Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: delhi Page 2 of about 75,398 results (0.268 seconds)

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

Sh. Sunil Kumar Kharwar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 SH. SUNIL KUMAR KHARWAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Arun K. Srivastava with Mr. Anil Jaryal, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State SI Sandeep, PS Punjabi Bagh SI Mohinder Singh, PS Viaks Puri Mr. Rohit Sehgal, Adv. for R-2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 41689/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.28/2018 dated 13.01.2018 registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

Smt Sunita vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 3600/2019 SMT SUNITA Through: Mr. R.S. Rai, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. K.K. Ghai, APP for State with SI ........ RESPONDENTS Prakash, PS - Burari CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.1433/2015 dated 20.11.2015 registered at PS Burari and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.4. With the consent of all the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present CRL.M.C.3600/2019 Page 1 of 2 petition is allowed.6. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and he has been identified by SI - Prakash /IO, PS - Burari and submits that matter ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

Kulbir Singh vs.state & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~3 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4787/2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019 KULBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Umesh Gupta, Adv. with Ms.Sushma, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. SI Gurbachan Singh PS Burari. Respondent no.2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby JUDGMENT (ORAL) quashing FIR No.591/2017 dated 13.10.2017, registered at Police Station Burari, for the offence punishable under Section 354(C) IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present CRL...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

University of Delhi vs.praveen Sagar

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:28. 11.2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + LPA7292019 & C.M. Applns.50303-50304/2019 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mahinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Koushik Ghosh, Ms. Manisha Relia, Advocates Versus PRAVEEN SAGAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sahil Garg, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra and Ms. Mansi Khanna, Advocates + LPA7342019 & C.M. Appls.50516-50517/2019 UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.J.S. Rupal, Mr. Koushik Ghosh, Ms. Manisha Relia, Advocates Versus UMANG BHARDWAJ ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sahil Garg, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra and Ms. Mansi Khanna, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ASHA MENON, J.1. The appellant/University of Delhi has filed two intra-court appeals being aggrieved by the common judgment dated 08.11.2019 whereby, it has been directed to grant admission to Praveen Sagar [respondent in LPA LPA7292019 & 734/2019 Page 1 of 13 729/2019 arisi...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

Vipin vs.bhavna Rajput

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:08. 11.2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + MAT. APP. (F.C.) 293/2019 & CM APPLs. 48509-510/2019 .....Appellant VIPIN Through: Mr. Anurag Rawat and Ms. versus Meenakshi, Advocates BHAVNA RAJPUT Through: None .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ASHA MENON, J.1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband being aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Family Court dated 31.08.2019, whereby it has dismissed his petition seeking divorce from the respondent/wife on the ground of cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short, the Act).2. The facts, as set out for the purposes of deciding this appeal, are that the parties had got married at Faridabad, Haryana on 20.11.2013, as per the Hindu rites and customs. The parties resided together at the matrimonial home i.e. premises No.E-284, Dakshinpuri, New Delhi whereafter they had shifted to a rented a...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

Jinender Kumar vs.chander Shekhar Lodhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 526/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 12.2019 JINENDER KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus CHANDER SHEKHAR LODHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Amit Punj, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Sajid Chaudhary with Mr. Arshad Ali, Mr. Rashid Hasan, Advocates for respondent No.1 with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) RC.REV. 526/2019 & CM APPL.39973/2019 (stay) 1.2. Respondent Nos.2(a) to 2(c) have been unserved. It is pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent No.2 was also the respondent No.2 before the Rent Controller and he did not file leave to defend application and he has not even impugned the eviction order.3. Service of respondent No.2(a) to 2(c) is, accordingly, dispensed RC.REV. 526/2019 Page 1 of 3 with.4.... Petitioner impugns order dated 08.05.2019, whereby the leave to def...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

Satish Kumar vs.the District & Sessions Judge (Hqs)

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:-03.12.2019 + W.P.(C) 12066/2019 SATISH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through Mr.S.S.Sastry, Adv. versus THE DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE (HQS) ..... Respondent Through Ms.Avnish Ahlawat with Mr.Nitesh Singh &Ms.PalakRohmetra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) C.M.No.49398/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 12066/2019 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by an ex-employee in the Office of the District and Sessions Judge, Delhi assailing the order dated 17.06.2017 passed by the Disciplinary Authority dismissing him from service, as also the order dated 01.11.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereunder his appeal challenging this dismissal came to be rejected. W.P.(C) 12066/2019 Page 1 of 6 2. The petitioner, who was appointed to the post of a peon ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

Rajdeep Jain & Anr vs.sharp Air Systems Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + C.R.P. 278/2019 Judgment delivered on:03. 12.2019 RAJDEEP JAIN & ANR ........ Petitioners versus SHARP AIR SYSTEMS PVT LTD & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Raghav Sharma, Advocate Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the Respondent: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA None. JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 51958/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.R.P. 278/2019 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 03.07.2019 whereby the application of the petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 (a) of the CPC has been dismissed.2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that plaint does not disclose a cause of action qua the petitioners who were C.R.P. 278/2019 Page 1 of 5 defendants No.1 and 2 in the Suit and the trial court dismissed the application by applying the ratio of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Madhav Prasad Aggarwal & Anr. v. Axis Bank Ltd. & Anr., (2019) ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

sh.aman Kaushik & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 03, 2019 + W.P.(CRL) 2406/2019 SH. AMAN KAUSHIK & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in person Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Charu Chaudhary, Advocate for Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent No.1/State with SI Radha Sharma Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J (oral) Crl.M.A. 41737/2019... Petitioners are seeking preponment of hearing in the main petition on the ground that subject matter of dispute inter se parties stands amicably resolved between the parties and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. Notice. Ms. Charu Chaudhary, Advocate appearing for Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Standing Counsel for respondent No.1/State, accepts notice. W.P.(CRL) 2406/2019 1 Heard. The application is allowed and the main petition is taken up for ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2019 (HC)

Pawan Bhati vs.state (govt.of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on 03.12.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 2461/2019 PAWAN BHATI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Charan Singh, Advocate. versus THE STATE(GOVT. of NCT of Delhi ..... Respondent Through Mr. G.M.Farooqui, APP for State. SI Rajeshwar: PS Palam Village CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI JUDGMENT BRIJESH SETHI, J.(Oral) 1. Vide this order, I shall dispose of a bail application filed u/s. 439 CrPC by the petitioner Pawan Bhati in FIR No.151/2019, u/s. 363/366/376/5IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Palam Village, Delhi.2. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner has prayed for bail on the ground that petitioner is innocent and falsely implicated. He is well educated person and has clean antecedents. It is submitted that petitioner is BAIL APPLN. 2461/2019 Page 1 of 6 distant cousin of the prosecutrix. Prosecutrix was introduced to the main accused Pawan s/o Amar Singh by the petitioner. The present case was got registered just to extort money ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //