Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 5 of about 756,017 results (2.312 seconds)

Feb 19 2020 (HC)

Sri Ansar Ali Vs. Sri Shaheed Shaik

Court : Karnataka

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF FEBRUARY2020BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK G. NIJAGANNAVAR M.F.A. NO.3296 OF2014(MV-I)BETWEEN : SRI ANSAR ALI, S/O MOHAMMED HUSSAIN, AGED ABOUT40YEARS, OC: MECHANIC, R/O. NO.403, 6TH CROSS, GANGONAHALLI, MEKKA MASZID ROAD, BANGALORE-560 039. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI SURESH M LATUR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. SRI SHAHEED SHAIK, S/O MEHABOOB SHAEB, R/O BHARATHI ENGINEERING WORKS, CIVIL BUS STAND, M.C. ROAD, MANDYA-571 401.2. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, UNITY BUILDING, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.D.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE FOR R2, NOTICE TO R1 DISPENSED) 2 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION1731) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:28. 10.2013 PASSED IN MVC NO.653/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE XII ADDL. SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND MEMBER, MACT, BANGALORE (SCCH-8), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. DA...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2020 (SC)

Sanjeev Kapoor Vs. Chandana Kapoor

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.286 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(CRL.)NO.1041 OF2020 SANJEEV KAPOOR CHANDANA KAPOOR & ORS. ... APPELLANT VERSUS ... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.This appeal has been filed against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh dated 05.11.2019 in CRM-M-4663 of 2019 filed by the appellant for setting aside the order dated 05.01.2019 passed by the Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Faridabad. The High Court dismissed the petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the appellant.2. Brief facts of the case necessary for deciding this appeal are: The appellant was married to respondent No.1 on 04.11.1998. On 17.08.199 a daughter was born and on 2 18.07.2005 a son was born out of their wedlock. An application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by respondent No.1 on 09.07.2013 against her husband claiming maintenance for respondent No.1 as well as respondent Nos.2 and 3,...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2020 (SC)

M/S. Ananda Social and Educational Trust Vs. The Commissioner of Incom ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).5437-5438/2012 M/S. ANANDA SOCIAL AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST ..APPELLANT(S) THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..RESPONDENT(S) VERSUS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.4702/2014 CIVIL APPEAL NO.1727/2020 (@SLP(C) NO.25761/2015) ORDER CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).5437-5438/2012 We have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the impugned Judgment(s) and Order(s) passed by the High Court of Karnataka. In our considered view, the reasons assigned by the High Court in passing the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) need no interference as the same are in consonance with law. Accordingly, there is no merit in these appeals and they are dismissed. 2 CIVIL APPEAL NO.4702/2014 This appeal has been preferred by the appellant - Director of Income Tax against the impugned judgment and order passed by the Delhi High Court holding that a newly registered Trust is entitled for registration under section 12AA of the I...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2020 (SC)

Suresh Chand and Anr. Vs. Suresh Chander (D) Thr. Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 482 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 11551 of 2011) Suresh Chand and Anr Versus .... Appellants Suresh Chander (D) Thr LRs and Ors .... Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J12 Leave granted. This appeal arises from a judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan at Jaipur in a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908. 3 The issue in the present appeal is whether a right of pre-emption was available to Beni Prasad who is alleged to be a joint owner in possession of the disputed courtyard. This has arisen in the context of the Rajasthan Pre-emption Act 19661. Briefly stated, 1 the Act 1 the facts which have given rise to the present appeal are thus: A suit2 for pre-emption was instituted by Beni Prasad in the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Badi, District Dholpur in Rajasthan. Beni Prasad died during the pendency of the proceedings a...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2020 (SC)

Vithaldas Jagannath Khatri (D) Through Smt. Shakuntala Alias Sushmi V ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6006 OF2009VITHALDAS JAGANNATH KHATRI (DEAD) THROUGH SMT. SHAKUNTALA ALIAS SUSHMI & ORS. Appellants Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA REVENUE AND FOREST DEPARTMENT & ORS. Respondents JUDGMENT R.F. Nariman, J.1. This appeal has come to us owing to a difference of opinion between Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.and K.M. Joseph, J.in a judgment dated 29.08.2019.2. The brief facts necessary to appreciate the controversy in this appeal are as follows: a partition deed dated 31.01.1970 (duly registered on 1.07.1970) was executed between late Shri Vithaldas Jagannath Khatri and his minor son and three minor daughters. In terms of this 1 document, the agricultural land of the Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) is sought to be divided by mentioning that parties two to five - who are the four children of Vithaldas - have to be provided expenses for their education and marriage, which will be borne out of the separate property al...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 2020 (SC)

Idol of Sri Renganathaswamy Rep by Its Executive Officer/Joint Commiss ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No 9492 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP(C) No 10520 of 2017) ...Appellant ...Respondents The Idol of Sri Renganathaswamy Represented by its Executive Officer, Joint Commissioner Versus P K Thoppulan Chettiar, Ramanuja Koodam Anandhana Trust, Rep. by its Managing Trustee and Ors JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1 This appeal arises from a judgment dated 1 December 2016 of a Single Judge of the Madurai Bench of High Court of Judicature at Madras. The High Court dismissed the appellants second appeal and upheld the judgment dated 31 August 2005 of the Principal District Judge, Tiruchirapalli and the decree dated 10 November 2004 of the Second Additional Subordinate Judge, 1 Tiruchirapalli, permitting the first respondent to sell a portion of the suit property to the fourth respondent.2. The first respondent is a trust represented by its Managing Trustee. The second and third respondents are members of the...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2020 (HC)

c.m.aleemullakhan and Anr Vs. The State of Karnataka & Anr

Court : Karnataka - Kalaburagi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH R DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE Dr.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.201319/2019 BETWEEN :1. C.M. Aleemullakhan Aged about 74 years Occ: Printer and Publisher Salar Daily, Hubli R/o Salar Daily, Dinasudar Printing Division New Cottonpeth, Hubli-580 020 2. K. Iftekhar Ahmed Shariff Aged about 63 years Occ: Editor, Salar Daily, Hubli Dinasudar Printing Division New Cottonpeth, Hubli-580 020 R/o No.25, Kataria Trade Centre Koppikar, Hubli ...... Petitioners (By Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande, Advocate) And:1. The State of Karnataka Through Gandi Gunj P.S. Bidar, represented by the Addl. S.P.P., High Court of Karnataka Crl.P.No.201319/2019 2 Kalaburagi Bench-585107 2. Basheerueddin S/o Md Yousufoddin Halhipparga, Aged about 62 years Occ: Agriculture & Vice President Dist: Congree Comitte Bidar R/o H.No.5-1-202, Qazipura Opp: Madrasa Mahmood Gawan Fort Road, Bidar-585401 (By Sri Mallikarjun Sahukar, HCGP...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2020 (HC)

The Branch Manager Vs. Devikamma @ Devakemma W/O Laxman Karenavar

Court : Karnataka - Kalaburagi

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY2020BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR MFA NO.31002/2010 (MV) C/W MFA CROB NO.1044/2011 (MV) MFA NO.31002/2010BETWEEN : The Branch Manager, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., S.V.Patil Chowk, Asian Plaza Complex, Gulbarga, now represented by Deputy Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., No.28, East Wing, 5th floor Centenary building, M.G.Road, Bangalore. (By Sri C.S.Kalaburagi, Advocate) AND:1. Devikamma @ Devakemma W/o Laxman Karenavar, Age:50 years, Occ: Household, 2. Ningamma W/o late Gangappa Karenavar, age:27. years, Occ: Household, ... Appellant 2 3. Laxman @ Lachmana S/o Dyawappa Karenavar, Age:55 years, Occ: Nil, 4. Mallappa S/o Laxman Karenavar, Age:31 years, Occ: Agriculture, 5. Saibanna S/o Laxman Karenavar, Age:18 years, Occ: Nil, Represented by respondent No.1. All residents of Sagar (B) village, Tq: Shahapur, Dist: Gulbarga Now Yadgir.6. Laxman S/o Bassanna, Age:...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2020 (HC)

Amci (India) Pvt Ltd Vs. Fiza Developers and Inter-Trade Pvt. Ltd.,

Court : Karnataka

R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY2020PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI M.F.A. NO.11155 OF2010(AA)BETWEEN : 1.2. AMCI (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NO.T-KAVERI ROAD BESANT NAGAR CHENNAI600090 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR.M.A.JAWAHAR. AMCI EXPORT CORPORATION ONE ENERGY PLACE SUIT NO.2000, LATROBE, PA15650REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE MR.M.A.JAWAHAR.... APPELLANTS (By Sri. K. SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SR. COUNSEL FOR Smt. FARAH FATHIMA, ADV.) AND:1. FIZA DEVELOPERS AND INTER-TRADE PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 AND HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.25/1, RESIDENCY ROAD2BANGALORE560052 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR B.M.FAROOKH. HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.SHIVASHANKAR BHAT FORMER JUDGE, HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA NO.401/29, 12TH MAIN, RMV EXTENSION SADASHIVANAGAR, BANGALORE560080.2.... RESPONDENTS (By Sri. S.S. NAGANAND, SR. COUNSEL FOR Sri. S. SRIRANGA, ADV....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2020 (HC)

Manu Arkasali Vs. All India Council for Technical Education

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE18H DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI WRIT PETITION NO.18450/2017 (EDN - RES)BETWEEN : MANU ARKASALI, S/O VISHWANATH M ARKASALI, AGED25YEARS, NO.33/1/2, 8TH CROSS, BILEKALLI, SOMESHWARA LAYOUT, BENGALURU560076. PETITIONER (BY SRI.SHIVARUDRA, ADVOCATE) AND:1. ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, 7TH FLOOR, CHANDERLOK BUILDING, JANPATH, NEW DELHI110001. REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY, THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, AICTE, PRASANNA KUMAR BLOCK, BANGALORE UNIVERSITY CAMPUS, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU560001. SRI. DHARMASTHALA MANJUNATHESHWARA INSTITUTE FOR MANAGEMENT, DEVELOPMENT SITE NO.1, CHAMUNDI HILL ROAD, SIDDARTHA NAGARA, 2. 2 MYSORE570011. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON.... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHOWRI H.R., ADVOCATE FOR R1 (VIDE ORDER DATED1802.2020); SRI.MANMOHAN P.N., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-2 TO REFUND THE ...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //