Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 1 of about 725,989 results (1.439 seconds)

Jan 15 2018 (HC)

Bharat Kansari Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. appeal (d.b) no. 237 of 2017 with i.a no.1192 of 2017 (against the judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2013 and order of sentence dated 19.03.2013, passed by the additional sessions judge-i, gumla, in s.t no.289 of 2009.) bharat kansari ... appellant versus the state of jharkhand ... respondent -------- coram : the hon ble mr. justice h. c. mishra the hon ble mr. justice b. b. mangalmurti ------ for the appellant : mr. md. zaid ahmed for the state : a.p.p. ------ by court:- though this case is listed for consideration of the interlocutory application filed by the appellant for bail, but upon going through the record, we find that the entire appeal can be disposed of at this stage itself, which is being done accordingly.2. heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the state.3. the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2013 and order of sentence dated 19.03.2013, passed by the learned additional sessions judge-i, gumla, in s.t no.289 of 2009, whereby the sole appellant, bharat kansari, has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under section 304 part-ii of the indian penal code, for causing the death of his own wife. upon hearing on the point of sentence, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo r.i for ten years and fine of rs.2000/- for the said offence.4. the prosecution case was instituted on the basis of the fardbeyan of ramkrishna sahu, the father of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2018 (HC)

Ms Hindalco Industries Limited Through President Mines Shri Bijesh Kum ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 7318 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 7319 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 7320 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 7321 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 7322 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 7323 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 7324 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 7325 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with w.p.(c) no. 7326 of 2017 m/s minerals and minerals limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents with 2 w.p.(c) no. 7327 of 2017 m/s hindalco industries limited ... ... petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others ... ... respondents ----------------- coram: hon'ble mr. justice shree chandrashekhar for the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 12 2018 (HC)

Ms Hindalco Industries Limited Through Its President Mines Shri Bijesh ...

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w. p. (c) no. 7286 of 2017 --- m/s hindalco industries limited .... ...... petitioner versus state of jharkhand & ors. .... ...... respondents --- coram : hon'ble mr. justice shree chandrashekhar --- for the petitioner : mr. a.k. ganguly, sr. adv. mr. indrajit sinha, adv. mr. ashish prasad, adv. ms. mukta dutta, adv. mr. vijay kant dubey, adv. for the respondent-state : mr. ajit kumar, a.g. mr. h.k. mehta, a.a.g. mr. atanu banerjee, g.a. mr. chanchal jain, jc to a.g. ms. aprajita bhardwaj, j.c to a.g. --- 05/12.01.2018 i.a. no. 231 of 2018 a strange application has been filed. seeking exemption from filing compliance report in terms of order dated 04.01.2018 passed in w.p.(c) no. 7286 of 2017, the respondents have filed this application.2. the learned advocate-general submits that under the high court rules period of limitation for filing appeal against an order passed by the single judge of this court is 30 days and an appeal vide l.p.a. no. 10 of 2018 alongwith an application for stay of order dated 04.01.2018 has been preferred by the state of jharkhand on 06.01.2018 itself, and that is the reason why this application has been filed seeking exemption from filing compliance report, as ordered by this court.3. mr. chanchal jain, the learned conducting counsel states that two defects were notified by the stamp reporter in the said appeal memorandum which have been removed on 11.01.2018.4. mr. a.k. ganguly, the learned senior counsel .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2018 (HC)

Nawin Sahu ? Nagendra Sahu Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Jharkhand

-1- in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi criminal appeal (d.b.) no. 90 of 1993 (r) (against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17th of february, 1993, passed by the judicial commissioner, ranchi, holding circuit court at lohardaga, in sessions trial no. 8 of 1992). ------------- nawin sahu @ nagendra prasad sahu .. appellant versus the state of bihar (now jharkhand) . . respondent -------- for the appellant : mr. ashish verma, advocate. for the respondent-state : mr. ram prakash singh, a.p.p. -------- present : hon ble mr. justice h. c. mishra hon ble mr. justice kailash prasad deo ------- by court.:- heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the state.2. the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 17th of february, 1993, passed by the learned judicial commissioner, ranchi, holding circuit court at lohardaga, in sessions trial no. 8 of 1992, whereby, the sole accused has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under section 302 of the indian penal code. upon hearing on the point of sentence, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the said offence.3. the prosecution case was instituted on the basis of fardbeyan of the informant rajendra ram, who is the nephew of the deceased ratan ram, recorded on 15.10.1991, at about 9.00 p.m., in village-aine in the district of lohardaga. according to the fardbeyan, the informant rajendra ram was informed at about 2. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2018 (HC)

Diwakar Mahato Vs. Chhutu Ram Mahato and Ors.

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr. revision no. 719 of 2006 .. diwakar mahato ... petitioner -v e r s u s- 1. the state of jharkhand 2. chhutu ram mahato 3. ruitu mahto 4. majhila mahato 5. gurucharan mahato 6. bishnu charan mahato ...opp. parties coram: - hon ble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh hon ble mr. justice rajesh kumar for the petitioner : - none for the opp. parties :- none. 04/11.01.2018 no one appears for the petitioner or the opposite parties.2. we have perused the impugned judgment and materials available on record. this revision petition is preferred against the judgment of acquittal dated 08th august, 2006 passed in sessions trial no. 20 of 2004, by the court of learned sessions judge, seraikela-kharsawan, whereunder accused/opposite parties have been acquitted of the charges for the offence under section 436 read with 34 of the indian penal code.3. as per the case of the complainant, the incident is of 27.05.1998 in the evening when on return from the local hat at about 7.30 p.m., he saw burning fire of his house having one room with thatched roof on a portion of plot no. 2496 of r.s. khata no. 214, village deoltand and his wife and children were crying. witnesses of the said case were trying to extinguish the fire and they half succeeded but the remaining half portion of the house was burnt. articles kept inside as well as hen 15 in numbers had completely been burnt to ashes. his wife complained of the acts of the accused persons, who had come .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 2018 (HC)

Deep Shikha Kumari Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (s) no.3758 of 2011 deep shikha kumari, daughter of ravindra narayan upadhay, resident of village west bokaro ghato tand, quarters no.c-16, p.o. ghato, p.s. mandu & district ramgarh. .... petitioner versus 1. the state of jharkhand through the chief secretary of government of jharkhand, ranchi, p.o. project bhawan, p.s. jagarnathpur & district- ranchi, jharkhand.2. the secretary, ministry of health and family welfare department, government of jharkhand, ranchi, p.o. project bhawan, p.s. jagarnathpur & district-ranchi, jharkhand.3. mrs. aradhana patnayak, i.a.s., mission director, national rural health mission committee, namkum, ranchi, jharkhand.4. the deputy commissioner, dumka, p.o. & p.s. & sub-divisional & district dumka.5. civil surgeon, dumka p.o.& p.s. & sub-divisional & district dumka. ....... respondents --- coram : hon'ble mr. justice pramath patnaik --- for the petitioners : mr. sarju prasad, advocate for the respondents : mr. anup kr. agarwal, j.c. to s.c.v ----- 08/11.01.2018 in the instant writ application, the petitioner has interalia sought for issuance of writ of certiorari for quashing the letter dated 01.03.2011 issued by the respondent no.3 and for quashing the memo no.77 dated 21.04.2010 passed by the respondent no.4. the petitioner has further prayed for direction to respondents for reinstatement in services with retrospective effect with all consequential benefits.2. the brief facts leading to filing of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2018 (HC)

Tata Steel Limited Through Its Chief Legal and Compliance Mrs Meena La ...

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (c) no. 2176 of 2015 with w.p. (c) no. 2184 of 2015 with w.p. (c) no. 2185 of 2015 in w.p. (c) no. 2176 of 2015) & (in w.p. (c) no. 2184 of 2015 tata steel limited. petitioner versus 1. union of india, through the secretary, ministry of coal, new delhi.2. the secretary, ministry of mines, government of india, new delhi.3. the state of jharkhand, through the chief secretary, ranchi.4. the secretary, department of mines & geology, government of jharkhand, ranchi.5. assistant mining officer, ramgarh.6. district mining officer, ramgarh. respondents in w.p. (c) no. 2185 of 2015 tata steel limited. petitioner versus 1. union of india, through the secretary, ministry of coal, new delhi.2. the secretary, ministry of mines, government of india, new delhi.3. the state of jharkhand, through the chief secretary, ranchi.4. the secretary, department of mines & geology, government of jharkhand, ranchi.5. assistant mining officer, dhanbad.6. district mining officer, dhanbad. respondents -------- coram : hon ble mr. justice h.c. mishra hon ble mr. justice pramath patnaik hon ble mr. justice dr. s.n. pathak -------- for the petitioner : m/s. abhishek manu singhvi, sr. advocate punit d. tyagi, advocate amit bhandari, advocate avirat kumar, advocate indrajit sinha, advocate ganesh pathak, advocate for the state : m/s. ajit kumar, advocate general kumar sundaram, j.c. to a.g. chanchal jain, j.c. to a.g. master akash, j.c. to a.g. for the union of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2018 (HC)

Santra Gope and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s) no. 1723 of 2008 ------- 1.santra gope, w/o sri ramdas gope, resident of village-bankati, p.o-tikar, p.s.-ichagarh, district-saraikella-kharswan. 2.revati gope, w/o sri madhusudan gope, resident of village-bankati, p.o-tikar, p.s.-ichagarh, district-saraikella-kharswan. ... petitioners versus 1.the state of jharkhand; 2.the deputy commissioner, saraikella-kharswan at seraikella; 3.the deputy development commissioner, saraikella-kharswan at seraikella; 4.the child development project officer, ichagarh, p.o & p.s- ichagarh, saraikella-kharswan; 5.the district programme officer, seraikella; 6.shrimati sunita gorai, wife of sri anant lal gorai, presently residing at village & p.o tikar, p.s. ichagarh, saraikella-kharswan; 7.sulekha gope, wife of sri dinesh chandra gope, presently residing at village & p.o tikar, p.s. ichagarh, saraikella-kharswan; .... respondents ------ coram: hon ble mr. justice pramath patnaik ------ for the petitioners : mr. h.k. mahto, advocate. for respondent nos. 1 to 5 : mr. fahad allam, j.c to g.a. iii md. shamim akhtar, g.a. iii for respondent no. 6 : ms. subha jha, advocate -------- c.a.v. on 08.11.2017 pronounced on 10/01/2018 per pramath patnaik, j.: in the accompanied writ application, the petitioners have inter alia, prayed for cancellation the selection and appointment of respondent nos. 6 and 7 as sevika and sahayika respectively for anganbari centre at bankati village and to select and appoint .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2018 (HC)

Shubh Chandra Jha Vs. Bccl

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (s) no. 3804 of 2012 shubh chandra jha, son of sri satya narayan jha, resident of village- mahuar, p.o. & p.s.-ghanshyampur, district-darbhanga. .... petitioner versus 1. m/s bharat coking coal limited, through its chairman-cum-managing director, having its office at koyla bhawan, koyla nagar, p.o.-koyla nagar, p.s.-saraidhela, district-dhanbad.2. general manager (p & ir) bharat coking coal limited, having its office at koyla bhawan, koyla nagar, p.o.-koyla nagar, p.s.-saraidhela, district- dhanbad.3. area personal manager, sijua area, b.c.c.l., p.o. & p.s. sijua, district- dhanbad.4. project officer, new akash kinaree colliery, b.c.c.l. p.o. katras bazar, p.s. katras, district-dhanbad. ... respondents --- coram : hon'ble mr. justice pramath patnaik --- for the petitioner : mr. shailesh kr. singh, advocate for the respondents-bccl : m/s amit kr. sinha & anoop kr. mehta, advocates .... cav on 14/11/2017 pronounced on 10/01/2018 per pramath patnaik, j.in the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has interalia prayed for quashing the order dated 06.02.2009 whereby the petitioner has been asked to retire on 01.08.2009 on the basis of a fictitious date of birth which is contrary to the date of birth mentioned in the school leaving certificate duly verified by the respondents. the petitioner has further prayed for reinstating him in service with back wages. 2 2. the brief facts as has been described in the writ application is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2018 (HC)

Godnath Mahto Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and Ors

Court : Jharkhand

1 in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p. (s) no. 6870 of 2007 godnath mahto, son of late madho mahto, resident of village-balsagra, p.o. balsagra, p.s. mandu, district-hazaribagh. ....... petitioner versus 1. the central coalfields limited through its managing director, darbhanga house, ranchi. 2.the director personnel, central coalfields limited, darbhanga house, ranchi. 3.the project officer, topa colliery, topa project, central coalfields limited, mandu, district-hazaribagh. 4.the general manager, topa project, central coalfields limited, mandu, district-hazaribagh. .... respondents --- coram : hon'ble mr. justice pramath patnaik --- for the petitioners : mr.gautam kumar singh, adv. for the respondents : mrs. ranjana mukherjee, adv. . cav on 01/11/2017 pronounced on 10/01 /2018 per pramath patnaik, j.in the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 02.08.2007 vide annexure-3 and letter dated 19.09.2007 vide annexure-4, whereby the date of birth has been corrected and changed as per the cmpf record from 20.04.1952 to 01.02.1948 and the petitioner has also prayed for issuance of writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue in service under respondent authority according to the date of birth dated 20.04.1952.2. the brief facts, leading to filing of the writ application, is that petitioner was appointed on 05.04.1973 and thereafter service book of the petitioner was opened wherein the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //