Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 10 of about 755,878 results (2.208 seconds)

Dec 10 2019 (HC)

Smt. K. Gayathri Mallya Vs. The Manager

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF DECEMBER2019BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.27470/2015 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN : Smt. K. Gayathri Mallya, Wife of A. Thrivikrama Mallya, Aged about 58 years, Advocate by Profession, Residing at No.32, 7th Cross, Indiranagar First Stage, Bangalore 560 038. (By Sri Vishwajith Shetty S., Advocate) And:1. The Manager, The Urban Co-operative Bank Limited, Siddapura (U.K.), Represented by its Manager, Annappaharinayaka Bengre, Sagar Branch, Sagar 577 401, Shimoga District.... Petitioner 2. Sri S.K. Santhosh Kumar, Son of not known, Aged about 36 years, Advocate and Court Receiver, Civil Court Complex, Sagar 577 401. 2 Sri S.N. Chandrashekar, Son of Narayanappa, Aged about 45 years, Resident of Santhekadur, Shimoga 577 201. Sri K. Jagadish, Son of Krishnamoorthy, Aged about 45 years, Resident of 2nd Cross, Vidyanagar, Shimoga 577 201. Sri S. Krishnamoorthy Prabhu, Son of Manjunatha Prabhu, Age...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Smt. Bharati Sharma vs.the State & Ors.

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: December 09, 2019 + TEST.CAS. 84/2018 SMT. BHARATI SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagdeep Singh Bakshi, Mr.Abhishek Mohan and Mr. Amitesh Singh Bakshi, Advs. versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anya Singh, Adv. for R-1 / State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 276 of India Succession Act, with the following prayers:-"It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may most graciously be pleased to: a) Grant in favour of the... Petitioner, Letters of Administration, with the WILL dated 30.12.2013 annexed thereto, in respect of the estate of the deceased, namely Smt. Susheela Ambike; a) Pass any other order in favour of the... Petitioner as is deemed fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court. 2. In substance, the petitioner is seeking Letters of Administration, with the WILL dated Decembe...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Daya Rani vs.chanchal Kumar Chanana & Ors

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1394/2015 Reserved on:26. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:09. h December, 2019 DAYA RANI ..... Plaintiff Through: None. versus CHANCHAL KUMAR CHANANA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Aditya Gaur, Advocate for D-1. Gupta & Ms.Pinki Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocates for D-2. Mr. Ashish Kapur & Ms. Chhavi Luthra, Advoates for D-4 alongwith D-4 in person. % CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN JUDGMENT I.A140042018 [by defendant No.4 under Order XXIII Rule 3 r/w Section 151 of transposition as plaintiff]. and I.A. 14645/2018 [by defendant No.4 under Section 151 of the CPC for recall of settlement]. in CS(OS) 1394/2015. the CPC for 1. The defendant No.4, Ms. Geeta Budhiraja, has filed these applications for transposition as a plaintiff in the suit, and for setting aside a mediated settlement dated 12.01.2016.2. The suit was instituted by Smt. Daya Rani, mother of the defendants, on 12.05.2015. She sought partition of certain properties own...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Cargill India Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.deepayan Mohanty

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on:09. h July 2019 Judgment pronounced on:9. December 2019. + RFA(OS) 72/2018 CARGILL INDIA PVT LTD & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shadan Farasat, Mr. Atif Shamim, Mr. Jasmeet Singh & Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocates. versus DEEPAYAN MOHANTY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rohit Puri, Ms. Pragya Puri, Mr. Mizan Sidiqqui, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. This is an appeal against the judgment passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in a suit instituted by the respondent under the provisions of Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for recovery of Rs. 3,25,56,496/- along with interest. For the sake of convenience, the appellant shall be referred to as Cargill and the respondent/plaintiff as DM.2. On 17.10.1996, DM joined the services of Bharat Cargill Holding Pvt. ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Unibros vs.all India Radio & Anr.

Court : Delhi

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on:9. December, 2019 Judgment reserved on:22. d November, 2019 FAO(OS) 229/2010 UNIBROS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jagdish Vatsa, Advocate. Versus ALL INDIA RADIO & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri and Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates for respondent no.1 Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against the judgment dated 25.02.2010 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court by which objections filed by respondent No.1 to the Award dated 15.07.2002 have been allowed, and also costs of Rs.50,000/- have been granted in favour of respondent No.1.2. Some necessary facts required to be noticed for the disposal of this appeal are that the parties e...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Micromax Informatics Limited vs.shivi Enterprises

Court : Delhi

$~A-43 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h Decemeber, 2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 504/2019 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Nishant Arora, Advocate. versus SHIVI ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through Mr. Anukul Raj, Mrs. Nikita Raj and Ms. Priscilla Ghales, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. Nos. 17276-77/2019 (Exemptions) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 504/2019 1.2. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondent enters appearance on advance copy and accepts notice.3. Present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award.4. Disputes and differences having arisen between the parties, the O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 504/2019 Page 1 of 2 5.6. Arbitration Clause in the Contract Agreement was inv...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Mohit Ahlawat vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10769/2017 MOHIT AHLAWAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER0912.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, who has been medically boarded out of the Border Security Force (BSF), on account of being found permanently unfit, has approached this Court seeking two reliefs. The first is for a direction to the... RESPONDENTS to grant him extraordinary pension or disability pension and the second is for grant of ex-gratia compensation.2. The facts in brief are that the... Petitioner joined the Armed Force Headquarters, Ministry of Defence as Lower Division Clerk (LDC) on compassionate grounds on 16th October, 2009. While working as such, he applied for the post of Assistant Commandant in the Central Armed Police Force (CAPF) through the Union Public Service Commiss...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Nikhil Saxena vs.state (n.c.t of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

$~ * + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1244/2018 NIKHIL SAXENA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Jai Khanduja, Advocate. versus STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. CRL.A. 1249/2018 WITH VISHAL SONKAR ..... Appellant Through Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. AND CRL.A. 95/2019 PUNIT @ RAJU Through Mr. Sahil Talwar, Advocate with Mr. Chander Kant and Mr. Nikhil Garg, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus CRL. A. Nos.1244/2018, 1249/2018, 95/2019 Page 1 of 33 THE STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State with Insp. Anil Kumar and ASI Ajit Kumar, PS Adarsh Nagar. % Reserved On :02. d November, 2019 Date of Decision:09. h December, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Veronica (Minor) Through: Mother Neetu Sodhi vs.jitendra Pal Singh Sod ...

Court : Delhi

* % + VERONICA (MINOR) THROUGH: MOTHER NEETU SODHI JITENDRA PAL SINGH SODHI & ORS ..... Defendants ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Deepak Verma, Adv. Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2019 CS(OS) 405/2016 & IAs No.9889/2016 & 11579/2018 (both u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 12536/2018 (u/S151CPC) Through: D-1 in person for D-2&3. Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Adv. for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff No.1 Ms. Veronica (Minor), acting through her mother plaintiff No.2 Neetu Sodhi, has instituted this suit for (i) declaration that the plaintiff No.1, being a coparcener and Class I heir, is entitled to a share of 1/18th + 1/72th of properties (a) B-10/329, Sunder Vihar, New Delhi, (b) Plot No.418, measuring 249.51 sq. yards, situated in the Hindustan Corporate House Building Society Limited, In Guruharkishan Nagar, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, (c) land bearing Khasra Nos.21/1, 2/1, 20/2, 5/2, 14/21, 33/1, 15/14, 20 & 24 viz standard a...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Jayant Ghadia vs.hindustan Tradex & Manufacturing Pvt Ltd and Others

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on 10.04.2019 Judgement pronounced on 09.12.2019 + EXECUTION PETITION No.79/2014 & EXECUTION APPLICATION (OS) Nos. 833/2015, 837/2015, 1122/2015, 167/2016, 68/2017 & 363/2017 JAYANT GHADIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain & Mr. Siddhant Nath, Advocates. versus HINDUSTAN TRADEX & MANUFACTURING PVT LTD AND OTHERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, with Mr. Senior Advocate Shohit Chaudhry, Advocate, for judgment debtor No.1 Mr. J.S. Lamba, Advocate, for objector Kuldeep Singh Dalal. Ms. Kajal Chandra with Ms. Prerna Chopra, Advocates, for Objector Ms. Amna Bi. Mr. Sandeep Sharma with Mr. Mrinal Srivastava, Advocates, for objector VP Gupta. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.: Preface 1. Principally I have been called upon to adjudicate upon Ex. P. 79/2014 (in short Execution petition). This execution petition has been filed by one Mr. Jayant Ghadia (in short, Ghadia). Ghadia h...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //