Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 5 of about 728,103 results (2.414 seconds)

Apr 12 2019 (SC)

Gurdev Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3894 OF2019(Arising from SLP (C) No.26111/2015) Gurdev Singh and others ..Appellants Versus Union of India and others ..Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 13.05.2015 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi passed in Letters 1 Patent Appeal No.282 of 2010, by which the Division Bench of the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the respondents herein Union of India and others and has quashed and set aside the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court, the heirs of the original writ petitioner have preferred the present appeal.3. The facts leading to the present appeal in nutshell are as under: That the father and predecessorininterest of the appellants Hem Singh was a migrant from Pakistan and was registered as a displaced person. Th...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2019 (SC)

Ram Prakash Vs. Puttan Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

NonReportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 38953896 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NOS.3549495 OF2017 Ram Prakash & Anr. ..Appellants Versus Puttan Lal & Ors. ..Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.Leave granted.2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned Judgment and Order dated 21.10.2016 and 11.08.2017 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Writ Petition (M/S) No.5459 of 2001 and Review Application No.877 of 2016 respectively, the original defendants/tenants have preferred the present appeals. 1 3. Respondent No.1 hereinlandlord filed an application under Section 21(1)(a)(b) of the U.P. Urban Building Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for release of the building from the father of the appellant herein (Late Guru Charan Lal) who was a tenant in respect of two rooms with veranda on the back side on the lowest storey and the husband of Appellant No.2 (Late Roshan Lal) was tenant in respect of another portion...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2019 (SC)

Center of Indian Trade Union, a Federation of Registered Trade Unions ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.7734 OF1997CENTER OF INDIAN TRADE UNIONS, A FEDERATION OF REGISTERED TRADE UNIONS Versus PETITIONER(S) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta, J.1. The petitioner had challenged the execution of the Power Project Agreement (PPA) and the modified power project agreements first of which was executed in the year 1993 by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (for short the MSEB) in favour of Dabhol Power Corporation Limited (for short DPC) before the Bombay High Court.2. Though the High Court came to the conclusion that the action of the Board and the Governments concerned was 1 questionable and that everything was not above board, it dismissed the writ petition(s) on the ground that the petitioner had not been able to place on record before the Court any material justifying the allegations as regards corruption, bribery, fraud and misrepresentation.3. Thereafter, the ...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2019 (SC)

Indibily Creative Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Govt. Of West Bengal

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No 306 of 2019 Indibility Creative Pvt Ltd & Ors ...Petitioners Versus Govt of West Bengal & Ors ...Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1Motivated by a mission to support meaningful Bengali cinema, the petitioners produced a film titled Bhobishyoter Bhoot. Their grievance, while invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 32 of the Constitution is that the State of West Bengal, its Department of Home and the Kolkata Police have caused an utterly unlawful obstruction of the public exhibition of their Bengali feature film. Simply put, their grievance is summarized in the extract which we reproduce from the first paragraph of the petition: The State of West Bengal is misusing police power and acting as a super-censor sitting atop the CBFC and is violating the Petitioners fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14,19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Indian Constitution thro...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 11 2019 (SC)

Chairman and Managing Director the Fertilizers and Chemicals Tranvanco ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3803 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.99 of 2018) Chairman and Managing Director, The Fertilizers And Chemicals Tranvancore Ltd. & Anr. .Appellant(s) VERSUS General Secretary FACT Employees Association & Ors. .Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.3804 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.100 of 2018) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 25.01.2017 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in W.A. 1 Nos.1820 and 1824 of 2012 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the writ appeals filed by the appellants herein and affirmed the judgment dated 21.08.2012 passed by the Single Judge of the High Court in W.P. Nos.33938/2008 and 2556 of 2009.3. These appeals involve a short point as would be clear from the facts stated infra.4. The appellants herein are the respondents and the respondents herein (responde...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2019 (SC)

Yashwant Sinha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its Directo ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.46 OF2019IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.298 OF2018YASHWANT SINHA & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH ITS DIECTOR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH M.A.No.58/2019 in W.P. (CRL.) 225/2018 R.P. (CRL.) No.122/2019 IN W.P. (CRL.) 297/2018 M.A. No.403/2019 IN W.P. (CRL.) No.298/2018 R.P.(C) No.719/2019 in W.P.(C) 1205/2018 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 A preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the review petition has been raised by the Attorney General on behalf of the respondents. The learned Attorney General contends 2 that the review petition lacks in bona fides inasmuch as three documents unauthorizedly removed from the office of the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, have been appended to the review petition and relied upon by the review petitioners. The three documents in question are: (a) An eightpage note written by three members of...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2019 (SC)

Sanjay Singh Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.46 OF2019IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.298 OF2018YASHWANT SINHA & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH ITS DIECTOR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH M.A.No.58/2019 in W.P. (CRL.) 225/2018 R.P. (CRL.) No.122/2019 IN W.P. (CRL.) 297/2018 M.A. No.403/2019 IN W.P. (CRL.) No.298/2018 R.P.(C) No.719/2019 in W.P.(C) 1205/2018 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 A preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the review petition has been raised by the Attorney General on behalf of the respondents. The learned Attorney General contends 2 that the review petition lacks in bona fides inasmuch as three documents unauthorizedly removed from the office of the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, have been appended to the review petition and relied upon by the review petitioners. The three documents in question are: (a) An eightpage note written by three members of...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2019 (SC)

Manohar Lal Sharma Vs. Narendra Damodardas Modi

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.46 OF2019IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.298 OF2018YASHWANT SINHA & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH ITS DIECTOR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH M.A.No.58/2019 in W.P. (CRL.) 225/2018 R.P. (CRL.) No.122/2019 IN W.P. (CRL.) 297/2018 M.A. No.403/2019 IN W.P. (CRL.) No.298/2018 R.P.(C) No.719/2019 in W.P.(C) 1205/2018 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 A preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the review petition has been raised by the Attorney General on behalf of the respondents. The learned Attorney General contends 2 that the review petition lacks in bona fides inasmuch as three documents unauthorizedly removed from the office of the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, have been appended to the review petition and relied upon by the review petitioners. The three documents in question are: (a) An eightpage note written by three members of...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2019 (SC)

Vineet Dhanda Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.46 OF2019IN WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.298 OF2018YASHWANT SINHA & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH ITS DIECTOR & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH M.A.No.58/2019 in W.P. (CRL.) 225/2018 R.P. (CRL.) No.122/2019 IN W.P. (CRL.) 297/2018 M.A. No.403/2019 IN W.P. (CRL.) No.298/2018 R.P.(C) No.719/2019 in W.P.(C) 1205/2018 JUDGMENT RANJAN GOGOI, CJI1 A preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the review petition has been raised by the Attorney General on behalf of the respondents. The learned Attorney General contends 2 that the review petition lacks in bona fides inasmuch as three documents unauthorizedly removed from the office of the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, have been appended to the review petition and relied upon by the review petitioners. The three documents in question are: (a) An eightpage note written by three members of...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 10 2019 (SC)

Shri n.k. Janu, Deputy Director, Social Forestry Division Vs. Lakshmi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3740 of 2019 (ARISING OUT OF S.L.P (C) No.15358 OF2018 SHRI N.K. JANU, DEPUTY DIRECTOR SOCIAL FORESTARY DIVISION, AGRA AND OTHERS ........APPELLANTS Versus LAKSHMI CHANDRA ........RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Hemant Gupta, J.Leave granted.2. The challenge in the present appeal is to an order dated 16.02.2018 whereby an application for recall of the order dated 06.12.2017 dismissing the Review Application in default was dismissed. 1 3. The case has a chequered history. The respondent initially filed a Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.36896 of 1992. The said Writ Petition was disposed of in terms of the judgment of the Division Bench of Allahabad High Court reported as State of U.P. and Others vs. Putti Lal1. The said judgment has been affirmed by this Court in State of U.P and Others. vs. Putti Lal2 decided on 21.02.2002. This Court held that the daily wagers are entitled to minimum pay scale as is being received b...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //