Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 11 of about 756,061 results (2.775 seconds)

Feb 17 2020 (SC)

Cab Securities Limited Vs. National Stock Exchange of India Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL DIARY NO.1651 OF2020CAB SECURITIES LIMITED APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED RESPONDENT(S) ORDER Delay condoned. We find no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ...........................J.[ARUN MISHRA]. ...........................J.[M.R. SHAH]. NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY17 2020. ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.3 SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CIVIL APPEAL....... Diary No(s).1651/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 24-09-2019 in AN No.37/2019 passed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai) CAB SECURITIES LIMITED Appellant(s) VERSUS NATIONAL STOCK EXCHANGE OF INDIA LIMITED Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.26372/2020-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.26369/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL) Date :17. 02-2...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (HC)

Sambhram Charitable Trust Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

1 INDEX OF ORDER Description Page Nos. Sl. No.I II Cause title Facts of the case Statement of objections on behalf of Respondent No.2 III Memo filed by the State Government IV Arguments advanced by the V learned counsel for the petitioners Arguments advanced on behalf of the State Government VI Arguments advanced by Sri N. Khetty, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 MCI323 4-31 31-50 5-52 52-56 56-57 57-61 VII Arguments advanced by Sri 61-70 Adithya Sondhi, learned senior counsel for Respondent Nos.52 to 108 students VIII Point for determination IX Determination X Importance of Education XI Objections filed by the Medical Council of India in W.P. Nos.4557- 4561/2019 70 71 76-77 77-80 2 XII Objections filed by the State Government in W.P. Nos.4557- 4561/2019 80-82 XIII Statement of objections by the 82-85 College in W.P. Nos.4557- 4561/2019 XIV Decision in W.P. Nos.4557- 85-88 4561/2019 dated 22.8.2019 filed by the students XV Dual stand taken by the MCI and 88-91 the State Governme...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (HC)

Prakash Madiwalayya Mathapati, Vs. The State of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka - Dharwad

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY2020BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA CRL . A . N O. 2592/2011BETWEEN :1. PRAKASH MADIWALAYYA MATHAPATI, AGE:41. YEARS, OCC: VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, R/O. HULKI NINGAPUR SARJA, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS1a) MAHANANDA W/O PRAKASH MATHAPATI, AGE:48. YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, R/O C/O M.T. MATHAPATI, NEAR MALLIKARJUN TEMPLE, JORAPUR PETH, VIJAYAPUR. 1(b) PRUTHVIRAJ S/O PRAKASH MATHAPATI, AGE:28 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL REPRESENTATIVE, R/O C/O M.T. MATHAPATI, NEAR MALLIKARJUN TEMPLE, JORAPUR PETH, VIJAYAPUR. 1(c) SANJEEVKUMAR S/O PRAKASH MATHAPATI, AGE:23. YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O C/O M.T. MATHAPATI, NEAR MALLIKARJUN TEMPLE, JORAPUR PETH, VIJAYAPUR. (BY SRI SRIHARSH A. NEELOPANT, ADVOCATE) AND : - APPELLANTS Crl. A. No.2592/2011 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, POLICE INSPECTOR, KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA, BAGALKOT, THROUGH SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH, DHARWAD. (BY SRI...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (HC)

Sri Suhail Rehaman Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.461/2020 (KLR-CON)BETWEEN : SRI SUHAIL REHAMAN, S/O MOHAMMED OMER ABDUL REHAMAN SAIT AGED ABOUT55YERAS R/AT NO.201, PRESTIGE ORCHID37BERLIE STREET NEAR HOCKEY STADIUM LANGFORD TOWN, MUSEUM ROAD BENGALURU-560 025. (BY SMT. B.V. VIDYULATHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VIKASA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. 2 . DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE-570001. ...PETITIONER23 . TAHASILDHAR MYSORE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT-570001. (BY SRI Y.D. HARSHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3) **** RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE R-2 IN RESPECT OF LAND IN SY. NO.17AT ANNEXURE-C TO THE WRIT PETITION AND DIRECT THE R-2 TO FORMALLY ISSUE AN ORDER OF CONVERSION UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION95OF KARNATAKA...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (HC)

The State of Karnataka Vs. M/S Anand Investment Private Limited

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT APPEAL No.582 OF2018(GM-KIADB)BETWEEN : 1.2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY M.S.BUILDINGS, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BENGALURU560001 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU560001... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. DHYAN CHINNAPPA, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL ALONG WITH SRI. T. L. KIRAN KUMAR, AGA ) AND:1. M/S. ANAND INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT70 NAGINDAS MASTER ROAD FORT, MUMBAI400023 2. 2 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MRS. ROSHEN MINOCHER NENTIN M/S. ANAND INVESTMENT PRIVATE LIMITED. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NO.14/3, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU560001 BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND EXECUTIVE MEMBER.... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K. G. RAGHAVAN, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. R. HEM...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (HC)

Shabana Salahudheen Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14h DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NOS. 29365-29368 OF2018(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NOS. 29817-29818/2018 & 29820- 29822/2018, 29823-29828/2018, 29874/2018 & 29876-29879/2018, 30406-30411/2018 (EDN-RES) IN W.P. NOS. 29365-29368/2018:BETWEEN :1. SHABANA SALAHUDHEEN, D/O P P SALAHUDHEEN, R/AT #35/10, 17TH CROSS, A-205, AKSHAY ORCHID, VEERANAPALYA, AC POST, NAGWARA, BANGALORE560045.2. VARUN MOHOD, AGED24YEARS, S/O NARENDRA MOHOD, R/AT NEAR PANDEY NURSING HOME, ARARIPURA, CHINDWARA, MADHYA PRADESH480001.3. POONAM NAG, AGED ABOUT25YEARS, D/O RANA NAG, R/AT JALJAD, POST CHHATAPIPAL, DT:BALANGIR, STATE-ODISHA767002.4. ARUN MOHAN, 2 AGED ABOUT25YEARS, S/O MADHAVAM, CHETHUKADAVU POST, MIE KUNNAMANGALAM, CALICUT DISTRICT673571. KERALA. ... PETITIONERS (BY SMT. AKKAMAHADEVI HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) AND:1. UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAVAN, NEW DELHI110001...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (HC)

State of Karnataka Vs. Sri P Giridhar Kudva

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.P. SANDESH WRIT PETITION NO.22473/2015 (S-KAT)BETWEEN :1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT (ADMN), VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-1.2. 3.4. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-9. SRI S.Y. KUMBAR, RETIRED DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND INQUIRING AUTHORITY, C/O THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU-9. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A & E), PARK HOUSE, BENGALURU-1. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI VENKATA SATYANARAYAN, HCGP) 2 AND: SRI. P.GIRIDHAR KUDVA, S/O. P. KRISHNA KUDVA (LATE), AGED ABOUT72YEARS, RETIRED DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, No.268/3/2, 37TH CROSS, 8TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-82. RESPONDENT (BY SRI KARTIKEYAN B.S. IYER, ADVOCATE) ORDER PASSED THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CO...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (SC)

Vinod Giri Goswami . Vs. The State of Uttarakhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.1606 of 2020 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.2779 of 2012]. Vinod Giri Goswami & Ors. .... Appellant(s) The State of Uttarakhand & Ors. .Respondent(s) Versus W I T H Civil Appeal Nos. 1607-1608 of 2020 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.6847-6848 of 2012]. Civil Appeal Nos. 1609-1610 of 2020 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.9885-9886 of 2012]. Civil Appeal Nos.1611-1612 of 2020 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.9910-9911 of 2012]. Civil Appeal Nos.1614-1615 of 2020 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.33762-33763 of 2012]. Civil Appeal Nos.1617-1618 of 2020 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.33750-33751 of 2012]. Civil Appeal Nos.1619-1620 of 2020 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.33759-33760 of 2012]. A N D Civil Appeal No.1621 of 2020 [Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.18604 of 2019]. [1]. JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.The above Appeals relate to the inter se seniority 1. disp...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (SC)

Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1600 OF2020(Arising out of SLP(C) No.5290 of 2019) POPATRAO VYANKATRAO PATIL ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The appellant has approached this Court being 2.3. aggrieved by the order dated 6.8.2018, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ 2 Petition No.8708 of 2017 thereby, declining to entertain the petition since the petition involves question of facts.4. The facts, in brief, giving rise to the present appeal are as under: The respondent District Collector, Satara had issued a notice of public auction for auctioning the sand blocks of Krishna river in the year 2012. The appellant had submitted his bid for excavation of sand insofar as Gat No.956A, Plot No.2 at village Rethare Khurd, Taluka Karad. The agreed quantity of excavation was 8500 brass. The a...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 2020 (SC)

M/S Z Engineers Construction Pvt Ltd Vs. Bipin Bihari Behera

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1627 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.5036 OF2019 M/S. Z. ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. & ANR. .....APPELLANT(S) BIPIN BIHARI BEHERA & ORS. .....RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. 2.3. Leave granted. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Orissa on 24th January, 2019 whereby the petition filed by the appellant under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, dismissing an application filed by the appellant under Order XIII Rule 8 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19081 to impound the power of attorneys (Exts. 4 and 5), was dismissed. The plaintiffs-respondents instituted a suit for partition through their power of attorney holder Kishore Chandra Behera (PW-1). During the cross-examination of PW-1, the present appellants filed 1 for short, Code 1 an application under Order XIII Rule 8 of the Code to impound the power of attorneys, Exts. 4 and 5,...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //