Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: kolkata Page 2 of about 44,450 results (0.215 seconds)

Sep 20 2017 (HC)

Government of West Bengal and Anr. Vs. Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius ...

Court : Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Original Side A.P.No.1046 of 2016 G.A.No.211 of 2017 Government of West Bengal & Anr. versus Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius) Co.& Anr. For the petitioners:- Mr.Pratap Chatterjee, Sr.Advocate Mr.Jishnu Saha, Sr.Advocate Mr.Amar Gupta Mr.Sanjay Ginodia Mr.Manoj Kumar Tewari Mr.Mayank Mishra Mr.Sidharth Sethi Advocates For the Respondent No.1 (CPMC) Petitioner:- Mr.Siddhartha Mitra, Sr.Advocate Ms.Mousumi Bhattacharya Mr.D.Gomes Mr.Soumitra Dutta Advocates For the Respondent No.2 (HPL).Mr.Anindya Kumar Mitra, Sr.Advocate Mr.Deepan Sarkar Mr.S.Prasad Mr.Partha Basu Judgement On: - 20th September, 2017 I.P.MUKERJI, J. This court heard an application (G.A.No.211 of 2017).taken out by the respondent No.1, Chatterjee Petrochem (Mauritius) Co.in an application (A.P.No.1046 of 2016) to set aside a partial final award made by an arbitral tribunal, signed and delivered in Paris on 9th September, 2016. The application asked for dis...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2017 (HC)

M/S Banwarilal Goel and Sons and Ors. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporatio ...

Court : Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE W.P.472 OF2017M/s Banwarilal Goel & Sons & ORS.-VSKolkata Municipal Corporation & ORS.Before: HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Mr.Arindam Banerjee, Mr.S.E.Huda, Mr.Ritoban Sarkar, Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh . For the PetitioneRs.Mr.Achinta Banerjee, Mr.Ambar Nath Banerjee, Mr.Amrita Panja Moulick . For KMC. Mr.Arnab Dutt For Proforma Respondents. Date: 18.09.2017 The Court: The Petitioner has not only challenged the hearing notices issued by the competent authority proposing to enhance the annual valuation of the property in question but also challenged the final order of the Hearing Officer determining the annual valuation for the purpose of ascertaining the property tax laviable on the premises owned by the Petitioner. The Petitioner claimed to be the owner of the municipal premises number 17, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Road, Kolkata 700 025. A letter dated 11th September, 2014 was issued upon the Petitioner No.1 by...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2017 (HC)

Lindsay International Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Laxmi Niwas Mittal and Or ...

Court : Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BEFORE: THE HONBLE JUSTICE SOUMEN SEN G.A.No.1951 of 2017 C.S.No.2 of 2017 LINDSAY INTERNATIONAL PVT.LTD.& ORS.versus LAXMI NIWAS MITTAL & ORS.For the Plaintiff : Mr.S.K.Kapoor, Sr.Adv., Mr.Jay Saha, Sr.Adv., Mr.Ravi Kapur, Adv., Mr.Shaunak Mitra, Adv., Mr.S.R.Kakrania, Adv., Mr.Sanjeeb Seni, Adv.MRS.Priyanka Prasad, Adv., Mr.Arkadeb Biswas, Adv.For the Defendant No.1 : Mr.P.Chidambaram, Sr.Adv., Mr.Siddhartha Datta, Adv., Mr.Bodhisatta Biswas, Adv., Ms.Surabhi Binani, Adv.Hearing Concluded On : 04.09.2017 Judgment On : 18th September, 2017 Soumen Sen, J.:- The defendant No.1 is the applicant. This is an application for revocation of leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent and for dismissal of suit on the ground that the plaint does not disclose any cause of action against the defendant no.1. The contention of the defendant no.1 is that according to the plaintiffs there was a pre-incorporation agreemen...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2017 (HC)

Debraj Dhur and Ors. Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE W.P.49 OF2017Debraj Dhur & ORS.-VSKolkata Municipal Corporation & ORS.Before: HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Mr.Saktinath Mukherjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.Debabrata Saha Ray, Adv., Mr.Indrajit Mitra, Adv., Mr.Pingal Bhattacharya, Adv.. For the PetitioneRs.Mr.Ashok Banerjee, Sr.Adv., Mr.Alok Kumar Ghosh, Adv., Mr.Debjit Mukherjee, Adv.. For KMC. Order On: 18.09.2017 The Court: There is a checkered history of the instant case. The Petitioner is challenging the action of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation fixing the compensation amount for the land acquired for widening the public road and ascertaining the area of land actually taken for such purposes. The facts, which emanate from the Writ Petition, are adumbrated hereinbelow. The Petitioners are the co-sharers of Premises No.20, Seven Tanks Lane, Kolkata 700 030. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation acquired a considerable portion of a land from the said premises in the ye...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2017 (HC)

Central Circle 3(1), Kolkata and Ors. Vs. Emta Coal Limited

Court : Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Original Side W.P.No.33 of 2016 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 3(1).Kolkata & ORS.versus Emta Coal Limited With W.P.No.34 of 2016 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 3(1).Kolkata & ORS.versus Emta Coal Limited With W.P.No.35 of 2016 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle - 3(1).Kolkata & ORS.versus Emta Coal Limited For the Petitioners : Mr.Kaushik Chandra, Addl. Solicitor General Mr.Prithu Dudhoria, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.J.P.Khaitan, Sr.Advocate Mr.Akhilesh Gupta, Advocate Mr.P.K.Jhunjhunwala, Advocate Mr.S.Rudra, Advocate Hearing concluded on : August 11, 2017 Judgment on : September 15, 2017 DEBANGSU BASAK, J.:- The Income Tax Department has challenged an Order dated June 10, 2014 passed by the Settlement Commission (Income Tax and Wealth Tax).Additional Bench, Kolkata in these writ petitions. The three writ petitions, all at the behest of the Income Ta...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2017 (HC)

Petitioner Vs. Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE Present : The Honble Mr.Justice Biswanath Somadder. WP959of 2013 Kariwala Industries Limited ....Writ Petitioner versus Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone & ORS...Respondents For the Writ Petitioner : Mr.J.P. Khaitan, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Ashok Bose, Mr.Ajay Gaggar, Ms.Anupa Banerjee, Mr.A.Guha, Mr.Agnibesh Sengupta, Ms.Rakhi Purnima Paul.Advocates For the Respondents : Mr.Anup Mukhopadhyay, Advocate .for Union of India Mr.Bhaskar Prasad Banerjee, Mr.Amitabrata Ray .Advocates for Commissioner of CustoMs.Kolkata. Mr.Alok Kumar Banerjee, Mr.P.K. Das, Mr.Arunabha Sarkar.Advocates for RBI. Heard on : 26.09.2014, 28.11.2014, 26.06.2015, 10.07.2015, 28.08.2015, 11.09.2015, 04.12.2015, 11.12.2015, 15.07.2016, 23.09.2016, 09.12.2016, 13.01.2017, 10.02.2017, 17.02.2017, 10.03.2017, 17.03.2017, 05.05.2017, 16.06.2017, & 28.07.2017. Judgement on : 15.09.2017. 30.01.2015, 19.06.2015, 31.07.2015, 21.08.2015,...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2017 (HC)

Sk. Aishan Hossain Vs. The Kolkata Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

ORDER SHEET WP4772017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE SK. AISHAN HOSSAIN Versus THE KOLKATA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Date : 15th September, 2017. Mr.Ramji Munsi, Adv., for the petitioner. Mr.Swagata Datta, Adv., for the respondent no.6. Mr.Gurudas Mitra, Adv., for the KMC. Mr.Suman Dey, Adv., for the State. The Court : The present writ petition is filed seeking direction for demolition of an unauthorized construction of G+5 storied building at premises no.33, Dr.Sudhir Basu Road, Kolkata700 023. According to the petitioner, the factum of unauthorized and illegal construction was known to the Corporation. Yet, the Corporation did not take any step against the private respondent. On the other hand, the Corporation says that immediately upon detecting that the private respondent has made an unauthorized and illegal constriction, an FIR was lodged under Section 401A of the Kolkata Municipal Corporatio...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 15 2017 (HC)

Mohammed Faisal Ekram Vs. Kazi Rezaur Rahaman

Court : Kolkata

OD-9 ORDER SHEET CS209of 2016 GA1915of 2017 GA2105of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE MOHAMMED FAISAL EKRAM Versus KAZI REZAUR RAHAMAN BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SAHIDULLAH MUNSHI Date : 15th September, 2017. Appearance: Mr.Arindam Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Supratim Laha, Adv.Ms.Sutapa Mitra, Adv.for the plaintiff Mr.Anirban Majumdar, Adv.Ms.Rima Das, Adv.Mr.Sourav Banerjee, Adv.for the defendant The Court : CS209of 2016 has been filed praying for a decree for a sum of Rs.11,50,000/- from the defendant which is evident from the summons which was issued by this Court. Admittedly, the suit is under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure. At the instance of the plaintiff the matter was brought in the list on 5th May, 2017 contending, inter alia, that no written statement was filed by the defendant despite they had entered appearance. Such order was recorded on 5th may, 2017. By the order dated 5th May, 2017 the suit was fixed on the category ...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2017 (HC)

Bengal Rowing Club and Anr. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, Kolkata a ...

Court : Kolkata

ORDER SHEET GA No.1539 of 2015 WP No.534 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE BENGAL ROWING CLUB & ANR. Versus COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX, KOLKATA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE DEBANGSU BASAK Date : 14th September, 2017. Appearance: Mr.J.P.Khaitan, Sr.Adv.Mr.Pradeep Sancheti, Adv.Mr.Shovendu Banerjee, Adv.Mr Agnibesh Sengupta, Adv.For the petitioneRs.Mr.Somnath Ganguli, Adv.Mr.Aiswarya Rajyashree, Adv.For the respondents. The Court : - A members club seeks a declaration that a members club is not a club or association within the meaning of Chapter-V of the Finance Act, 1994 as amended by the Finance Act, 2005 and is therefore, not liable to pay any service tax under such Act. Learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners submits that, there are distinctions and differences between a members club and a proprietary club. A members club functions on mutuality. Such mutuality is not available in the case of proprietary club. Learned Senior...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2017 (HC)

(Deceased) Vs. The State of West Bengal and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE W.P.930 OF2016Bimal Kumar Shah, Executor to the Will of Birinchi Behari Shaw, (deceased) -VSThe State of West Bengal & ORS.Before: HONBLE Mr.JUSTICE HARISH TANDON Mr.S.N.Mukherjee, Sr.Advocate, Mr.Utpal Bose, Sr.Advocate, Mr.K.A.Bhaduri . For the Petitioner. Mr.Alak Kumar Ghosh, Mr.Gopal Chandra Das, Mr.Debangshu Mondal . For the Respondents. Date: 14.09.2017 The Court: The present Writ Petition is filed not only for quashing, cancelling and / or rescinding the acquisition of premises number 106C, Narkeldanga North Road, Kolkata 700 011 but also for correction of a mutation record maintained by the Kolkata Municipal Corporation by deleting the name of the Corporation as owner and inserting the name of the Petitioner therein. The other consequential reliefs in the form of a compensation and forbearance from dealing with and / or encumbering the said property and / or making any construction are also sought for...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //