Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 7 of about 727,677 results (2.661 seconds)

Nov 20 2018 (HC)

Smt. Anusha N Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

W.P.Nos.44038-44039/2018 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018 PRESENT HONBLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HONBLE MRS.JUSTICE S. SUJATHA W.P.Nos.44038 44039 OF2018(GM RES) PILBETWEEN :1. SMT.ANUSHA N., D/O LATE NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT28YEARS. SMT.ANJULA VISHWANATH W/O VISHWANATH N., AGED ABOUT26YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.399 (N) BEHIND NITHYANANDA HIGH SCHOOL, JIGANI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE-560 105 ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI VISHWANATH, ADVOCATE) UNION OF INDIA BY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE, 4TH FLOOR, A-WING, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY UNION OF INDIA BY THE MINISTRY OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT, SHASTRI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-110 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY2 AND: 1.2. W.P.Nos.44038-44039/2018 3.4. 5.6. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DEPARTMENT OF LAW, JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS, GROUND FLOOR, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN WELFARE, RO...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2018 (HC)

The Karnataka Industrial Areas Vs. sri.byregowda

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.55485 OF2017(LA-KIADB) WRIT PETITION No.11178 OF2016(LA-RES) C/W IN W.P. No.55485 OF2017 BETWEEN THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, NO.49, 5TH FLOOR, KHANIJA BHAVAN EAST WING, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE560001. REPTD., BY ITS SECRETARY ... PETITIONER (BY SRI.S.S.NAGANAND, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI.ASHOK.N.NAYAK, ADVOCATE ) AND1 SRI.BYREGOWDA S/O. LATE CHIKKATHAMMEGOWDA, MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO.213/A, 6TH CROSS, KUBERA KOPPALU, MYSORE570016 2. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, ZONAL OFFICE, KRS ROAD, MYSURU570016 RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SRINIVASA.D.C, ADV., FOR R1; SRI.P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV., FOR R2; SRI.SRIRANGA.S, ADV., FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT IN I.A.1/2018) 2 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGME...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2018 (SC)

Mahendra Pratap Dubey Vs. Managing Officer,evacuee Property

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6384 OF2010Mahendra Pratap Dubey :Versus: ..Appellant Managing Officer, Evacuee Property & Ors. ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order dated 26th February, 2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.30158 of 1995, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the decision of the Chief Settlement Commissioner, Board of Revenue U.P. at Lucknow was rejected. The Assistant Custodian/Managing Officer (Evacuee 2 Property), Board of Revenue, Lucknow had allowed the application filed by respondent No.3 - Mainmum Nissa @ Kumani, W/o Subrati @ Algu, R/o Village Singramau, Tehsil Shahganj, District Jaunpur, U.P., accepting her claim that she was occupying the suit property as owner thereof, having purchased the same at a public auction and in furtherance whereof a certificate of sale cam...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2018 (SC)

Vijay Pullarwr Vs. Hanuman Deostan

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7789 OF2011Vijay Pullarwar & Ors. ..Appellant(s) :Versus: Shri Hanuman Deostan, a Public Trust through its Trustees ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This appeal is filed by the original defendants against the judgment and order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench in Second Appeal No.364 of 1990 decided on 24th October, 2008, whereby the High Court, in the second appeal, restored the decree of possession of the suit property passed by the trial court against the appellants, by setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the District 2 Court, Nagpur in Regular Civil Appeal No.564 of 1983 dated 21st January, 1989.2. The respondent No.1, Shri Hanuman Deosthan, is a public trust duly registered under the provisions of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 (presently known as Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950) (for short 1950 Act). The respondents filed Special Civil...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2018 (SC)

Vimla Devi . Vs. The National Insurance Company Limited .

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11042 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.17321 of 2016) Vimla Devi & Ors. .Appellant(s) VERSUS National Insurance Company Limited & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed by the claimants against the final judgment and order dated 23.03.2015 1 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur in SBCMA No.1739 of 2007 whereby the High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the claimants and affirmed the award dated 05.12.2005 passed by the MACT Chomu (Jaipur) in MAC Case No.48/2005.3. In order to appreciate the issues arising in the case, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts hereinbelow.4. The appellants are the claimants/plaintiffs whereas the respondents are the non applicants/defendants in the claim petition out of which this appeal arises.5. One Rajendra Prasad aged around 25 years was travelling in the passenger Bus bea...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2018 (SC)

Sumer Singh Jat and Ors. etc.etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. Etc. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

NonReportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.1104711061 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.3028730301 of 2018) (D.No.12356/2018) Sumer Singh Jat & Ors. Etc.Etc. ..Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Rajasthan & Ors. Etc.Etc. ..Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. These appeals are directed against the final judgments and orders passed by the High Court of 1 Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Special Appeal Writ Nos. 794/2017 dated 20.09.2017, 908/2017 dated 06.10.2017, 792/2017, 801/2017 & 815/2017 dated 25.10.2017, 826/2017 dated 27.10.2017, 816/2017 dated 01.11.2017, judgments and orders passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan Bench at Jodhpur in D.B. Special Appeal Writ Nos. 969/2017 dated 29.11.2017, 948/2017 dated 29.11.2017, 947/2017 dated 29.11.2017, 1069/2017 dated 06.12.2017, judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur in D.B. Special Appeal...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2018 (SC)

Santosh @ Santhosh Kumar Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1409 OF2018(Arising out of S.L.P.(Crl.) No.6224 of 2017) Santosh @ Santosh Kumar .Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Kerala .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is filed against the final judgment and order dated 13.06.2016 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Crl. A. No.1837 of 1 2010 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal in part by maintaining the conviction but reducing the sentence imposed on the appellant herein by order dated 13.09.2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Court(Adhoc1), Palakkad in Sessions Case No.221 of 2009.3. Few facts need to be mentioned for disposal of this appeal, which involves a short question.4. The appellant along with two others were prosecuted for commission of an offence punishable under Section 55 (a) of the Abkari Act enacted by the State of Kerala in Sessions Case No.221/2009 in the Court of Additional S...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2018 (SC)

Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited Vs. Engineering Workers ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

NonReportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11063 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(C) No.28379 of 2018) Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. ..Appellant(s) VERSUS Engineering Workers Association & Ors. ..Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.11067 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(C ) No.28393 of 2018) Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. ..Appellant(s) VERSUS Engineering Workers Association & Ors. ..Respondent(s) 1 WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.1106411066 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 2838628388 of 2018) Mazda Services Etc. ..Appellant(s) VERSUS Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondent(s) AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.11068 OF2018(Arising out of SLP(C ) No.28437 of 2018) Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. ..Appellant(s) VERSUS Engineering Workers Association & Ors. ..Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.2 1.2. Leave granted. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 29.08.2018 passed by the High Co...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2018 (SC)

Rakesh Malhotra Vs. Kamaljit Singh Sandhu .

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NON-REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.11070 OF2018[Arising out of SLP (C) No.22667 of 2016]. Rakesh Malhotra .. Appellant Versus Kamaljit Singh Sandhu & Ors. .. Respondents JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, J.1.2. Leave granted. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 29.2.2016 passed in R.S.A. No.4015 of 2011 by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, by which the High Court has allowed the said appeal preferred by the original defendant Nos. 2 and 3 by setting aside the judgment and order dated 10.8.2011 passed by the Additional District Judge, Gurgaon and, consequently, has dismissed the suit preferred by the appellant herein (original plaintiff). The original plaintiff (appellant herein) has preferred the present appeal.3. The facts leading to this appeal in nutshell are as follows:2. That the appellant herein (hereinafter referred to as the original plaintiff) instituted Civil Suit No.159 of...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2018 (HC)

Smt Veena Harish Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION No.49636 OF2018(S-RES)BETWEEN : SMT. VEENA HARISH AGED41YEARS W/O SRI. HARISH ACCOUNTS OFFICER BANGALORE TURF CLUB LTD., NO.52, RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE560001. PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUBRAHAMANYAM JOIS, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. K C SHANTAKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA VIDHANA VEEDHI BENGALURU560001.2. THE BANGALORE TURF CLUB LTD., NO.52, RACE COURSE ROAD BANGALORE560001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. E S INDIRESH,AGA FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE226OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS RELATING TO CONCERNING AND CONNECTED WITH THE LETTER DATED1210.2018 VIDE ANNEX-E AND THE IMPUGNED COMMUNICATION DATED3110.2018 VIDE ANNEX-G ISSUED BY R-2 PERUSE THE SAME AND DECLARE THEM AS MALICIOUS AND DEVOID OF THE AUT...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //