Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 8 of about 728,175 results (3.077 seconds)

Apr 25 2019 (SC)

M/S Trimex Sands Pvt Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4283 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.2348 of 2018) M/s Trimex Sands Pvt. Limited & Anr. .Appellant(s) VERSUS Union of India & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 09.11.2017 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No.5734 of 2016 whereby the High Court disposed of the said writ petition filed by respondent No.3 herein (original writ petitioner before the High Court) against respondent Nos.1 1 and 2 herein (Union of India and another) and set aside the order dated 30.06.2016(notified on 06.07.2016).3. Heard learned counsel on IA No.16352 of 2018.4. This is an application made by the Union of India through the Under Secretary, Ministry of Mines for appropriate directions and for disposal of the appeal.5. A few facts need mention for the disposal of the said application so...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2019 (SC)

Rajan Vs. The Home Secretary Home Department of Tamil Nadu

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REPORTABLE WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) No.321 OF2018Rajan ..Petitioner(s) :Versus: The Home Secretary, Home Department of Tamil Nadu and Ors. ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India has been preferred inter alia seeking premature release of the petitioner as he has already undergone over 30 years of actual imprisonment. With remission, the total sentence undergone is above 36 years. 2 2. The petitioner claims that he is a refugee from Sri Lanka. He was named as an accused in relation to an offence committed on 27th July, 1988, registered as FIR in Crime No.104/88 at Thanipadi Police Station. The prosecution case was that the petitioner, along with coaccused, committed dacoity at the house of one Pitchaikara Grounder and while he was trying to escape in a Maruti Van, the police and common public erected a barricade, upon which the petitioner fired from a ...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2019 (SC)

Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.4261 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 14312 of 2015) Reliance Life Insurance Co Ltd & Anr .... Appellants Versus Rekhaben Nareshbhai Rathod ....Respondent JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1Leave granted. 2 This appeal is from a decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 dated 20 February 2015. The State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2 at Ahmedabad allowed an appeal of the insured respondent and sustained a claim under a policy of life insurance. This decision has been upheld in revision by the NCDRC. The insurer is hence in appeal. 3 On 10 July 2009, the spouse of the respondent took a policy of life insurance from Max New York Life Insurance Co Ltd, for a sum of Rs 11 lakhs. Barely two months thereafter, on 16 September 2009 he submitted a proposal for a life insurance 1 NCDRC 2 SCDRC 1 term plan policy of the appellant for an insurance cover of Rs 10 lakhs. Amo...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2019 (SC)

Alka Shukla Vs. Life Insurance Corpn. Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.3413 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.32335 of 2016) Smt. Alka Shukla .... Appellant Versus Life Insurance Corporation of India ....Respondent JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1The present appeal arises from a judgement of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 which reversed the judgment of the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2. The SCDRC had affirmed the view of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg3 allowing an accident insurance claim. 2 The spouse of the appellant obtained three insurance policies from the Life Insurance Corporation of India4 : (i) New Bima Gold Policy; 1 NCDRC 2 SCDRC 3 the District Forum 4 LIC of India 1 (ii) LIC Jeevan Tarang Policy; and (iii) Twenty Years Money Back Policy with profits and accident benefit. The details of the policies are tabulated below: Policy No Policy Number Date of Total Term Commenceme nt Sum...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2019 (SC)

Dipakbhai Jagdishchndra Patel Vs. The State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.714 OF2019(@ SLP(Criminal) No.5415 of 2017) DIPAKBHAI JAGDISHCHANDRA PATEL ... APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANOTHER ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, J.1. This appeal by special leave granted by this Court is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad dismissing the Special Criminal Application No.1230 of 2009 filed by the appellant under Section 482 of the 1 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Cr.PC for short).2. The petition under Section 482 Cr.PC. was filed challenging the complaint and the Order passed by the Sessions Court rejecting the request of the appellant to discharge him of the offences under Sections 489B and 489C of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as the IPC for short).3. The contents of the FIR dated 10.04.1996 are as follows: The facts of my complaint are that today ie., on 10.04.199...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2019 (SC)

Cheriyath Jyothi Vs. Sainudeen

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1424 OF2016Cheriyath Jyothi Appellant(s) :Versus: Sainudeen and Anr. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This appeal takes exception to the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dated 4th March, 2015 in O.P.(C) No.1819 of 2014 (O).2. Briefly stated, the appellant made a representation to the Secretary, Karakulam Gram Panchayath on 6th May, 2013, complaining that the occupant in the neighbouring plot had erected an unauthorised building and was using the same as a Plant for making Rubber Sheets on commercial basis. The appellant claims to be occupying House K.P. No.V/168 of the Karakulam Gram Panchayath in Survey No.43/213 of 2 Vattappara Village. The representation reads thus: Cheriyath Jyothi B.Sc., M.B.B.S., the cloister, nr. Rock Park, Venkode P.O., Vasttappara, thiruvanathapurm695028. No.jyo/cT/01 To the secretary, karakulam grama panchayath, karakulam P.O...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2019 (SC)

Delhi Develpment Authority Vs. Nalwa Sons Investment Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL No.4260 OF2019(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No.29201 of 2014) Delhi Development Authority :Versus: ..Appellant(s) Nalwa Sons Investment Ltd. and Anr. ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1.2. Leave granted. The seminal question involved in the present appeal is: if the original lessee (respondent No.1, a public limited company) in respect of the plot given on lease by the appellant, transfers the same to another public limited company, albeit an alter ego of the former, consequent to an order of 2 arrangement and demerger passed by the Company Judge, then whether it is liable to pay 50% unearned increase (UEI) on the market value of the plot to the appellant (lessor)?.3. Briefly stated, in an auction conducted by the appellant, respondent No.1 (former name Jindal Strips Limited) was allotted a commercial plot in Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi, on 23rd March, 1993. Possession of the plot was handed...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2019 (SC)

Dharmaji Shankar Shinde Vs. Rajaram Shripad Joshi (Dead) Through Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO.7448 OF2008DHARMAJI SHANKAR SHINDE AND OTHERS Appellants VERSUS RAJARAM SHRIPAD JOSHI (DEAD) THROUGH LRs. AND OTHERS Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.7449 OF2008JUDGMENT R. BANUMATHI, J.These appeals arise out of the judgment dated 15.11.2006 passed by the High Court of Bombay dismissing the Second Appeal No.887 of 2003 thereby upholding the decision of the first Appellate Court holding that Ex.P-73 is a mortgage by conditional sale and that the respondents-plaintiffs are entitled to redeem the suit property upon payment of the balance amount. 1 2. Facts giving rise to these appeals are that the respondents- plaintiffs filed a suit for redemption of the suit property bearing S.No.147 present G.No.750 admeasuring 2 Hectares 18 Are situated in village Kudal, Jawli taluka and district Satara. Case of the respondents-plaintiffs is that the suit property was mortgaged by their father Shripad Joshi on 28.07...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2019 (SC)

Nagji Odhavji Kumbhar . Vs. The State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.880 OF2009Nagji Odhavji Kumbhar & Anr. .Appellants State of Gujarat Versus Respondent JUDGMENT Hemant Gupta, J.The challenge in the present appeal is to an order passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad on 24.10.2008 maintaining conviction for offences under Sections 302 and 324 of IPC against the appellants for causing death of Bhura Govind and Lakha Arjan.2. The prosecution case is that on 1st July 1987 at about 12 midnight in Village Prempara-Rampara, the appellants caused injuries to Bhura Govind and Lakha Arjan with spears etc and on account of grievous injuries inflicted, both of them died on the spot. The FIR was lodged at 7 AM on 2nd July 1987 and the appellants were arrested on 1 17th July 1987. The cause of occurrence is that the appellants were not giving right of way to the deceased. The complainant party had filed the civil suit in which injunction was granted in their favou...

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 23 2019 (SC)

Globe Ground India Employees Union Vs. Lufthansa German Airlines

Court : Supreme Court of India

[email protected] SLP(C)Nos.25341-42 of 2017 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 4076-4077 OF2019[Arising out of S.L.P.(C)Nos.25341-42 of 2017]. Globe Ground India Employees Union ... Appellant Versus Lufthansa German Airlines & Anr. ... Respondents JUDGMENT R. Subhash Reddy,J.1. 2. Leave granted. These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 24.11.2016 passed in L.P.A. No.107 of 2016 and order dated 14.7.2017 in R.P.No.146 of 2017 by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi.3. Necessary facts in brief for disposal of these appeals are that, the appellant workers union raised the industrial dispute which was referred by the Central Government to Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court by an order dated 1 [email protected] SLP(C)Nos.25341-42 of 2017 04.02.2010. The question which was referred for adjudication by the Industrial Tribunal reads as under:- Whether the action of the Management of M/s Globe Ground India Private Ltd., New Delhi, a subsidi...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //