Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 7 of about 728,175 results (3.572 seconds)

Apr 29 2019 (SC)

Govind Singh Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.770 OF2019(Arising out of SLP (CRL.) No.6695 OF2018 GOVIND SINGH ...Appellant VERSUS THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ...Respondent JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 11.04.2013 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal No.587 of 2008 in and by which the High Court has affirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 IPC and sentence of life imprisonment imposed upon the appellant.3. Case of prosecution is that on 23.05.2007 at 07.30 PM, deceased Lalita was sitting in her room along with her friend Dev 1 Kumari (PW-1); while her mother Indra Kunwar (PW-2) was cooking food inside the house. At that time, the appellant-father of the deceased came to her room and took out the bulb saying that he wanted to connect the same in the courtyard. When deceased asked her father Govind Singh not to do so, he disconnec...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2019 (SC)

Jagdishraj Khatta Vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos. 539540 OF2008JAGDISHRAJ KHATTA APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH RESPONDENT JUDGMENT N.V. RAMANA, J.1. These appeals are directed against judgment and order dated 09.01.2008 and 27.02.2008, passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla in Criminal Appeal No.356 of 1993, whereby the appeal preferred by the State of Himachal Pradesh was allowed, and the judgment and order dated 03.04.1993 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kangra, Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh, acquitting the appellantaccused for offences under Sections 498A and 306 of the IPC, and Section 30 of the Indian Arms Act, was set aside.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the appellant, who 1 was posted as the Forest Range Officer at Jawalamukhi, at the relevant time, was residing with the deceased (his wife) and two minor children. On 07.01.1990, at about 10 a.m., within s...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2019 (SC)

Sadayappan @ Ganesan Vs. State Represented by Inspector of Police

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1990 OF2012SADAYAPPAN @ GANESAN APPELLANT VERSUS STATE, REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE RESPONDENT N.V. RAMANA, J.JUDGMENT1 This appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 13th December, 2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Criminal Appeal No.346 of 2011 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant herein and upheld his conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34, IPC.2. Prosecution case in brief is that Selvam @ Thangaraj (deceased), Karuppusamy (A1) and Sadayappan @ Ganesan (A2/appellant herein) were neighbouring 1 agricultural land owners in the village of Kandavayal who used to go together for hunting of rabbits in the nearby forest area. Around 15 years prior to the incident, the deceased Thangaraj had negotiated to buy some agricultural land f...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2019 (SC)

Vikram Johar Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.759 of 2019 (arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.4820/2017) VIKRAM JOHAR ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT ASHOK BHUSHAN,J.Leave granted.2. This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment of the Allahabad High Court dated 06.02.2017 by which judgment, the criminal revision filed by the appellant was dismissed. The criminal revision was filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 29.11.2016 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate rejecting his discharge application moved under Section 239 read with Section 245 Cr.P.C. in a complaint case No.483 of 2013 under Section 504 and 506 of I.P.C. 1 3. The brief facts of the case, which need to be noted for deciding this appeal are:- 3.1 The respondent No.2 (hereinafter referred to as complainant), was a partner of M/s. Ram Company engaged in business of wood processing and sale. The company h...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2019 (SC)

The State Bank of India and Ors. Vs. P. Soupramaniane

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL2009.... Appellants No . 7011 The State Bank of India & Others. of Versus P. Soupramaniane . Respondent JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.The Respondent who was working as a Messenger in 1. the State Bank of India at Puducherry was discharged from service by an order dated 15.05.1986. The appeal filed by the Respondent against the order of discharge was dismissed on 03.07.1986. Later, the Staff Union took up the cause of the Respondent and made a representation on his behalf which was also rejected on 04.05.1992. Challenging the aforementioned orders, the Respondent filed a Writ Petition in the High Court of Judicature at Madras which was dismissed by a learned Single Judge on 07.06.2000. Aggrieved thereby, the Respondent filed a Writ Appeal which was allowed by the Division Bench of the Madras High Court. The order of discharge of the Respondent from service was set aside and the Appellants were directed to r...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2019 (SC)

Girish Mittal Vs. Parvati v. Sundaram

Court : Supreme Court of India

Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Contempt Petition (C) No.928 of 2016 (Transfer Case (C) No.95 of 2015) In GIRISH MITTAL .... Petitioner PARVATI V. SUNDARAM & ANR. Versus . Respondent (s) Contempt Petition (C) No.412 of 2016 With In (Transfer Case (C) No.96 of 2015) And Contempt Petition (C) No.59 of 2017 In (Transfer Case (C) No.95 of 2015) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. The three Contempt Petitions are filed complaining of wilful and deliberate disobedience of the directions issued by this Court in the judgment dated 16.12.2015 in Transfer Case (Civil) No.96 of 2015. 1 2. The subject matter of the judgment in Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry1 is whether the information sought under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the RTI Act) can be denied by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the other banks on the ground of economic interest, commercial confidence, fiduciary relationship or public interest. The fa...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2019 (SC)

Mallikarjunaiah Vs. Nanjaiah .

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7768 OF2011Mallikarjunaiah .Appellant(s) VERSUS Nanjaiah & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 14.11.2007 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in RSA No.23 of 2005 whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal filed by the appellant herein. 1 2. A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of this appeal.3. The appellant is the plaintiff and the respondents are the defendants of the civil suit out of which this appeal arises.4. The civil suit leading to this appeal was filed by the appellant(plaintiff) seeking declaration of his title in relation to the properties described in Schedule A attached to the plaint, being the land admeasuring 20 Guntas in Sy. No.17/3; western portion of 32 Guntas in Sy.No.29/1; and 11 Guntas in Sy. No.34/3, all situated at Karagund Village, Javagal Hobli, Arasike...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2019 (SC)

Ms. Goli Vijayalakshmi Vs. Yendru Sathiraju (Dead) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8109 OF2010GOLI VIJAYALAKSHMI & ORS. .Appellant(s) VERSUS YENDRU SATHIRAJU(DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. .Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8110 OF2010JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. The aforesaid civil appeals arise from the impugned judgment dated 22nd November, 2005 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Appeal No.1146 of 1996(and cross objections) confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court dated 12th October, 1995 in Original Suit No.175 of 1987 whereby the Courts below have inter alia decreed the suit schedule A and B properties and have dismissed the 1 suit qua schedule C property filed by the respondent(s)/plaintiff(s).2. When the aforesaid civil appeals were taken up for adjudication, the respondents/plaintiffs raised a preliminary objection to the prosecution of the appeals on the ground that the civil appeals have abated in toto. It is to be further no...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 26 2019 (SC)

y.sathiraju (D) tr.his Lrs . Vs. Goli Kannayya (Dead) by Lrs. .

Court : Supreme Court of India

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8109 OF2010GOLI VIJAYALAKSHMI & ORS. .Appellant(s) VERSUS YENDRU SATHIRAJU(DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. .Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 8110 OF2010JUDGMENT Rastogi, J.1. The aforesaid civil appeals arise from the impugned judgment dated 22nd November, 2005 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Appeal No.1146 of 1996(and cross objections) confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court dated 12th October, 1995 in Original Suit No.175 of 1987 whereby the Courts below have inter alia decreed the suit schedule A and B properties and have dismissed the 1 suit qua schedule C property filed by the respondent(s)/plaintiff(s).2. When the aforesaid civil appeals were taken up for adjudication, the respondents/plaintiffs raised a preliminary objection to the prosecution of the appeals on the ground that the civil appeals have abated in toto. It is to be further no...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2019 (SC)

Hirabai (D) Thr. Lrs. Vs. Ramniwas Bansilal Lakhotiya(d)bylrs.&or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4282 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.31350 of 2009) Hirabai (D) Thr. L.Rs. & Ors. .Appellant(s) VERSUS Ramniwas Bansilal Lakhotiya (D) by L.Rs. & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 19.12.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at 1 Aurangabad in Second Appeal No.177 of 1988 whereby the High Court dismissed the second appeal filed by the appellants herein and upheld the judgment of the Trial Court and first Appellate Court.3. A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of this appeal.4. This appeal is filed by the legal representatives of two original plaintiffs, who died after filing of the civil suit.5. The original two plaintiffs were the real sisters of defendant No.3 (respondent No.3 herein Shankarlal) and their father was late Motilal.6. There is a building named...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //