Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 11 of about 727,858 results (2.538 seconds)

Jan 28 2019 (SC)

Satya Raj Singh Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1314 OF2013Satya Raj Singh Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh Respondent JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.This appeal is directed against the final judgment 1. and order dated 03.09.2009 passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No.2464 of 2000 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant herein and upheld the judgment dated 30.08.2000 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Katni in Sessions Trial No.690/1999 by which the appellant was found guilty of 1 the offence punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1000/, in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for three months.2. In order to appreciate the issues involved in this appeal, relevant facts need mention in brief infr...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2019 (SC)

Dr. h.k. Sharma Vs. Ram Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 12371238 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) Nos.2842028421 of 2017) Dr. H.K. Sharma .Appellant(s) VERSUS Shri Ram Lal .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and orders dated 03.10.2017 in Recall Application No.871 of 2017 in W.P.(MS) No.396 of 2016 and dated 17.07.2017 in W.P.(MS) No.396 of 2016 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital. 1 3. In order to appreciate the short controversy involved in these appeals, few relevant facts need mention infra.4. The appellant is the opposite party whereas the respondent is the applicant in the original application out of which these appeals arise.5. The respondent (applicant) is the owner of house bearing No.5A, Court Road, Nardev Shastri Road, Dehradun comprising of four rooms, one kitchen, two verandahs and two galleries. The respondent has let out a portion of this h...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2019 (SC)

Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL/APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.99 OF2018Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners Union of India & Ors. VERSUS WITH ..Respondents WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.100 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.115 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.459 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.598 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.775 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.822 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.849 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.1221 OF2018SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.28623 OF2018WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.37 OF20191 JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. The present petitions assail the constitutional validity of various provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [Insolvency Code or Code].. Since we are deciding only questions relating to the constitutional validity of the Code, we are not going into the individual facts of any case.2. Shri Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Advocate, appearing in Writ Petition (Civil) No.99 of 2018, has first...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2019 (SC)

Ramesh Sanka Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (Crl.) No.142 OF2018Ramesh Sanka .Petitioner (s) VERSUS Union of India & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.This writ petition is filed by one Mr. Ramesh 1. Sanka under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or directions directing Respondent No.23 (CBI) to investigate the entire matter and examine all the allegations made by the writ petitioner against Respondent Nos.12 to 22 in accordance with law. The 1 other reliefs claimed in clause (b) to (d) of the writ petition are consequential to the main relief.2. Stated concisely, the petitioner seeks the aforementioned reliefs on following facts.3. The petitioner is a former employee of Respondent No.12 a Limited Company. He worked as CEO of the said company from June 2014 till 31st December 2016.4. In substance, the grievance of the writ petitioner is against Respondent No....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2019 (SC)

High Court of Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and State of Andhra ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 73-74 OF2019HIGH COURT OF HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL ETC. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS P. MURALI MOHANA REDDY AND ORS. ETC. .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.In these appeals, challenge is laid to the judgment dated March 25, 2015 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of judicature at Hyderabad, whereby two writ petitions filed by the respondents herein have been allowed. There are, in all, four persons who had filed these two writ petitions and who are appointed as Additional District and Session Judges in the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh (now States of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana) as Adhoc Fast Track Court District Judges. 22) The issue of appointment of such Adhoc Judges came up for consideration before this Court in Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India & Ors.1 whereby this Court prescribed the modalities and pr...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 2019 (SC)

Brig. Sukhjeet Singh (Retd), Mvc Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.148 of 2019 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.1120/2017) BRIG. SUKHJEET SINGH (RETD.) MVC ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN,J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been filed questioning the judgment of Allahabad High Court dated 17.01.2017 dismissing the application filed by the appellant under Section 482 Cr.P.C. wherein the orders passed by the Session Judge dated 02.11.2015 rejecting the two applications filed by the appellant under Section 391 Cr.P.C. were challenged.3. Brief facts of the case, which are necessary to be noted for deciding this appeal are:- 3.1 A Regimental Welfare Trust relating to the Scinde Horse Regiment of Indian Army was registered on 27.06.1959. The Trust owned 1 various immovable properties including agricultural land in Village Bichaie, Phoolpur and Beehat in Tehsil-Bilaspur, District-Rampur. The respondent No.2 ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2019 (SC)

Dev Wati Vs. The State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.134 OF2019(Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.1705/2015) Dev Wati and Ors. ...Appellants Versus The State of Haryana and Anr. ...Respondents JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16.10.2014 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Revision No.3135/10 (O&M) upholding the judgment dated 09.11.2010 passed by the Sessions Court, Faridabad in Sessions Case No.54/2010. 1 3. By the impugned judgment, the application under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short the Cr.P.C.) filed by the complainant was allowed and consequently the appellants herein were summoned by the Sessions Court to face trial in Sessions Case No.54/2010.4. The brief facts arising out of this appeal are that a missing complaint came to be lodged by the brother of the deceased (PW9, Harkesh). After two days of such com...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2019 (SC)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. M/S. Atul Automations Pvt Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1057 OF2019(arising out of SLP(C) No.12471 of 2018) COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. ATUL AUTOMATIONS PVT. LTD. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1058 OF2019(arising out of SLP(C) No.12704 of 2018) COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ....APPELLANT(S) M/S. PARAG DOMESTIC APPLIANCES VERSUS ...RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1060 OF2019(arising out of SLP(C) No.16325 of 2018) COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS VERSUS M/S. ATUL AUTOMATIONS PVT. LTD. ....APPELLANT(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 1059 OF2019(arising out of SLP(C) No.16204 of 2018) COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ....APPELLANT(S) M/S. PARAG DOMESTIC APPLIANCES JUDGMENT VERSUS ...RESPONDENT(S) NAVIN SINHA, J.Leave granted. 1 2. The respondents during OctoberNovember, 2016 imported certain consignments of MultiFunction Devices (Digital Photocopiers and Printers) (hereinafter referred to as MFDs). The Commissioner of Customs held ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 24 2019 (SC)

Munishamappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 96-97 OF2011MUNISHAMAPPA & ORS. .....APPELLANTS Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA .....RESPONDENT WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 995-996 OF2011LAKSHMANA & ORS. .....APPELLANTS Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA .....RESPONDENT WITH1CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 622 OF2011RANI .....APPELLANT Versus VENKATESHAPPA & ORS. .....RESPONDENTS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.1362-1363 OF2011VENKATESHAPPA & ORS. .....APPELLANTS Versus STATE BY MALUR POLICE ETC. .....RESPONDENTS Dr DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J1By a judgment dated 31 October 2003, the Principal Sessions Judge, Kolar acquitted eleven persons who were tried for offences under Sections 143, 148, 323, 324 and 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (penal code) and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act 1908. The State challenged the order of acquittal in a criminal appeal while the injured complainant assailed the acquittal in a criminal revision. By ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2019 (SC)

Radhamma Vs. h.n. Muddukrishna

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7092 OF2010RADHAMMA & ORS. ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS H.N. MUDDUKRISHNA & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing RFA No.347/1998 holding that the appellants are not entitled to claim any share in the joint family properties. The appellants/plaintiffs filed a suit on 16.1.1976 for 1/10th share in the suit properties described in the schedule to the plaint as A to H. The learned trial Court decreed the suit declaring that the second plaintiff (since first plaintiff died on 7.7.1978 leaving behind daughter) Smt. Nagamma is entitled for 1/10th share of joint family properties in the plaint which are scheduled properties A to E and the properties in the plaint scheduled F & G were held to be the selfacquired properties of the 1 testator, and property H was declared as the exclusive property of the Smt. K.C. S...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //