Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 3 of about 755,542 results (2.616 seconds)

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Union of India vs.vinod Ashwini Saxena & Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h November, 2019 Decided on:2. d December, 2019 W.P. (C) 5954/2016 & CM245362016 (stay) UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG and Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus VINOD ASHWINI SAXENA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ajay Kumar Tandon, Ms Purnima Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr Sudhir Walia and Ms Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocates for R-2. Mr Dewesh Singh and Mr Sukriti Ghai, Advocates for R-3. W.P. (C) 1206/2017 & CM54922017 (stay) + SIDHARTH ZUTSHI UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr Devesh Singh, Ms Sukriti Ghar versus and Mr Rahul Adhana, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG and Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI. Mr Ajay Kumar Tandon and Ms Purnima Singh, Advocates for R-2. Mr Sudhir Walia and Ms Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH W.P. (C) Nos. 5954/2016 & 1206/...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Sidharth Zutshi vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h November, 2019 Decided on:2. d December, 2019 W.P. (C) 5954/2016 & CM245362016 (stay) UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG and Mr Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus VINOD ASHWINI SAXENA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ajay Kumar Tandon, Ms Purnima Singh, Advocates for R-1. Mr Sudhir Walia and Ms Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocates for R-2. Mr Dewesh Singh and Mr Sukriti Ghai, Advocates for R-3. W.P. (C) 1206/2017 & CM54922017 (stay) + SIDHARTH ZUTSHI UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr Devesh Singh, Ms Sukriti Ghar versus and Mr Rahul Adhana, Advocates. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG and Mr Vikram Jetly, CGSC for UOI. Mr Ajay Kumar Tandon and Ms Purnima Singh, Advocates for R-2. Mr Sudhir Walia and Ms Niharika Ahluwalia, Advocates for R-3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH W.P. (C) Nos. 5954/2016 & 1206/...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Kalpana Mehdiratta vs.air Force Bal Bharati School & Ors

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 597/2017 % 1. KALPANA MEHDIRATTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Padma Kumar S, Mr. Praveen Kumar Mehdiratta, Mr. S.C. Pandey and Mr. Ram Singh, Advs. versus AIR FORCE BAL BHARATI SCHOOL & ORS ..... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arvind Nayar, Sr. Adv, Mr. Sachin Dutta, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Adv. for R- 1, 2, 3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT0212.2019 The petitioner Kalpana Mehdiratta challenges, by means of this writ petition, the selection and appointment of Respondent No.6 Ms. Mani Shankra, as Vice-Principal of the Respondent No.1-School (hereinafter referred to as the School) by a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) which met, for the said purpose, on 26th June, 2015. She also prays that she be promoted as Vice-Principal, in place of Respondent No.6, with effect from the date of promotion of Respondent No.6, i.e. 1st July, 2015. WP (C) 597/2017 Page 1 of 40 Facts 2. The petitioner was appoint...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Ravita & Ors vs.suresh

Court : Delhi

$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d December, 2019 RAVITA & ORS CM(M) 1714/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R. K. Sonkiya, Advocate. (M:9810124896) versus Through: None. SURESH CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J.(oral) CM APPL.51749/2019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 1714/2019 & CM APPL. 51748/2019 2. The present petition under Article 227 challenges the impugned order dated 23rd October, 2019 by which the ld. Trial Court has permitted the reopening of the cross-examination of DW-2 Ms. Manisha at the behest of the Plaintiff/Respondent. The case of the... Petitioner/Defendant is that Ms. Manisha was cross-examined by the Plaintiff on 8th February, 2019 and the matter was thereafter listed for final arguments. At that stage, the Plaintiff moved an application relying upon various documents to argue that the statement made by Ms. Manisha that she si...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Shree Vijay Shanti Suri Education Trust & Anr. Vs.arun Kumar Purohi ...

Court : Delhi

$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CONT.CAS(C) 1042/2019 Date of decision:2. 12.2019 SHREE VIJAY SHANTI SURI EDUCATION TRUST & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Devyani Ashna, Mr. Kunal Gosain and Ms. Pallavi Mohan, Advs.1. versus ARUN KUMAR PUROHIT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Ms. Sanjna Dua and Mr. Tushar Mathur, Advs. for R-2. Ms. Archana Pathak Dave and Mr. Kumar Prashant, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Ashish Kumar, Addl. Adv. General with Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, Adv. for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL): The captioned contempt petition is pivoted on the alleged breach and/or non-compliance of the order dated 23.10.2019 passed in W.P.(C) No.10840/2019 and CM No.44879/2019. CONT.CAS(C) No.1042/2019 Page 1 of 14 Background:-"2. For disposal of this contempt petition, the following broad facts are required to be noticed:2. 1.... Petitio...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Umesh Kumar vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 1093/2019 Reserved on :19. 11.2019 Date of Decision :02. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: UMESH KUMAR Through: Mr. Archit Upadhayay (DHCLSC) ... Appellant STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Versus ... Respondent Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with ASI Praveen Kumar, P.S. Anand Parbat CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The present appeal has been filed assailing the judgment of conviction dated 02.08.2019 and order on sentence dated 02.08.2019 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.430/2016 registered under Sections 308/354B/354/323/506 (Part-I)/509 IPC PS Anand Parbat.2. The appellant was convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for 6 months for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC and SI for 1 year for the offence punishable under Section 354 IPC. It was directed that both the sentences would run concurrently. The benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. was also awarded by the trial court.3. The facts of the case, as noted by the tria...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Rahul Dev Mandal @ Rahul vs.state

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1117/2015 Judgment Reserved :18. 11.2019 Date of Decision :02. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF RAHUL DEV MANDAL @ RAHUL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Aditya Vikram and Mr.Avinash, Advocates. STATE Versus Through: Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for State. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI1 The appellant has instituted the present appeal assailing the judgment of conviction dated 01.06.2015 and order on sentence dated 06.06.2015, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge in FIR No.201/2013, registered under Sections 363/366/376 IPC and 4 POCSO Act, 2012 P.S. Chankyapuri whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act, 2012 and was sentenced to undergo RI10years and to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000/- under Section 376 IPC, in default whereof to undergo SI for 8 months.2. The brief facts as noted by the trial court are reproduced herein below:-"CRL.A. 1117/2015 Page 1 of 9 2. The facts in brief ar...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Ran Vijay Singh vs.central Industrial Security Force

Court : Delhi

$~1 * + RAN VIJAY SINGH IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 553/2016 Through: Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Advocate. .... Petitioner CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE versus . Respondent Through: Ms. Anju Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0212.2019 1. The... Petitioner, a former Constable in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) has filed the present petition challenging the order dated 23rd January, 2015 of the Disciplinary Authority (DA) whereby the... Petitioner has been awarded the punishment of compulsory retirement with all admissible pensionary benefits. The... Petitioner has also challenged an order dated 27th May 2015 of the Appellate Authority (AA) dismissing his appeal and the order dated 5th October, 2015 dismissing his Revision Petition.2. The... Petitioner joined the CISF as a Constable on 25th August, 2001. In the... Petitioners version of the events on 2nd September...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

The State vs.gaurav @ Mohit & Ors.

Court : Delhi

11 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.L.P. 659/2019 THE STATE Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for the State ........ Petitioner versus with Insp., PS Jafrabad. GAURAV @ MOHIT & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. Date of Decision:02. d December, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) CRL. M.A. 41606/2019 (condonation of delay) Keeping in view the averments made in the application, the delay of nineteen days in filing the criminal leave petition is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. Crl.M.A. 41607/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, present application stands disposed of. Page 1 of 7 CRL. L.P. 659/2019 CRL.L.P. 659/2019 1. Present criminal leave petition has been filed on behalf of the State challenging the judgment dated 9th August, 2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge05 (Shahdara District), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi acquitting the...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Rolls-Royce Plc vs.deputy Director of Income Tax, Circle-2(1), Interna ...

Court : Delhi

$~29, 30, 32, 43 & 44 * + + + + + Date of Decision:02. 12.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA9692019 ITA9702019 ITA9722019 ITA9732019 ITA9742019 ROLLS-ROYCE PLC ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Percival Billimoria, Mr.SR Patnaik, Mr.Thangadurai VP and Mr.Sidharth Thakur, Advocates versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Lakshmit Gurung, Senior Standing Cousnel with Mr.Talha A Rahman, Mr.Siddharth Gupta and Mr. Shaz Khan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(Oral):1. The present appeal is preferred by the assessee against the common order passed by the Income Tax Tribunal Delhi Bench I-2 New Delhi dated 28th May, 2019, in several ITAs preferred before it, pertaining to the assessment years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2009-10. The Tribunal has rejected the said appeals preferred by the appellant, inter alia, on the premise that this Cour...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //