Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 9 of about 727,858 results (2.773 seconds)

Feb 01 2019 (SC)

g.ratna Raj (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Sri Muthukumarasamy Permanent Fund Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.25822583 OF2011G. Ratna Raj (D) by LRs. .Appellant(s) VERSUS Sri Muthukumarasamy Permanent Fund Ltd. & Anr. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Application for substitution is allowed. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 11.01.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in O.S.A. Nos.299 & 300 of 2006 whereby the Division Bench 1 of the High Court allowed the appeals filed by respondent No.1 herein.3. The controversy involved in these appeals lies in a narrow compass. However, in order to appreciate the same, few relevant facts need mention hereinbelow.4. The original appellantG Ratna Raj (since dead and now represented by his legal representatives) was the plaintiff whereas respondent No.1 was defendant No.1 in the civil suit out of which these appeals arise. Respondent No.2 is impleaded as party respondent in this Court by order dated 06....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2019 (SC)

Asharafi Devi (D) Thr. Lrs. Vs. State of u.p. Through Collector/Distri ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5217 OF2010Asharfi Devi (D) THR. LRs. .Appellant(s) VERSUS State of U.P. & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 16.12.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Review Application No.81507 of 2008 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.10557 of 2002 whereby the High Court dismissed the Civil Misc. Review Application filed by the original appellant herein. 1 2. In order to appreciate the short controversy involved in this appeal, few facts need mention infra.3. The appellants herein are the legal representatives of the original appellant, who was the writ petitioner and the review petitioner whereas the respondents herein were the respondents in the writ petition and the review application.4. The original appellant was the owner of certain lands. These lands were subjected to ceiling proceedings un...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2019 (SC)

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Kolkata Vs. Jagannath Gupta Fa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

[email protected] SLP(C)No.17428/18 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1381 OF2019[Arising out of S.L.P.(C)No.17428 of 2018]. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Kolkata ... Appellant Versus Jagannath Gupta Family Trust ... Respondent JUDGMENT R. Subhash Reddy, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This civil appeal is filed by the appellant, i.e., the Commissioner of Income tax (Exemptions), Kolkata, aggrieved by the Order dated 18.09.2017 passed by the High Court of Calcutta in I.T.A No.7 of 2017.3. The respondent herein, M/s. Jagannath Gupta Family Trust, is a registered Trust under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, (for short the Act) and also 1 [email protected] SLP(C)No.17428/18 approved under Section 80G(5)(vi) of the Act vide proceedings dated 16.08.2010. The trust was created with an avowed object of public and charitable purposes, namely, medical relief, education, any other causes of public utility etc. It is stated that the respondent-trust is r...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2019 (SC)

Union of India Vs. Md. Samim Azad

Court : Supreme Court of India

[email protected] SLP(C)No.22212/18 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1382 OF2019[Arising out of S.L.P.(C)No.22212 of 2018]. Union of India & Ors. ... Appellants Versus Md. Samim Azad ... Respondent JUDGMENT R. Subhash Reddy, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This civil appeal is filed by the Union of India through the General Manager, Eastern Railway and others, aggrieved by the order of the Division Bench of Calcutta High Court passed on 31st August 2017 in F.M.A. No.878 of 2017.3. The dispute relates to appointment of a halt contractor at the railway station. On instructions, we were informed by the learned Additional Solicitor General that there are three types of railway stations, viz., Block Station, Flag Station and Halt Station. Halt station, is a station where signalling system is not 1 [email protected] SLP(C)No.22212/18 available and train stoppages are controlled by railway time table. Halt contractor is a contractor who is appointed by Railways to sell...

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2019 (SC)

All India Institute of Medical Sciences Vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi

Court : Supreme Court of India

1 REPORTABLE THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1392 OF2019(@ SLP(C) No.27490 OF2018 All India Institute of Medical Sciences Appellant Versus Sanjiv Chaturvedi & Ors. Respondents JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is against the final judgment and order dated 21.08.2018 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital allowing the writ petition being WPSB No.359 of 2018 filed by the respondent no.1 and quashing the order dated 18.09.2017 passed by the Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as CAT) at the Principal Bench at Delhi, inter alia, staying proceedings in OA33100790/ 2017 filed by the respondent no.1 and pending before a Division Bench of CAT at Nainital. The respondent no.1, an Indian Forest service officer of the 3. Uttarakhand cadre of 2002 Batch was posted as Deputy 2 Secretary at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi from 29.6.2012 till 28.6...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (SC)

Vijay Kumar Jain Vs. Standard Chartered Bank

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.8430 OF2018VIJAY KUMAR JAIN APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STANDARD CHARTERED BANK & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1266 OF2018JUDGMENT R.F. NARIMAN, J.1. The present appeal arises out of an Appellate Tribunals judgment rejecting the appellants prayer for directions to the resolution professional to provide all relevant documents including the insolvency resolution plans in question to members of the suspended Board of Directors of the corporate debtor in each case 1 so that they may meaningfully participate in meetings held by the committee of creditors [CoC]..2. We may take the facts of Civil Appeal No.8430 of 2018. Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. the corporate debtor, was incorporated on 06.01.1986. It is said to be a profit-making company in the business of processing of oil-seeds and refining crude oil for edible use. In September, 2017, Company Petition Nos.1371 and 1372 were filed...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (SC)

Mahadev P Kambekar(d) tr.lrs. Vs. Shree Krishna Woolen Mills Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.57535754 OF2011Mahadev P Kambekar (D) TR. LRS. .Appellant(s) VERSUS Shree Krishna Woolen Mills Pvt. Ltd. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1) These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 19.07.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Appeal No.169 of 1999 in Suit No.503 of 1980 and in Appeal No.199 of 1999 in Suit No.503 of 1980 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court allowed both the appeals filed by the appellants 1 herein (defendant) and the respondent(plaintiff) herein respectively.2) In order to appreciate the controversy involved in these appeals which lies in a narrow compass, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts hereinbelow.3) The appellants are the legal representatives of Mahadev Pandurang Kambekar, who was the original defendant whereas the respondentShree Krishna Woolen Mills Pvt. Ltd. is the plaintiff in the Civil Suit ou...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (SC)

n.sankaranarayanan Vs. Chairman,tamil Nadu Housing Board and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.73907391 OF2009N. Sankaranarayanan .Appellant(s) VERSUS The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board & Ors. .Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL Nos.74057406 OF2009Aruna Theatres & Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. .Appellant(s) VERSUS The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Housing Board & Ors. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.In Civil Appeal Nos.73907391 of 2009 1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 04.03.2008 passed by 1 the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Appeal No.1499 of 2005 and Writ Petition No.5718 of 2005 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court dismissed the writ appeal and the writ petition filed by the appellant herein.2. In order to appreciate the controversy involved in these appeals, it is necessary to set out few relevant facts hereinbelow.3. The appellant herein is the appellant in Writ Appeal No.1499 of 2005 and writ petitioner in W.P. No.5718 of 2005 whe...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (SC)

Rajendra Lalitkumar Agrawal Vs. Ratna Ashok Muranjan

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1331 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.23299 of 2018) Shri Rajendra Lalitkumar Agrawal .Appellant(s) VERSUS Smt. Ratna Ashok Muranjan & Anr. .Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 06.08.2018 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Second Appeal No.44 of 2017 whereby the High Court dismissed the second appeal filed by the appellant herein. 1 3. In order to appreciate the short controversy involved in this appeal, few relevant facts need mention hereinbelow.4. The appellant is the plaintiff whereas the respondents are the defendants in the civil suit out of which this appeal arises.5. The appellant filed a civil suit against the respondents for specific performance of the contract in relation to the suit property. The said suit was based on an agreement dated 08.08.1984. The respondents filed their writ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 2019 (SC)

Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Vs. Arthur Import &Amp; Exp ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1330 OF2019(Arising out of S.L.P.(c) No.9394 of 2012) Smt. Bhimabai Mahadeo Kambekar (D) Th. LR .Appellant(s) VERSUS Arthur Import and Export Company & Ors. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. 2. Leave granted. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 30.09.2011 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No.6235 of 2011 whereby the Single Judge of the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants herein. 1 3. Few facts need mention infra to appreciate the short controversy involved in this appeal.4. The dispute, which has reached to this Court in this appeal at the instance of one party to such dispute, arises out of and relates to the entries made in the revenue records in relation to the disputed land.5. The dispute began from the Court of Superintendent of land records. Thereafter it reached to the Deputy Director of Lan...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //