Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 4 of about 755,542 results (2.864 seconds)

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Rolls-Royce Plc vs.deputy Director of Income Tax

Court : Delhi

$~29, 30, 32, 43 & 44 * + + + + + Date of Decision:02. 12.2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA9692019 ITA9702019 ITA9722019 ITA9732019 ITA9742019 ROLLS-ROYCE PLC ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Percival Billimoria, Mr.SR Patnaik, Mr.Thangadurai VP and Mr.Sidharth Thakur, Advocates versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Lakshmit Gurung, Senior Standing Cousnel with Mr.Talha A Rahman, Mr.Siddharth Gupta and Mr. Shaz Khan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(Oral):1. The present appeal is preferred by the assessee against the common order passed by the Income Tax Tribunal Delhi Bench I-2 New Delhi dated 28th May, 2019, in several ITAs preferred before it, pertaining to the assessment years 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08 & 2009-10. The Tribunal has rejected the said appeals preferred by the appellant, inter alia, on the premise that this Cour...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Shri Sandeep Dahiya vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12643/2019 SHRI SANDEEP DAHIYA ........ Petitioner and Singh Through Mr. Abhishek Mr.Abhist, Advs. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Mr. Shashi Gupta and Mr. Mayank Ahuja, Adv. for NDMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER0212.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This public interest litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: (a) Issue writ of mandamus or any other writ/order/direction to the Respondent No.1, for taking action against the Commercial properties bearing Plot No.WZ-671, Main Market, Rishi Nagar, Rani Bagh, DeIhi- 110034, Plot No.861, Rani Bagh, Delhi 110034, Plot No.1484, Rani Bagh, Delhi-110034, Plot No.320, Rishi Nagar, Rani Bagh, Delhi 110034, Plot No.936, Rishi Nagar, Rani W.P.(C) 12643/2019 Page 1 of 3 Bagh, Delhi 110034, Plot No.3381...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Ateet Bansal vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:2. d December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6266/20 1. ATEET BANSAL Versus Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Gaurav Rohilla, Sr. Govt. Counsel for R-1, 3, 4 & 5 Mr. Vipul Pankaj Sanghi, Adv. for R-2 Mr. Amit Bansal, Ms. Seema Dolo & Ms. Vipasha Mishra, Advs. for R-8 & R-9. Ms. Survehi Suri, Adv. for R-10 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) JUDGMENT This so-called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers: (i) issue writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent No.1 Union of India to make present "National Career Service" portal proper, functional, comprehensive portal for advertisement to all central government, state governments and other instrumentalities of State recruitments. All Government jobs and...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Animesh vs.the Central Board of Secondary Education

Court : Delhi

$~1 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA1202019 ..... Appellant ANIMESH THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION Through: Mr. Ranjit Sharma, Advocate with appellant in person. versus Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, Ms. Seema Dolo and Mr. Vipasha Mishra, Advocates. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON % The appellant/petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated 07.12.2018, ORDER0212.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a writ petition filed by him for issuing directions to the respondent/Central Board of Secondary Education (in short CBSE) to revaluate his answer sheet of the Economics paper, for which he had sat in his Grade XII examination, in the academic year 2017-18.2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. The appellant/petitioner had appeared in Grade XII examinations, 2018 at Delhi, in the academic year 2017-18. Besides Physics, Chemistry and Maths, the appellant had also appeared in the Economics paper ...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2019 (HC)

Sri. Honnappa Vs. Sri v Shashidhara Chary

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE2D DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.51212/2019 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN : S/o. Late Gangappa, Aged about 66 years, R/at No.1 D Cross Lakshmananagara, Opp. Home Textile, Hegganahalli Main Road, Bengaluru-560 097 Sri K.G. Gurusiddaiah, S/o. late Gangappa, Aged about 65 years, R/at No.10, 5th Cross, 6th Main, Sachidanandnagar, Kengeri Satellite Town Bengaluru-560 097 1. Sri Honnappa, 2.3.4. (By Sri H.M. Somashekaraiah, Advocate) PETITIONERS Sri Gangadharaiah, S/o late Gangappa, Aged about 60 years, R/at No.23, 3rd Cross, Jnanajyothinagar, Ullalu Main Road, Bengaluru-560 097 K.G. Lingadvaru, S/o late Gangappa, Aged about 55 years, R/at No.13, 3rd Cross, Hoysalanagar Pipeline Road, Sunkadakatte Bengaluru-560 079 2 AND : 1.2. Sri V. Shashidhara Chary, S/o. Sri V. Venkataramana Chary, Aged about 45 years, R/at No.32 Pillappa Lane, Nagarathpet Cross, Bengaluru-560 002 Sri N. Umesh, S/o. S...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 2019 (HC)

Madhucn Projects Ltd. Vs.national Highways Authority of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 % + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 428/2019 MADHUCN PROJECTS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chaturvedi, Mr.Suryadeeep Singh, Mr. Sumit Kumar Shukla and Ms. Radha R. Tarkar, Advs. Amitabh versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Padma Priya and Mr. Dhruv Nayar, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: In view of the aforegoing facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may graciously be pleased to: a. restrain the respondent No.1 during the pendency and until conclusion of the Arbitral proceedings, by way of a temporary order and injunction, from encashing / invoking or taking any precipitative steps or receiving any monies under the Performance Bank Guarantee of OMP(I) (COMM)...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Shambhu Sharma and Ors. Vs.high Court of Delhi Thr. Its Registrar Gen ...

Court : Delhi

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2019 Decided on:29. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 9546/2016 SHAMBHU SHARMA AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI THR. ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Mr. Karthik Sundar and Ms. Rajshree Jaiswal Advocates for Delhi High Court. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This class action litigation has been instituted by six employees of this Court, aggrieved by the disparities in the grant of clothing and dress maintenance allowance, also called washing allowance.2.... Petitioner No.1 is presently a Judicial Assistant (JA),... Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are Senior Judicial Assistants (SJAs),... Petitioner No.4 is a Senior Judicial Translator (SJT),... Petitioner No.5 is a Judicial Translator (JT) and... Petitioner No.6 is a Junior Judicial Assistant (JJA). W.P.(C) 9546/2016 Page 1 of 25 3. It is ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Director Directorate of Education & Anr vs.mohd. Shamim & Ors

Court : Delhi

% + *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019. RC.REV. 279/2014 & CMs No.16348/2012 (for stay), 10006/2014 (u/S151CPC), 15202/2017 (for directions) & 29048/2017 (u/S151CPC) DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Mr. Shashank Tiwari and Mr. Arpit, Advs. with Mr. Pradeep Kaushik, DoE, L.A. Zone-27, Jhandewalan, New Delhi. Versus MOHD. SHAMIM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjay Dua and Mr. Akshay Deep Singhal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This Division Bench has been constituted under Rule 8 of Part B of Chapter 3 of Volume V of Delhi High Court Rules & Orders for answering the questions formulated in the order dated 16th August, 2017 of one of us (Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.) sitting singly and the relevant paragraphs of which order are as under: 3. This Rent Control R...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Ankur Kohli & Anr. Vs.state & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~55 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 11.2019 CRL.M.C. 6094/2019 ANKUR KOHLI & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Yogesh Maini, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Ombir, PS Ranhola Mr. Ashutosh Bansal, Adv for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 41427/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.6094/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.143/2011 dated 20.07.2011 registered at Police Station Ranhola and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.6094/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 17.11.2010 as per essential Hindu...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Suresh Yadav & Anr vs.the State

Court : Delhi

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5810/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40372/2019 SURESH YADAV & ANR ........ Petitioners THE STATE Through Mr. Ravin Rao, Adv. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State Insp. Ravinder singh, PS Paschim Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By way of the present petition, petitioner seeking setting aside of order dated 24.10.2019 whereby the learned Trial Court dismissed the application u/s 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recalling of witnesses PW-6 namely ASI Jagdish for his cross-examination.2. The petitioners are facing trial in case FIR No.522/2004 registered at P.S. Paschim Vihar for the offences punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471/120-B IPC. CRL.M.C.5810/2019 Page 1 of 4 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that PW-6, ASI Jagdish, is a vital witness, being the alleged decoy customer, who was examined-in-chief before the Ld. Trial Court but could not be c...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //