Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 4 of about 756,181 results (2.126 seconds)

Sep 25 2020 (SC)

Jitendra Gupta Vs. C. Chandramouli Ias

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).3298 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.2978 of 2020) DR. JITENDRA GUPTA PETITIONER(S) VERSUS RESPONDENT(S) DR. C. CHANDRAMOULI, IAS (SECRETARY, DoP&T, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA) With Contempt of Court PetitoinNo.416 of 2020 (Dr. Jintendra Gupta vs. Dr. C. Chandramouli) ORDER ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.Leave granted.2. The appeal and contempt petition have been filed by the same person, Dr. Jitendra Gupta. The appeal has been filed against the judgment of the Delhi High Court dated 24.12.2019 rejected the Contempt Case(C) No.1140 1 of 2019 filed by the appellant where contempt proceedings were requested to be initiated for violation of judgment of Division Bench dated 02.07.2019 of the High Court passed in W.P.(C)No.5648 of 2018. The contempt petition has been filed in this Court for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondent for disobedience of the order dated 03.02.2020 passed by this Court in SLP(...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 2020 (SC)

Anwar Ali Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1121 OF2016Anwar Ali and another Appellants Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 20.09.2016 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Criminal Appeal No.464 of 2012, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondent The State of Himachal Pradesh and has reversed the judgment and order of acquittal passed by the learned trial Court and consequently has convicted the 1 appellants original accused for the offences punishable under Sections 302 read with 34, 392, 201 and 420, IPC and has sentenced the appellants herein original accused to undergo life imprisonment for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with 34, IPC, the appellants original accused have preferred the present appeal.2. That the appellants herein original accused were charg...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2020 (SC)

Union of India Vs. M/S g.s. Chatha Rice Mills

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 3249 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 3860 of 2020 Union of India & Ors. Appellants M/S G S Chatha Rice Mills & Anr. Respondents Versus W I T H Civil Appeal No 3250 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3861 of 2020) W I T H (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3869 of 2020) Civil Appeal No 3250 of 2020 W I T H (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3867 of 2020) Civil Appeal No 3252 of 2020 W I T H Civil Appeal No 3253 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.3865 of 2020) 1 W I T H Civil Appeal No 3262 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.5029 of 2020) W I T H Civil Appeal No 3265 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7059 of 2020) W I T H Civil Appeal No 3267 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.6451 of 2020) (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7063 of 2020) Civil Appeal No 3269 of 2020 W I T H (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7064 of 2020) Civil Appeal No 3270 of 2020 W I T H W I T H Civil Appeal No 3271 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.7057 of 2...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2020 (SC)

Beli Ram Vs. Rajinder Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7220-7221 OF2011BELI RAM Appellant Versus RAJINDER KUMAR & ANR. Respondents JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The sole question of law for consideration in the present appeals is whether in case of a valid driving licence, if the licence has expired, the insured is absolved of its liability.2. The facts are in a very narrow compass. The first respondent herein, met with an accident on 20.5.1999 while driving a truck owned by the appellant herein, under whom he was gainfully employed. The consequence for the first respondent was 20 per cent permanent disability. The first respondent herein filed a petition under the 1 Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the Compensation Act) before the Commissioner, Sadar, Bilaspur on 17.2.1999 seeking compensation of an amount of Rs.5,00,000/-, impleading the appellant and second respondent herein the insurance company which had insured the ...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 2020 (SC)

National Alliance for Peoples Movements Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE1CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NO.4116 OF2020National Alliance for Peoples Movements & Ors. . Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. . Respondent(s) JUDGMENT1 The petitioners herein were before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay claiming to be in Public Interest (PIL CJLDVC No.44/2020) seeking that the decision of the High Powered Committee (HPC for short) dated 25.03.2020 to the extent of Clauses (iii), (iv) and (vii) of paragraph 8, decisions/minutes of HPC meeting dated 11.05.2020 excluding certain categories of offences provided in 2 paragraph 5(i) and 5(ii) for the purpose of grant of interim bail and corrigendum dated 18.05.2020 of the Minutes of the Meeting of HPC dated 11.05.2020 to the extent of clarification that the class and/or category of offences determined by the HPC for temporary release be not read as a direction made by it for mandatory release of prisoners falling in that categor...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 22 2020 (SC)

State of Kerala and Anr. Etc. Etc. Vs. M/S Rds Project Limited and Ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3239-3246 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS. 3008-3015 OF2020 STATE OF KERALA & ANR. ETC. ETC. APPELLANTS VERSUS M/S RDS PROJECT LIMITED & ORS. ETC. ETC.RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1) Leave granted.2) Heard Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India appearing on behalf of the State of Kerala, Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent No.1, Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent No.3, Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent No.2, Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent No.9 and Mr. V. Giri, learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 & 5. The impugned High Court judgment dealt with a project called the Palarivattom Flyover on the National Highway, Cochin City, State of Kerala. This was constructed by 2 Respondent No.1 and inaugurated on 12.10.2016. However, after one year o...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2020 (SC)

Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla Vs. National Law School of India University, Be ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION(CIVIL)No.1030 OF2020RAKESH KUMAR AGARWALLA & ANR. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS NATIONAL LAW SCHOOL OF INDIA UNIVERSITY, BENGALURU & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) With Special Leave Petition (C)No.11059 of 2020. JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN,J.This writ petition filed in Public Interest under Article 32 of the Constitution of India questions admission notification dated 03.09.2020 issued by National Law School of India University, Bengaluru for conducting separate admission entrance examination, the National Law Aptitude Test(NLAT) scheduled for 2 12.09.2020. The petitioner seeks a direction to National Law School of India University (hereinafter referred to as NLSIU) to admit students only through Common Law Admission Test, 2020(CLAT) examination scheduled to take place on 28.09.2020. The writ petition is filed by two petitioners. First petitioner is the father of a student aspiring to gain admission into five years LL.B...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2020 (SC)

Sagufa Ahmed Vs. Upper Assam Plywood Products Pvt. Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOs.30073008 OF2020SAGUFA AHMED & ORS. Appellants Versus UPPER ASSAM PLYWOOD PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Respondents JUDGMENT V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.1. Challenging an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as NCLAT) dismissing an application for condonation of delay as well as an appeal as time barred, the appellants have come up with the above appeals. 1 2. We have heard Mr. Gunjan Singh, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Sajan Poovayya, learned Senior Counsel who accepts notice on behalf of the first respondent.3. The appellants herein together claim to hold 24.89% of the shares of a company by name Upper Assam Plywood Products Private Limited, which is the first respondent herein. The appellants moved an application before the Guwahati Bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as NCLT) for the winding up of the company. The ...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 18 2020 (SC)

b.santoshamma. Vs. d.sarala.

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3574 OF2009B. SANTOSHAMMA & ANR. .Appellants Versus D. SARALA & ANR. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3575-3577 OF2009JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.These appeals are against a common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad dismissing the appeals being A.S. Nos.892 of 1994, 893 of 1994, 894 of 1994 and 1785 of 1994 and inter alia confirming the judgment and decree of the Trial Court in O.S.No.20 of 1993 and OS No.91 of 1993 and the decree of dismissal by the Trial Court of the Suit being O.S.No.92 of 1993. 2 2. The Appellant No.1, in Civil Appeal No.3574 of 2009, B. Santoshamma, hereinafter referred to as the Vendor, wife of the Appellant No.2 in the said appeal, B. Darshan Reddy, purchased 300 square yards of land, in survey No.262 of Hayathnagar Village and Taluk in Ranga Reddy District, hereinafter referred to as the suit land, from one D. Tanesha...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 2020 (SC)

Pappu Deo Yadav Vs. Naresh Kumar

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2567 OF2020PAPPU DEO YADAV VERSUS NARESH KUMAR AND ORS. ...Appellant(s) ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The appellant questions a decision of the High Court of Delhi1. On 18.05.2012, the appellant was injured in a motor accident while travelling to Hapur as a passenger in a bus, having paid the requisite fare. At about 1.30 pm when the bus reached village Sadikpur, PS-Hafizpur, Hapur, Uttar Pradesh, the driver of the offending bus (the first respondent) sought to overtake the bus in which the appellant was travelling, from the wrong side, and zipped the appellants bus, scratching it. This rash and negligent act caused a dent in the bus where the appellant was seated, as a result of which he suffered injuries. The appellant was removed to Dr. Khans Rehan hospital and thereafter, AIIMS Trauma Center. The appellant claimed compensation, impleading the owner, the driver of the vehicle, ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //