Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 6 of about 742,450 results (2.113 seconds)

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

Dr. Subhash Vijayran vs.delhi Development Authority Throug Its Vice-Ch ...

Court : Delhi

$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 7338/2018 and CM No.29303/2018 DR. SUBHASH VIJAYRAN Through: versus... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUG ITS VICE- CHAIRMAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Pawan Mathur, Adv. for DDA Mr. Shantwanu Singh, Adv. for RWA CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1311.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 7338/2018 1. This so called Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : A. Direct the respondent DDA to take necessary steps ensuring electricity connection, drinking water supply and toilet facilities at the guard rooms of Pocket-1, 3 & 4 of Sector-34, Rohini, P.O. Bawana, Delhi-110039. B. Pass any other or further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and W.P.(C) 7338/2018 Page 1 of 3 circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and to meet...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

Union of India and Anr vs.satish Kumar Kalothra

Court : Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 8404/2017 & CM Appl.No.34583/2017 (stay) UNION OF INDIA AND ANR $~16 * + CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Versus Saxena, Mr. M. K. Tiwari, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocates SATISH KUMAR KALOTHRA ..... Respondent Through Mr. M. K. Bhardwaj and Mr. Akash Dahiya, Advocates % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1311.2019 1. The Union of India through the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) and the Ministry of Rural Development (MRD), Government of India has filed the present petition challenging an order dated 19th May, 2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, allowing OA No.648/2017 filed by the Respondent. The CAT held that the Respondent was entitled to all amounts attached to the post of Deputy Secretary in the Department of Rural Development (DRD), which were denied to him on account of suspension order d...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

Sh. Bhagat Singh Mahna & Ors. Vs.state & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5736/2019 SH. BHAGAT SINGH MAHNA & ORS. Through: Ms. Gita Dhingra, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State with Subhash Chandra, PS Samaipur Badli R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40033/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.1. 2. CRL.M.C. 5736/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.34/2019 dated 22.01.2019 registered at Police Station Samaipur Badli, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 5736/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP on behalf of the State.6. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The respondent no.2 is the widow of late Sh. Ajay Mahna, son of petitioner No.1, namely, Sh. Bhagat Singh Mahna. Husban...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

Arvinder Singh Kalara & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5742/2019 & CRL.M.A. 40051/2019-Stay ARVINDER SINGH KALARA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Tanuj Arora, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Dharmender Kumar & SI Sanjay, P.S. Roop Nagar Mr. Jujhar Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 40052/2019 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5742 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 5742/2019 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.193/2012 dated 19./10.2012 registered at Police Station Roop Nagar, District North Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition i...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

M/S Loh Vanizya Udyog Pvt Ltd vs.richie Khosla & Ors

Court : Delhi

$~5 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h November, 2019 CM(M) 388/2019 & CM APPLs. 10685/2019, 10686/2019 M/S LOH VANIZYA UDYOG PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Mr. Harpreet Singh & Mr. Pranjal Saran, Advocates (M-9810087071) RICHIE KHOSLA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocate for R- 1&2 (M-9654222460) Ms. Asiya Khan, Advocate for R-3 (M-9971644936) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 17th November, 2018 by which Respondent Nos.1&2/Plaintiffs (hereinafter, Plaintiffs) have been permitted to lead rebuttal evidence.2. Various issues were framed in the suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the Plaintiffs. Two of the issues are as under: 7) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to seek mesne profits from the defendants, if yes, at what rate and for which period?. OPP8 Whether the plaintiffs are entitl...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

Dr. Subhash Vijayran vs.government of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11419/2018 % DR. SUBHASH VIJAYRAN Through:... Petitioner in person ........ Petitioner versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Mr. Premsagar Pal, Advs. for R-1 and 4 Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. for R-2/DDA Mr. Kabir Ghosh, Adv. for R-3 Mr. Shantwanu Singh, Adv. for RWA-Pocket 1, Sector 34, Rohini SI Ranbir Singh from PS Nangloi CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER1311.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 11419/2018 1. This Public Interest Litigation has been preferred with the following prayers : (1) Direct removal of the two illegal encroachments of religious nature on public roads along with the trees planted around them blocking the public roads as detailed W.P.(C) 11419/2018 Page 1 of 3 in Para-10, Sub-Paras (3), (4) & (5) of this petition (Pages-11 & 12). (2) Pass any other or further order or orders...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

Sunil Sachdeva vs.owner of Domain Name www.cjr7.com & Ors

Court : Delhi

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h November, 2019. CS(OS) 385/2019, IA No.10455/2019(u/O.XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & IA No.11070/2019(u/O.XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) SUNIL SACHDEVA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sidhant Kumar, Adv. Versus OWNER OF DOMAIN NAME WWW.CJR7.COM & ORS. Through: Counsel for D-2 (appearance not given). ..... Defendants Mr. Akhil Anand, Adv. for D-3. Mr. Neel Mason with Mr. Tarang Gupta & Mr. Shivang Sharma, advs. for D-4/ Google LLC USA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW The plaintiff instituted this suit against (i) owner of Domain Name 1. www.cjr7.com; (ii) Net4 Network Services Limited; and, (iii) Google India Private Limited, (i) for recovery of damages of Rs.2,10,00,000/- from defendant no.1 for defaming the plaintiff; (ii) for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from hosting online on their website and online search engine respectively statements defamatory of the plaintiff; (iii) for permanent injunction restraining th...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

Sudesh Bala and Ors vs.vinod Kumar & Ors

Court : Delhi

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA(OS) 2/2019 and CM APPL. 606/2019 Reserved on:27. 09.2019 Date of decision:13. 11.2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal and Ms. Suman Chaudhary, Advocates IN THE MATTER OF: SUDESH BALA AND ORS VINOD KUMAR & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellants/plaintiffs, five in number, have challenged the judgment dated 23.10.2018, dismissing a suit for declaration, partition and permanent injunction [CS(OS) 632/2016]. instituted by them against their brother (respondent No.1), sister-in-law (respondent No.2), nephew (respondent No.3) and mother (respondent No.4).2. Before proceeding to examine the averments made in the plaint, it is relevant to record that despite service, the defendants/respondents had failed to appear in the suit proceedings. Vide order dated 05.05.2017, the right of the defendants to file the written statement was clos...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2019 (HC)

Bank of India vs.pradeep Jain & Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. h November, 2019 + CM (M) 93/2019 BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Shailly Dinkar and Mr. Vipin Jain, Advocates. (M:9873715747) versus PRADEEP JAIN & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S. L. Gupta and Mr. Aditya Vikram Gupta, Advocates for R-1 to 5. (M:8800732313) Ms. Jatinder Kaur, Court Receiver/R- 6 in person. (M:9773638523) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The... Petitioner Bank of India has filed the instant petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying for a clarification and for framing of general guidelines/rules in respect of the fee payable to Court Receivers.2. The background of the petition is that the contesting Respondent Nos.1 & 2 availed credit facility from the Bank of India and UCO bank as a consortium. It is alleged that the said... RESPONDENTS had defaulted and accordingly, proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 08 2019 (HC)

U. C. Sharma vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. h October, 2019 Decided on:8. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 3327/2018 U. C. SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan and Mr. Hemant Chauhan, Advocate along with the... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj and Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocates CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present petition is directed against an order dated 15th September, 2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench in C.P. No.52/2017 in O.A. No.285/2008 filed by the... Petitioner as well as an order dated 15th November, 2017 passed by the CAT dismissing the... Petitioners Review Application No.238/2017. The... Petitioner has sought specific directions to the... RESPONDENTS to pay the... Petitioner interest at 12% per annum on a sum of Rs.1,19,220/- being the pay of the....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //