Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: himachal pradesh Page 7 of about 4,413 results (0.160 seconds)

Nov 08 2012 (HC)

Karnail Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Sanjay Karol, J. Oral: 1. Matter was taken up at 10 a.m. 2. On 26.3.2004, petitioner (accused) was found to have committed offences, punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, regarding which FIR No.75/04, dated 26.3.2004 (Ex. PW-7/A) was recorded at Police Station Sadar, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh. Police investigated the matter, which revealed that petitioner was guilty of having committed the aforesaid offences. Challan was presented in the Court for trial and notice of accusation was put to the petitioner for having committed offences, punishable under Sections 279, 337 and 304-A of the Indian Penal Code, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. 3. In order to establish its case, prosecution examined as many as eleven witnesses and statement of the accused, under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was also recorded, in which he pleaded false implication and stated that the accident took place on account of mechanical defect in ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2012 (HC)

Sh. Bihari Lal Vs. Smt. Kundal Dai and Another

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Kuldip Singh, J. (Oral). This petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed against the order dated 17.3.2012 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Shimla Camp at Rohru in Crl. Revision No.4-R/10 of 2006 and in Crl. Revision No.15-R/10 of 2008, both decided on 17.3.2012 by common order. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondents had filed petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. which was allowed by learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohru on 13.11.2002. The respondents filed Execution Petition for executing judgment dated 13.11.2002. The petitioner took the objection that respondent No.1 was not entitled to any maintenance as she was living in adultery. The objection was dismissed on 6.3.2006. The petitioner filed Crl. Revision No.4-R/10 of 2006 against the order dated 6.3.2006. 3. The petitioner again filed objections against execution of the judgment dated 13.11.2002. The main objection was that respondent No.1 had been living in adultery a...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2012 (HC)

Amar Chand Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Oral: Kuldip Singh, J. 1. This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for releasing the petitioner on bail in FIR No.67/2012, dated 13.7.2012, registered at Police Station Rohru, District Shimla, under Sections 376, 506 IPC. 2. It has been stated that allegations against the petitioner are that he sexually assaulted his daughter-in-law while she was preparing tea. The petitioner is innocent, he has committed no offence. The petitioner has been implicated by the victim at the behest of some interested persons in order to grab the property. The allegations against the petitioner are false. There is no legal evidence connecting the petitioner with the offence. 3. The victim is second wife of elder son of petitioner. The first wife of the elder son of petitioner had died. The victim and her husband were living separately and they joined the petitioner only in the last week of June, 2012. The conduct of victim towards other family members was not good, the petitioner had lodged 2-3 com...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 01 2012 (HC)

Tulsi Ram Vs. State of H.P. Through Principal Secretary (industries) t ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

V.K. Ahuja , J. 1. The petitioner was allegedly appointed as driver on daily wage basis with the respondent department since 4.1.1990. As alleged by the petitioner, his services were terminated on 8.2.1991. He filed an Original Application before the erstwhile Administrative Tribunal on 24.7.1991. He was granted interim stay and he continued and thereafter, the stay was vacated. 2. The petitioner raised a demand notice before the Labour and Conciliation Officer, who referred the matter to the Labour Commissioner, who ultimately referred the matter to the learned Labour Court. The learned Labour Court vide its impugned award dated 16.7.2009 Annexure P-2, dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner. 3. Being aggrieved, the petitioner has come up by way of the present petition challenging the said award. 4. Notice of the petition was issued to the respondents, who filed reply. 5. It is clear from the impugned award passed by the learned Labour Court that there is nothing to substantiat...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2012 (HC)

Rattan Lal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Through Secretary (iph) Govt. ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Deepak Gupta, J. 1. The petitioner, who is working as Junior Engineer in the IPH has challenged his transfer from the Flood Protection Sub Division, Jalehra to the post of Assistant Engineer, IPH Circle, Una in place of private respondent No.2. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that he has served all over the State. In October, 2011 the petitioner was promoted as Assistant Engineer and posted at IPH Headquarter at Shimla. The petitioner made a request that he be transferred from IPH Headquarter and after accepting his request he was transferred to Sub Division, Amb against a vacant post on 17.4.2012. The petitioner joined there on 24.4.2012. On 23.6.2012 the Government ordered the shifting of the Tubewell Sub Division, Amb to Flood Protection Sub Division, Jalehra, though according to the petitioner this order has still not been implemented. Now, the petitioner who was adjusted at Amb only after six months has been again transferred to Una only to accommodate the private respondent...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2012 (HC)

State of Himachal Pradesh Through Principal Secretary (Home) to the Go ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Kuldip Singh, J. 1. This petition has been filed against the order dated 23.4.2012 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan in Criminal Revision No. 17-Cr.R./10 of 2011 reversing order dated 18.7.2011 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Court No.1, Paonta Sahib in Cr.Misc. Application No. 317/4 of 2011. 2. On 18.4.2011 Rohit Kothal and Nitish Joshi while going to Dehradun via Paonta Sahib from Haryana were searched at Behral Barrier, Paonta Sahib by the Police and from their personal search currency notes worth Rs. 30 lacs were recovered, both of them were arrested under Sections 41, 109 Cr.P.C. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Paonta Sahib dropped the proceedings against both Rohit Kothal and Nitish Joshi vide order dated 11.5.2011. The police produced currency notes before the Executive Magistrate, who ordered seizure of the same under Section 102 Cr.P.C. The police after lapse of one month approached the court for initiating proceedings under Section 10...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2012 (HC)

Sh. Palo Ram Vs. Guari and Others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Kuldip Singh, J. 1. The plaintiff has come in second appeal against judgment, decree dated 13.11.2000 passed by learned District Judge, Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes Chamba, Division Chamba in Civil Appeal No.45 of 1999, reversing judgment, decree dated 31.7.1999 passed by learned Sub Judge Ist Class, Dalhousie, District Chamba in Civil Suit No.5/95. Some of the parties originally before the trial Court have died, some names have been deleted, therefore, in this judgment the parties are referred as plaintiff and defendants. 2. The plaintiff Palo Ram filed the suit for declaration that he has become owner of the land measuring 13-15 bighas, specifically described in the plaint and for possession of said land. The pleaded case of the plaintiff is that suit land is entered in the name of the defendants as mortgagors and plaintiff as mortgagee as per jamabandi for the year 1989-1990. The suit land was mortgaged with the plaintiff much prio...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2012 (HC)

Khemkaran, Son of Shri Rambhajan and Another Vs. State of Himachal Pra ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Kuldip Singh, Judge (Oral). This is an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for releasing the petitioner on bail in FIR No.44/2012, dated 22.06.2012, registered at Police Station, Bharari, District Bilaspur, under Sections 376,328, 342, 497, 498, 506, 382 IPC. 2. It has been stated that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The case has been registered on the complaint of Jaswant Singh filed under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. in the Court of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Court No.3, Ghumarwin. The complainant has alleged that his marriage was solemnized with prosecutrix in January, 2006. From the wedlock one male child was born. In October, Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2011, petitioner came to his house for repairing work. On 10.05.2012, the petitioner abducted prosecutrix and had stolen `90,000/- including gold ornaments. The complainant lodged missing report of his wife. 3. The prosecutrix contacted the complainant on his...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2012 (HC)

Krishan Lal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

V.K. Sharma, J. Oral: 1. The petition has been filed on the following substantive prayer:- It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the petition may kindly be allowed and the impugned order dated 16.2.2010 passed by the Ld. Presiding Judge, Shimla, Annexure-P/6 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondent No.1 and 2 may kindly also be directed to assign the seniority to the petitioner w.e.f. November 1996 when the petitioner was initially engaged on work. 2. Background facts may be stated thus. The petitioner had joined the employment of the respondent-Irrigation and Public Health Department (in short I and PH Deptt.) as daily rated beldar in November, 1996. He was disengaged on 1.9.2001. On a dispute raised by him the matter was referred to the court for adjudication on 11.12.2002, wherein the following consent order dated 3.7.2006, Annexure P/6, was passed:- 3.7.2006 Present Shri Shashi Shirshu, Advocate for petitioner. Shri T.C. Kainthla, Ld. DDA for respondent with Shri Balbi...

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 2012 (HC)

Beasa Thakur Vs. State of H.P. Through Secretary Technical Education V ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

1. The petitioner, by means of this petition, has laid challenge to the order, dated 1st September, 2012, Annexure P2, whereby she has been transferred from Mandi to Jogindernagar. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that she is not an Instructor, but a Junior Tailoring Mistress and, therefore, she could not have been transferred in place of private respondent, who is an Instructor. Believing the submission of the petitioner to be correct, we had stayed the impugned order on 11.9.2012 in the following terms: CMP No. 11003 of 2012 Notice in the aforesaid terms. The grievance of the petitioner is that though she is actually Junior Tailoring Mistress but she has wrongly been shown as Instructor (Embroidery and Needle Work) and posted in place of respondent No.3, who actually is an Instructor (Embroidery and Needle Work) and the RandP Rules of the two posts are not the same. In view of the aforesaid submissions the impugned order is stayed in case the petitioner is not relieved till...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //