Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 1 of about 725,730 results (1.772 seconds)

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Subrato Sengupta Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Superintendent of ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b. a. no. 2663 of 2017 subrato sengupta petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through superintendent of police, eow r. c.b.i,ranchi opposite party coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh for the petitioner: ms. shruti shrestha, advocate for the c.b.i : mr. kailash prasad deo, s.c c.a.v on: 06/11/2017 pronounced on: 18/11/2017 1. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with r.c. 10(s) 2014 eow r for the offence initially registered under sections 120 (b), r/w 420, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code on the basis of complaint lodged by shri neeraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector iv, bokaro steel city 827004 addressed to one s.k. khare, superintendent of police/ c.b.i, eow, ranchi alleging as follows: (i.) that state bank of india, sme branch, ranchi has given loan to m/s shirdi sai technopacks, located at demotand, district hazaribagh. (ii) it is further alleged that the company was promoted by sri vivek pratap singh, sri birendra kumar and its banking relationship with state bank of india started at commercial branch, bokaro (sme branch, bokaro). (iii) it is further alleged that the loan was sanctioned to the above named unit on 22.08.2009 but subsequently declared n.p.a on 28.11.2011 and since there was no recovery in the loan account to the tune of rs. 4.89 crores plus accrued interest calculated till july, 2013 and as such the matter was transferred to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Vivek Pratap Singh Vs. The Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b. a. no. 3300 of 2016 vivek pratap singh petitioner versus the central bureau of investigation opposite party coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh for the petitioner: mr. yogesh modi, advocate for the c.b.i : mr. kailash prasad deo, s.c c.a.v on: 06/11/2017 pronounced on: 18/11/2017 1. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with cbi/eow/ranchi p.s. case no. r.c. 08(s) of 2014 eow r for the offence initially registered under sections 120 (b), r/w 420, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code on the basis of complaint lodged by shri neeraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector iv, bokaro steel city 827004 addressed to one s.k. khare, superintendent of police/ c.b.i, eow, ranchi alleging therein that: (i.) that state bank of india, sme branch, ranchi has given loan to m/s renuka polysacks pvt. ltd, located at demotand, district hazaribagh. (ii) it is further alleged that the company was promoted by sri vivek pratap singh, and sri birendra kumar and smt. smt. renuka singh and its banking relationship with state bank of india started at commercial branch, ranchi (sme branch, ranchi). subsequently, at the request of the borrower, the account was transferrd to sme branch, bokaro as such the present branch i.e. sme bokaro has filed the complaint in this regard. (iii) it is further alleged that the loan was sanctioned to the above named unit on 20.08.2005 but subsequently, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Kumar Rashmirathee Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through C B I

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b. a. no. 3674 of 2016 kumar rashmirathee singh petitioner versus the union of india through c.b.i opposite party coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh for the petitioner: mrs. j. majumdar, advocate for the c.b.i : mr. kailash prasad deo, s.c. c.a.v on: 06/11/2017 pronounced on: 18/11/2017 1. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with r.c. case no. 8(s)/ 2014 eow for the offence initially registered under sections 120 (b), r/w 420, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code on the basis of complaint lodged by shri neeraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector iv, bokaro steel city 827004 addressed to one s.k. khare, superintendent of police/ c.b.i, eow, ranchi alleging therein ; (i.) that state bank of india, sme branch, ranchi has given loan to m/s renuka polysacks pvt ltd, located at demotand, district hazaribagh. (ii) it is further alleged that the company was promoted by sri vivek pratap singh, uday pratap singh, and smt. renuka singh and its banking relationship with state bank of india started at commercial branch, ranchi (sme branch, ranchi). subsequently, at the request of the borrower, the account was transferred to sme branch, bokaro. as such the present branch sme branch has filed the said complaint. (iii) it is further alleged that the loan was sanctioned to the above named unit on 20.08.2005 but subsequently, declared n.p.a on 28.11.2011 and since there was no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Birendra Kumar Alias Virender Kumar Vs. The Central Bureau of Investig ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b. a. no. 1438 of 2017 birendra kumar @ virendra kumar petitioner versus the central bureau of investigation opposite party coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh for the petitioner: mr. yogesh modi, advocate for the c.b.i : mr. kailash prasad deo, s.c c.a.v on: 06/11/2017 pronounced on: 18/11/2017 1. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with r.c. case no. 12(s) of 2014 eow r for the offence initially registered under sections 120 (b), r/w 420, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code on the basis of complaint lodged by shri neeraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector iv, bokaro steel city 827004 addressed to one s.k. khare, superintendent of police/ c.b.i, eow, ranchi alleging therein that: (i.) that state bank of india, sme branch, ranchi has given loan to m/s balaji food and masala co. located at hazaribagh, district hazaribagh. (ii) it is further alleged that the company was promoted by sri vivek pratap singh, uday pratap singh, and sri birendra kumar and its banking relationship with state bank of india started at commercial branch, bokaro (sme branch, bokaro). (iii) it is further alleged that the loan was sanctioned to the above named unit on 20.08.2006 but subsequently, declared n.p.a on 28.11.2011 and since there was no recovery in the loan account to the tune of rs. 2.59 crores plus accrued interest calculated till july, 2013 and as such the matter was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Dinesh Chand Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through C B I

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 4827 of 2016 dinesh chand petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through central bureau of investigation opposite party --------- coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh --------- for the petitioner : mr. pandey neeraj rai, advocate for the c.b.i : mr. k.p. deo, s.c. --------- c.a.v. on 23.08.2017 pronounced on 18/11/2017 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the c.b.i the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under sections 120b, 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code and section 13(2) read with section 13(1) (d) of the prevention of corruption act. the case of the prosecution is that one niraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector-iv, bokaro steel city, bokaro, duly authorized by the competent authority of the bank of lodge an f.i.r. that state bank of india, sme branch, bokaro steel city has given loan to shirdi sai technopacks pvt ltd. located at demotand, hazaribagh. the company was promoted by sri vivek pratap singh, resident of flat no.-403, 4th floor, maa durga apartment, hazaribagh and sri birendra kumar, resident of suresh colony, hazaribagh and its banking relationship with state bank of india started at commercial branch, bokaro. it is further alleged that the loan was sanctioned to the above mentioned unit on 22.08.2009 but subsequently declared n.p.a. on 28.11.2011 and since there was no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 18 2017 (HC)

Dinesh Chand Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 4832 of 2016 dinesh chand petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i opposite party --------- coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh --------- for the petitioner : mr. pandey neeraj rai, advocate for the c.b.i : mr. k.p. deo, s.c. --------- c.a.v. on 23.08.2017 pronounced on 18/11/2017 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the c.b.i the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under sections 120b, 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 of the indian penal code and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the prevention of corruption act. the case of the prosecution is that one niraj raja singh, chief manager, state bank of india, sme branch, city centre, sector-iv, bokaro steel city, bokaro, duly authorized by the competent authority of the bank of lodge an f.i.r. that state bank of india, sme branch, bokaro steel city has given loan to balaji laminator pvt ltd. located at demotand, hazaribagh. the unit was promoted by sri vivek pratap singh, resident of flat no.-403, 4th floor, maa durga apartment, hazaribagh and his brother sri vineet pratap singh and its banking relationship with state bank of india started at commercial branch, bokaro. it is further alleged that the loan was sanctioned to the above mentioned unit on 12.09.2006 but subsequently declared n.p.a. on 09.10.2011 and since there was no recovery in loan account to the tune of rs. 5.43 crores .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2017 (HC)

Maya Murmu and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court : Jharkhand

1 cr.m.p. no.824 of 2004 ----------- against order dated 17th april, 2004 passed by the learned sessions judge, seraikella-kharsawan in criminal revision no.04 of 2004. ----------- 1.maya murmu w/o karo murmu 2.minor laxmi murmu d/o karo murmu being minor represented through her mother and natural guardian maya murmu both residents of village-gamdesai, p.s. rajnagar, district seraikella-kharsawan . . . petitioners --versus-- 1.the state of jharkhand 2.karu @ dasrath murmu s/o moghai murmu resident of village-gamdesai, p.s. rajnagar, district-seraikella- kharsawan . . . opp. parties. for the petitioners : mrs. rashmi kumar, advocate mr. sachin mahato, advocate for the state : mr. tapas roy, a.p.p. for the o.p. no.2 : mr. a.k. sahani, advocate present hon ble mr. justice b.b.mangalmurti judgment1017.11.2017 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and o.p. no.2 as well as learned a.p.p. for the state.2. instant application has been filed for quashing/setting aside the order dated 17.04.2004 passed by the sessions judge, seraikella-kharsawan in cr. revision no.04 of 2004 wherein the court has held that the petitioner no.1-wife is not entitled for maintenance and order of grant of maintenance in her favour passed by the court of s.d.j.m., seraikella-kharsawan has been set aside. although, the maintenance amount ordered in favour of minor daughter laxmi murmu was found justified and the revision application was partly allowed and partly dismissed. aggrieved by the said order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2017 (HC)

Akbar Mian and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

1 criminal appeal (sj)no. 299 of 2003 (against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 5 th february, 2003, passed by the additional sessions judge, fast track court no.4, hazaribag in connection with s.t. no. 55 of 1994 corresponding to g.r. case no. 819 of 1987, barhi p.s. case no. 72 of 1987) 1. akbar mian s/o late sadique mian 2. raffique mian s/o late sadique mian 3. khalil mian s/o late hamid mian all r/o village tilir, p.s. barhi, district hazaribag ...... appellants vs. state of jharkhand ....... respondent present: hon'ble mr. justice ratnaker bhengra ---------- for the appellants :mr. bhaiya vishwajeet kumar, advocate for the respondent :mr. awnish shankar, a.p.p. cav on271.2017 delivered on ------- ---------- this criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 5 th february, 2003, passed by the additional sessions judge, fast track court no.4, hazaribag in connection with s.t. no. 55 of 1994 corresponding to g.r. case no. 819 of 1987, barhi p.s. case no. 72 of 1987, whereby the appellant nos. 1 & 2 have been sentenced to undergo r.i. for three years each for the offences punishable under section 452/34 ipc and six months each for the offence punishable u/s 323/34 ipc and appellant no. 3 sentenced to undergo r.i. for three years u/s 452 ipc and also sentenced to undergo r.i. for two years u/s 324 ipc and six months u/s 323 ipc. all the sentences were directed to run concurrently.2. the prosecution .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2017 (HC)

Krishna Deo Singh and Ors Vs. Jhari Devi and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi c.m.p. no. 119 of 2010 krishna deo singh and ors. ..petitioners versus jhari devi and ors. . opp. parties --------- coram: hon ble mr. justice amitav k. gupta ---------- for the petitioners : mr. vikash kumar, advocate for the opp. parties : mr. v.k. sharma, advocate ---------- 13/dated:17.11.2017 learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to take steps under order 5 rule 20 c.p.c., for substituted service of notice upon the legal heirs of deceased respondent no. 20(a), by publication of the notice in daily hindi newspaper in prabhat khahar (chatra edition), published and widely circulated in the chatra district. heard. permission accorded. learned counsel shall file the draft notice. office is directed to supply the contents of the notice. learned counsel shall file an affidavit annexing the newspaper clipping regarding the publication of notice. office is directed to list this case on 03.03.2018. (amitav k. gupta, j.) tarun /- in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi c.m.p. no. 366 of 2010 mako munda & others ..... petitioners versus julius munda & others ...... respondents --------- coram: hon ble mr. justice amitav k. gupta ---------- for the petitioner : mr. v.k. tiwary, advocate for the respondents : ----------- 06/dated:17.11.2017 learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that he shall file substitution application as well as supplementary affidavit within a week. (amitav k. gupta, j.) tarun/- in the high court of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2017 (HC)

Mr Azaz Khan Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b. a. no. 1416 of 2017 mr. azaz khan petitioner versus the state of jharkhand opposite party with a.b. a. no. 1650 of 2017 deepak kumar bagty petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i opposite party with a.b. a. no. 1665 of 2017 rajendra kumar singh petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i opposite party with a.b. a. no. 1824 of 2017 rajesh ranjan petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i opposite party with a.b. a. no. 2125 of 2017 subhasish sinha petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i opposite party with a.b. a. no. 2187 of 2017 kartik lal petitioner versus the state of jharkhand through c.b.i opposite party coram: hon'ble mr. justice anant bijay singh for the petitioners: mr. faisal khan, advocate mr. sanjay kumar pandey, advocate mr. indrajit sinha, advocate mr. a.k. sahani, advocate for the c.b.i : mr. kailash prasad deo, advocate 08/dated: 16.11.2017 since all the anticipatory bail applications arise out of one and the same case hence they are taken up together and disposed of by common order. the petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with r.c. case no. 8(s)2015 eow r, for the offence initially registered under sections 120 (b), r/w 420, 467, 468, & 471 of the i.p.c on the basis of complaint lodged by sri r.j. shankara, zonal manager, uco bank, zonal office sainik bazar, main road, ranchi alleging therein that he is authorized by the bank to lodge .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //