Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: maharashtra state consumer disputes redressal commission scdrc aurangabad Page 12 of about 120 results (0.487 seconds)

Jan 09 2014 (TRI)

Sbi Life Insurance Company Ltd. and Another Vs. Lalitha Subhashrao Chi ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

K.B. Gawali, Member: 01. This appeal is preferred by the original opponent Nos. 1 and 2 against the judgment and order dated 20/02/2008 passed by the District Consumer Forum in complaint case No. 226/2007 whereby the complaint is partly allowed by holding appellants liable for deficiency in service. The respondent No. 1 is the original complainant, whereas the respondent No. 2 is the agent of appellants. For better understanding the appellant Nos. 1 and 2 hereinafter jointly termed as "Opponent insurance company ", the respondent No. 1 as the "complainant" and respondent No. 2 as the agent of opponent insurance company. 02. Facts giving rise to this appeal are as under : That, the complainant is the mother of deceased Sachin Subhashrao Chidrawar . That, the deceased Sachin during his life time had obtained insurance policy No. 2402084501 from the opponent insurance company having the death benefit of Rs 5,00,000/- and critical illness of Rs 5,00,000/- w.e.f.from 12/01/2007. That, after...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2014 (TRI)

Chief Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Dis. Co. Ltd. and Anothe ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

K.B. Gawali, Member: 1. This appeal is an exception to the judgment and order dated 15.11.2007 passed by the District Forum, Beed in consumer complaint No.41/2007, whereby the complaint is partly allowed. The appellants are the officers of the MSEDCL who are original opponents (hereinafter referred as œopponents?), whereas respondent is the original complainant (hereinafter referred as œcomplainant?). 2. The facts of the case in a nutshell are that the complainant had obtained electric connection to his Municipal house No.929 situated at Ambajogai, District Beed since the year 1997 having meter No.R-5581. That for the last 17-18 years he had been regularly paying the electric bills. That on 10.02.2006 there was a sudden increase in the power supply due to which his TV caught fire and subsequently the said fire spread in his house in which the other articles such as mixture, fan, iron, utensils, the windows and doors of the house and the cash of Rs.10,000/- was burnt. It was...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2014 (TRI)

Shaikh Sadulla Abdul Gafur Samda Vs. Tata Motor Finance Ltd. and Other ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. This appeal is directed against judgment and order dated 17.10.2008 passed by District Consumer Forum Nanded, partly allowing C.C.No.227/2008 directing opponent finance company to pay to complainant compensation of Rs.2000/- and Rs.1000/- towards cost of the proceedings and further to return cheque etc. (For the sake of brevity appellant is herein after referred as complainant and respondent as opponent finance company) 2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that:- On 3.1.2004 complainant Shaikh Sadulla purchased Tata Sumo jeep bearing registration number as MH-26-741 for Rs.3,14,000/- by borrowing loan of Rs.3,14,000/- from opponent No.1 finance company. It was agreed by complainant to repay the loan amount with interest by 47 monthly instalment of Rs.8870/-. Accordingly complainant executed deed of agreement in favour of opponent No.1 finance company hypothecating the vehicle. As per complainant he has paid 45 monthly instalment...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2014 (TRI)

The Bajaj Auto Limited and Another Vs. Shaikh Rafiq Shaikh Osman and A ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 9.10.2006 passed by District Consumer Forum Beed partly allowing consumer complaint No.480/02 directing appellants/opponents 1 and 2 to pay to the respondent/complainant amount of Rs.73,845/- with interest @ 9% p.a. towards the cost of auto rickshaw and Rs.25,000/- more compensation for causing mental torture. (For the sake of brevity appellant is hereinafter referred as opponent and respondent No.1 as complainant , respondent No.2 as opponent No.3) 2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that:- Opponent No.1 Bajaj Auto Ltd. is manufacturing company and opponent No.1 Pagariya Auto Centre is dealer of opponent No.2, opponent No.3 Samarth Auto is service centre. On 18.12.2000 complainant purchased auto rickshaw from opponent No.2 for consideration of Rs.68,345/-. Complainant was also required to spend amount of Rs.5500/- towards registration charges. According to complainant th...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2014 (TRI)

Rekha Arun Salvi Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Through Its ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 5.3.2008 passed by Dist.Consumer Forum Parbhani dismissing the consumer complaint No.213/2007. (For the sake of brevity appellant is herein after referred as complainant and respondent as 'opponent insurance company') 2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that:- Late Arun Salvi who was the husband of complainant Smt.Rekha died on 9.8.2006 by heart attack. On 2.1.2006 he had obtained LIC policy covering risk of Rs.50,000/- from opponent. After his death his widow complainant Smt.Rekha submitted the claim with opponent LIC. As per the terms and conditions of the policy deceased paid monthly premiums till the month of June 2006. However the opponent repudiated her claim on the ground that while submitting insurance proposal deceased Arun suppressed the material information about his illness. Therefore complainant has filed consumer complaint alleging deficiency in service on t...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2014 (TRI)

Anand Nagari Urban Credit Co-op. Society Ltd. Vs. Walmik

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 10.09.2008 passed by District Consumer Forum, Parbhani partly allowing consumer complaint No.105/2008 directing the appellant/opponent credit society to pay to the complainant amount of shares of Rs.75,000/- with interest @ 9% p.a. and further compensation Rs.500/- and Rs.500/- more towards cost of the proceeding. (For the sake of brevity the appellant is hereinafter referred as the œopponent society? and respondent as the œcomplainant?. 2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that, opponent is a credit society. It advances loan to its members. The complainant is a member of opponent society since the year 2007. On 30.09.2007 the opponent society received amount Rs.7500/- from the complainant towards shares and issued share certificate. Loan Rs.30,000/- was advanced to the complainant and out of the loan, the amount of shares was deducted. According to the complai...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2014 (TRI)

Assistant Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd ...

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 9.6.2008 passed by District Consumer Forum Nanded in C.C.No.59/2008 whereby the complaint is allowed by holding the appellant to have committed deficiency in service. (For the sake of brevity appellants are herein after referred as "opponents" whereas respondent as "the complainant".) 2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that :- complainant had obtained the electric connection from opponents for his agriculture power pump installed on the borewell situated in land admeasuring 60R in Gut No.239 owned by him. It is also contended by him that land from Gut No.688 admeasuring 40R was also being irrigated from this power pump. It is submitted by him that there was regular electric supply up to year 2003. However, on 9.10.2003 it was noticed that the aluminum wire on the electric poles was stolen and crime No.88/2003 was also registered with the police. That, due to the said theft o...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2014 (TRI)

Uniphos Seeds and Biogenetic and Another Vs. Bhagwat Ramdas Patil

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. Challenge in this appeal is the judgment and order dated 15.1.2008 passed by District Consumer Forum, Jalgaon in C.C.No.31/2007 whereby the complaint is partly allowed by holding appellant as responsible for deficiency in service. (For the sake of brevity appellant No.1 seed manufacturing company is herein after referred as "opponent seed company" whereas appellant No.2 is referred as "opponent dealer" and respondent as the "complainant"). 2. Brief facts giving rise to this appeal are that:- Complainant is a farmer having land admeasuring 5 acres from Gut No.30 of village Khirdi, Tq.Chopada, Dist.Jalgaon. It is submitted by complainant that he had purchased seeds of Papai Goldi on 26.12.2005 of lot No.61505 from opponent dealer. As regards cultivating of seeds he has submitted that he purchased six bags each containing 10 gm(wrongly mentioned as 10 kg) at rate of Rs.1750/- for each bag i.e. for the total amount of Rs.10,500/-. That, after th...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2014 (TRI)

M/S New India Assurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Haribhau Laxmanrao Shinde

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

S.M. Shembole, Presiding Judicial Member: 1. Challenge in both these appeals are the judgments and orders dated 31.10.2008 passed by District Consumer Forum Latur partly allowing C.C.No.132/2008 and 133/2008 directing appellant/opponent insurance company to pay to the complainant amount of insurance Rs.1 lakh and Rs.50,000/- respectively with interest @ 9% p.a. within 30 days from the date of receipt of the judgments and orders and further compensation of Rs.3000/- and Rs.2000/- more towards cost of proceedings in each complaints. (For the sake of brevity appellant is herein after referred as "opponent insurance company" and respondent as "the complainant") 2. As both the complaints are filed by the same complainant against the same opponent insurance company claiming amount of insurance of two policies, we have decided to dispose of both these appeals by this common judgment. 3. The brief facts giving rise to these appeals are that:- Complainant Shri.Haribhau Shinde is running busines...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 24 2013 (TRI)

Gangadhar Balaji Sudhewad Vs. Deorao Mariba Sonbkamble and Another

Court : Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Aurangabad

K.B. Gawali, Member: 1. The original opponent No. 2 who is the Ex-Chairmen of the Zilla Parishad Shikshan and Karmachari Sahkari Patsanstha Ltd has challenged the impugned judgment and order passed by the Dist. Forum, Nanded in CC.No. 259/2007, whereby the complaint is partly allowed. The respondent No. 1 is the original complainant ( hereinafter termed as the œcomplainant?. ) whereas the respondent No. 2 is the original opponent No. 1 which is Credit Co-operative Society ( hereinafter termed as the œOpponent society?.) 2. Facts giving rise to this appeal are as under. That, the complainant had obtained loan of Rs 33,000/- from the society in the year 1999. That, he had repaid the entire balance loan amount Rs 42,605/- on 18/12/2003. That, out of the payment of this balance loan amount Rs 42,605/-, the amount of Rs 12,605/- was adjusted against the amount of the share already paid by him with the society and the rest of Rs 30,000/- paid in cash through his relative namely S...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //