Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 11 of about 755,878 results (2.561 seconds)

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Pradeep Aggarwal vs.state & Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~51 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 6334/2019 PRADEEP AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Garima Verma, Adv. with petitioner in person versus STATE & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr. K K Ghei, APP for State WSI Sushila, PS Paschim Vihar Mr. Suman Saharan, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person Mr. Prabhas Roy, Adv. for R-3 to 7 with R-3 to 7 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 42211/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.1. 2. CRL.M.C.6334/2019 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C.6334/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seek quashing of FIR No.291/2011 dated 01.10.2011 registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and respondent nos.3 to 7 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is t...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Tusaj Lifestyle Pvt Ltd vs.skb Food Products Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2019 FAO3252016 & CM APPL. Nos.25744/2016, 25746-47/2016 TUSAJ LIFESTYLE PVT LTD Appellant SKB FOOD PRODUCTS PVT LTD ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Tanmay Mehta, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr.Sushant Mahapatra, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellant impugns order dated 15.12.2016 whereby an application of the respondent/petitioner under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC was allowed and the appellant its agents were restrained from infringing the registered trademark of the respondent Yum Yum or passing of either in respect of restaurant or package food items or from using Yum Yum Tree or any other trademark identical or deceptively similar, phonetically or visually, with or without prefix or suffix to the trade mark of the respondent and from passing of their business. FAO. 325/2016 Page 1 of 4 2. Appell...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Subhash Gulati vs.harish Kumar Sethi

Court : Delhi

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 691/2019 & CAV. 1210/2019 Judgment delivered on:09. 12.2019 SUBHASH GULATI ... Petitioner HARISH KUMAR SETHI ..... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr.Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Kunal Mada, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr.Neeraj Yadav and Mr.Siddharth Arora, Advs. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APP No.52918/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. RC.REV. 691/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 17.09.2019 whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed and an eviction order passed.2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner contends that the proceedings were listed on 02.09.2019 before the Rent Controller, RC.REV. 691/2019 Page 1 of 3 when the arguments on an application filed by the petitioner under Section 151 CPC were heard and thereafter, the matter was adjourned to 17.09.2019 for orders/clari...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Bajrang Vats vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 12.2019 + W.P.(C) No.12966/2019 BAJRANG VATS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Bajrang Vats, petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Adv. with Mr.Aaryan Verma, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Naman Jain, Adv. for Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Adv. for R-3, 4 & 5. Insp.Pharlad Singh, SHO, PS Barakhamba Road. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) ORDER1 This public interest litigation has been preferred for the following prayers:-"a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ/directions to the... RESPONDENTS to shift the protestors from Mandi House Periphery to other suitable place immediately and Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ/directions to the... RESPONDENTS to open the Sikandra Road (One-way from ITO to Mandi b) WP(C) No.12966/2019 Page 1 of 2 c) House Periphery) and Bhagwan Dass Road (Two-way from red l...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 2019 (HC)

Rakesh Kumar Solanki vs.raj Kumar & Ors

Court : Delhi

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h December, 2019 + CM(M) 1148/2019 & CM APPL. 34830/2019 RAKESH KUMAR SOLANKI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate. versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Chauhan, Advocate for R (M:9818582376) Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr. Sachin Nawani Advocates for R-4. (M:9910770311) Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, SC for DDA with Mr. Nazia Parveen, Advocate. (M:9278693021) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(Oral) 1. Ld. Counsels for the parties have been heard. It is submitted that Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are ex-parte before the Trial Court.2. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 1st April, 2019 by which the witnesses of the... Petitioner/Defendant No.6 were not permitted to be examined and the evidence of... Petitioner was closed by the Trial Court. The submission of ld. counsel for the... Petitioner is that on the earlier occasion, vide order dat...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2019 (HC)

Balram Meena vs.railway Protection Force and Anr.

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:26. h November, 2019 Decided on:6. h December, 2019 WP(C) 10240/2017 BALRAM MEENA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S.Dalal with Ms. T.Banerjee and Mr.Manu Kharra, Advocates. RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE AND ANR. versus Through: Mr.Jitendra .....Respondents Standing Counsel with Mr.Amit Kumar and Mr.Saurav Sharma, Advocates. K.Singh, CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner challenges an order dated 22nd August, 2017 passed by the Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force (RPF) terminating his services as Constable.2. This is the third round of litigation.3. Pursuant to an advertisement issued in 2011 the... Petitioner applied for the post of Constable. He was duly called for in the selection and was appointed as Constable by a letter dated 1st October, 2014. By an order dated 15th June, W.P.(C) 10240/2017 Page 1 of 5 2015 his selection stood cancelled on the grou...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2019 (HC)

Schloss Chanakya Private Limited vs.state & Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6270/2019 SCHLOSS CHANAKYA PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. K R Chawla, Mr. Vijay Chawla, Mr. Prashant Mehta & Mr, Dhruv, Advocates versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State SI Kishore, PS Sarojini Nagar Mr. Prateek Kumar and Mr. Sunil Sehgal, Advocates for R-2 to 6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL MA419962019 (exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6270/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks directions thereby quashing the FIR No.97/2018 dated 11.08.2018 registered at Police Station- CRL.M.C. 6270/2019 Page 1 of 5 Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 338/304A IPC and the proceedings emanating therefrom.4. The present petition has been filed on the ground that petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 6 have already...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2019 (HC)

Ajay Kaushik & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

$~67 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 6288/2019 AJAY KAUSHIK & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Rahul Nagpal, Adv. with petitioners in person STATE & ANR. versus Through Mr. K K Ghei, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI. Ashok, PS Farsh Bazar Mr. Jitender Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 42058/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6288/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.884/2014 dated 13.11.2014 registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.6288/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got marrie...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2019 (HC)

Asha Kumari vs.technology Information Forecasting and Assessment Counc ...

Court : Delhi

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 W.P.(C) 2576/2017 & CM APPL. 11122/2017 ASHA KUMARI Through: Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Ms. Shweta Kapoor and Ms. Priya Pande, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION FORECASTING AND ASSESSMENT COUNCIL (TIFAC) & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA JUDGMENT A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) By the instant petition, the petitioner, in effect, seeks issuance of a writ of Mandamus for being regularized to the post of Hindi typist with the respondent-Technology Information Forecasting And Assessment Council in short, TIFAC. The facts emerging from the record are that 2. the committee of Parliament on Official Language recommended 27 items of work to be done in Hindi by TIFAC. At that point of time, there was no Hindi typist in It resulted into TIFAC undertaking a process for selection for the TIFAC. W.P.(C.) No.2576/2017 Page 1 of 13 typist w.e.f. 18.05.2006....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 2019 (HC)

Umesh Kumar & Anr vs.ram Kaur ( Deceased ) Thr Lrs

Court : Delhi

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 12.2019 RC.REV. 182/2018 & CM APPL. 17620/2018 UMESH KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioners versus RAM KAUR ( DECEASED ) THR LRS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. M.L.Mahajan with Mr.Gaurav Mahajan and Ms.Meena Mahajan, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr.G.P.Thareja, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 29.01.2018, whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioners has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.2.... RESPONDENTS had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioners on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from the tenanted premises being shop (Corner), Ground Floor in property No.1/20, Road No.20, East Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi-110026, more RC.REV.182/2018 Page ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //