Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: delhi Page 6 of about 75,398 results (0.271 seconds)

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Chanderwati vs.ram Pratap & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2019 RC.REV. 228/2016 CHANDERWATI versus RAM PRATAP & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. L.S. Solanki, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.36807/2018 (for bringing on record LRs of R-1), CM APPL.36808/2018 (for condonation of delay in filing CM368072018) Learned Counsel for the... Petitioner submits that he has no objection to the applications being allowed and the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.1 being brought on record. In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the applications, they are allowed. Delay in filing CM APPL368072018 is condoned. Applications are allowed and legal heirs are brought in RC.REV. 228/2016 Page 1 of 3 record. RC.REV. 228/2016 & CM APPL.15500/2016 (stay), CM AP...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Subhash Chand & Anr vs.gauri

Court : Delhi

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2019 RC.REV. 220/2017 & CM APPL. 16682/2017, 30839/2017 SUBHASH CHAND & ANR versus GAURI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Naveeen K. Sharma and Mr. Ashok Kumar Aggarwal, Advocates with petitioner No.2 in person. For the Respondent: Mr. G.D. Chopra, Advocate with respondent No.1 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 03.11.2016, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from one shop on the ground floor of property bearing No.3502, Ward No.9, Gali RC.REV. 220/2017 Page 1 of 3 Bajrang Bali, Sita Ram Bazar, Near ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Farukh vs.sadhna Tyagi

Court : Delhi

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2019 RC.REV. 396/2019 & CM APPL. 29641/2019, 29643/2019 FARUKH versus SADHNA TYAGI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Ms.Nazma Akhtar and Ms.Meenakshi Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.Sandeep Garg, Ms.Priya Saxena and Mr.Harshit Goyal, Advocates. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT1... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.01.2019, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from X/4104 (also known as X/4104-A), Gali No.15, Shanti Mohalla, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi-110031, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the eviction petition...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

M/S Hudson Overseas vs.commissioner of Customs (Exports) Icd, Tkd, New ...

Court : Delhi

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12573/2019 M/S HUDSON OVERSEAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Jasmeet Kaur & Ms. Shweta Dhaka, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORTS) ICD, TKD, NEW ........ RESPONDENTS DELHI AND ORS. Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, SSC with Mr.Aman Rewaria, Adv. for R-1 & R-2 Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) JUDGMENT This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:1. (a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to set-aside the seizure memorandum bearing F.No.DRI/IZU/INT-75/2019/3718 to 3721 dated 31.08.2019 with reference to shipping bill No.4651654 dated 04.06.2019; and/or (b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to the... RESPONDENTS to issue the release of the goods detained against Shipping Bill No.4651654 dated 04.06.2019...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Ritnand Balved Education Foundation vs.om Sai Mandir Nyas Trust (Regd) ...

Court : Delhi

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019. CS(OS) 1582/2013, IA No.14425/2015 (u/O XXXIX R-2A CPC), IA No.15458/2017 (u/O XVA r/w S-151 CPC), IA No.15459/2017 (u/O XII R-6 CPC) & OA No.146/2019 (of D-1 against order dated 22nd July, 2019) RITNAND BALVED EDUCATION FOUNDATION ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira V. Arora, Mr. Rajan Chawla, Mr. Tanmaya Mehta & Mr. Shyam Singh, Advs. Versus OM SAI MANDIR NYAS TRUST (REGD) & ANR.. Defendants Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia & Mr. Akash Nagar, Advs. for D-1. Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of possession of 166.98 sq. mtrs. forming part of the property at site No.2, Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi allotted by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to the plaintiff, and for recovery of mesne profits and injunction.2. The suit was entertained and vide ad-interim order dated 16th September, 2013, ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Zasha Advertising Pvt Ltd vs.abhijit Roy

Court : Delhi

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Delivered on:29. h November, 2019 RFA3372019 & CM APPL No.17611/2019 ZASHA ADVERTISING PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Dhruv Kapur and Mr.Maharshi Kalra, Advocates. versus ABHIJIT ROY ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate. YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the order dated 07.01.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-4/ South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.18/2019 whereby the suit of the appellant under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of Rs.4,71,320/- against the respondent/defendant was dismissed in limine.2. a) The brief facts are: on 26.05.2018 the Respondent placed purchase order upon the Appellant at Delhi for taking the Appellant's service for branding AC bus with effect from 27.05.2018 for a period of one month at the rate of Rs.78,000/- excluding ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Indian Oil Corporation Limited Through Its Authorised Signatory, Deba ...

Court : Delhi

$~A-30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 11.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 486/2019 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, DEBASISH NANDA........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Ritu Bhalla & Ms. Riya Basu, versus Advocates NAYARA ENERGY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ESSAR OIL LIMITED) THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, PANKAJ TRIPATHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee, Ms. Jyoti Dastidar & Ms. Shuchita Chaudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 16784/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 486/2019 1. Present petition has been jointly filed by the parties under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 486/2019 Page 1 of 2 2. It is averred in the petition that the Arbitral ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

S Block Welfare Society & Ors vs.vidyut Arora & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~10, 11 and 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + S BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS CM (M) 214/2019 and CM APPL. 6012/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for with (M: person in... Petitioner 9871339314). VIDYUT ARORA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, Advocate (M:98110. 6767). WITH11and 16 + CM (M) 266/2019 and CM APPL. 7204/2019 CM (M) 829/2019 and CM APPLs. 25224/2019, 25225/2019, 39211/2019 VIDUT ARORA Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, ........ Petitioner Advocate (M:98110. 6767). S-BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for R- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH13,8,9,12 and 13 (M:98713. 9314). Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) 1. These three petitions relate to the Residents Welfare Association of S- Block, GK-1, known as the S-Block Welfare Society. The elections to the said society were held on 30th April, 2017 and the same...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Vidut Arora vs.s-block Welfare Society & Ors

Court : Delhi

$~10, 11 and 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + S BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS CM (M) 214/2019 and CM APPL. 6012/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for with (M: person in... Petitioner 9871339314). VIDYUT ARORA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, Advocate (M:98110. 6767). WITH11and 16 + CM (M) 266/2019 and CM APPL. 7204/2019 CM (M) 829/2019 and CM APPLs. 25224/2019, 25225/2019, 39211/2019 VIDUT ARORA Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, ........ Petitioner Advocate (M:98110. 6767). S-BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for R- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH13,8,9,12 and 13 (M:98713. 9314). Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) 1. These three petitions relate to the Residents Welfare Association of S- Block, GK-1, known as the S-Block Welfare Society. The elections to the said society were held on 30th April, 2017 and the same...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion vs.delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

$~12 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 29th November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8799/2018 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through ........ Petitioner Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2911.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been initiated by this Court on its own motion mainly for the reason that a letter was received by the Registrar General of this Court dated 14th November, 2017, wherein author of the letter has mentioned about the illegal construction at Village Poonthkalan, Delhi-110086.2. Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that they will verify the facts mentioned in the letter and that, if there is any unauthorised construction, the same will be removed by the respondent, in accordance with law.3. In view of the above submission, we hereby direct the respondent to arrive at the conclusion, initially, whether the construc...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //