Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 4 of about 1,807 results (0.141 seconds)

Jul 31 2012 (TRI)

D.S. Sharma Vs. the Lt. Governor (Delhi),through Chairman, Delhi and O ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

ORDER (ORAL) Dr. Veena Chhotray, Member (A): 1. Shri D.S. Sharma, a Junior Engineer under the DDA, is aggrieved at imposition of penalty of reduction of pay to the lowest stage in the time scale of pay for a period of three years with cumulative effect.  This is in pursuance of a disciplinary proceeding initiated under Regulation 25 vide the charge sheet dated 07.06.2007 alleging certain financial irregularities in execution of a specified work during the years 2004-05 and 2005-06. After the inquiry, in course of which the allegations were held as proved, the Disciplinary Authority vide its order dated 22.1.2010 imposed the aforesaid penalty.  The appeal against the said order was rejected by the Appellate Authority by its order dated 09.02.2011.  The applicant submitted a revision petition dated 12.5.2011 to the Vice Chairman, DDA against the order of the Appellate Authority.  It is submitted in the OA that the respondents did not take any decision on his revision ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 31 2012 (TRI)

Sanjay Vs. the Commissioner Kvs, Shahid Jeet Singh Marg, New Delhi and ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Order (Oral): 1. The applicant who is a PGT (Hindi) Teacher is aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents on the request made by the applicant for his transfer from Kendriya Vidyalaya (KV), Delhi Cantontment No.1 to KV Hisar Cantonment. Though he has given various representations which have been enclosed to the OA, the applicant’s request has not yet been considered. On the contrary, the applicant has been transferred from his hard station to Delhi Cantonment whereas his request is to be posted to Hissar where his wife is presently posted. The reliefs sought for by the applicant are as follows:- (a)  To direct the respondents to modify the transfer of the applicant from KV Delhi Cantt. No.1 o KV Hisar Cantt. (b)  To modify the order dated 04.06.2012 by transferring the applicant to KV Delhi Cantt. (c)  To declare the action of respondents in not accepting even mutual transfer request of the applicant as illegal and arbitrary and issued necessary directions for ac...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 2012 (TRI)

Lok Nayak Hospital Paramedical and Technical Employees Union Near MaIn ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Sudhir Kumar, Member (A): 1. This OA has been filed by a Union of Paramedical and Technical employees through its General Secretary, with one of the members of the Union joining as the representative second applicant.2.   The applicants are aggrieved by the Employment Notification issued through the Employment News 26 December, 2009-01 January, 2010, through which the Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board (DSSSB, in short) has notified vacancies for the posts of Senior Radiographers in Health and Family Welfare (HandFW, in short) Department of Govt. of NCT of Delhi (GNCTD, in short) Post Code No. 85 of 2009 and Junior Radiographers, Post Code No.86 of 2009 through Advertisement No.004/2009, in which the essential qualifications and pay scales have been mentioned as follows:- Name of the Post: Sr. Radiographer in HandFW, GNCT Delhi Post Code: 85/09 Number of Vacancies : 34(UR-19, OBC-09, SC-04 and ST-02 including EXSM-03)  Essential Qualifications: 1. Matriculation/H...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2012 (TRI)

Jitender Kumar and Another Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary Do ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. As can be derived from the Original Application, late Shri Rajendra Singh was appointed as Helper in Doordarshan Maintenance Centre (DMC) Radhika Vihar, Krishna Nagar, Mathura w.e.f. 27.01.1992. While still in service, he expired on 17.10.2002 leaving behind applicants and other family members. In view of sudden death of applicant in harness, respondent No.4, i.e. Station Engineer (Kendra Abhiyanta) Prasar Bharati enabled applicant No.2 to put forth the claim of dependent of late Shri OA 4340/2011 Rajendra Singh for employment on compassionate ground. Applicant No.2 processed and espoused the candidature of applicant for such appointment on the post of Helper or any other post in Group D category in Broadcasting Corporation of India (DMC). Vide his letter No. DMC/MTR/14(4)/2003-S/229 dated 23.04.2003, respondent No. 4 forwarded such claim of applicant to respondent No. 2 for suitable action. With reference to DG, DD, ND OM No.3/27/2004-SII (A)/501 dated 11.04.2005, the DMC, Mathura ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2012 (TRI)

Ramesh Sagar, New Delhi Vs. Chief Secretary Govt of Nct of Delhi, Delh ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Sudhir Kumar, Member (A): 1. The applicant of this OA was an Assistant Superintendent in the Jail Department, and retired on 31.03.2004.  At the fag end of his career, on the date of his retirement from Tihar Jail, a charge sheet was issued to him instituting disciplinary enquiry against him, because of which even 8 years after his retirement, his gratuity has not been paid, and only provisional pension is being paid to him.  The applicant has, therefore, approached this Tribunal seeking orders for quashing the charge sheet and payment of amount of gratuity along with interest for the delayed payment.  He had also prayed for Interim Relief to direct the respondents to release the amount of gratuity along with interest for the period of delay, but the whole case itself came to be finally heard before a decision on the Interim Relief could be pressed. 2.   The Articles of Charges leveled against the applicant were as under:- Article-I That the said Shri Ramesh Sa...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2012 (TRI)

Sheela Vs. Commissioner of Police, Police Headquarter, I.P. Estate, Ne ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. Applicant is second widow of deceased Anil Kumar, who was working as a Constable with the respondents and committed suicide on 02.12.2005 due to some family problem with the applicant.  Accordingly a case bearing FIR No.873/2005 dated 02.12.2005 under Section 306/34 IPC was registered in PS Mangol Puri against the applicant.  It may be stated that the first wife of the deceased had already expired in the year 2001 due to illness, leaving behind minor daughter Kum. Khsuboo.  The grievance of the applicant in this case is regarding payment of pensionary benefits to the applicant on account of death of her husband.  As pensionary benefits were not paid to the applicant, she filed Writ Petition (C) No.3947/2008 before the High Court, which was subsequently transferred to this Tribunal and registered as TA No.15/2012. 2. Respondents have filed their reply.  The facts, as stated above, have not been disputed.  Respondents in the reply-affidavit have categoric...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 2012 (TRI)

Dr. Virendra Jain, Medical Officer, Cghs (Retd.), New Delhi Vs. the Se ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

ORDER (ORAL) M.L. Chauhan, Member (J). This OA has been filed by the applicant, thereby praying for the following reliefs: “In view of the humble submissions made and fact and circumstances explained in the foregoing paras, the applicant most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to:- (i)   Set aside the impugned orders dated 5.9.2008 Annexure A-I and dated 14.9.2008 Annexure A-2 and direct the respondents to refund to the applicant Rs.46,570/- with interest thereon @12% per annum upto the date of payment; (ii)  Set aside order dated 11.2.2009 Annexure A-2A and direct the respondents to release final pay of CGEGIS with interest thereon 12% per annum till the date of payment. (iii)  Direct the respondents to make payment of interest @12% per annum on P.F. due from July, 2006 to Feb. 2009 when payment was made and on other dues which were belatedly paid. (iv)Grant any other relief deemed fit and proper in the facts and cir...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2012 (TRI)

Dr. O.P. Maurya, Former Joint Director of Employment Exchanges, Direct ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. The applicant, a former Joint Director of Employment Exchanges, Directorate General of Employment and Training, Ministry of Labour, seeks benefit of the revised scale of pay of Rs.12000-16500 w.e.f.1.9.1998, the date when he had been appointed on ad hoc basis against the said post, till his retirement on 31.1.2003.  The OA also seeks quashing of the impugned order dated 24.8.2007 passed by the respondents in pursuance of the Tribunals directions vide its order dated 10.5.2007 in OA No.2187/2006.  Directions for grant of revised retiral benefits and any other benefits accruable have also been sought. 2. The OA had been allowed vide Tribunal the Tribunal’s order dated 25.3.2009. However, on a challenge by the Respondents, the Delhi High Court vide its order dated 22.12.2010 gave the following operational directions:- 26.  In view of above discussion, we set aside the impugned judgment dated 25.03.2009 passed by the Tribunal insofar it has held that the department ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2012 (TRI)

Arun Kumar, New Delhi Vs. the Chairman, Delhi Metro Rail Co-operation, ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J) 1. Petitioner had filed Writ Petition No. 5235/2008 with a prayer to issue a writ or order to give appointment to him as a Plumber from the date of appointment of similarly situated persons with all consequential benefits including pay and allowances and seniority. 2.   The said Writ Petition was transferred to the Tribunal and renumbered as TA No.325/2009.  TA was allowed on 16.3.2010 on the ground that when the vacancies were available and all the other 14 persons were appointed, petitioner could not have been isolated and panel ought to have been exhausted. Thus respondents were directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for appointment as Plumber. 3.   RA was filed by the respondents on the ground that they had not stated at any stage that 14 vacancies were filled.  On the contrary, panel had lapsed.  The RA 298/2010 was allowed on 12.4.2012 by observing as follows:- “On request of counsel for the origin...

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2012 (TRI)

Mahender Singh, New Delhi Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through Chief ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Member (A): 1. The applicant of this OA is before this Tribunal, aggrieved by the rejection of his representation through the impugned Annexure A-1 dated 23.04.2011, through which he has been informed as follows:- Office Memorandum “In reference to their application for grant of financial upgradation under MACP Scheme 2008, Shri Mahender Singh, ECG Tech. and Sh. Rameshwar Gope, Radiographer are hereby informed that casual employees, including those granted temporary status and employees appointed in the Government only on ad hoc or contract basis shall not qualify for benefits under the aforesaid Scheme.  Hence, their application has been rejected. 2.   The applicant is aggrieved that his re-employment category has been wrongly stated, in spite of this Tribunal having allowed his earlier OA No.2183/2005 on 05.12.2006, by which the respondents had been directed to pay to him the increased salary of Rs.4300/-, which was being earlier paid to him aft...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //