Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 11 of about 756,017 results (2.248 seconds)

Jan 31 2020 (SC)

The State of Odisha Vs. Gobinda Behera

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 893 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 3148 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) D No 8200 of 2019) Reportable State of Odisha and Ors .... Appellant(s) Versus Gobinda Behera ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J12 3 Delay condoned. Leave granted. This appeal arises from a judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa dated 29 March 2018. 4 The respondent applied for appointment to the post of a Constable in the Odisha State Police in the 6th IR Batallion, Khurda on 29 October 2011. In response to a query, the respondent specifically stated in his application that he was not involved in any criminal case. He was appointed on 14 December 2011. A verification roll was provided to him, which was to be filled up in terms of Rule 673 of the Orissa Police Rules. On 22 May 2012, the Superintendent of Police, Puri informed the Commandant that during the course of the verification of...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2020 (HC)

Neelamma Vs. M G Roopa

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R DEVDAS MFA NO.5651 OF2016(MV)BETWEEN :1. NEELAMMA W/O LATE MAHESHWARAPPA AGED ABOUT43YEARS R/AT KAMASAMUDRA VILLAGE, KANKATTE HOLI, ARASIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT. NOW ALL R/AT SRINIVASA COMPOUND, HEGGERE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TUMKUR TALUK-572103 2.3. NAVEEN KUMAR.K.M. @ NAVEEN S/O LATE MAHESHWARAPPA R/AT KAMASAMUDRA VILLAGE, KANKATTE HOLI, ARASIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT. NOW ALL R/AT SRINIVASA COMPOUND, HEGGERE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TUMKUR TALUK-572103 KUMARASWAMY.K.M. S/O LATE MAHESHWARAPPA R/AT KAMASAMUDRA VILLAGE, KANKATTE HOLI, ARASIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT. NOW ALL R/AT SRINIVASA COMPOUND, HEGGERE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TUMKUR TALUK-572103 2 4. MALAMMA W/O LATE MADAPPA AGED ABOUT66YEARS R/AT KAMASAMUDRA VILLAGE, KANKATTE HOLI, ARASIKERE TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT. NOW ALL R/AT SRINIVASA COMPOUND, HEGGERE VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TUMKUR TALUK-572103. (BY SRI R.D.RENUKARAD...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 2020 (HC)

Mr. M S Ardhanari Vs. Mr K C Subba Reddy

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE30H OF JANUARY, 2020 R PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH M.F.A.NO.2148/2017 (MV) BETWEEN MR. M.S. ARDHANARI S/O. SUBRAMANIAM M.P. BALAJI SERVICE STATION NO.38/1, M.G. ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. APPELLANT (BY SRI. W.M. SUNDARAMURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND: MR. K.C. SUBBA REDDY @ KONIREDDY CHINNA SUBBA REDDY AGED ABOUT59YEARS S/O. LATE NAGIREDDY SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY WIFE1 MRS. PRAMILAMMA AGED ABOUT53YEARS W/O. MR. K.C. SUBBA REDDY @ KONIREDDY CHINNA SUBBA REDDY BOTH ARE R/AT NO.345/13, 2ND FLOOR KRISHNA REDDY BUILDING, 7TH MAIN CHOWDESHWARI LAYOUT MARATHAHALLY BENGALURU-560 037. 2 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., ST. PATRICK S. BUILDING NO.21, MUSEUM ROAD BENGALURU-560 025.2. (BY SRI. K.V. GIRISH, ADVOCATE FOR R1 ABSENT R2 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)... RESPONDENTS THIS M.F.A IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED1402.2017 PASSED IN MVC.NO.2701/...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2020 (HC)

Smt Seetha S Shetty Vs. Mr B Vijayadas Adyanthaya

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE29H DAY OF JANUARY2020BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE N.S.SANJAY GOWDA R.S.A.NO.2131/2016BETWEEN : S/O LATE MEENAKSHI ADYANTHAYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT79YEARS, R/AT KAPU-574 106, UDUPI TALUK. SMT. SEETHA S.SHETTY, AGED ABOUT69YEARS, W/O LATE SADANANDA S.SHETTY, RESIDING AT BAJPE GUTTU HOUSE, BAJPE, MANGALORE-575 014. APPELLANT (BY SRI. S.VITTAL SHETTY , ADVOCATE) AND:1. MR.B.VIJAYADAS ADYANTHAYA, 2.3. SHRI B. NAVEENDAS ADYANTHAYA, S/O LATE MEENAKSHI ADYANTHAYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT71YEARS, R/AT NEAR STATE BANK OF INDIA, AJJARAKADU, UDUPI-576 101. SHRI B.VINAYADAS ADYANTHAYA, S/O LATE MEENAKSHI ADYANTHAYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT77YEARS, R/AT NEAR STATE BANK OF INDIA, AJJARAKADU, UDUPI-576 101. 2 SMT. SHAKUNTHALA SHETTY, W/O LATE KITTANNA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT84YEARS, R/AT ASHRAYA, JODUKATTE, UDUPI-576 101. SHRI. B.BHAGAVANDAS ADYANTHAYA, S/O LATE MEENAKSHI ADYANTHAYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT69YEARS, R/AT ASHRAYA, JODUKATTE, UDUPI-576 101. SHRI. KAUSHI...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2020 (SC)

Mukesh Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) D NO.3334 OF2020MUKESH KUMAR ...Petitioner VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS Respondents R. BANUMATHI, J.ORDER This writ petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner-Mukesh Kumar - a death-row convict. The petitioner has filed the writ petition challenging the rejection of his mercy petition by the President of India and seeking commutation of his death sentence inter alia on the following grounds:- (i) (ii) Relevant materials were not placed before the President of India and they were kept out of consideration while considering the mercy petition; The mercy petition was rejected swiftly and there was pre-determined stance and complete non-application of mind in rejection of the mercy petition; 1 (iii) Solitary confinement of the petitioner for more than one and half years due to which the petitioner has developed severe psychiatric ailments; (iv) ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2020 (SC)

Shripal Bhati Vs. State of Up

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION (ARISING OUT OF SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.9276 OF2017 CIVIL APPEAL No.802 OF2020SHRIPAL BHATI & ANR. .. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. .. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the High Court1 dated 08.02.2017 dismissing the Writ Petition filed by the appellants laying a challenge to the appointment of respondent No.4 on the post of Project Engineer (Electrical) on deputation in New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as NOIDA) and his subsequent absorption. 1 High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Page 1 of 16 3. The appellants are presently posted as Assistant Project Engineer (Electrical) in NOIDA.4. On a request made by respondent No.4, who was employed as a Sub-Divisional Officer with U.P. Power Corporation Ltd., seeking appointment on a vacant post of Project Engineer (Electrical) in...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2020 (HC)

High Court of Karnataka Vs. Sri G N Shivakumar

Court : Karnataka

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRL.CCC NO.1 OF2020C/W CRL.CCC NO.15 OF2019IN CRL.CCC No.1/2020BETWEEN : HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL BENGALURU560001 (SRI PRABHULING K.NAVADGI, ADVOCATE GENERAL ALONG WITH SRI VIKRAM HUILGOL, HCGP (ASSISTED THE HONBLE COURT) ... COMPLAINANT AND:1. SRI.G.N.SHIVAKUMAR OWNER AND THE CHIEF EDITOR B-TV NEWS CHANNEL OFFICE AT NO.32/1-2, CRESCENT TOWER CRESCENT ROAD NEAR GOLD PINCH HOTEL HIGH GROUNDS, BENGALURU560001 2. SRI VIJAYA SANKESHWARA REPRESENTING VRL MEDIA LIMITED THE OWNER OF DIGVIJAYA KANNADA NEWS CHANNEL OFFICE AT NO.131/3, LALBAGH MAIN ROAD BENGALURU560027 3. SRI ANANDA SANKESHWARA THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DIGVIJAYA KANNADA NEWS CHANNEL OFFICE NO.13LALBAGH MAIN ROAD BENGALURU560027 4. SRI SUBHASH HOOGAR DIGVIJAYA KANNADA NEWS CHANNEL THE CHIEF EDITOR OF THE OWNER OF TV5 ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2020 (HC)

Sri Mahalingappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE28H DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K. SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1169 OF2010BETWEEN SRI MAHALINGAPPA S/O LATE SHIVANNA28YEARS R/AT KUNTAMMANATHOTA TUMKUR.... APPELLANT (BY SRI. R SRINIVASA GOWDA, ADVOCATE APPOINTED AS AMICUS CURIAE, VIDE COURT ORDER DATED2803.2019 ) AND STATE OF KARNATAKA TUMKUR RURAL POLICE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M. DIWAKAR MADDUR - HCGP) THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF THE CR.P.C PRAYING TO, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED2627.10.2010 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FTC-I, TUMKUR IN S.C.NO.136/2008-CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S498A) AND304B) OF IPC AND SEC.3, 4 AND6OF D.P. ACT AND ETC., THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This appeal is filed by one Mahalingappa / Accused No.1 in S.C. No.136/2008, challenging t...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2020 (SC)

Kashmira Devi Vs. The State of Uttarakhand

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.724 OF2019Kashmira Devi .Appellant(s) Versus State of Uttarakhand & Ors. . Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.S. Bopanna,J.1. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant assailing the impugned judgment and final order dated 29.06.2017 and 10.07.2017, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Nainital in Government Appeal No.42 of 2010, whereby the High Court has allowed the appeal filed by the Respondent and set aside the acquittal of appellant passed by the trial court and convicted the Page 1 of 30 appellant for the charges under Sections 304B and 498 A IPC.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the marriage between deceased/ Urmila @ Guddi and Proforma Respondent No.3/Jagdish Singh was solemnized four years back. At the time of the marriage dowry was given by parents of the deceased as per their financial capacity; despite the same the husband and in laws of the deceased were not satisf...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 2020 (SC)

Shree Ambica Medical Stores Vs. The Surat Peoples Co-Operative Bank L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 562 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 4362 of 2016) Shree Ambica Medical Stores & Ors Appellants Versus The Surat Peoples Co-operative Bank Limited & Ors Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 allowed an appeal instituted by the first respondent and set aside the decision of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of Gujarat2. The State Commission found substance in the consumer complaint of the appellants and decreed their claim for compensation in the amount of Rs 53,66,877 with interest at 9 percent per annum. In addition, the State Commission awarded Rs 25,000 towards mental agony and Rs 5,000 towards litigation costs. The claim of the appellants arose under an insurance cover pertaining to goods hypothecated by the appellants with the first respondent under a cash credit facility. The insurer, New India Assurance Company L...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //