Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 15 of about 755,598 results (2.808 seconds)

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.naincy Sagar & Anr

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA7132019 & C.M. APPL.48802-48804/2019 + Reserved on:15. 11.2019 Date of decision:19. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS NAINCY SAGAR & ANR Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, for respondent No.1. AND + LPA7172019 & C.M. APPL.49163-49165/2019 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus PRATEEK SOLANKI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, LPA713& 717/20...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.prateek Solanki & Anr

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA7132019 & C.M. APPL.48802-48804/2019 + Reserved on:15. 11.2019 Date of decision:19. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS NAINCY SAGAR & ANR Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, for respondent No.1. AND + LPA7172019 & C.M. APPL.49163-49165/2019 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus PRATEEK SOLANKI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, LPA713& 717/20...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Honeycom Synergies vs.commissioner of Customs (Export) & Ors.

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:19. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6495/2019 & CM APPL.27484/2019 HONEYCOM SYNERGIES Through: Mr. ........ Petitioners Seth, Mr.Chinmaya Seth & Mr.Ekansh Mishra, Adv A.K. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. Central Govt., Counsel for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The proceedings which were commenced, against the petitioner, vide Show Cause Notice No.09/2017, dated 24th March, 2017, issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), stands settled, by Final Order, dated 1st November, 2018, passed by the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Settlement Commission) in Settlement Application No.5580/2018, subject to appropriation of 84,28,058/-, deposited by the petitioner towards Customs Duty escaped on imports effec...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Sonepat & Ors vs ...

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :8. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:19. h November, 2019 + WP(C) 822/2015 COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX, SONEPAT & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel Versus AMIT DECORATIVE PLYWOODS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through: Mr. Sudhir Malhotra, ........ RESPONDENTS Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. These proceedings emanate from a Show Cause Notice, dated 16th January, 2013, issued by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (Petitioner No.2 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as the DGCEI) to the respondents, whereby it was alleged that... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2 (M/s. Amit Decorative Plywoods Pvt Ltd and M/s Amit Densified Doors Pvt Ltd) had indulged in clandestine removal and undervaluation of goods manufactured by them. The Show Cause Notice required the respondents to show cause as to why WP (...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Mrs. Vinod vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h November, 2019 Decided on:19. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 2432/2013 MRS. VINOD UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR versus Through: Mr. J.P.Shukla, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shipra Shukla, Advocate. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH J U D G M EN T Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge in the present petition is to an order dated 19th November, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.2165/2009 as well as to an order dated 19th April, 2012 dismissing Review Application No.19/2011.2. The issue involved in the case at hand concerns the plea for regularisation of the... Petitioner, who was working as a Mobile Booking Clerk (MBC) in the Northern Railway, with retrospective effect, and for re-fixation of her seniority.3. At the outset, it requires to be noted that there were two... Petitioners in the above OA No.2165/2009 before the CAT. Th...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Rita Vashishtha vs.anil Kumar Vashishtha

Court : Delhi

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:23. d April, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:_19_November, 2019 % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 188/2017 RITA VASHISHTHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vishesh Wadhwa, Mr.Saurabh Dhingra, Ms.Swadha Gupta and Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocates Versus ANIL KUMAR VASHISHTHA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Anil Sharma, Mr.Arun Baali and Mr.Kunal Nath, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the judgment dated 16.09.2017 passed by the Family Court by which the petition filed by the respondent/husband seeking divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) was allowed and a decree of divorce has been granted.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 03.11.1995, at Hath...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Sonu @ Shahnawaz vs.state (Nct Govt of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2019 CRL.A. 1141/2017 SONU @ SHAHNAWAZ versus ..... Appellant STATE (NCT GOVT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Suhil Kumar Jain with Ms Krishnashree Devi, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Amit Gupta, APP for State. SI Rahul, PS Bhajanpura. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The present appeal arises out of a judgement dated 31.05.2017 passed by the Learned ASJ, (North-East), Karkardooma Courts, whereby the Appellant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 397/392/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter IPC). By an order dated 08.06.2017, the appellant has been sentenced to seven years of rigorous imprisonment for the offence under Section 397 IPC; three years of rigorous imprisonment and fine of 1000/- for the offence under Section 392 IPC and in default, simple imprisonment for one month; and simple imprisonment for six...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Sahara India Commerical Corporation Ltd vs.vijay Kumar Agarwal & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2019 + CM(M) 1646/2019 and CM APPL. 49853/2019, 49854/2019 SAHARA INDIA COMMERICAL CORPORATION LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Ms. Neha Gupta, Ms. Rhea Dube and Mr. Aadhar Nautiyal, Advocates. VIJAY KUMAR AGARWAL & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order of the NCDRC dated 29th August, 2019 by which the... Petitioner has been directed to make a deposit of the entire decretal amount. Mr. Ashish Dholakia, ld. counsel for the... Petitioner submits that strangely, the NCDRC has neither decided the admission of the petition, nor issued notice, and there has been no stay of the operation of order of the State Commission. He further submits that while the... Petitioner is willing to deposit the decretal amount as a condition for maintaining the Revisio...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Manju Singh & Anr. Vs.state

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on :22. 10.2019 Pronounced on :19.11.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2207/2019 MANJU SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners STATE Through: Mr. Bankey Bihari and Mr. Birendra Bikram, Advs. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Amit, P.S.Kalyan Puri. Mr. Girish Chandra and Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Advs. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR ORDER1 This is an application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.339/2019 dated 21.07.2019 under Sections 420/468/4IPC, registered at Police Station Kalyanpuri, East District, Delhi. Bail Appln. 2207/2019 Page 1 of 10 2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the complainant alleged that on 04.03.2019 one person namely Jamuna Prasad (petitioner No.2 herein) alongwith Manju Singh (petitioner No.1 herein) whom Jamuna Prasad introduced as his wife came to the complainant for taking first fl...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Anil Vashisth vs.m/s Awaaz India Media P. Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Delivered on:19. h November, 2019 RFA9842019 ANIL VASHISTH ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Amit Swami, Advocate. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through : None. M/S AWAAZ INDIA MEDIA P. LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS YOGESH KHANNA, J.CM APPL No.49721/2019 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 08 days in refiling the appeal stands condoned. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL No.49720/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RFA9842019 & CM APPL No.49719/2019 1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the ex parte judgment and decree dated 19.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-10/Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.11/2018 whereby the suit of the appellant for recovery of Rs.4.00 lac was RFA No.984/2019 Page 1 of 4 dismissed. Though, initia...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //