Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 10 of about 756,017 results (2.246 seconds)

Feb 05 2020 (SC)

Shri Govinda Chandra Tiria Vs. Sibaji Charan Panda

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3542-3543/2010 SHRI GOVINDA CHANDRA TIRIA Appellant(s) VERSUS SIBAJI CHARAN PANDA & ORS. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. On the recommendation of the Staff Selection Commission, the respondent No.1 before us was so offered an appointment to the post of Lower Division Clerk (LDC) Group C in the Ministry of Environment & Forests, Government of India, New Delhi in the pay scale of Rs.950-1500/- vide letter dated 24.05.1993. In terms of this letter of appointment, the head quarter of the work was at New Delhi, but the appointment carried with it a liability to serve anywhere in India. On completion of the period of probation of two years, the respondent NO.1 made an application dated 22.07.1994 in pursuance to Circular dated 24.11.1993, seeking options from the staff for the post of LDC on transfer on deputation basis initially for a period of one year, which was likely to be extended t...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 2020 (SC)

M/S High Range Coffee Curing pvt.ltd. Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).10680-10683 OF2011M/S HIGH RANGE COFFEE CURING PVT.LTD. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.ETC. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.10684 OF2011ORDER1 2. Heard counsel for the parties. The opening ground urged by the appellant is that the High Court ought not to have entertained the appeals on merits without condoning the delay in filing of appeals. This argument though attractive at the first blush, does not take the matter any further as we find the delay was only of 71 and 283 days respectively and sufficient explanation has been offered by the respondent(s) which could be condoned in the interest of justice and we order accordingly. 2 3. The core issue raised in these appeals, in our opinion, is no more res integra. It has been answered in the decision of this Court in Malnad Areca Processing and Marketing Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Assessment) and Other...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2020 (HC)

M/S. Wipro Enterprises (P) Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE4H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT W.P. NOS. 52272/2016 & 58523-58533/2016 C/W W. P. NOS. 25450/2016 & 26503-26513/2016, 38863/2016 & 48608-48618/2016, 51482-51483/2016 & 51543-51552/2016, 16458/2017 (T-RES) IN W.P. NOS. 52272/2016 & 58523-58533/2016:BETWEEN : M/S. WIPRO ENTERPRISES (P) LTD (FORMERLY PART OF M/S WIPRO LTD., CONSUMER CARE AND LIGHTING DIVISION), NO.105, HOOTAGALLI INDUSTRIAL AREA, MYSORE-570018. REPRESENTED BY (VISHAL MITTAL. GROUP MANAGER LEGAL AND INDIRECT TAXES PETITIONER (BY SRI. G SHIVADASS, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W MS. SONAL SINGH & SRI. RAVI RAGHAVAN, ADVOCATES) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES IN KARNATAKA VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009.3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF2COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT)-1, SESHADRI BHAVAN, DEWANS ROAD, MYSOR...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2020 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Gopaldas Bhagwan Das and Ors

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3636 OF2016UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS GOPALDAS BHAGWAN DAS & ORS. Respondent(s) R. F. Nariman J.JUDGMENT This matter has a somewhat chequered history. In 1943, Government of India requisitioned 4 acres and 34 gunthas of the land owned by one Rajabahadur Bhagwandas Haridas, bearing Survey No.120/2 (Part) of Village Malad, Mumbai, in exercise of powers conferred under Rule 75A of the Defence of India Rules, 1939. On 27.07.1949, the Collector, Thane, de-requisitioned 2.68 acres in the Survey No.120 Part 2 out of the aforesaid 4 acres 34 gunthas. Ultimately, despite the land having first being requisitioned, a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as Act), was issued on 24.10.1975 acquiring the aforesaid extent of 8623 square meters. A declaration under Section 6 of the Act was issued on 30.11.1978. According to the respondents herein, a ...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 2020 (SC)

Md. Ali Imam Vs. The State of Bihar Thr. Its Chief Secretary

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.990-992/2020 [@ SLP [C]. NOS.18577-18579/2018]. MD. ALI IMAM & ORS.ETC.ETC. Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.993/2020 [@ SLP(C) No.20783/2018 (XVI)]. CIVIL APPEAL NO.994/2020 [@ SLP(C) No.26881/2018 (XVI)]. JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.Leave granted.2. The appellants before us are the retired teaching and non- teaching employees of the deficit grant minority colleges of the State of Bihar who are aggrieved by what is alleged to be unreasonable and arbitrary discrimination between such of them who retired before 31.08.2010, as against those who retired after that date, for the grant of benefit of the amendment made to the Triple Benefit Scheme.3. We may, at the inception, first note that the appellants before us have impleaded not only the State of Bihar but also the 2 concerned Universities being respondent Nos.3 to 8 since ...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2020 (HC)

M/S Jakkur Promoters Pvt Ltd Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.A.PATIL CRIMINAL PETITION NO.824/2019 BETWEEN :1. M/s. Jakkur Promoters Pvt. Ltd., (Earlier known as M/s. Mantri Promoters) Having its registered address at Mantri House No.41, Vittal Mallya Road, Bengaluru-560 001 Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr. Ravishankar B.S., 2. M/s. Hamara Shelters Private Limited No.41, Vittal Mallya Road Bengalore-560 001 Represented by its Authorised Signatory Mr.Ravishankar B.S.3. Sri Venkat Surya Kumar S/o Rama Rao Challa Aged about 50 years Director, M/s. Hamara Shelters Pvt. Ltd., No.25/21, 1st B Main Road Hebbal Mills, Ganganagar Extension Bengaluru-560 032. 4. Methuku Srinivas S/o Janardhanam Setty Methuku Aged about 46 years Director, M/s. Hamara Shelters Pvt. Ltd., No.55 Sri Sai Khuteers 4th Cross, 1st Main, Meenakshi Residency Kodipalya, Kengeri Hobli Bengaluru-560 050.5. Mantri Developers Private Limited Partner M/s. Mantr...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2020 (HC)

Sri N M Premkumar Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 R BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ CRIMINAL APPEAL No.36/2019 BETWEEN SRI. N.M.PREMKUMAR, S/O. MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT28YEARS, NAGADENAHALLI VILLAGE, SRINIVASPURA TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 101.... APPELLANT [BY SRI. VEERANNA G. TIGADI, ADVOCATE]. AND STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SRINIVASPURA POLICE, SRINIVASPURA, KOLAR DISTRICT, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560 001. [BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP].... RESPONDENT * * * THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S3742) OF CR.P.C., IMPUGNED JUDGMENT OF PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE CONVICTION AND ORDER OF SENTENCE DATED1012.2018, PASSED BY THE II ADDITONAL SESSIONS JUDGE AT KOLAR [SPECIAL COURT FOR POCSO]. IN S.C. NO.31/2017, CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S363 376(2)(i) OF IPC AND SECTION6OF POCSO ACT. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2020 (HC)

Sri T N Raghupathy Vs. The High Court of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31t DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE SHRI ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ WRIT PETITION No.6380 OF2019(GM-RES-PIL) C/W W.P. Nos. 5368/2019 (GM-RES), 35595/2019 (GM-RES-PIL) and 7388/2019 (GM-RES) BETWEEN : In W.P. No.6380 of 2019 Sri. T.N. Raghupathy, S/o late Narayana Udupa, Aged 69 years, R/at No.54, 1st Floor, 10th Main Road, Binny Layout, Vijayanagar, Bengaluru 560 040 . . .... Petitioner (By Sri T.N. Raghupathy,... Petitioner as party in person) 1.2. The High Court of Karnataka Through its Registrar General, High Court Buildings, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru 560001. The Committee for Designation of Senior Advocates of High Court of Karnataka Through its Secretary High Court Buildings, 2 Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru 560001. Sri R.V. Subramanya Naik (RVS Naik), Senior Advocate, Aged about 64 years, No.5, 3rd Main Road, N.R. Colony, Bengaluru 560019. Sri Gurunath Ganga...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2020 (HC)

Satish Daniel Vs. Smt Philomina & Anr

Court : Karnataka - Kalaburagi

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR WRIT PETITION NO.203554/2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN : Satish Daniel S/o S.H. Daniel Age:75. years Occ: Retd Employee R/o H.No.1-3-5Ashapur Road, Opp: Rajmata Temple Raichur, presently in United States of America Through His Special Power of Attorney, Martin Luther S/o Jayappa, Age:54. years, Occ: Pvt. Service, r/o H.No.1-3-582/33, Ashapur Road, Raichur. (By Sri Shivanand Patil, Advocate) And:1. Smt Philomina W/o John, Age:44. years, Occ: Teacher R/o H.No.1-11-Rampur Village Tq & Dist: Raichur-584101. ...... Petitioner 2 2. John S/o Vasant Raj Age:50. years Occ: Ex-Serviceman R/o H.No.1-11-Rampur Village Tq & Dist: Raichur-584101 ...... RESPONDENTS (By Sri Sachin M. Mahajan, Advocate) This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorari or any other order of like nature and quash the impugned or...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2020 (HC)

H Suresh S/O K Hanumantappa Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE31T DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K. SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1240 OF2010BETWEEN H. SURESH S/O K HANUMANTAPPA AGED ABOUT40YEARS OCC:BUSINESS OF CEMENT AND RICE R/O NAVULE, THRIMURTHINAGARA SHIMOGA. (BY SRI. B.S. PRASAD AND SRI CHINMAYEE - ADVOCATES) AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY P.S.I. MAHILA POLICE STATION SHIMOGA. (BY SRI. M. DIVAKAR MADDUR - HCGP)... APPELLANT... RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF THE CR.P.C PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED1012.11.2010 PASSED BY THE P.O. FTC-III, SHIVAMOGGA IN S.C.NO.149/2009- CONVICTING THE APPELLANT / ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S498A) OF IPC AND ETC., THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by one H. Suresh / Accused No.1 in S.C. No.149/2009, challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 10.11.2010, passed by the Presidi...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //