Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 8 of about 755,542 results (2.473 seconds)

Nov 24 2019 (HC)

State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) vs.mukesh

Court : Delhi

Page 1 of 1 CRL. L.P. 466/2019...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Union of India vs.maqbool Ahmed Qureshi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h November, 2019 Decided on:22. d November, 2019 W.P.(C) 6132/2017 & C.M. APPL. 25479/2017 (stay) UNION OF INDIA MAQBOOL AHMED QURESHI & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jagdish Bhagat (R-2) in person. Mr M. K. Tiwari, Mr R. Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Advocates for R-6. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Ms. Akshita Rao and Ms. Vibhuti Tyagi, Advocates for R-7. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present petition by the Union of India is directed against an order dated 23rd September, 2016, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), disposing of O.A. No.1518/2012 filed by the... RESPONDENTS.2. The... RESPONDENTS are Direct Recruit Officers of the Civil Construction Wing (CCW) of Prasar Bharati, who have been working as Chief Engineers (Civil) (Leve...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Muhammad Ajmal vs.delhi Waqf Board

Court : Delhi

$~48 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2019 W.P.(C) 12342/2019 & CM APPL. 50398/2019 MUHAMMAD AJMAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui & Mr. Rakesh Bhugra, Advocates (M-9873344786) versus DELHI WAQF BOARD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Saleem Ahmed, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Charu Dalal, Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh & Ch. Amit, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed seeking the following prayer: the Delhi Waqf Board/respondent a. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus thereby directing to discharge their statutory duties as contemplated under the Waqf Act, 1995 whilst taking apposite legal action against all the encroachers inter-alia by forthwith removing them from the Waqf property in question, which is a Qabristan and Dargah of a famous Sufi Saint Hazrat Khwaja Baqi Billah R.A situated at Eidgah Chowk, Qutub Road, Paharganj, New Delhi. And a. Issue a writ in the na...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Rajeev Gupta vs.the State & Anr

Court : Delhi

$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5937/2019 RAJEEV GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. S K Giri, Adv. with petitioner in person versus THE STATE & ANR Through Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS ASI Ram Niwas, PS Dabri Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 40845/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C.5937/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.311/2014 dated 03.05.2014 registered at Police Station Dabri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.5937/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present pet...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Pradeep & Ors vs.state & Ors

Court : Delhi

$~58 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5954/2019 Date of decision:22.11.2019 PRADEEP & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. B.S. Chowdhary, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State with Inspector Gulshan Kumar, PS Sultan Puri Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 40891/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5954/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.191/2007 dated 07.02.2007 registered at Police Station Sultan Puri and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State. CRL.M.C. 5954/2019 Page 1 of 3 6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have set...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Himanshu & Ors vs.university of Delhi, Faculty of Law Through Registra ...

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement reserved on 21.11.2019 Judgement pronounced on 22.11.2019 + W.P.(C) 11177/2019 & C.M. No.46002/2019 HIMANSHU & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Naushad Alam, and Mr. Jitendra Bharti, Advocates. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI, FACULTY OF LAW THROUGH REGISTRAR Through Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J: Backdrop: Before me are three petitioners who seek admission to the LL.B. programme offered by the University of Delhi (hereafter referred to as University). 1.1. The petitioners were denied admission by the University for the reason that the documents submitted by them were either discrepant or incomplete. 1.2. It is worth noting that the University did not pass any specific written order in that behalf. The reasons for denying admission, it appears, were W.P.(C) 11177/2019 Pg. 1 of 13 only communicated to the petitioners orally by the concerned authorities...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Parvinder Singh & Anr. Vs.vandana Walecha & Ors.

Court : Delhi

$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:22. 11.2019 RC.REV. 663/2019 PARVINDER SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners versus VANDANA WALECHA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Abhimanyu Mahajan, Ms. Anubha Goel, Mr. Mayank Joshi and Ms. Tanisha Bawa, Advocates with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Hemant Chadhri, Mr. Piyush Arora and Mr. Gaurav, Advocates with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. 50366/2019 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CAV11542019 In view of the appearing of the learned counsel for the respondent, caveat stands discharged. RC.REV. 663/2019 & CM APPL. 50365/2019 (stay) 1.... Petitioners impugn order dated 06.06.2019, whereby eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed after trial. RC.REV. 663/2019 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject eviction petition was filed by the respondent ...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Meera Devi vs.state (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.A. 521/2018 1. MEERA DEVI Judgment delivered on:22. d November, 2019 ...Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms. Katyayini and Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. CRL.A. 372/2018 2. KANWAR SINGH ...Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. Nitish Mittal, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. + CORAM: JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. Mehta, J.: JUDGMENT1 Instant appeals are arising out of a common judgment dated 19.12.2017 and order on sentence dated 06.01.2018 in SC No.522arising out of FIR No.395/2007 under Sections 302/2CRL.As. 521/2018 & 372/2018 Page 1 of 32 IPC PS Punjabi Bagh, Delhi. Both the Appellants have been convicted under Sections 3IPC and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 30,000/- each and in default to undergo further Simple Imprisonment for one y...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Kanwar Singh vs.state (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.A. 521/2018 1. MEERA DEVI Judgment delivered on:22. d November, 2019 ...Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate with Ms. Katyayini and Mr. Shubham Gupta, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. CRL.A. 372/2018 2. KANWAR SINGH ...Appellant Through: Mr. K. Singhal and Mr. Nitish Mittal, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State. + CORAM: JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA I.S. Mehta, J.: JUDGMENT1 Instant appeals are arising out of a common judgment dated 19.12.2017 and order on sentence dated 06.01.2018 in SC No.522arising out of FIR No.395/2007 under Sections 302/2CRL.As. 521/2018 & 372/2018 Page 1 of 32 IPC PS Punjabi Bagh, Delhi. Both the Appellants have been convicted under Sections 3IPC and sentenced to undergo Life Imprisonment with fine of Rs. 30,000/- each and in default to undergo further Simple Imprisonment for one y...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Concept Communication Limited vs.bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited

Court : Delhi

$~29 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. 11.2019 O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 386/2019, IA Nos.14096-98/2019 & IA163362019 CONCEPT COMMUNICATION LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Mr. Aman Varma & Ms. Jaivir K.Sidhant Advocates versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. L.B.Rai, Ms. Aishwarya Tyagi Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996(Act) seeking extension of time for completion of pleadings and passing the Award. Vide order dated 02.08.2019, this Court in OMP (MISC.)(COMM.) 310/2019 had granted two weeks time to the respondent to file its evidence by way of affidavit and six weeks time was granted to the Arbitral Tribunal to complete the proceedings. Counsel for the petitioner vehemently submits that the respondent is only prolonging the proceedings by taking adjournments on one pretext or the other. De...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //