Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 8 of about 727,677 results (2.345 seconds)

Nov 15 2018 (SC)

Anand Kumar Mohatta Vs. State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) Department of Ho ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF2018CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1395 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.3730 of 2016]. REPORTABLE Anand Kumar Mohatta and Anr. Versus State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Department of Home and Anr. ....Appellant(s) Respondent(s) JUDGMENT S.A. BOBDE, J.Leave granted.2. This Criminal Appeal is filed by Appellants challenging the final judgment and order dated 02.02.2016 of the High Court of Delhi. The High Court vide the above dated final judgment and order dismissed the petition filed by the Appellants under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code and refused to quash FIR No.0139/2014 dated 20.08.2014. During the pendency of the appeal in this Court, Respondent No.1 filed charge sheet dated 03.08.2018 in the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, Delhi against the Appellants herein. Thus, by way of amendment to the main prayer in the appeal, Appellants have also prayed for quashing of charge sheet dated 03.08.2018. Appellants se...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2018 (SC)

u.p.jal Nigam Vs. Ajit Singh Patel

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1101711018 OF2018(Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.3014630147 of 2018) (Diary No.30171 of 2018) U.P. JAL NIGAM & ORS. . APPELLANTS :Versus: AJIT SINGH PATEL & ORS. . RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. Delay condoned. Leave granted.2. These appeals take exception to the judgment and order dated 28th November, 2017 in WritA No.37143/2017 and 25th July, 2018 in Review Application No.2/2018 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The said writ petition 2 was filed by the respondent Nos.1 to 11 herein to challenge the order dated 11th August, 2017 passed by the Chief Engineer/Adhisthan21, U.P. Jal Nigam (for short Nigam). The said decision of the Chief Engineer was preceded by a decision of the Board of Directors of Nigam taken in its 166th meeting held on 26th July, 2017. It was found that the appointments made to 113 posts of Assistant Engineer (Civil), 5 posts of Assistant Engineer (E...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2018 (SC)

Mahendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh .

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).1242-1243/2016 MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH C.A. No.1874-1875/2016 C.A. No.3808/2016 JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.1. Applications for impleadment/intervention are dismissed.2. The appellants are candidates who participated in the selection process of Ranker Sub-Inspector conducted during 2011. According to them, they were not physically fit to participate in the physical efficiency test and yet they were compelled to participate. It is further submitted that for those who have not thus participated in the selection on account of the physical illness, the Competent Authority had issued a circular permitting them to participate on a subsequent date. Therefore, it is submitted that the candidates who have been compelled to undergo physical efficiency test despite their 1 illness could not have been put in a worse condition.3. Ms. Aishwarya...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2018 (HC)

Muktumhussain Mehaboob Sab Bapunavar Vs. Sanjubabu Kolambi

Court : Karnataka - Dharwad

1 RSA No.100067/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.100067/2018 (SP) BETWEEN MUKTUMHUSSAIN MEHABOOB SAB BAPUNAVAR, AGE:61 YEARS AGRICULTURIST, R/O KAWALWAD VILLAGE HALIYAL TALUK-581329 APPELLANT (BY SHRIYUTHS B MUHAMMED ALI AND HAMEED S SHAIKH, ADVOCATES) AND:1. SANJUBABU KOLAMBI AGE:33. YEARS AGRICULTURIST2 ABDULGAFAR KARIMSAB KASUGAL AGE:59. YEARS AGRICULTURIST3 RAJESAB KARIMSAB KASUGAL AGE:44. YEARS AGRICULTURIST4 MOHAMMADRAFIQUE KARIMSASB KASUGAL AGE:44. YEARS AGRICULTURIST2RSA No.100067/2018 ALL ARE R/O KAWALWAD VILLAGE HALIYAL TALUK-581329 (BY SMT. HEMALEKHA K.S., ADVOCATE FOR R1; RESPONDENT NOS. 2 & 3 ARE SERVED; NOTICE TO RESPONDENT NO.4 IS DISPENSED WITH) RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION100OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED:21.11.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO.18/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, U.K. KARWAR, ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2018 (HC)

Mahindra Sanyo Special Steel Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

R1IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF NOVEMBER2018PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B.M. SHYAM PRASAD WRIT APPEAL NO.2781 OF2018GM-TEN)BETWEEN : MAHINDRA SANYO SPECIAL STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED74 GANESH APARTMENT L.J.ROAD, MAHIM WEST MUMBAI - 400 016. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, MR. PRADEEN SALIAN.... APPELLANT (BY SRI. UDAYA HOLLA, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ADITYA NARAYAN, ADVOCATE) AND:1. UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS ROOM NO.239, RAIL BHAWAN RAISINA ROAD, CONNAUGHT PLACE NEW DELHI - 110 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.2. 2 RAIL WHEEL FACTORY INDIAN RAILWAYS OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER OF STORES YELAHANKA, BANGALORE - 560 064. REPRESENTED BY MR.M.K. KAUSHIK PRINCIPAL CHIEF MATERIALS MANAGER.... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SANJAY GOWDA N.S, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-2) THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION4OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGEMENT DATED2708.2018 IN WRIT PETITIO...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 15 2018 (HC)

Mahadeva @ Papi Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K. SOMASHEKAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No.548 OF2014S/O BASAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT32YEARS, MANTIHADI VILLAGE, H.D.KOTE TALUK68 BETWEEN1 MAHADEVA @ PAPI, 2. RAGHU @ MAHADEVA @ BHEEMANAHALLI GOWDAIAH, S/O LATE MARAIAH, AGED ABOUT34YEARS, HANAGATTIHADI VILLAGE, PRESENTLY R/AT MUSHKARE & CHANNEGOWDANAHUNDI VILLAGE, H.D.KOTE TALUK68 (In view of death of Accused No.2 Raghu @ Mahadeva, appeal against him stands abated) (NOW A1 IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY, CENTRAL PRISON, MYSORE) (BY SRI. HASHMATH PASHA, ADVOCATE)... APPELLANTS2AND STATE OF KARNATAKA BY H.D.KOTE POLICE, MYSORE DISTRICT561068. (REPRESENTED BY LEAREND STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR) (BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR MAJAGE, ADDITIONAL SPP)... RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION3742) OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED1012.2013 AND SENTENCE DATED1212.2013 PASSED BY THE III ADDL....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2018 (SC)

Sabha Shanker Dube Vs. Divisional Forest Officer

Court : Supreme Court of India

Non Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10956 of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.1045 of 2016) .... Appellant Sabha Shanker Dube Versus Divisional Forest Officer & Ors. .Respondents W I T H CIVIL APPEAL Nos._10957-10963 of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 1252-1258 of 2016) CIVIL APPEAL (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.11108 of 2016) No._10964___ of 2018 JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.Leave granted These Appeals are filed against the judgment of the 1. High Court of Allahabad dated 24th September, 2015 in Special Appeal No.1198 of 2006 and others by which the judgment of the learned Single Judge denying relief to the Appellants was affirmed. 1 | P a g e The Appellants are daily rated workers employed in 2. Group D posts in the Forest Department in the State of Uttar Pradesh. They filed Writ Petitions before the High Court of Allahabad seeking regularization of their services, the minimum of the pay scales available to thei...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2018 (HC)

Smt M Veena Vs. Smt Suma

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA MFA NO.7023/2017 (CPC) BETWEEN SMT M VEENA WIFE OF HONNEGOWDA D/O LATE MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT41YEARS R/AT NO940 A. THIRTHANKARA ROAD, SIDDARTHANAGARA LAYOUT MYSURU570011... APPELLANT (BY SRI. BHASKAR HEGDE, ADV.) AND1 SMT SUMA D/O LATE MADEGOWDA W/O HONNEGOWDA R/O NO.62, SRI KRISHNA MOSAIC TILES, BILAGUMBA CROSS NELAMANGALA ROAD, MANJUNATHA NAGARA RAMANAGARA TOWN571511 2. SMT VIJAYAMMA W/O LATE MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT66YEARS MUDAGERE VILLAGE MALUR HOBLI CHANNAPATNA TALUK571501 2 S/O LATE MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT35YEARS MUDAGERE VILLAGE MALUR HOBLI CHANNAPATNA TALUK571501 W/O SHIVAKUMARA W/O LINGEGOWDA G. S. D/O LATE MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT43YEARS NO.4088, 3RD CROSS SHANKARANAGAR CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE STREET MANDYA CITY571401 3. SRI M. SANTHOSH4 SMT NALINA M5 6. SMT PREETHI M W/O SURESH B D/O LATE MADEGOWDA AGED ABOUT37YEARS NO.887, III CROSS, E & F BLOCK AGNI HAMSA ROA...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 13 2018 (SC)

Labhuji Amratji Thakor Vs. The State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //