Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 10 of about 728,175 results (2.720 seconds)

Apr 22 2019 (SC)

Anil Kumar Anand Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Preventive)

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3138 OF2018ANIL KUMAR ANAND .APPELLANT Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) .RESPONDENT With CIVIL APPEAL No.3139 OF2018CIVIL APPEAL No.3140 OF2018JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The appellant in CA No.3140/2018, M/s. Diyas Mantra Lighting Private Limited, as well as its Directors, are aggrieved by the impugned order dated 30.3.2017 of the Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), New Delhi, as well as the order of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short CESTAT) dated 6.11.2017, 1 dismissing the appeal and sustaining the order of the Original Authority, revaluing the import consignments of the appellant, numbering twenty one, for the period from December, 2012 to January, 2015.2. The appellant is stated to be a regular importer of electric decorative lightings, and in the process of such imports, filed a bill of entry on 21.1.2015 at the ICD, Tughlakabad, New Del...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2019 (SC)

Naresh Chandra Bhardwaj Vs. Bank of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4037 OF2019[Arising out of SLP(C) No.16555 of 2018]. NARESH CHANDRA BHARDWAJ .APPELLANT Versus BANK OF INDIA & ORS. .RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. 2. Leave granted. The appellant was employed with respondent No.1/Bank of India (for short Bank) as Scale II Officer when he sanctioned three loans while posted at the Lal Bangla Branch of the Bank at Kanpur. The appellant was also the recommending authority for two loans at Harsh Nagar Branch, once again, at Kanpur. These loans were ultimately 1 classified as Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) and the process of granting these loans was scrutinised by the Bank when various procedural abnormalities were found, which were likely to cause a loss to the Bank of Rs.70.32 lakh.3. In pursuance of the disciplinary proceedings initiated the appellant was visited with the major penalty of removal from service which shall not be disqualification for future ...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2019 (SC)

Ashatai Vs. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3962 OF2019(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.4925 of 2019) Ashatai w/o Anand Duparte Appellant versus Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. Respondent JUDGMENT INDU MALHOTRA, J.Leave granted.1. The present Civil Appeal has been filed to challenge the Order dated 30.11.2018 passed in Revision Petition No.472 of 2018 by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as the National Commission). 1 2. The factual matrix in which the present case has been filed is as under :2. 1. The Complainant/Appellants husband Late Anand Duparte had obtained a personal loan of Rs. 2,00,000/ on 27.02.2015 from the Respondent Finance Company. The personal loan was advanced on 27.02.2015 after executing the loan agreement, and completing all legal formalities. The Respondent Finance Company secured the loan by issuance of an insurance policy by its sister concern i.e. M/s Shriram General Insurance C...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2019 (SC)

Dr. R S Grewal Vs. Chander Parkash Soni

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 11086 of 2018 Dr RS Grewal & Ors VERSUS Chander Parkash Soni & Anr ..Appellants ..Respondents With Civil Appeal No 11087 of 2018 And with Civil Appeal No 11088 of 2018 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1This appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 21 January 2016 in a second appeal. The High Court reversed the judgment and the decree of the trial Court, which was confirmed in first appeal, by which a suit for possession of certain property in the occupation of the defendants as tenants had been decreed. 2 Dr Hira Singh was the owner of a residential house (shown in the site plan 2 filed together with the suit) together with some shops constructed on property bearing Municipal No B-XX-69 (Old) 515 (New) at College Road, Civil Lines, Ludhiana. The family pedigree is depicted below: Late Dr. Hira Singh (Died in 1945) Late ...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2019 (SC)

Nisha Singla Vs. Adarsh Colony Cooperative House Building Society Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3963-3965 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) NOs. 29157-29159 OF2011 NISHA SINGLA ........APPELLANT Versus ADARSH COLONY COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD. & ORS. .......RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT Hemant Gupta, J.Leave granted.2. Challenge in the present appeals is to an order passed on 16.05.2011 in the review application filed by the appellant and the order dated 09.12.2002 passed in Writ Petition No.19358 of 2002 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. 1 3. The case has a chequered history. The appellant is one of the founder members of the Society1 established to provide residential plots to its members. The Appellant deposited some amounts between 12.05.1975 to 15.01.1982 for the purpose of allotment of a residential plot. The credit balance as on 15.01.1982 is said to be Rs. 11,475/-. The Society made a request to the Chairman of Improvement Trust, Ludhiana for development of the land. The Improv...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2019 (SC)

Regional Manager, u.p.s.r.t.c.. Vs. Maslahuddin (Dead)

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3959 OF2019[Arising out of SLP (C) No.29305 of 2008]. Regional Manager, U.P.S.R.T.C. & Anr. .. Appellants Versus Maslahuddin (Dead) .. Respondents [WITH C.A. No.3960 of 2019 [@ SLP (C) No.29295 of 2008]. and C.A. No.3961 of 2019 [@ SLP (C) No.29293 of 2008]. JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. Delay in filing the applications for substitution in SLP (C) No.29305 of 2008 and SLP (C) No.29295 of 2008 is condoned. Abetment, if any, is set aside and the applications for substitution are allowed in terms of the prayer made. 1.1 Leave granted.2. As common question of law and facts arise in these appeals, as such, arising out of the impugned judgment and order passed by 2 the High Court, all these appeals are being disposed of by this common judgment and order.3. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Lucknow in W...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2019 (SC)

Bikash Ranjan Rout Vs. The State Home Department Secretary

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.687 OF2019[Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.297 of 2015]. Bikash Ranjan Rout .. Appellant Versus State through the Secretary (Home), Government of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi .. Respondent JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1. 2. Leave granted. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 20.08.2014 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Criminal M. C. No.3386 of 2013 by which the High Court has dismissed the said petition and has confirmed the order passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (West) Delhi dated 05.02.2013, by which the learned 2 Magistrate ordered further investigation, the original accused has preferred the present appeal.3. That the FIR was lodged against the appellant herein original accused on 28.09.2007 being FIR No.426/2007 at Police Station Janakpuri, Delhi for the offences under Sections 420, 468 and 471 of the IPC. That on completion of ...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2019 (SC)

Bharat Broadband Network Limited Vs. United Telecoms Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3972 OF2019(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.1550 of 2018) Bharat Broadband Network Limited Appellant Versus United Telecoms Limited Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.3973 OF2019(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.1644 of 2018) JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1. 2. Leave granted. The present appeals raise an interesting question as to the interpretation of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [Act]..3. The appellant, Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. [BBNL]., had floated a tender dated 05.08.2013 inviting bids for a turnkey project for supply, installation, commissioning, and maintenance of GPON equipment and solar power equipment. The respondent was the 1 successful L1 bidder. The appellant issued an Advance Purchase Order [APO]. dated 30.09.2014. Clause III.20.1 of the General (Commercial) Conditions of Contract [GCC]. provides for arbitration. The said clau...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2019 (SC)

Lunawat Construction Company Rep. By Maniklal Peerchand Lunawat Vs. Un ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (c) No.96 OF2011Lunawat Construction Company, A Partnership Firm represented By its Partner Maniklal Peerchand Lunawat .Petitioner(s) VERSUS Union of India & Anr. Respondent(s) WITH TRANSFERRED CASE (c) No.30 of 2010 AND WRIT PETITION (c) No.36 OF2012JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. By filing Writ Petition (c) No.96/2011 under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner 1 therein has challenged the constitutional validity of The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites and Remains (Amendment and Validation) Act, 2010 (Annexure P 15).2. In connected writ petition and the Transferred Case, the petitioners have claimed the similar reliefs, which are claimed in the lead Writ Petition No.96/2011.3. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the record of the case, we deem it just and proper to send these writ petitions and the transferred case to the High Court of Bo...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 16 2019 (SC)

Ranjit Kumar Karmakar @ Dulal Karmakar Vs. Hari Sankar Das

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3967 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.8898 of 2015) Ranjit Kumar Karmakar @ Dulal Karmakar .Appellant(s) VERSUS Hari Shankar Das .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 24.09.2014 passed by the High Court of Tripura at Agartala in R.S.A. No.42 of 2007 whereby the High Court allowed the second appeal filed by the 1 respondent herein, set aside the judgment/decree dated 24.04.2007 passed by the Additional District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in T.A. No.34 of 2006 and restored the judgment/decree dated 05.04.2006 passed by the Civil Judge(Junior Division) No.2, Agartala, West Tripura in T.S. No.103 of 2004.3. A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of this appeal, which involves a short point.4. The appellant is the plaintiff and the respondent is the defendant of the civil suit out of which this ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //