Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: central administrative tribunal cat guwahati Page 3 of about 32 results (0.144 seconds)

Oct 11 2001 (TRI)

M. Yanthan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Reported in : (2003)(2)SLJ221CAT

1. The legitimacy of the process of recruitment by promotion from amongst the substantive members of the State Civil Service to the All India Service in aid of the Indian Administrative Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954 read with the Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 concerning the applicant is the core issue for adjudication in this application. This is the second round of litigation so far the applicant is concerned.2. The applicant is a senior Member of the Nagaland State Civil Service and posted as Secretary, Government of Nagaland, Excise Department. A Selection Committee was constituted for the purpose of preparation of a list of suitable officers under Rule 3 of the Indian Administrative Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the Regulations) for the purose of recruitment by promotion for the year 1996-97. The Selection Committee did not recommend the applicant. The applicant questioned the afore...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 10 2001 (TRI)

Dr. Binoy Krishna Mandal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ25CAT

1. The legitimacy of the order of transfer and posting of the applicant from Indian Council of Agricultural Research Complex Headquarters, Umiam to Indian Council of Agricultural Research Complex, Tripura Centre, Lembucherra vide order dated 29.6.2001 is the subject matter of the controversy that requires adjudication. A thumb-nail sketch of the basic facts relevant for the purpose of adjudication are outlined hereinbelow: The applicant at the relevant time was holding the post of Principal Scientist (Fish and Fishery Science) in the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Research Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya (hereinafter referred to as ICAR).2. The ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region was established in the year 1975 with a view to aid and assist the agricultural development in the NEH Region of the country. It is the pioneering institute of its kind set up by ICAR that emcompasses all the disciplines of agriculture, horticulture, animal sciences, agricultural, engineer...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2001 (TRI)

Mahendra Prasad Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

1. This application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has arisen and is directed against the action of the respondents for adhering to the sealed cover procedure in the matter of promotion of the applicant in the following circumstances.The applicant joined as an Officer in the Railway service and initially he was assigned to the Central Railway Cadre and subsequently transferred to the N.F. Railway. He was promoted to the Junior Administrative Grade on ad hoc basis in September 1996. The name for empanelment of Junior Administrative Grade came up for consideration in the year 1997. A panel was approved on 13.11.97. The case of the applicant was considered and kept in sealed cover. By order dated 1.12.97 the respondents appointed 35 officers belonging to the applicant's batch to officiate in Junior Administrative Grade from the date of their taking over the post. The applicant's name did not figure in the list. The applicant submitted representation before the...

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 2001 (TRI)

Mrs. Poonam Tiwari Vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

1. This application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 has arisen and is directed against the order dated 15.12.187 terminating the services of the applicant as Primary Teacher, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, CRPF, Amerigog. The basic facts relevant for the purpose of adjudication of this case arc briefly summed up as follows: The applicant was initially appointed in the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS for short) as a Primary Teacher on ad hoc basis in July, 1987 and served as such on ad hoc capacity till 31.7.1984. By order dated 12.7.1984 she was appointed as Primary Teacher in the KVS on an initial pay of Rs. 330/- in the scale of Rs. 330-10-350 EB 380-15-500-EB-15-560 on the basis of a selection for appointment of Primary Teachers. On selection, she was posted as Primary Teacher at KVS, Khanapara. The applicant accordingly joined at KVS, Khanapara from where she was transferred to KVS, Amerigog, Guwahati.2. The applicant got married on 2.8.1985 and she con...

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 2001 (TRI)

H. Ali Vs. Employees State Insurance

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

1. The legitimacy of the action of the respondents imposing penalty of forfeiture of 50% pension of the applicant has given rise to this proceeding in the following circumstances: The applicant at the relevant time was holding the post of Manager Grade II (II Employees' State Insurance Corporation). By Memorandum dated 17.1.1995 the Regional Director initiated a disciplinary measure against the applicant in terms of the Employees State Insurance Corporation (Staff and Conditions of Service) Regulations. The Article of charges accompanied by the statement of imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour as well as the list of documents by which a list of witnesses by whom the Article of charges were proposed to be sustained. The applicant submitted explanation in writing denying and disputing the allegations. In addition, the applicant also questioned the competence and jurisdiction of the very initiation of the proceeding. The respondent authority conducted enquiry by appointing an Enquiry...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2001 (TRI)

Shri Hiranmoy Sen Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

1. The decision of the respondents communicated through D.O. No.PCC/FT/97 dated 4.2.2000 by the Deputy Director (Legal), Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, New Delhi informing the Government decision declining to revise the pay scale of Senior Auditors in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department is the subject matter of this proceeding which has arisen in the following circumstances: The applicants, 149 in number, are Senior Auditors in the Office of the Principal Accountant General (Audit), Assam, Meghalaya etc. at Shillong and Guwahati under the Indian Audit and Accounts Department, Government of India (hereinafter referred to as IA and AD). The applicants were initially appointed in the erstwhile composite office of the Accountant General, Assam, Meghalaya etc., Shillong as Auditors in the pay scale of Rs. 330-560 or as Selection Grade Auditors in the pay scale of Rs. 425-800. In the later part of 1983 proposals were made for restructuring of IA and AD with a v...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2000 (TRI)

Sh. Samar Bhowmic Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

1. The applicant is aggrieved by the order passed by the respondents initiating disciplinary proceedings against him under Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 and the Disciplinary Authority's order dated 31.1.1995 removing him from service. Against this order, the applicant had filed an appeal which was disposed of by the Appellate Authority by his order dated 21.9.1995, reducing the penalty from removal from service to compulsory retirement. The review application filed by the applicant has been rejected by the order dated 7.4.1997. The applicant has also impugned another order passed by the Chief Post Master General on 24.11.1995 rejecting his prayer for B.C.R. promotion as well as the increment.2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was working as Section Supervisor in Assam Circle, Guwahati with Respondent 4. He was issued with charge memo dated 3.6.1992 on the allegations regarding certain vouchers for bills which were alleged to be irregularly done and against the de...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2000 (TRI)

Shri Bijay Krishna Banik Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

1. The applicant is aggrieved by the transfer order passed by the respondents dated 7.4,1998 transferring him as Announcer Senior Grade from All India Radio. Agartala to All India Radio Belonia (for short 'A.I.R.') and rejection of his representation by order dated 30.6.1998. Subsequently, the applicant has been relieved by order dated 24.7.1998 which is impugned in this O.A'.2. The present application is the second round of litigation by the applicant. Earlier, he had filed O.A. 94/98, which was disposed of by the Tribunal's order dated 20.5.1 1998. The respondents in their written statement have submitted that the applicant had submitted a representation against the transfer order dated 7.4.1998 on 23.4.1998 to the Director General, A.I.R. New Delhi, through proper channel.However, before the same was disposed of by the Competent Authority, he had filed O.A. 94/98. By the Tribunal's order dated 20.5.1998, the respondents were directed to consider arid dispose of the representation b...

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2000 (TRI)

Ram Ashraya Yadav Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

1. The applicant has filed this application seeking the following reliefs : (i) Grant of Rs. 300/- p.m. w.e.f. 1.1.93 as made available to similarly situated Controllers. (ii) Extension of add on element of 30% again for retirement benefits as provisioned for the running staff situated under similar circumstances.2. We have heard the applicant in person and Mr. B.K. Sharma, learned Counsel for the respondents and perused the records.3. The applicant was initially appointed as Guard-C with effect from 20.3.68 in the category of running staff. Thereafter he was promoted as Guard-B and then to the post of Controller (Traffic) as Section Controller in supervisory (stationary) post on 21.1.1983. Later, he was further promoted to the post of Deputy Controller and then to Chief Controller in which post he is presently working in N.F. Railway. He stated that by the Railway Board Notification dated 25.11.1992 (Annexurc-VI), the respondents have taken into account the drop in emoluments of runn...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 2000 (TRI)

Tarit Ranjan Das Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

1. This Review Application has been filed by the applicant seeking review of the judgment and order dated 10.7.1998 dismissing the Original Application No. 151 of 1991. This Tribunal dismissed the O.A.holding that the nature of work , duties and responsibilities of the two categories of Stenographers to one of which the applicant belonged were not same. This conclusion was arrived at relying on para 46.34 of the Fifth Central Pay Commission recommendations, the factors like similarity of job contents, status and responsibilities were not similar to that of the applicant. There existed difference between the applicant and the Stenographer Grade 'C' of the Central Secretariat with respect to the job responsibilities. Besides, the Tribunal came to such conclusion on the ground that the applicant in his case had not made any claim to the effect that his responsibilities were same or similar to those of the Stenographers Grade 'C' of the Central Secretariat.2. It has been stated in the Rev...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //