client may avail .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //