Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: chhattisgarh state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc raipur Page 4 of about 159 results (0.131 seconds)

Apr 21 2014 (TRI)

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Kanti Prasad and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal has been filed being aggrieved by the order dated 29.04.2013, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum"), in Complaint Case No.136/2011. By the impugned order, the District Forum, has allowed the complaint of the respondent Nos.1 to 5/complainants and directed the appellant/O.P.No.1 to pay sum of Rs.5,00,000/- to the respondent Nos.1 to 5/complainants along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint 14.09.2011 and also awarded Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation and advocate fee to the respondent Nos.1 to 5/complainants. 2. The facts of the complaint filed before the District Forum are : that Late Subran was father of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and son of respondent No.4 and 5. Subran was an employee of S.E.C.L. and he was insured with appellant/O.P.No.1 through his employer O.P.No.2 and 3/S.E.C.L. The insurance was effective for the period from 16.10.1999 to 15.1...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2014 (TRI)

M. Ravi Vs. Branch Manager, State Bank of India

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 29.12.2012, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Korba (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum) in Complaint Case No.38/2010. By the impugned order, the District Forum, has dismissed the complaint of the appellant/complainant. Hence this appeal. 2. In nut shell, the case of the appellant/complainant before the District Forum, was that he was having a saving bank account in the Kusmunda Branch of the respondent Bank. No cheque book facility was provided by the Bank or obtained by the appellant/complainant for operation of that account. Two cheques bearing No.824159 and 821460 of Rs.40,000/- each, were presented for encashment before the respondent Bank from the account of the appellant, which were returned by the respondent Bank with the endorsement that no sufficient amount is available in the Bank account of the appellant/complainant. In view of this endorsement, the payee filed complaint u/s 138...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2014 (TRI)

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Through: Senior Divisional Man ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.11.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint No.35/2012 "„shok Kumar Jain vs. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited." By the impugned order, learned District Forum has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent /complainant and directed the appellant/O.P. to pay within a month a sum of Rs.46,000/- to the respondent/complainant along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint till date of payment. The District Forum, has further directed the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as advocate fees and cost of litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant is registered owner of a motorcycle bearing registration ...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2014 (TRI)

Veena Rawte Vs. Jila Shahri Vikas Abhikaran, Through Incharge Officer, ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.06.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Rajnandgaon (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum") in Complaint No.108/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, dismissed the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint filed by the appellant/complainant before the District Forum are : that Mohan Lal Rawte, husband of the appellant/complainant was insured with Life Insurance Corporation of India (respondent No.3/O.P.No.3), through respondent No.2/O.P. No.2 Samudayik Vikas Samiti, Lakholi and became member of "Janshree Beema Yojna". Late Mohan Lal Rawte, the husband of the appellant/complainant deposited amount of premium Rs.25/- on 28.01.2012 before respondent No.2/O.P.No.2. Mohan Lal Rawte, died on 01.03.2012 and the appellant/complainant, is nominee of the deceased Mohan Lal Rawte. Claim was preferred by the appellant/complainant...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 17 2014 (TRI)

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Siddique Rizwani

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 28.01.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum) in Complaint Case No.104/2012. By the impugned order, learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent/complainant and directed the appellant/O.P. to pay within a month a sum of Rs.1,22,500/- to the respondent/complainant along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 20.03.2012 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellant/O.P. to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as compensation for mental agony and a sum of Rs.3,000/- as advocate fees and cost of the litigation to the respondent/complainant. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the complaint filed by the respondent/complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant is owner of Maruti Omni Van bearing registration No.C.G.04-B-3593 and the said vehicle was in...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2014 (TRI)

M/S. Sargam Mobiles, Through: Proprietor âandeuro;andldquo; Anil Gehi ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. The complainant has filed this complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the opposite party for seeking direction to the opposite party : (a) pay the remaining claim amount Rs.20,52,458/- (Rs. Twenty Lakhs Fifty Two Thousand Four Hundred and Fifty Eight only); (b) to pay interest @ 12% p/.a. on the aforesaid amount; (c) to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental and physical agony and (d) to grant any other relief, which this Commission deems fit. 2. Brief facts of the complaint are that : the complainant is running a shop at Shop No.40, Jairam Complex, G.E. Road, Raipur (C.G.) in the name and style of M/s Sargam Mobiles and is engaged in business of selling of mobiles phones of various companies as well as accessories. The mobiles, memory card etc. kept/stored in the shop were insured with the O.P./Insurance Company under Policy No.450301/11/10/11/00000054 for security against fire and other natural calamities and Po...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 2014 (TRI)

National Insurance Company Limited, Through Divisional Manager Vs. Vij ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 07.12.2013, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum") in Complaint Case No.262/2013, whereby the complaint of the respondent / complainant, has been partly allowed. 2. The appellant/O.P. has preferred this appeal against the impugned order dated 07.12.2013, passed by the District Forum and has also filed application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The appeal is belated by 63 days. 3. Shri C.S. Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the appellant/O.P. prayed for condoning the delay in filing the appeal on the basis of grounds mentioned in the application for condonation of delay filed by the appellant/O.P. and he seeks an opportunity to argue the matter on merits. 4. We have heard arguments of learned counsel for the appellant on the application for condonation of delay and have also perused the record of the District Forum. 5. In Rev...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2014 (TRI)

Ramakant Dani Vs. Branch Manager, Bank of Baroda, Durg Branch and Anot ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order, dated 11.06.2013 of District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (C.G.) (henceforth œDistrict Forum?), in Complaint Case No.211/2011, whereby the complaint of the appellant / complainant seeking compensation on account of loss to the crop, which was insured under National Agricultural Insurance Scheme, has been dismissed on the ground that as per declaration given by the appellant/complainant in the application form for obtaining agricultural credit limit, his land was irrigated and therefore no compensation was payable. 2. In nut shell, the facts of the case are that the appellant / complainant is a farmer of Village Motinpur, Tehsil Dhamdha, District Durg (C.G.) and he was having Kisan Credit Card and was enjoying credit facilities upto extent of Rs.3,00,000/- on the basis of that Kisan Credit Card. It is also not in dispute that as per National Agricultural Insurance Scheme, all persons, who have been grante...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2014 (TRI)

Mohammad Yusuf Raza Vs. Indore Transport Agency

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 23.02.2013, passed District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (C.G.) (henceforth "District Forum?) in Complaint Case No.357/2010. By the impugned order the learned District Forum, has dismissed the complaint of the appellant/complainant. 2. In nutshell, the facts of the case are that a Video Camera of Sony Company, valuing Rs.1,40,000/-, was booked by the appellant/complainant with the respondent/Transport Agency for its transport from Nagpur to Raipur, in the form of a parcel and requisite charges were paid by the appellant/complainant to the respondent/O.P. The allegation of the appellant/complainant against the respondent / O.P. was that the said parcel was not delivered at its destination and thus, deficiency in service has been committed by the respondent/O.P., so appellant/complainant, is entitled to get value of the article, along with other amount of compensation from the respondent/O.P. 3. The r...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 2014 (TRI)

Branch Manager, Shriram Transport Finance Company Limited and Another ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

R.S. Sharma, President: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 21.12.2012, passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Surguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) (henceforth District Forum") in Complaint Case No.68/2012. By the impugned order, the learned District Forum, has partly allowed the complaint of the respondent/complainant and directed the appellants/OPs to pay within a month from the date of the order a sum of Rs.3,69,300/- (Rs.Three Lakhs Sixty Nine Thousand and Three Hundred Only) to the respondent/complainant, along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of filing of the complaint i.e. 05.06.2012 till date of payment. The District Forum has further directed the appellants/OPs to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- as compensation for mental, physical agony and financial inconvenience and Rs.1,000/- as cost of litigation. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the complaint of the respondent /complainant before the District Forum are : that the respondent/complainant purchased the Highwa Tru...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //