Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: company law board clb Page 92 of about 913 results (0.173 seconds)

Jan 31 1991 (TRI)

Carbon Corporation Ltd. Vs. Abhudaya Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (1992)73CompCas572

1. This matter arises out of 59 references filed under section 22A of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), by Carbon Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the applicant-company) for confirming the opinion formed by its board of directors to refuse the registration of 1,49,950 shares in favour of the parties shown as transferees hereinabove.2. The relevant particulars of these references such as petition number, date of filing with the Company Law Board, names of the transferees, number of shares, date of lodgement and date of board meeting at which the opinion was formed to refuse the registration of transfer of the shares, are all contained in the statement annexed to this order (annexure 'A'). Also against each reference in the last but two columns of the statement, information is given about the date on which reference was filed with the Bench and whether separate application for condonation of delay, if any, is made by the...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1991 (TRI)

Jagdishchandra Champaklal Vs. Deccan Paper Mills Co. Ltd. and

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (1994)80CompCas159

1. There are three appeals under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, in the matter of refusal by M/s. Deccan Paper Mills Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the company") (respondent No. 1) to register transfer of 16,440 fully paid-up equity shares of Rs. 25 each of the company made up of 3 lots, namely, 11,464/2,221/2,755 by respondents Nos. 2 to 4 to the appellant. Briefly the facts of the case, as mentioned in the application, are as under : (i) Respondent No. 2 by himself and through his wife and son, respondents Nos. 3 and 4, was holding the said 16,440 shares as absolute owner thereof in three lots, namely, 11,464 shares in his own name and 2,221 and 2,755 shares in the names of respondents Nos. 3 and 4. (ii) To the knowledge of respondent No. 1, respondent No. 2 was negotiating with the appellant for financial assistance/loan. Shri F. M. Pochkhanwala, chairman of the company (respondent No. 1), vide letter dated April 28, 1986, addressed to the appellant, for and on behal...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1991 (TRI)

Bajaj Tempo Ltd. Vs. Bajaj Auto Ltd. and anr.

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Reported in : (1994)80CompCas618

1. This matter arises out of 124 references filed under Section 22A of the Securities Contract Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), by Bajaj Tempo Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "the applicant-company") for confirming the opinion formed by its board of directors to refuse the registration of 26,550 shares, involved in 34 references, in favour of Bajaj Auto Holdings Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "BAHL") and 12,050 shares, involved in 90 references, in favour of Bajaj Auto Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "BAL") on the ground that the transfer of the shares is likely to result in such change in the composition of the board of directors as would be prejudicial to the interests of the company or to the public interest. The particulars of these references relating to reference number, date on which it was filed, number of shares involved, name of transferee, name of transferor, date of lodgment of the shares and the date of board meeting at which transfer was refused, are...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //