Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 9 of about 755,542 results (2.127 seconds)

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Dr Rajat Duhan & Ors vs.all India Institute of Medical Sciences & Ors

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:10. 10.2019 Date of decision:22. 11.2019 LPA6552019 & CM APPLs. 44567-44570/2019 + DR RAJAT DUHAN & ORS Through: Mr. Nitin K. Gupta, Advocate .....Appellants versus ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dushyant Parashar, Advocate for Ms. respondents No.1 & 2/AIIMS Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Arunima Pal, Mr. Tarun Verma, Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Sumangla, Advocates for respondent No.3/MCI Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda, Mr. Rohan Anand, Advocates for respondent No.4/NBE Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocates for respondents No.5 & 6/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON ASHA MENON, J.1. This intra-court appeal has been preferred by three appellants who are medical graduates, being aggrieved by the order dated 21.08.2019, whereby the learned Single Judge had dismissed their writ petition [W.P.(C) LPA6552019 Page 1 of 9 6367/2019...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 2019 (HC)

Ganga Ram vs.shekhar Kumar

Court : Delhi

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2019 + CM (M) 1656/2019 GANGA RAM Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus (M:9716104763) Through: None. SHEKHAR KUMAR CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh (Oral) CM APPL. 50248/2019 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM APPL. 50249/2019 (delay in refiling) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in refiling the petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. CM (M) 1656/2019 & CM APPL. 50247/2019 (stay) 3. There are two grievances in the present petition. The first grievance is in respect of order dated 27th August, 2019. Ld. counsel for the... Petitioner- Defendant (hereinafter the Defendant), submits that the Respondent Plaintiff (hereinafter the Plaintiff) had not filed any list of witnesses. After the cross-examination of PW-1 was concluded on 21st January 2019, the Plaintiff filed th...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 21 2019 (HC)

Smt. Rathnavva Ravi Shiggavi Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.35133 OF2019(GM-MMS) . . .... PetitionerBETWEEN : Smt. Rathnavva Ravi Shiggavi, W/o Ravi Shiggavi, Aged about 48 years, R/o Gundenahalli Village, Byadagi Taluk, Haveri District 581 106. (By Shri Prakash B.S., Advocate) AND: 1.2. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Vidhana Soudha, Bengaluru 560 001. The State of Karnataka, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Commerce and Industries (MSME & Mines), Vikasa Soudha, Dr. Ambedkar Veedhi, Bengaluru 560 001.3. 4.5.6. 2 The Commissioner and Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Khanija Bhavana, Race Course Road, Bengaluru 560 001. The Senior Geologist, Department of Mines and Geology, P.B. Road, Haveri District, Haveri 581 110. The Deputy Commissioner and Licensing Authority under the Karnataka Regulation of Sto...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2019 (HC)

Mr a Ashraf Ali Vs. Smt B S Susheela Devi

Court : Karnataka

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.9033/2018 C/W WRIT PETITON NO.9034/2018 C/W WRIT PETITION NO.57934/2018 (GM CPC) IN W.P.NO.9033/2018: BETWEEN MR A ASHRAF ALI S/O LATE B.R.ABDULLAH, AGED ABOUT50YEARS, R/AT CITY LINES, NO.15, GROUND FLOOR, COOPER ARCH, NO.83, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-01. (BY SRI PRASANNA KUMAR C S, ADV.) AND SMT B S SUSHEELA DEVI W/O LATE DR.BJS ACHARYA, AGED ABOUT91YEARS, R/AT NO.24, 2ND MAIN ROAD, TATA SILK FARM EXTENSION, BASAVANAGUDI, BANGALORE-560 004. ...PETITIONER RESPONDENT (BY SMT SUNITHA H SINGH, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED0201.2018 PASSED ON I.A.NO.8 IN O.S.NO.5539/2013, PENDING ON THE FILE OF V ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH13, BANGALORE, VIDE ANNEXURE-A. 2 IN W.P. NO.9034/2018:BETWEEN : M/S BRIGADE PROPERTIES HAVING OFF.NO.19, NALPAD CH...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.naincy Sagar & Anr

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA7132019 & C.M. APPL.48802-48804/2019 + Reserved on:15. 11.2019 Date of decision:19. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS NAINCY SAGAR & ANR Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, for respondent No.1. AND + LPA7172019 & C.M. APPL.49163-49165/2019 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus PRATEEK SOLANKI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, LPA713& 717/20...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University vs.prateek Solanki & Anr

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA7132019 & C.M. APPL.48802-48804/2019 + Reserved on:15. 11.2019 Date of decision:19. 11.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus ........ RESPONDENTS NAINCY SAGAR & ANR Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, for respondent No.1. AND + LPA7172019 & C.M. APPL.49163-49165/2019 GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Ms. Ekta Sikri, Mr. Saket Sikri, Mr. Ajaypal Singh, Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Mr. Viplav Acharya and Mr. Arun Sanwal, Advocates. versus PRATEEK SOLANKI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raj Kamal and Mr. Aseem Atwal, Advocates, LPA713& 717/20...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Honeycom Synergies vs.commissioner of Customs (Export) & Ors.

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:19. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6495/2019 & CM APPL.27484/2019 HONEYCOM SYNERGIES Through: Mr. ........ Petitioners Seth, Mr.Chinmaya Seth & Mr.Ekansh Mishra, Adv A.K. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORT) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. Central Govt., Counsel for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. The proceedings which were commenced, against the petitioner, vide Show Cause Notice No.09/2017, dated 24th March, 2017, issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), stands settled, by Final Order, dated 1st November, 2018, passed by the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Settlement Commission) in Settlement Application No.5580/2018, subject to appropriation of 84,28,058/-, deposited by the petitioner towards Customs Duty escaped on imports effec...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Sonepat & Ors vs ...

Court : Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :8. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:19. h November, 2019 + WP(C) 822/2015 COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX, SONEPAT & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Sr. Standing Counsel Versus AMIT DECORATIVE PLYWOODS PVT. LTD. & ORS. Through: Mr. Sudhir Malhotra, ........ RESPONDENTS Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % C. HARI SHANKAR, J.1. These proceedings emanate from a Show Cause Notice, dated 16th January, 2013, issued by the Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (Petitioner No.2 herein and referred to, hereinafter, as the DGCEI) to the respondents, whereby it was alleged that... RESPONDENTS No.1 and 2 (M/s. Amit Decorative Plywoods Pvt Ltd and M/s Amit Densified Doors Pvt Ltd) had indulged in clandestine removal and undervaluation of goods manufactured by them. The Show Cause Notice required the respondents to show cause as to why WP (...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Mrs. Vinod vs.union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h November, 2019 Decided on:19. h November, 2019 W.P.(C) 2432/2013 MRS. VINOD UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR versus Through: Mr. J.P.Shukla, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Shipra Shukla, Advocate. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH J U D G M EN T Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge in the present petition is to an order dated 19th November, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.2165/2009 as well as to an order dated 19th April, 2012 dismissing Review Application No.19/2011.2. The issue involved in the case at hand concerns the plea for regularisation of the... Petitioner, who was working as a Mobile Booking Clerk (MBC) in the Northern Railway, with retrospective effect, and for re-fixation of her seniority.3. At the outset, it requires to be noted that there were two... Petitioners in the above OA No.2165/2009 before the CAT. Th...

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2019 (HC)

Rita Vashishtha vs.anil Kumar Vashishtha

Court : Delhi

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:23. d April, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:_19_November, 2019 % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 188/2017 RITA VASHISHTHA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vishesh Wadhwa, Mr.Saurabh Dhingra, Ms.Swadha Gupta and Mr.D.K.Sharma, Advocates Versus ANIL KUMAR VASHISHTHA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Anil Sharma, Mr.Arun Baali and Mr.Kunal Nath, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the judgment dated 16.09.2017 passed by the Family Court by which the petition filed by the respondent/husband seeking divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) was allowed and a decree of divorce has been granted.2. The necessary facts to be noticed for the disposal of the present appeal are that the marriage between the parties was solemnized on 03.11.1995, at Hath...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //