Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Court: rajasthan jodhpur Page 16 of about 2,876 results (0.220 seconds)

Nov 13 2014 (HC)

Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. ZahiruddIn and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR (1) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.789/2014 State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Zahiruddin & Anr. (2) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.815/2014 State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs.Bhawani Singh Solanki & Anr. (3) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.827/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Bansi Lal Teli & Ors. (4) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.828/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Saddiqui Mohd.Chhipa & Ors (5) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.830/2014 State of Rajasthan Vs.Bansi Lal Teli (6) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.832/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Zahiruddin & Ors. (7) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.833/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Om Prakash Bangar & Ors. (8) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.834/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Bhawani Singh Solanki & Ors (9) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.849/2014 State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Altaf Hussain & Anr. (10) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.854/2014 State of Rajasth...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2014 (HC)

State of Raj Vs. Bansi Lal Teli

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR (1) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.789/2014 State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Zahiruddin & Anr. (2) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.815/2014 State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs.Bhawani Singh Solanki & Anr. (3) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.827/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Bansi Lal Teli & Ors. (4) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.828/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Saddiqui Mohd.Chhipa & Ors (5) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.830/2014 State of Rajasthan Vs.Bansi Lal Teli (6) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.832/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Zahiruddin & Ors. (7) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.833/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Om Prakash Bangar & Ors. (8) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.834/2014 Municipal Council, Bhilwara Vs. Bhawani Singh Solanki & Ors (9) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.849/2014 State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Altaf Hussain & Anr. (10) D.B.Civil Special Appeal (W) No.854/2014 State of Rajasth...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 2014 (HC)

State Vs. Kuldeep Singh

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL LEAVE TO APPEAL NO.6/2014 State of Rajasthan versus Kuldeep Singh Date of order : 12.11.2014 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.M.S.Panwar, for the petitioner. The instant leave to appeal has been preferred by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment dated 24.9.2013 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar in Cr.Case No.269/2011 whereby the learned trial Court acquitted the respondent from the offence under Section 279 and 304A IPC. I have heard learned Public Prosecutor and have gone through the record. The respondent was tried by the learned trial Court for the offences under Sections 279 and 304A IPC. The trial court acquitted the respondent on the ground that the prosecution could not lead any evidence to show as to how and in what manner the accident occurred. It was observed by the trial court that the sole eye-witness of the incident Narendra Sing...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 2014 (HC)

Bhagwan Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 S.B.Criminal Revision Petition No.1154/2014 Bhagwan versus State of Rajasthan. 12.11.2014 Hon'ble Mr.Justice Sandeep Mehta Mr.Ramesh Purohit, for the petitioner. Mr.LR Upadhyay, PP, for the respondent State..Heard. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner through his natural guardian mother Nosar under Section 53 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 challenging the order dated 20.10.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Bhilwara whereby he rejected the appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 10.10.2014 passed by the learned Juvenile Justice Board, Bhilwara rejecting the prayer of the petitioner for being released to the guardianship/custody of his mother Nosar. The petitioner has been charge-sheeted for offences under Sections 363, 366A, 376(D) and 120B IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act. Assailing the orders impugned, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prosecutrix and the accused are both of...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 2014 (HC)

Surendra Bahadur Singh Vs. Kapil Soni and anr

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6816/2014 Surendra Bahadur Singh versus Kapil Soni & Anr. Date of Order :: 12th November, 2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr.Narendra Thanvi, for the petitioner. Mr.H.R.Soni, for the respondents. ---- BY THE COURT: This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against order dated 12.04.2014 passed by the trial court, whereby, the application filed by the respondent- plaintiff under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 ('the Act') has been allowed. During pendency of the suit, the plaintiff filed an application under Section 65 of the Act, inter alia, with the averments that a copy of the rent note, which had been filed with the plaint, its original was not available; a copy whereof was filed by his father in the suit filed by him before the Court of Additional Munsif No.2, Jodhpur and the defendant Trilok Chand Golecha in his written statem...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 12 2014 (HC)

Bhawana and ors Vs. Chandmal

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

BHAWANA & ORS. VS. CHANDMAL (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.14104/13) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER BHAWANA & ORS. VS. CHANDMAL (S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.14104/13) Dated:- 12th November, 2014. HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANGEET LODHA Mr.Sandeep Saruparia, for the petitioners. Ms. Vintee Kela, for the respondent. Reportable 1. This writ petition is directed against order dated 18.10.13 passed by the Additional District Judge No.2,Bhilwara in Civil Suit No.39/11, whereby an application preferred by the petitioners- defendants under Order XXXXVII Rule 1 CPC seeking review of order dated 18.9.12 rejecting the objection of the petitioners regarding admissibility in evidence of a document i.e. an agreement to sell dated 4.7.09, stands dismissed.2. The relevant facts are that the respondent-plaintiff preferred a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,70,000/- with the averments that he had purchased the khatedari land of the petitioners-defendants comprising khasra no.580 a...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2014 (HC)

Kishani Devi Vs. Lal Nath

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.184/2010 Kishani Devi versus Lal Nath IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.184/2010 Kishani Devi versus Lal Nath Date of order : 11.11.2014 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.H.S.Shrimali, for the petitioner. Mr.O.P.Rathi, P.P.for the State. The instant miscellaneous petition is preferred against the order dated 13/4/2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2, Bikaner in revision whereby, the learned revisional court partly accepted the revision preferred by the respondent and modified the order dated 15/1/2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nokha in Criminal Case No.19/2003. The petitioner being the wife of the respondent filed an application under section 125 Cr.P.C.before the Judicial Magistrate, claiming maintenance for herself and her children. The application was allowed by order dated 15/1/2008 and the Magistrate directed that the respondent shall b...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2014 (HC)

Smt.Mamta Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1708/2014 Smt.Mamta versus State of Rajasthan IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1708/2014 Smt.Mamta versus State of Rajasthan Date of order : 11.11.2014 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.Ranjeet Singh, for the petitioner. Mr.O.P.Rathi, P.P., for the State. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner assailing the order dated 11.8.2009 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sanchore in Cr.Case No.560/2009 whereby the learned Magistrate took cognizance against the petitioner for the offence under Section 3(1)(6) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1961. The order taking cognizance has been assailed on the ground that the same is barred by limitation prescribed under Section 468 Cr.P.C.Facts in brief are that the SHO Chitalwana, District Jalore filed a complaint against the petitioner for the aforesaid offence in the court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, San...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 11 2014 (HC)

Anil Kumar Bairwa and anr Vs. Govind Singh Rathore

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :ORDER: S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO.600/2014 IN S.B.CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4680/2013 Anil Kumar Bairwa & Anr. versus Shri Govind Singh Rathore Date of Order :: 11.11.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the petitioneRs.---- BY THE COURT: Heard learned counsel for the petitioneRs.This contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of order dated 03.05.2013 passed by this Court. By order dated 03.05.2013, it was directed as under:- The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the respondent Municipal Board, Khudala Falna has wrongly convened the meeting on 18.04.2013 and dismantling all the existing Committee, the meeting has been deferred and thus, the present petitioners sitting members of existing Committees have been deprived of their status as well as not to work in those Committees. The impugned action is in violation of provision of the Act and the relevant Rules..............

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 2014 (HC)

Guddi Paliwal Vs. State and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

1 D.B.Civil Special Appeal(Writ) No.1399/2014 Guddi Paliwal V/s State of Rajasthan & ORS.5.11.2014 HONBLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUNIL AMBWANI HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.K.LOHRA Mr.D.S.Sodha for the appellant. It is alleged that in the selection of Aanganwari Worker, the respondent no.6 has been wrongly selected, inasmuch as, she was less than 19 years of age when the resolution was passed by the Gram Panchayat. It is stated that the minimum age prescribed for selection of Aanganwari Worker is 21 yeaRs.In exceptional circumstances when no candidate is available, the age can be relaxed by the Gram Panchayat. According to the appellant, the respondent no.6 was born on 2.11.1994, which is sought to be established by the mark-sheet issued to her by the Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan for the Secondary Examination, 2011 vide Roll No.0577506 recording her date of birth to be 2.11.1994. On 16.8.2013 when the resolution was passed by the Gram Panchayat, she was less than 19 years of age. Learne...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //