Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 5 of about 755,542 results (2.144 seconds)

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Ramanpreet Kaur vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * + W.P.(CRL) 1843/2019 & CRL.M.A. 13377/2019 RAMANPREET KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raghav Parwatiyar, Mr. Rohit Bhalla and Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC and Mr. Aaryan Verma, Advocate for UOI. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL Reserved on:19. h November, 2019 Date of Decision:29. h November, 2019 MANMOHAN, J: JUDGMENT1 Present petition has been filed by the sister of the detenue Ramanpreet Kaur seeking release of her detained brother Gagan Jot Singh. The petitioner prays for an issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash Detention Order dated 11th March, 2019 passed against the detenue under Section 3(1) of Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as COFEPOSA) by respondent No.2 as well ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Muktaben M. Mashru vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1. t October, 2019 Date of Decision:29. h November, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4206/2018 & Crl.M.A.30311/2018 MUKTABEN M. MASHRU ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Nidhi Mohan P., Mr.Soajib Qureshi and Mr.S. Shriram, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Rajeshwar, PS:Palam Village, Delhi. Mr. Ajay Burman, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nishi Chaudhary and Ms. Sadhvi Gaur, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 2.8.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Dwarka Court, New Delhi. (hereinafter to be referred as impugned order) whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge has set aside the order dated 17.3.2018 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate. Crl.M.C.4206/2018 Page 1 of 24 2. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Courts, vide order dated 1...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Vinay Varma vs.kanika Pasricha & Anr.

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h August, 2019 Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + CM (M) 1582/2018 & CM APPL. 53645/2018 ........ Petitioner VINAY VARMA Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepak Bashta & Ms. Vandini, Advocates (M- 9999149022) versus KANIKA PASRICHA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harsh Jaidka, Advocate for R-1 (M-9811145052) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The classic Saas-Bahu imbroglio, has now transformed into disputes between parents/in-laws and their children. These disputes have raised complex legal issues as to the interpretation of and balance between two legislations i.e. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter DV Act) and The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter PSC Act).2. Since the time that the DV Act has been enacted, the concepts of `shared household and `matrimonial home have been considere...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Kishan Gupta & Ors vs.chander Prabha

Court : Delhi

$~38 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 CM(M) 1696/2019 & CM APPLS. 51369/2019, 51370/2019, 51371/2019 KISHAN GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Nandani Sahwney & Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocates (M-9811688721) versus CHANDER PRABHA Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 26th November, 2019 by which the ld. Appellate Court hearing an appeal against the decree of eviction dated 21st October, 2019, has refused to grant stay of the operation of the eviction. The submission of Ms. Nandni Sahwney, ld. counsel appearing for the... Petitioners/tenants (hereinafter tenants) is that the tenants have been in lawful possession since 1957 and have a strong case on merits. It is her submission that the Trial Court has erred in the manner in which the evidence has been appreciated. She submits that the rent was being ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Union of India & Anr vs.devender Kumar Goel

Court : Delhi

$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2743/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocates versus DEVENDER KUMAR GOEL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar Chaurasia, Ms. Garima Shukla, Mr. Pardeep Jatav and Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER2911.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The Union of India has filed this writ petition challenging an order dated 11th November, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT), allowing O.A. No.1482/2007. The CAT has by the impugned order quashed the charge-sheet dated 4th August, 1997 as well as a penalty order dated 15th March, 2007 issued against the Respondent, with all consequential benefits.2. While directing notice to issue in present petition on 28th August, 2011, the impugned order of the CAT was stayed. W.P.(C)...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Gogoal Hydro Private Limited vs.bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Court : Delhi

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 09.2019 Pronounced on:29. 11.2019 ARB.P. 6/2019 GOGOAL HYDRO PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Bajpai & Mr. Divakar Kumar, Advocates versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajat Kumar & Vedant Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2.... Petitioner is engaged in Design & Engineering, Manufacturing, Installation, Testing and Erection & Commissioning of Electro Mechanics of New Hydro Electric Power Project on turnkey basis as also Renovation, Modernization and Upgradation of existing Hydro Electric Power Project upto 250MW.3. On 29.03.2011, the respondent issued a work order No.NDA/DHR-1/2/VALVE/11_027/14009 for repair and maintenance of Rotary Valves of Unit 1 & 2, B...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Wings Wear Workers Lal Jhanda Union vs.wings Wear Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :03. 09.2019 Pronounced on:29. 11.2019 CO.PET. 202/1996 WINGS WEAR WORKERS LAL JHANDA UNION........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.K. Chaturvedi, Ms. Anjali WINGS WEAR PVT. LTD. versus Chaturvedi, Mr. Sagar Chaturvedi, Mr. Shravan Chandrashekhar, Advocates Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate for Official Liquidator ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Mr. Anul Mishra, Mr. Balwinder Singh Suri Advocate for Auction Purchaser. Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Ms. Krishna Kishan, Ms. Prachi Golichha, Advocate for applicant Mr. Suresh K. Dei, Advocate for Ex Director Shri Neeraj Monga. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.CO. APPL. NOS. 337/2019, 475/2019 and 674/2019 1. The property concerned in the present applications is plot No.1818, Block B-II, Mohan Co-operative, Badarpur, New Delhi. On 1st November, 2018, this Court had reduced the reserve price to Rs. 5 Crores as the parties were ad-idem that the property was not being ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Krishan Kumar vs.shanti Devi & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + CM(M) 1694/2019 & CM APPL. 51335/2019 KRISHAN KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Prof. Madan Mohan & Ms. Nayantara Sharma, Advocates (M-8373971576) versus SHANTI DEVI & ANR Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(oral) 1. The present petition is filed challenging the impugned orders dated 15th January, 2019 and 12th March, 2019. The grievance of the... Petitioner/Defendant is that the Plaintiffs/Respondents have been permitted to file the replication vide order dated 15th January, 2019 and the admission/denial has also been closed on the said date. However, without waiting for the replication to be filed, the Trial Court has gone ahead and settled the issues and also directed affidavits-in-evidence to be filed. Thereafter, on 12th March, 2019, the replication along with certain additional documents has been taken on record and e...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Apfc Employees Provident Funds Organisation vs.m/s Profolab

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :-"29.11.2019 + W.P.(C) 9029/2019 & CM No.37280/2019 (delay) APFC EMPLOYEES' PROVIDENT FUNDS ORGANISATION Through: Ms. Rashmi Bansal, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus M/S PROFOLAB ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nikhil Patnaik, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition filed by the APFC Employees Provident Funds Organisation assails the order dated 05.08.2011 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal. Under the impugned order, the appeal preferred by the respondent-employer was allowed, thereby setting aside the order under Section 7A of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act for short) directing the respondent to deposit the provident fund dues of its ex-employee Ms. Asha Nangia. The petitioner also assails the order dated 30.01.2017 whereby its belated review petition was rejected by the Tribunal.2. The case of the peti...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2019 (HC)

Kundan Lal vs.sanjay Kumar

Court : Delhi

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 474/2015 Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2019 KUNDAN LAL versus SANJAY KUMAR ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ashish Sehrawat with Mr. Kapil Yadav, Mr. Ravi Kumar and Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr. Naveen K. Sharma, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) JUDGMENT RC.REV. 474/2015 & CM APPL.18663/2015 (stay) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 23.04.2015, whereby the leave to defend application of the petitioner was dismissed and an eviction order passed.2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, from one shop situated at the ground floor in property No.B-10(old No.B-457/1), Madhu Kunj, Shivaji Road, North Ghonda, Shahdara, Delhi, more RC.REV.474/2015 Page 1 of...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //